Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

Yeah, this "we have different brains uwu" it's basically everywhere on troon social media. If you can identify trans with a simple brainscan, why basing the transing (especially for kids) why subjective perception, when you have an allegedly bullshit-proof method to say who is trans and who is not? Last year in Canada a man identified as a woman because he was sick and tired to pay a higher car insurance. I saw a few genderspecials commenting on their social media with "Please don't do this bullshit". Now, putting aside the fact that it's those morons' fault if the situation in Canada is like that, I've seen nobody clamoring for brainscans in order to prevent this kind of issues.
Yes, as mentioned before, the brain research is inconclusive. Troons jumped on it because it appeared to be a scientific validation of their beliefs, but there have been multiple studies with different results, and it's more about general trends than concretely verifiable sexual dimorphism. Troons only ever bring up the research when they're specifically questioned about what scientific basis they have, but the deeply ingrained ones like Labelle reject even that, because any possible verification system could prove them wrong.
 

This drives me mad. Hair removal should NOT be covered by our healthcare since it's a luxury, and one that can be taken care of effectively in a variety of ways WITHOUT the use of doctors.
Yes, I would LOVE to see everyone in my lovely country get everything they want from our systems, but resources are finite on all fronts.
Prioritizing hair removal, or any aesthetics, through the healthcare system not only means taking money and medical supplies away from people with legitimate medical afflictions but also means that to get it, they'll need a doctor's note or consent of some kind and that means more doctor's appointments, appointments that add up in terms of time in a country where people can be waiting up to a month to see their family doctor to have a concerning lump looked at.

I also have a bit of a personal problem with even things like plastic surgery for anyone with dysmorphia of any kind being covered. I don't want people killing themselves over what they see in the mirror, but it's INCREDIBLY worrying that we, through therapy and acceptance, tell our dysmorphic youth that eating disorders and cutting off their imperfections with scissors will not make them happy and stable while simultaneously handing out breast implants so trans women stop threatening to kill themselves (like Bria, or Labelle's fave example, Liz Eden)
I don't really care that it's hypocritical because honestly they are different situations, but what I do care about is the message it sends to the already confused and rejected youth who are told that loving themselves is the first step to being loved; We're willing to "fix" these women, but you're not worth it.

And the worst part? Despite being handed all that, despite being prioritized over others with very similar issues, as Labelle proves here it's still not enough.
Labelle STILL wants more.
I'm not even exaggerating when I say that if hair removal was universally covered by our health care (which I hate to admit, in some cases (as Labelle mentions) it IS but it's thankfully hard to get) people like Labelle (and by this I don't mean trans women, I mean entitled people, like Lebelle) would still cry thatit isn't enough.
The next step would be to have trips to makeup artists covered (despite the fact that many non-trans-women in our country grow up without access to makeup and aren't taught how to apply it) or trips to the hairdresser (again, despite many low income families in our country cutting their own hair because it's a luxury)
It's not even that I'm trying to make a "slippery slope" kind of argument here, it's that these are actually the very real, very natural, next steps in Labelle's argument.

It's really sad.
And again, I wish we lived in a world or even a country where all Canadians COULD access these kinds of luxuries and look and feel exactly how they want, but our system is finite, and it's so incredbly selfish to complain that your healthcare won't cover hair removal when it's a choice between that and someone's cyst biopsy, or RX renewals.

I just can't fathom being that selfish, that entitled and that self centered.
 
This drives me mad. Hair removal should NOT be covered by our healthcare since it's a luxury, and one that can be taken care of effectively in a variety of ways WITHOUT the use of doctors.
Yes, I would LOVE to see everyone in my lovely country get everything they want from our systems, but resources are finite on all fronts.
Prioritizing hair removal, or any aesthetics, through the healthcare system not only means taking money and medical supplies away from people with legitimate medical afflictions but also means that to get it, they'll need a doctor's note or consent of some kind and that means more doctor's appointments, appointments that add up in terms of time in a country where people can be waiting up to a month to see their family doctor to have a concerning lump looked at.

I also have a bit of a personal problem with even things like plastic surgery for anyone with dysmorphia of any kind being covered. I don't want people killing themselves over what they see in the mirror, but it's INCREDIBLY worrying that we, through therapy and acceptance, tell our dysmorphic youth that eating disorders and cutting off their imperfections with scissors will not make them happy and stable while simultaneously handing out breast implants so trans women stop threatening to kill themselves (like Bria, or Labelle's fave example, Liz Eden)
I don't really care that it's hypocritical because honestly they are different situations, but what I do care about is the message it sends to the already confused and rejected youth who are told that loving themselves is the first step to being loved; We're willing to "fix" these women, but you're not worth it.

