🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

[Horus]

Just found it odd that both the gunt and Jimbo did similar content of shows but one was banned the other was not. Also saying the Gunt has a good show is subjective. I think it's shit due to the alcoholic barely holding himself together long enough to do a show. The only good episode he did was the newest jarbo leaks. Other then that he is shit, doesn't know how to keep a conversation going, needs cohosts to do the work for him, can't help but reference "MUH WUIFE" repeatedly, can't help but act like he is the best thing next to sliced bread.

I guess if you're into borderline functional alcoholic fatass attention whores to listen too when you are bored. Ralph has that for ya to go for.

Ralph got cancelled because went out of his way to pick a fight with the media. He had the most popular (by viewers) nightly show on Youtube for awhile, and the Wall Street Journal wanted to talk to him about his "alt-right" behavior. Naturally, Ralph told them to fuck off and he was banned shortly after. Had he just said "Hey we are doing an adult show, we get guest from all political persuasions, and let them fight it out" he probably would have been OK.

Jim gets huge numbers, but he does not stream on a regular basis, plus the media has not picked up on him, so figured that is why he was able to avoid getting axed until very recently.

 

[UnKillFill]

Ralph got cancelled because went out of his way to pick a fight with the media. He had the most popular (by viewers) nightly show on Youtube for awhile, and the Wall Street Journal wanted to talk to him about his "alt-right" behavior. Naturally, Ralph told them to fuck off and he was banned shortly after. Had he just said "Hey we are doing an adult show, we get guest from all political persuasions, and let them fight it out" he probably would have been OK.

He really didn't pick that fight though... He was in a lose/lose situation when that journalist bitch (whose name escapes me) decided his charity stream was a targetable news story. There is no way that talking to her would have been in any way beneficial to him, as it was clear that she already had the story written and just wanted more rope to hang him with. Ralph has fucked up a LOT since then, but not talking to the WSJ was not one of those fuckups.

Fuck the embarrassment that passes for "main stream" journalism today.

 

[Path Started]

Whats everyones opinion on the readings of the Matt stuff? Or other readings in general?

 

[The Reaper]

He really didn't pick that fight though... He was in a lose/lose situation when that journalist bitch (whose name escapes me) decided his charity stream was a targetable news story. There is no way that talking to her would have been in any way beneficial to him, as it was clear that she already had the story written and just wanted more rope to hang him with. Ralph has fucked up a LOT since then, but not talking to the WSJ was not one of those fuckups.

Fuck the embarrassment that passes for "main stream" journalism today.

It was Yoree Koh, and he did make a mistake: He proceeded to mock her and Gator spammed all those memes of her being an NPC. Rather than make it difficult for Youtube to kick him off the platform he gave them a legitimate reason to.

If Ralph was a smarter man he could've gone live with her (with chat disabled so she had no reason to run away) and made her look like a fool by showing how stupid her soon-to-be published article was. If she didn't show up he could come out and say she "discredited any and all of WSJ journalism by refusing to actively seek the story."

I'm not trying to say Youtube wasn't about to kick Ralph off anyways, but he made their decision look more legitimate, and let Yoree Koh get away with shitty journalism.

Whats everyones opinion on the readings of the Matt stuff? Or other readings in general?

It's drama, and drama is what makes Youtubers bite off more than they can chew. Look at what happened to Ralph after Knoxville. It's funny, but this is the type of stuff that some people go overboard with when dabbling.

 

[UnKillFill]

It was Yoree Koh, and he did make a mistake: He proceeded to mock her and Gator spammed all those memes of her being an NPC. Rather than make it difficult for Youtube to kick him off the platform he gave them a legitimate reason to.

If Ralph was a smarter man he could've gone live with her (with chat disabled so she had no reason to run away) and made her look like a fool by showing how stupid her soon-to-be published article was. If she didn't show up he could come out and say she "discredited any and all of WSJ journalism by refusing to actively seek the story."

I'm not trying to say Youtube wasn't about to kick Ralph off anyways, but he made their decision look more legitimate, and let Yoree Koh get away with shitty journalism.

No way. As I said before. With the actual pathetic state of the news today, even if Ralph had pulled down his pants and answered every single question that Yoree Koh (thanks for reminding me of her name) had asked him, I still do not believe there would be any difference. She just would have twisted whatever answer he gave to fit the story that she had clearly already written, and still twisted it to get him off youtube just as fast. Like I said, he was damned if he did, damned if he didn't back then.

 

[Path Started]

It's drama, and drama is what makes Youtubers bite off more than they can chew. Look at what happened to Ralph after Knoxville. It's funny, but this is the type of stuff that some people go overboard with when dabbling.

