Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

Late and autistic, but that nose looks like it really wants to escape her exceptional face. It's made really clear there's no model sheet or anything for her bitchy self-insert, that, or those comics were really rushed. Also 60% of the expressions she puts on characters look unfinished, make poor eye contact, or are so sloppily done to the point where they're literally just emojis. It's funny as shit.
View attachment 961271 View attachment 961288 View attachment 961291 View attachment 961283

Has Sophie ever studied art or took any art classes? And does she take nicely to criticism? New to this thread, sorry.

And :offtopic: but I've been seeing plenty of DesmondIsAmazing horrorcows and pedoforks, so the creepy liberal messages she gave in these comics are hard for me to ignore. It's like a pattern.
View attachment 961276 View attachment 961277

Edit: Broken attachements.
He claims to have been making comics since elementary school, but he's never posted any of his childhood works. I think he actually hates drawing and only does it for the same reason he became a teacher- so he can force his beliefs on children. In fact, I'm willing to bet he got fired from his teaching job for inserting politics into every lesson.
 
This drives me mad. Hair removal should NOT be covered by our healthcare since it's a luxury, and one that can be taken care of effectively in a variety of ways WITHOUT the use of doctors.
Yes, I would LOVE to see everyone in my lovely country get everything they want from our systems, but resources are finite on all fronts.
Prioritizing hair removal, or any aesthetics, through the healthcare system not only means taking money and medical supplies away from people with legitimate medical afflictions but also means that to get it, they'll need a doctor's note or consent of some kind and that means more doctor's appointments, appointments that add up in terms of time in a country where people can be waiting up to a month to see their family doctor to have a concerning lump looked at.

I also have a bit of a personal problem with even things like plastic surgery for anyone with dysmorphia of any kind being covered. I don't want people killing themselves over what they see in the mirror, but it's INCREDIBLY worrying that we, through therapy and acceptance, tell our dysmorphic youth that eating disorders and cutting off their imperfections with scissors will not make them happy and stable while simultaneously handing out breast implants so trans women stop threatening to kill themselves (like Bria, or Labelle's fave example, Liz Eden)
I don't really care that it's hypocritical because honestly they are different situations, but what I do care about is the message it sends to the already confused and rejected youth who are told that loving themselves is the first step to being loved; We're willing to "fix" these women, but you're not worth it.

And the worst part? Despite being handed all that, despite being prioritized over others with very similar issues, as Labelle proves here it's still not enough.
Labelle STILL wants more.
I'm not even exaggerating when I say that if hair removal was universally covered by our health care (which I hate to admit, in some cases (as Labelle mentions) it IS but it's thankfully hard to get) people like Labelle (and by this I don't mean trans women, I mean entitled people, like Lebelle) would still cry thatit isn't enough.
The next step would be to have trips to makeup artists covered (despite the fact that many non-trans-women in our country grow up without access to makeup and aren't taught how to apply it) or trips to the hairdresser (again, despite many low income families in our country cutting their own hair because it's a luxury)
It's not even that I'm trying to make a "slippery slope" kind of argument here, it's that these are actually the very real, very natural, next steps in Labelle's argument.

It's really sad.
And again, I wish we lived in a world or even a country where all Canadians COULD access these kinds of luxuries and look and feel exactly how they want, but our system is finite, and it's so incredbly selfish to complain that your healthcare won't cover hair removal when it's a choice between that and someone's cyst biopsy, or RX renewals.

I just can't fathom being that selfish, that entitled and that self centered.
I totally agree with you, it makes me mad as well. Many health insurance plans don't cover dental and place it in the cosmetic category but now troon surgery is not cosmetic? It shouldn't be covered in health insurance much less use taxpayer's money in countries with free health care. I agree that in SOME cases a "cosmetic" procedure could be made under specific circumstances like implants for REAL women who had their breasts removed so they won't die of cancer. Like someone getting a real bad side effect of having a cimino fistula and having their arm lumpy as if they have some monster sized blisters for example. But a troon that have absolutely no health problems taking resources from people that need it? How in the world this even became worthy of discussion.

PS labelle thinks if you don't offer surgery or hormones you're a gatekeeper. If you offer it they only care what's in your legs and not treating the dysphoria. Everything Labelle says will end up being contradicted in the next week or month.
 