And the worst part? Despite being handed all that, despite being prioritized over others with very similar issues, as Labelle proves here it's still not enough.
Labelle STILL wants more.
I'm not even exaggerating when I say that if hair removal was universally covered by our health care (which I hate to admit, in some cases (as Labelle mentions) it IS but it's thankfully hard to get) people like Labelle (and by this I don't mean trans women, I mean entitled people, like Lebelle) would still cry thatit isn't enough.
The next step would be to have trips to makeup artists covered (despite the fact that many non-trans-women in our country grow up without access to makeup and aren't taught how to apply it) or trips to the hairdresser (again, despite many low income families in our country cutting their own hair because it's a luxury)
It's not even that I'm trying to make a "slippery slope" kind of argument here, it's that these are actually the very real, very natural, next steps in Labelle's argument.

It's really sad.
And again, I wish we lived in a world or even a country where all Canadians COULD access these kinds of luxuries and look and feel exactly how they want, but our system is finite, and it's so incredbly selfish to complain that your healthcare won't cover hair removal when it's a choice between that and someone's cyst biopsy, or RX renewals.

I just can't fathom being that selfish, that entitled and that self centered.
Welcome to the modern day and age, where trendsgenders believe they're more important than a guy who just got impaled by a rusty metal pole.
 
This drives me mad. Hair removal should NOT be covered by our healthcare since it's a luxury, and one that can be taken care of effectively in a variety of ways WITHOUT the use of doctors.
Yes, I would LOVE to see everyone in my lovely country get everything they want from our systems, but resources are finite on all fronts.
Prioritizing hair removal, or any aesthetics, through the healthcare system not only means taking money and medical supplies away from people with legitimate medical afflictions but also means that to get it, they'll need a doctor's note or consent of some kind and that means more doctor's appointments, appointments that add up in terms of time in a country where people can be waiting up to a month to see their family doctor to have a concerning lump looked at.

I also have a bit of a personal problem with even things like plastic surgery for anyone with dysmorphia of any kind being covered. I don't want people killing themselves over what they see in the mirror, but it's INCREDIBLY worrying that we, through therapy and acceptance, tell our dysmorphic youth that eating disorders and cutting off their imperfections with scissors will not make them happy and stable while simultaneously handing out breast implants so trans women stop threatening to kill themselves (like Bria, or Labelle's fave example, Liz Eden)
I don't really care that it's hypocritical because honestly they are different situations, but what I do care about is the message it sends to the already confused and rejected youth who are told that loving themselves is the first step to being loved; We're willing to "fix" these women, but you're not worth it.

And the worst part? Despite being handed all that, despite being prioritized over others with very similar issues, as Labelle proves here it's still not enough.
Labelle STILL wants more.
I'm not even exaggerating when I say that if hair removal was universally covered by our health care (which I hate to admit, in some cases (as Labelle mentions) it IS but it's thankfully hard to get) people like Labelle (and by this I don't mean trans women, I mean entitled people, like Lebelle) would still cry thatit isn't enough.
The next step would be to have trips to makeup artists covered (despite the fact that many non-trans-women in our country grow up without access to makeup and aren't taught how to apply it) or trips to the hairdresser (again, despite many low income families in our country cutting their own hair because it's a luxury)
It's not even that I'm trying to make a "slippery slope" kind of argument here, it's that these are actually the very real, very natural, next steps in Labelle's argument.

It's really sad.
And again, I wish we lived in a world or even a country where all Canadians COULD access these kinds of luxuries and look and feel exactly how they want, but our system is finite, and it's so incredbly selfish to complain that your healthcare won't cover hair removal when it's a choice between that and someone's cyst biopsy, or RX renewals.

I just can't fathom being that selfish, that entitled and that self centered.
That's yet another reason why I despise troons. They bitch and moan about their gender dysphoria and how they need to have surgeries to feel better -- but there are lots of people out there who have something that they hate about their bodies. If we cover cosmetic surgery for some -- we really should do it for all.

As someone who is flat chested, I had a lot of anxiety about my figure because of it. I got told by people quite often that I'd have a great figure if I just had a bigger chest which made me very self-conscious about it. No one ever said that insurance companies should help people like me feel better about my body and let me have a bigger rack for free. Why aren't we giving hookers and strippers or even Hooter's waitresses free boob jobs? That would at least be a form of employment assistance which would have more value than giving it to a bunch of AGPs who only need it because of a stupid fetish.

Insurance plans generally don't even cover smoking cessation or weight loss programs -- 2 things that would greatly improve health and lower insurance/medical costs. Why are fake boobs and franken genitals more important than issues that affect far more people than trans?
 