I don't think shitting on Matt will be more than he can chew, Matt is widly disliked by most types of people, anti GGers hate him, GGers hate him, nobody likes him.

He is unlikely to go after anyone in a serious way nowadays, he has chilled out in recent years and especially since the stream.me saga, even more so after the pillstream saga.

This more chilled out ralph saga is interesting, it might alienate some of his audience because of the lack of serious drama and change of attitude compared to the stream.me days.

But he has to do this so he has a place to stream and be able to earn money from the streams.

Has anyone analyzed how much money he is earning lately? you can see his earnings below, obviously this doesn't include any money from streamelements donations.

I believe 1 lino is 1.2 $cents so this means he has earned $8,710.44‬ I think? ((1.2 * 725870) /100), I remember there was some kind of system in dlive where you have to "store" or "set aside" a certain amount of lino in order to make partner or something like that.

But you can see all this on the earnings page on his profile.

newproject 2 = 14 supporters pledging $87
patreon = 93

If we estimate that people are doing the same ratio of donations on patreon((93/14)*87), then it could be as much as $577.68 from patreon.

So, we're looking at $7976.16 a year from monthly subscribers and then whatever he gets from dlive and streamelements and then the merch he sells, I don't think he has ads on his site. I'm guessing of course, but he is likely earning around $20k to $25k a year? Am I missing something here ?

This must be a serious drop compared to what he was getting on youtube, I seem to remember much bigger donations and they were much more often on youtube.

Unless I'm missing a revenue stream here, that apartment with Andy likely would've really been painful for him to have to deal with, he said on stream that is sorted now and the only thing he pays for, for Andy now is the phone bill, which Andy pays him monthly for(he said).

Does anyone remember that one time he showed a screenshot from his youtube earnings page accidentally ? I seem to remember that was $4-6k a month. Does anyone remember this ? Does anyone have a screenshot? I am sure this was discussed here at the time.

He needs to look at some way to grow, this money is just about enough to live on, but dam its no wonder he was down when he was kicked off youtube, literally cut his earnings by 3/4's or more?

 

[Unog]

You've just described prime o&a and Gavin McInnis with that too

They handled it much, much better though.

It was Yoree Koh, and he did make a mistake: He proceeded to mock her and Gator spammed all those memes of her being an NPC. Rather than make it difficult for Youtube to kick him off the platform he gave them a legitimate reason to.

Nobody who is sane and has an I.Q. higher than room temperature thinks that Ralph's reply to that shitty journo was a legitimate reason to kick him off of the platform, let alone attack and have returned thousands of dollars worth of charity money to a children's cancer fund. Or did you forget that part of him getting kicked off of YT?

I will give Ralph an infinite amount of shit since it's fun to dig at the guy, but this is one situation he handled as well as he could have. Hell, I give him props for being one of the very few people to have the balls to go down swinging, even if it did turn out that he's just as much a thin-skinned pussy as Tonka.

 

[AltisticRight]

The book is from 2012, they couldn’t have known each other until 2014 when Gamergay kicked off.

“AUGHHHHH, Its just a joke alog.”
Uh huh, sure thing Walph. Definitely isn’t your lingering homolust to show Jim your soliloquy.

Jim has been around for a long time, perhaps Jarbo always had a mancrush on him? The started gaymer gayte just so senpai can notice him!!!
Jk, the gunt just wants Jim on.

It was Yoree Koh, and he did make a mistake: He proceeded to mock her and Gator spammed all those memes of her being an NPC. Rather than make it difficult for Youtube to kick him off the platform he gave them a legitimate reason to.

If Ralph was a smarter man he could've gone live with her (with chat disabled so she had no reason to run away) and made her look like a fool by showing how stupid her soon-to-be published article was. If she didn't show up he could come out and say she "discredited any and all of WSJ journalism by refusing to actively seek the story."

I'm not trying to say Youtube wasn't about to kick Ralph off anyways, but he made their decision look more legitimate, and let Yoree Koh get away with shitty journalism.

Constant spamming of gas the kikes and having guests on to name the Jew is a reason that's good enough already.

The Gunt also raised nearly 20k for a charity, which was then sent back because some sjw jws at wsj got triggered at goyim having fun at their expense. Unless you're a dimwitted far left brainlet or the retarded lolberg private company type, taking almost 20k away from a charity because of some autistic podcast and some trashy outlet's articles is vile and shitty.

