Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Confused Doggo, Bessie and 4 others
AnOminous said:
How many of those were appeals from his rulings and how many from his career as a personal injury lawyer? While the mandamus writs were certainly significant events, I haven't seen anything like evidence that he's continually overruled, overruled more often than other judges, or even worse than the run of the mill for the area.
Click to expand...

I defer to your expertise. It looks like they have one appeal in 2006 where he is "John Chupp". Then it jumps to 2010 where he becomes "Honorable John Chupp." The infamous Episcopal Church case seems to be from around 2009 from Google searches.

These are just filings from participant lawyers I believe. The action the appeals court took regarding them is not mentioned.

Also I think Chupp had a more exceptional case than this one.

Avdeef V apparently every judge and town official.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20191014-205814.png
    Screenshot_20191014-205814.png
    492.4 KB · Views: 197
  • Screenshot_20191014-212308.png
    Screenshot_20191014-212308.png
    2 MB · Views: 170
  • Informative
Reactions: Confused Doggo, Bessie, Botchy Galoop and 4 others
Son of Sparda 84 said:
I still can't believe the fact that the judge and more importantly Lawtwitter don't think being called a pedo and sexual predator isn't defamatory. What does count as defamatory? And again I'm amazed that even when he has an affidavit of the con owner that proves that Monica and Ron attempted TI Chupp wanted more contracts like it wasn't proof enough. They got text messages for Christ sake
Click to expand...

None (or few, at least) of them think that. Chupp is lazy and didn't read the lawsuit, because it's quicker and easier just to dismiss a complicated lawsuit he probably quickly assessed 'is probably going to get appealed three ways to sunday no matter what I do. this is not worth my time'. He didn't look at things and then determine "No, it's fine to call him a pedo, that's free speech", he didn't look at it at all. As for lawtwitter, they know it's defamation just as much as Lemoine and Casey and etc know it's defamation. They've just taken it upon themselves to side with the defendants - likely because it'll give them more good boy pats - and so they willfully ignore facts, law, and everything else, and will twist anything possible to argue their side. It's literally their job to do that (or it used to be, or they'd like it to be)

A lawyer that says "All I actually care about is the facts" is probably lying to you, because lawyers are lying more often than they're not. Cuz lawyers. LawTwitter is extra lying. This case has nothing to do with them, people spread misinformation about the law all the time everywhere, this isn't anything that should concern them more than xyz random lawsuit or random knowitall who actually is a knownothing. They care because they've drawn their lines in the sand and chose the side they think they'll get the most of, and thus they will always twist things to align with their perspective. Lying and claiming they only care about the poor, abused facts is just a part of that.

Why they chose that side differs from person to person, but mostly seems to trace back to Popehat pee.
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, ThatAsianDuck, Confused Doggo and 13 others
Garm said:
I defer to your expertise. It looks like they have one appeal in 2006 where he is "John Chupp". Then it jumps to 2010 where he becomes "Honorable John Chupp." The infamous Episcopal Church case seems to be from around 2009 from Google searches.

These are just filings from participant lawyers I believe. The action the appeals court took regarding them is not mentioned.

Also I think Chupp had a more exceptional case than this one.

Avdeef V apparently every judge and town official.
Click to expand...

That guy appears to be some pro se nutjob suing people for a variety of incomprehensible things.

Allanon said:
They've just taken it upon themselves to side with the defendants - likely because it'll give them more good boy pats - and so they willfully ignore facts, law, and everything else, and will twist anything possible to argue their side. It's literally their job to do that (or it used to be, or they'd like it to be)
Click to expand...

Saying you believe the defendants because nobody ever lies about metoo accusations would at least be an honest position to stake out and clearly at least some of the defense partisans actually do believe this. Saying that accusing someone of rape and pedophilia is not per se defamation, though, is just lying, and anyone who has a law degree and knows better who says that is just flat out lying.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Confused Doggo, AStupidMonkey and 7 others
Random Internet Person said:
Wasn't Hitler also documented to be a Disney fan?
Click to expand...
He was a huge fan of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. He thought it was one of the greatest movies of their time considering a full length animated movie had never been done until Snow White. And went to great lengths to acquire a personal copy of the film for himself.
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ThatAsianDuck, Confused Doggo, Exterminatus and 11 others
theworstkindofeurofag said:
How did he get this

View attachment 970689

from this (quoted verbatim from Nick's video):

„What we have is a man with a 20 year career and we have a group of people who have come out with allegations that date back 7 to 10 years, sometimes longer. The allegations seem to be unsupported by anything other than their word. Their allegations are undermined by the fact that these allegations remained silent for so long and not only did the allegations remain silent, but the people making the allegations not only worked closely with Mr. Mignogna, but also were very, very openly friendly, and publicly and privately friendly, with Mr. Mignogna during the entire time."​
Click to expand...
See what out of context looks like
 
P5Fever said:
He was a huge fan of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. He thought it was one of the greatest movies of their time considering a full length animated movie had never been done until Snow White. And went to great lengths to acquire a personal copy of the film for himself.
Click to expand...

Would Hitler have been an animu?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dumb
Reactions: ColtWalker1847, Botchy Galoop, Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL and 5 others
P5Fever said:
Vito who is totally not KickVic and is definitely neutral is showing how very ultra neutral he is.
View attachment 971353
twitter.com

Monica Rial on Twitter

“Talk about incredible timing, tomorrow is my birthday. Thank you all for your support. It has meant the world to us. You inspired us to keep fighting for what’s right. And to all of the other survivors out there, this win is yours. I hope we have helped you find your voice. ❤️...
twitter.com twitter.com
But remember he’s definitely not KickVic. That’s why he sperged out at twitter nobodies who called him out on his hypocrisy a few weeks back then blocked them all.
Click to expand...

Excuse my lateness but I couldn't help but notice something about Sharon's tweet. Is it normal for an (aledged) reporter to write a piece about someone and @ them in the tweet where they advertise it? Just seems odd to me.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Late
  • Autistic
Reactions: Crabbo, ConSluttant, GenericReviewerDraco and 2 others
ZombiU&Me said:
Excuse my lateness but I couldn't help but notice something about Sharon's tweet. Is it normal for an (aledged) reporter to write a piece about someone and @ them in the tweet where they advertise it? Just seems odd to me.
Click to expand...
I think it is. Then again, I'm thinking about sports, where teams and athletes are subjects all the time and sometimes, accounts can have a sense of humor during games and taking shots at opponents.

P5Fever said:
He only accepts blond haired blue eyed waifus.
Click to expand...
I swear to God if Adolf Hitler got into anime and shipping...
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Confused Doggo and ZombiU&Me
ZombiU&Me said:
Excuse my lateness but I couldn't help but notice something about Sharon's tweet. Is it normal for an (aledged) reporter to write a piece about someone and @ them in the tweet where they advertise it? Just seems odd to me.
Click to expand...

I've seen celebrities tagged before but here it's obvious she's tagging because she's buying in to this bullshit.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Confused Doggo, AStupidMonkey and Roland Daggett
Hope I Twittered right.
View attachment 971643
twitter.com

CJ Black on Twitter

“#CJs2Cents: Whether Vic turns out to be guilty of these accusations against him or not doesn't matter. #roosterteeth...in your #RWBY Companion book, you credited Gray, J.J., Kathleen & even fucking Shane Newville for their parts in the show. But you credited NEITHER VA for Qrow...
twitter.com twitter.com

archive.is

Twitter

archived 15 Oct 2019 08:44:47 UTC
archive.is archive.is

Might be old news, but I haven’t seen it posted here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Confused Doggo and AStupidMonkey
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back