My elderly great-aunt had a long curly moustache as long as I knew her, and she never wanted or needed it removed. She was perfectly healthy, just old and hairy, old people's hair goes weird sometimes. It looked strange, for sure, but it didn't bother her, so it wasn't a problem needing fixed. Why not fund better psychiatric care and therapy to help people be comfortable with the way they look instead of funding dangerous experimental surgeries that are only going to cost more to revise the complications and open the doctors up to lawsuits when a lot of the patients end up regretting them?
 
troon entitlement is a wonder to behold.

As someone who is flat chested, I had a lot of anxiety about my figure because of it. I got told by people quite often that I'd have a great figure if I just had a bigger chest which made me very self-conscious about it. No one ever said that insurance companies should help people like me feel better about my body and let me have a bigger rack for free. Why aren't we giving hookers and strippers or even Hooter's waitresses free boob jobs? That would at least be a form of employment assistance which would have more value than giving it to a bunch of AGPs who only need it because of a stupid fetish.

simple. because body image issues only matter to troons. nobody else's dissatisfaction with their bodies should be remedied for free.
 
New Poutine interview
Since it's a paid article, Billie's put full text is on facebook
1570360262226.png
 
>It's difficult to find one's place in a society that always makes us invisible
This is like him not being satisfied with the healthcare system already covering certain cosmetic surgeries for trans people and prioritizing trans patients over others because he also expects them to cover shit like hair removal: he says trans people are "invisible", yet both mass media outlets and alternative media outlets talk about trans issues more or less every single day at this point and LGBT organizations focus extensively on the T nowadays. What more does he want?

>We almost never have the right to witness characters who are trans* without it serving a specific purpose in the story which is pretty objectifying as well as redundant
Pretty much all of Gui-gui's comics focus on trans issues in one way or the other, so I don't see how he's changing anything :P

*He uses the verb "s'adonner" which means "devote oneself to" in true and honest French but apparently it also can mean "coincidentally find oneself" in Poutine French. I'm guessing he was using it in the second sense
 
Last edited:
>We almost never have the right to witness characters who are trans* without it serving a specific purpose in the story which is pretty objectifying as well as redundant
Pretty much of Gui-gui's comics focus on trans issues in one way or the other, so I don't see how he's changing anything :P

*He uses the verb "s'adonner" which means "devote oneself to" in true and honest French but apparently it also can mean "coincidentally find oneself" in Poutine French. I'm guessing he was using it in the second sense

I'd take it as coincidentally in this case. No need for the find one's self.

You said exactly what I came here to say: When did, in Guillaume's writing, the transness not serve the plot.

He kind of has point about trans characters being trans to serve the story. But at least he could do something about it with his comic but he won't.

Like the soccer game arc. The black kid is trans? Why is he trans? Because otherwise the white kid couldn't be schooled.

Now keep the black trans kid but make this a soccer training arc like those sports animes BUT the black kids trans BUT it doesn't matter they're here to win the tournament.

Now you'd have a story where the trans aren't tools (in all sense of the word)
 
New webTroon repost

An afternoon at the park (1)
View attachment 959340

An afternoon at the park (2)
View attachment 959341

An afternoon at the park (3)
View attachment 959338

An afternoon at the park (4)
View attachment 959337

An afternoon at the park (5)
View attachment 959339
Late and autistic, but that nose looks like it really wants to escape her exceptional face. It's made really clear there's no model sheet or anything for her bitchy self-insert, that, or those comics were really rushed. Also 60% of the expressions she puts on characters look unfinished, make poor eye contact, or are so sloppily done to the point where they're literally just emojis. It's funny as shit.
Screenshot 2019-10-06 at 19.07.43.png
Screenshot 2019-10-06 at 19.12.57.png
Screenshot 2019-10-06 at 19.13.39.png
Screenshot 2019-10-06 at 19.13.47.png


Has Sophie ever studied art or took any art classes? And does she take nicely to criticism? New to this thread, sorry.

And :offtopic: but I've been seeing plenty of DesmondIsAmazing horrorcows and pedoforks, so the creepy liberal messages she gave in these comics are hard for me to ignore. It's like a pattern.
tumblr_pyagoilyYm1tm163xo1_640.png
tumblr_pydprlV8Iz1tm163xo1_1280.jpg


Edit: Broken attachements.
 
It's an interesting statement "It's difficult to find one's place in a society that always makes us invisible".

Most adults are pretty much invisible to each other because why care what strangers are up to as long as they aren't being a potential threat or nuisance (Or are in distress too I guess).

So attention seeking behavior like saying "I'M A DAINTY LADY, DEAL WITH IT!!!" doesn't really work when you're Labelle's age so he has to have children in his comic be his mouthpiece for anyone to care.
 
Back