Who even reads WSJ anymore? I read one of their dumbass Chinese articles recently talking about a possible economic collapse in China because on the 15th of September apparently through infrared mapping and light pollution analysis stuff (autism radar), they autistically deducted that factories seem to "suddenly stop", genius. The “Mid-Autumn Festival” isn't a thing and there isn't a holiday for that in China. What kind of retarded reporting is that? It's like saying aboland becomes a lawless anarchy mess because most stores are closed after 8pm on the 25th of December.

Fuck them. The gunt is fun to poke around, but this was one of the few cases where he was right.

 

[Path Started]

Gunt raised over $27k for charity which was rejected, yet these hospitals or charities would happily accept donations from scum sources.

The media painted a completely false picture of Ralph, and not to gunt shield, but he hasn't exactly done anything that bad in his internet life, lets be fair. Yet I am sure someone like Jeffery Epstein has donated to st judes, I can't find proof of him doing it but I am sure someone like him who abuses people daily have donated to them, and they are aware of rumors of said person yet accept the donations.

 

[AltisticRight]

Gunt raised over $27k for charity which was rejected, yet these hospitals or charities would happily accept donations from scum sources.

The media painted a completely false picture of Ralph, and not to gunt shield, but he hasn't exactly done anything that bad in his internet life, lets be fair. Yet I am sure someone like Jeffery Epstein has donated to st judes, I can't find proof of him doing it but I am sure someone like him who abuses people daily have donated to them, and they are aware of rumors of said person yet accept the donations.

The worst thing the Gunt has ever done was allegedly doxxxxing some of his ex-paypiggies. There isn't any solid proof, just conjecture and secondary ones, that's just being objective here. I personally think the Gunt is guilty and did it because he was drunk out of his fucking mind.
Second worst thing he's done was getting too cozy with paedophile Corey, which really is nothing. That only resulted in his own life being fucked around by Corey's paedoshielders.

Doxxxxxing? There's literally nothing wrong with it. I do think doxxxing nobodies (as Ralph, dispatch, Devon Tracey aka Autism-is-Unstoppable, and pretty much the media does) is pointless unless colourful internet history can be found and they do have a presence online worthy of a laugh is too far, but that's just a standard I hold myself to.

Having the heart (or optics) to raise money for a charity and Dark V (wrong spelling) redeems this stupid shit, IMHO. Still, I'll make fun of the gunt because it's funny. One may say he is indeed just playing optics, so what? He still raised the money. Same goes with PewDiePie's charity stuff, so what, actual money is being raised and it's all that matters. How much money were raised by his critics such as the incel that is David Shitrat and those in the septic tank cult? This is one of the few times where an ad hom argument is acceptable to me.

YT forcing the money to be sent back and WSJ's lame hitpiece was disgusting. I don't care if they raised money singing to "Horst Wessel Lies" or Moonman rap, the money is used for an ultimately good cause. Where was WSJ when this happened? Unless they reimburse the charity with five times the amount Ralph raised, they will be forever viewed as despicable vultures by myself and I'm sure many others. #WSJhatesCancerKids #YoreeKohisAnUglyGook

This is especially gross since the WSJ is right leaning, at least historically. They've ran pieces on climate alarmism and endorses right leaning candidates of other nations. People expect them to have some kind of a reputation.

 

[Unog]

The worst thing the Gunt has ever done was allegedly doxxxxing some of his ex-paypiggies.

I dunno man, him and Andy downloading a shitload of CP to go over it on-stream and alerting god-knows how many pedos that they needed to DFE was worse in my opinion. For all we know the retards interrupted an ongoing investigation, and ended up letting possible chomos get away scot-free.

Which would be the only thing I can think of that would possibly have actual, real-life, consequences. Other than that yeah it's just stupid internet drama shit.

 

[Path Started]

I followed everything while the doxing thing was happening, but in fact Ralph did not dox the paypigs, it was because of other donations people made to zoom/dispatch/others and they got the details from that. So at least on that point he is actually innocent there.

His fuck ups have been funny to follow and it's decent entertainment both to watch his out bursts and also his show is entertaining at the same time.

I think unless he relapses and goes back on the drink, there will be significantly less "eat a fucking cock go fuck yourself" type out bursts especially while on dlive, he is willing to speak more openly on other platforms, for instance when he was on with randbot2020 on afreeca.tv he spoke more "real" and not "on" if you see what I mean. Probably a combination of not being on dlive and not hosting killstream made him more open and relaxed, not completely like he used to be like on stream.me but a little more open.

If a total unknown is being doxed I don't really see a point in it, why bother doxing some random random user, obviously if that user happens to be someone famous in real life or interesting in real life or have a interesting internet profile as you say, that would be interesting and funny to me, otherwise it's boring and I see no point wasting the time doing it.