Labelle's arguments are based entirely on feelings, and feelings can contradict themselves. This reliance upon emotional appeals makes people like Billy immune to logical arguments.
Ironically, that's the subject of this edit (warning: it's pretty long.)
mass_debating - Copy.png
 
Labelle's arguments are based entirely on feelings, and feelings can contradict themselves. This reliance upon emotional appeals makes people like Billy immune to logical arguments.
Ironically, that's the subject of this edit (warning: it's pretty long.)
Dancing is forbi- I mean transphobic!
 
Compulsory heterosexuality and strict gender roles are unhealthy and unnatural. But this tween boy likes wearing dresses and has a crush on another boy, and that's so pathological that he needs to go on Lupron and pretend to everyone that he's a straight girl. Which is it, Billy?
 
Compulsory heterosexuality and strict gender roles are unhealthy and unnatural. But this tween boy likes wearing dresses and has a crush on another boy, and that's so pathological that he needs to go on Lupron and pretend to everyone that he's a straight girl. Which is it, Billy?

Both. And asking how that works is transphobic.
 
Compulsory heterosexuality and strict gender roles are unhealthy and unnatural. But this tween boy likes wearing dresses and has a crush on another boy, and that's so pathological that he needs to go on Lupron and pretend to everyone that he's a straight girl. Which is it, Billy?
You can pretend to be straight. You just can't actually be straight. People like Labelle don't want equality. They want to flip the tables. They don't have a problem with sexual dictatorship. They just want to be the dictators.
 
why would healthcare cover the procedures for something that isnt a medical disorder?
Because they view themselves as a marginalized class that, after so many years of discrimination, deserves everything handed to them on a silver platter. They absolutely refuse to work for it.
"Work for money? But I'm trans! I deserve it for free!"
 
(spoiler:
Late and autistic, but that nose looks like it really wants to escape her exceptional face. It's made really clear there's no model sheet or anything for her bitchy self-insert....Has Sophie ever studied art or took any art classes? And does she take nicely to criticism? New to this thread, sorry.

(cut for space)

Welcome to the thread! As one of the Farm's many resident art fags, Labelle's art is usually my main focus here as well but I'll try to answer your questions with as little ranting as possible and just give you the straight up, soul burning facts about this, hm, "artist":

- Tells anyone who critiques the art that it's their style rather than lack of skill, comparing Assigned Male to Peanuts and Calvin and Hobbes (the idea of learning the rules before you break them must be transphobic)

- Calls anyone who suggests art classes haters and transphobes.

- Begged for a 3k tablet from audience, justified it by saying that someone with an audience of millions couldn't work on a cheap Wacom Bamboo (spoiler: the expensive tablet didn't improve the shitty art).

- Sells stickers and posters with traced art and stolen fonts on them (if you ever notice a Labelle piece actually looking competent, it's traced)

- Threw a tantrum when traced/stolen reference images for backgrounds and poses were found by us (use terms Labelle likes, like "girl" instead of "woman" and you'll almost always find it within the first couple of results)

- Deletes all valid and helpful art critiques from Assigned Male page while mumbling about art being about the message.

In short, much like a lot of tumbler "artists" the art is just a way to deliver their message, and their message is just a way to pander to a crowd that they know will fund their lazy lifestyle.
Improving isn't important when you can copy/paste the same face three times in a row and still travel the world on some other suckers dime. Everything looks sloppy, rushed and drawn with no consideration for anatomy because that's exactly what it is, every single time.

If you want the receipts for everything I've said they all exist in this thread so a quick google search with kiwi farms and your keywords will most likely find them.

And as a final note; I'm no amazing artist myself, but even I've extended a hand to Labelle, offering even handed critiques and art advice on the sole condition that some of the worst comments (like the stuff about needing expensive supplies to be a good artist) were retracted. I was given the usual speel and then ignored.
These "artists" always say they'll take advice from people who offer it with the intention of actually helping them improve, but their egos are so fragile that they can't tell a link to some figure drawing tutorials from a burning cross on their lawn.
 
(spoiler:

(cut for space)

Welcome to the thread! As one of the Farm's many resident art fags, Labelle's art is usually my main focus here as well but I'll try to answer your questions with as little ranting as possible and just give you the straight up, soul burning facts about this, hm, "artist":

- Tells anyone who critiques the art that it's their style rather than lack of skill, comparing Assigned Male to Peanuts and Calvin and Hobbes (the idea of learning the rules before you break them must be transphobic)

- Calls anyone who suggests art classes haters and transphobes.

