Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
i didn't write it. i didn't post inaccurate personal info made to defame. i didn't post the dumb timeline that doesn't fit events. i didn't post a bunch of hateful text that isn't even cited or is cited by things that aren't confirmed by it.

irrelevant. i am not trying to write a wiki that claims to be truthful.
Okay then...
yes, really irrelevant to my points
Wait, no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ti-99/4A
@Holden
Quick question to see how smart you are...
What do you think the punishment is for a 'defamatory' statement?
 
you post some surnames, addresses, phone numbers and other things i never gave. that's defamation and is a crime here. game over.

This argument is not new Fuckbot. Other idiots, who can actually use words and do stuff like reason and explain, have tried to use this too, and it never has held up scrutiny in court... ever.
 
Now, @Holden, I'd love to know how "inaccurate" information is, in ANY way, defamation.

By the way, my name is Igor Fitzgerald. If anyone claims that's my name, apparently you are defaming me!!!!!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
it's irrelevant if my posts are hateful or not. what's relevant is that what's posted there are hateful lies. like the entitlement thing or an idea i raped my friend.
Here's some defamation: You are a dumb motherfucker. Seriously, I am convinced your mother drank when she was pregnant with you. You were probably dropped down a stairwell when you were a year old. Actually, I take that back. Your mom did crack and you're a survivor of shaken-baby syndrome.

Now sue me, motherfucker.
 
there doesn't need to be one. just that being published is a crime.
No holden. Go look up the statues for what constitutes 'defamation'.
Defamation is a TORT crime. Not a criminal one. That means you can sue, but no one is going to jail.
Defamation does not JUST need to be published. It needs these elements (as I've stated before):
published
knowingly false
injurious
unprivileged

We have published. But they aren't knowingly false because 1) they're quotes and 2) you haven't given us the correct answers.
These are also not injurious as you have not lost any reputation from this site.
http://injury.findlaw.com/torts-and-personal-injuries/defamation-law-the-basics.html
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/defamation-law-made-simple-29718.html
https://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal/liability/defamation
http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/defamation.html
(some reading to educate your dumb ass - notice how they all say there MUST be a damage. Tort law requires that there is a duty, a breach of duty, an injury in some form, and that the injury was caused by that breach of duty)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort
http://www.hmpfmlaw.com/articles/the-four-elements-of-a-tort


Get on my level son, you've been served.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back