I just like to enjoy laughing at shit, and if that shit involves shows or hosts of the shows I may also enjoy, I'll enjoy that as well, in fact it makes it more entertaining, and now Ralph has accepted the memes and jokes a little, it's better for him.

The WSJ and general cancelling of Ralph was totally disgusting, simply singing some songs and being edgy on the internet shouldn't be a reason for the youtube refunding of money, and the negative attention it brought to the show was very retarded. He should'nt have been banned for anything he did. I was hoping the ban would mean he would be going harder or be more "edgy", sure he was at first but now dlive has cracked down on a lot of things he has to be calmer.

Unless a new saga starts on a site like afreeca.tv or another site with little moderation, we will be seeing a more chilled out side of Ralph and that likely will allow him to at least keep his existing audience, I just wonder if it will alienate some people who want an edgy show.

I dunno man, him and Andy downloading a shitload of CP to go over it on-stream and alerting god-knows how many pedos that they needed to DFE was worse in my opinion. For all we know the exceptional individuals interrupted an ongoing investigation, and ended up letting possible chomos get away scot-free.

Which would be the only thing I can think of that would possibly have actual, real-life, consequences. Other than that yeah it's just stupid internet drama shit.

That was a bad move, they probably thought it was going to be a good idea, and be good to get rid of some pedos, but when you think about it more, like the possibility that law enforcement were tracking these profiles already, and were gaining evidence, and if what they did fucked with it, then that certainly was a bad move.

It was still fun to watch though.

 

[Unog]

I followed everything while the doxing thing was happening, but in fact Ralph did not dox the paypigs, it was because of other donations people made to zoom/dispatch/others and they got the details from that. So at least on that point he is actually innocent there.

Do you have sources for that? When it happened it looked like a pretty open and shut case, with the "evidence" that was supposedly exculpatory not accounting for the fact that he had posted the guy's dox within half an hour of getting the message that pissed him off enough to do it.

That was a bad move, they probably thought it was going to be a good idea, and be good to get rid of some pedos, but when you think about it more, like the possibility that law enforcement were tracking these profiles already, and were gaining evidence, and if what they did fucked with it, then that certainly was a bad move.

It was still fun to watch though.

I agree that it was fun to watch, but there's no changing that there could possibly be a chomo who's diddled a kid who would've gotten caught beforehand if not for them stumbling dick-first into the most retarded own-goal they could've possibly have made at the time.

 

[Path Started]

Do you have sources for that? When it happened it looked like a pretty open and shut case, with the "evidence" that was supposedly exculpatory not accounting for the fact that he had posted the guy's dox within half an hour of getting the message that pissed him off enough to do it.



I agree that it was fun to watch, but there's no changing that there could possibly be a chomo who's diddled a kid who would've gotten caught beforehand if not for them stumbling dick-first into the most exceptional own-goal they could've possibly have made at the time.

I remember the posts at the time yes, I have no source, and no proof, but I was autistically following everything and everyone and that is what I think, it would be great to know for sure if lord akira did donate to others at the time, which I think he did.

If you look at the whole thing and was following it at the time, there was a lot of shit going on and a shit load of back room shit to.

I don't believe Ralph doxed Lord Akira because when you think about it, to me it seems more likely that others did it because he donated to other people as well, so everyone he donated to would've had his dox. And a group of people were going round fucking with Ralph and his pay pigs as its been discussed here a lot. Also Ralph has adamantly denied doing it over and over, sure he has done that with other things only to admit it later on, but on this case I would tend to think he didn't do it.

And I do agree it was an own goal/bad idea, sadly I'm sure he had good intentions and thought it was probably a good plan both for viewers to enjoy and to potentially fuck up some pedos, but it didn't go down well and was a bad idea in general. I would always stay away from that kind of thing as that type of stuff would (and did) divide the audience, some thinking it was "great some pedos were having a light shined on them hope they get investigated", and others thinking that its bad because "law enforcement may have been following this already so you should've just reported it"

 

[shex]

@Path Started
I actually have it bookmarked. But in short, Lord Akira was namefagging on cow and could have been doxed by simply googling his user name.

@Lord Akira brainlet
I apologize to @theralph for accusing him of doxing this exceptional individual.

View attachment 682676View attachment 682677View attachment 682678

This is bullshit:
View attachment 682681

Aside from the timing and motive, Akira's opsec is retardedly low. I can't blame Ralph for doxing you when your putting your shit out there yourself.