- Begged for a 3k tablet from audience, justified it by saying that someone with an audience of millions couldn't work on a cheap Wacom Bamboo (spoiler: the expensive tablet didn't improve the shitty art).

- Sells stickers and posters with traced art and stolen fonts on them (if you ever notice a Labelle piece actually looking competent, it's traced)

- Threw a tantrum when traced/stolen reference images for backgrounds and poses were found by us (use terms Labelle likes, like "girl" instead of "woman" and you'll almost always find it within the first couple of results)

- Deletes all valid and helpful art critiques from Assigned Male page while mumbling about art being about the message.

In short, much like a lot of tumbler "artists" the art is just a way to deliver their message, and their message is just a way to pander to a crowd that they know will fund their lazy lifestyle.
Improving isn't important when you can copy/paste the same face three times in a row and still travel the world on some other suckers dime. Everything looks sloppy, rushed and drawn with no consideration for anatomy because that's exactly what it is, every single time.

If you want the receipts for everything I've said they all exist in this thread so a quick google search with kiwi farms and your keywords will most likely find them.

And as a final note; I'm no amazing artist myself, but even I've extended a hand to Labelle, offering even handed critiques and art advice on the sole condition that some of the worst comments (like the stuff about needing expensive supplies to be a good artist) were retracted. I was given the usual speel and then ignored.
These "artists" always say they'll take advice from people who offer it with the intention of actually helping them improve, but their egos are so fragile that they can't tell a link to some figure drawing tutorials from a burning cross on their lawn.
Thank you! This looks like really entertaining content, I'll be looking for these in the thread whenever I get the time :)

Half of me feels sorry for these grownass artists/content creators/whatever not being able to handle any kind of criticism, like they fail to understand critiques aren't supposed to be taken personally and it's necessary for their growth as a person and as a creator. From my experience they'll either tell you to fuck off, not respond, act passive-aggressive or hit that trusty block button. The real milky thing like you mentioned, is the contrived and stupid mental gymnastics to deflect criticism (i.e, it's just my art style, art is subjective, admitting they don't know shit about the essentials and just copy pros who've already learned the rules and broke them). They often cherrypick as well; only going for the comments that praise them. Best case scenario they leave it at that, worst case scenario they make a massive hissfit of the whole thing and claim they're being cyberbullied by the haters and harassers.

Normally they have a very childish and hugboxy audience who use little to no critical thinking, so they see this behavior as acceptable, and thus the cycle continues. I've never seend these kinds of individuals being accepted in real jobs. And if they do, they're fired as soon as they do a chimpout, or they get their own group of people who can stand them because professionals can't. It's either a strong case of the tism or poor parenting/environment, that or they're severely deluded.

But hey, it's transphobic to say this. Let's not.
 
Thank you! This looks like really entertaining content, I'll be looking for these in the thread whenever I get the time :)

Half of me feels sorry for these grownass artists/content creators/whatever not being able to handle any kind of criticism, like they fail to understand critiques aren't supposed to be taken personally and it's necessary for their growth as a person and as a creator....But hey, it's transphobic to say this. Let's not.

It's actually becoming quite a problem in the professional art scene. With art actually becoming an acceptable career option for more and more people, I've noticed job postings from the last decade (especially in my specific field) will put must be able to accept and implement artistic critiques with no ego or some variation thereof because our industry is littered with talented, but incredibly emotional fragile, egos. The amount of temper tantrums I've witnessed from full grown adults over small corrections would make most people sick.

That said, this isn't completely off topic art sperging, I promise. Here's how it relates to Labelle and AM:

Most of these tantrums have two roots: either they're from a spoiled brat who isn't used to anything but praise or an absolutely insecure, fragile soul who is so on the defensive that forgetting to say "good morning" sends them into an anxious fit.

As much as I'd love to think Labelle is the former, since the childish, bratty, me me me attitude fits so well, I do suspect it's more of the latter. I think Labelle is incredibly insecure as an artist and as a transwoman and worries any criticism towards either carefully crafted identity will break the illusion for both Labelle, and the audience.