 

[Unog]

I remember the posts at the time yes, I have no source, and no proof, but I was autistically following everything and everyone and that is what I think, it would be great to know for sure if lord akira did donate to others at the time, which I think he did.

If you look at the whole thing and was following it at the time, there was a lot of shit going on and a shit load of back room shit to.

I don't believe Ralph doxed Lord Akira because when you think about it, to me it seems more likely that others did it because he donated to other people as well, so everyone he donated to would've had his dox. And a group of people were going round fucking with Ralph and his pay pigs as its been discussed here a lot. Also Ralph has adamantly denied doing it over and over, sure he has done that with other things only to admit it later on, but on this case I would tend to think he didn't do it.

The thing that nobody could account for and the "proof" as I recall it that came out couldn't even account for was that the dox was posted like fifteen minutes after Akira got the pissed off DM response from Ethan. It's a bigass stretch in my opinion that he it was a coincidence.

@Path Started
I actually have it bookmarked. But in short, Lord Akira was namefagging on cow and could have been doxed by simply googling his user name.

Thanks! You actually posted this while I was typing this lol. If you see even in that post, the user themself admits that the timing and motive are still suspect, and to wit, Ralph could've realized/known beforehand that Akira's opsec being terrible would give him plausible deniability.

It's also not beyond the scope of the imagination that Ralph would deny it in perpetuity, because doxxxxxing is considered in his sphere to be one of the worst things you can do to a person online, and the amount of hay he's made with giving other people shit not only over actually doxing people but attempting to dox people (Kraut comes to mind) would sink a shitload of even the audience that he currently has, were he to ever admit it. It'd be his "not showing up at Knoxville" or "AIM AIM AIM" moment.

 

[Smarty Pants]

The thing that nobody could account for and the "proof" as I recall it that came out couldn't even account for was that the dox was posted like fifteen minutes after Akira got the pissed off DM response from Ethan. It's a bigass stretch in my opinion that he it was a coincidence.

You're forgetting that Akira was namefagging in /cow/ and was posting the DM's there.

 

[Unog]

You're forgetting that Akira was namefagging in /cow/ and was posting the DM's there.

Spoiler: huuuuuuge ass image

This is what @Lord Akira had said he posted to /cow/ at the time, in this snippet:

Alright guys, I'm back. I saw what you guys asked and I figured I'll just do a long post to answer some questions instead of quoting everything.

The doxing:
I post and the next thing I know I get the first DM which is basically "Hehe Nothin' personal kid tips fedora" followed by a post on /cow/ with my facebook and linkedin information and a couple of photos. Then the second reply follows forth, which I'm assuming is him trying to damage control and deflect by accusing me of leaking information I literally have no access to nor want regardless.

Notice the timeline here:

Spoiler: Huuuuge ass phone image

Look at the timestamps here. 10:03 Akira sends the message that talks about a poor showing. Ralph sends the DM that said "I'll unblock you to say this" at 10:24, which means that to have posted the DM on /cow/ he would've had to do it between 10:24, and 10:46.

That's twenty minutes. So if the order was Akira posts the DM -> Akira gets autistic ominous message -> dox ends up on /cow/, it seems a bit much of a stretch to me to think that some random fuck would take it upon themselves to try to coincidentally setup Ralph to make him look bad, when Occam's Razor would point in the direction of Ralph being the culprit. He not only had motive and opportunity, but he even admitted he was there.

Ralph also somewhat slipped up in the same way Ian Miles Cheong did in the video he had talking about how he was swatting Warski as well, in saying "oh, that had nothing to do with doxing you" in relation to the previous message, more or less admitting to it unless you want to somehow argue that doesn't make grammatical sense.

I just don't see how the evidence doesn't clearly point to Ralph short of him admitting outright that he did it, frankly.

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

@Path Started
I actually have it bookmarked. But in short, Lord Akira was namefagging on cow and could have been doxed by simply googling his user name.

No, Dispatch went over this but basically if you went to Walph’s Patreon you could see his real name and tied it to his Lord Akira accounts.

I still think Walph probably did dox Akira, but its possible someone else could’ve.

Something to consider, why would a guy who constantly says “idgaf about doxing” decide to ring up a guy who just got doxed and slighted him by dropping dms? Makes ya thunk.

 

[1234567890abc]

You're forgetting that Akira was namefagging in /cow/ and was posting the DM's there.

Nah this was debunked a long time ago. The Gunt absolutely did some gay ops on @Lord Akira and it was shared for us to laugh at the Gunt who pretended it didn't happen for the better part of the story. Besides, this type of behavior is pretty common by him. He's been doing this type of shit since gamergate. It's been in his ED article for a long time.