Think of it like a cult leader that's been surrounded by yes men for so long they actually start to believe their own bullshit, even though they know they only started spouting nonesense for easy money and power. Deep down they know it's not real, but 99% of what they hear throughout the days says it is, and it's much more comfortable to wrap yourself in that falsehood than face the truth and work hard to REALLY become what you want to be.
If they let that 1% speak out and go unchallenged it opens the door for doubt for Labelle and the blinded AM crowd. Doubt causes people to question, questioning opens up conversations, and conversations can open eyes and lead to growth and change, two things that threaten that nice blanket of flasehoods.

So to protect their ego, livelihood and path down easy street, cult lead-I mean preachy tumbler artists delete comments, scream at anyone who questions, create fake attacks against themselves and create new words like "transmisogyny" to shut down any questioning and never need to grow or improve.
 
I feel bad for his intended audience. I hope kids don't actually read Assigned Male, but I can imagine some SJW parents buying the merch and trying to push it on their kid. He uses that as an excuse for his shit art, that it's aimed at children so adults can't criticise it (because children are supposedly less discerning). But there's been so much excellent media made for children by skilled and practised artists that it just doesn't wash. Look at a Pixar movie, or an old Disney or Warner Bros cartoon or comic strip: the characters are so well designed and distinct that you can get an idea of their whole personality at a glance; the composition of each panel is carefully structured to make everything flow round the lines of action and draw the eye in, and allow room for speech bubbles; characters and objects are heavily stylised and distorted, but that comes after experience of drawing realistic anatomy and objects from life. Look at a Flower Fairies picture book with the beautifully rendered paintings of fantasy fairies alongside realistic flowers, the artist had to know how to draw from life in order to do that. Or Hergé's or Miyazaki's landscapes.
Maybe I'm just an oldie who thinks everything was better back in my day, but kids deserve better entertainment than this shit.
 
I feel bad for his intended audience. I hope kids don't actually read Assigned Male, but I can imagine some SJW parents buying the merch and trying to push it on their kid. He uses that as an excuse for his shit art, that it's aimed at children so adults can't criticise it (because children are supposedly less discerning). But there's been so much excellent media made for children by skilled and practised artists that it just doesn't wash. Look at a Pixar movie, or an old Disney or Warner Bros cartoon or comic strip: the characters are so well designed and distinct that you can get an idea of their whole personality at a glance; the composition of each panel is carefully structured to make everything flow round the lines of action and draw the eye in, and allow room for speech bubbles; characters and objects are heavily stylised and distorted, but that comes after experience of drawing realistic anatomy and objects from life. Look at a Flower Fairies picture book with the beautifully rendered paintings of fantasy fairies alongside realistic flowers, the artist had to know how to draw from life in order to do that. Or Hergé's or Miyazaki's landscapes.
Maybe I'm just an oldie who thinks everything was better back in my day, but kids deserve better entertainment than this shit.
Doubt a kid gives half a shit about reading troon lectures coming from cartoons, and if they try to read it they'll probably get confused or bored half way through. Why not something that teaches them valuable, useful life lessons? Why do they need to know something as trivial and minimal as transwomen's issues because muh inclusive progressive society? That's stuff people thoroughly learn about in their teens or so, not in preschool. And don't give shit like "umm Bugs Bunny wore dresses sometimes, that's the tea sis", the only time they showed that to children was to show how nutty the characters where. Not to add social commentary. When that Unicorn episode from the Powerpuffs reboot came out, lots of people shat on it for its poor writing, including troons themselves. This subject matter is simply not something an incompetent writer should put out for babies to watch (the reboot also had an actual pedophile directing an episode, so there's that).
Billy cannot properly grasp a concept as complicated as being trans. Children don't even develop abstract thinking before the age of 10 for fuck's sake, what kind of fantasy world is this freak living in? These comics are just catering to kids with parents who are grooming them. I do wonder how Stephie has responded to this argument, it's plain common sense and has nothing to do with muh evil cis heteronormative 50's parents.

Remember this old comic, latest comic is just the same joke with different drawings, made on the $3000 tablet
View attachment 962509
Oh shit, then I guess according to Stephie, we should let kids jump off heights to see if they can fly, have a diet solely based on sweets, skip school, and drive a car. Because something something children are their own people, and we need to be less gross strict parents reinforcing compulsory roles and stereotypes, because that would be unhealthy and unnatural right? Just let kids come out and be fluid.
 
Back