Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread


This is going to be a long case.

She's also fat.

retarded.jpg
 
Fat women are obsessed with believing they're attractive.

When in reality most people are in awe that the fat has begun to choke her brain functions.

Social justice logic is just a side effect of obesity.
(Powerleveling)Thank god my mother ain't one of them, hell she fucking hates SJW and constantly complains about people being politically correct. There are women that are fat but ain't useless ugly hags. People like Jamie should do herself a favor by eating a salad or two and exercising a little to get a toyboy or two instead of failing at trolling and being completely retarded on twitter.

This is going to be a long case.

She's also fat.

View attachment 985346

Omega OOF!
 
Jamie should be ignored, her infinite jabbering isn't worth talking to her because she'll just run away, deflect and post shitty memes and reaction gifs as answers instead of not acting like a sped.

You know what, not even gonna call her a sped because that's 100% offensive to actual speds.
 
You know it would be much easier to "dunk" on KF if you just do it directly. We know you're here, just make an account with a burner email, it's not that hard.
But then they'd be like that hypocritical cunt armzgurl, what with joining a known neo-nazi website dedicated to spreading terrorism, oppressing the gays, killing trannies, and not believing people are pedophiles without hard evidence.
 
You know it would be much easier to "dunk" on KF if you just do it directly. We know you're here, just make an account with a burner email, it's not that hard.
And have to deal with the evil patriarchy that believes facts and evidence, gives a shit about due process, doesn't believe all our problems are exclusively the fault of everyone else and we're all special and beautiful and stunning and brave for being fat losers that screech on social media all day? Never!
 
Really. Got any links, screenshots, or archives of this? Because that would be the first evidence of the person in that picture not being J.

You are also very confused. The redhead girl, Casey J Harwood, said this.
View attachment 984973
It is in reference to this photo lifted from vic's fansite and on the Jan 30th version of the ANN article. It was redacted on Feb 4th.
View attachment 985020
Not these series of photos.
View attachment 984997
The person in that photo is, according to ANN, "J". It exists nowhere else. It wasn't lifted from some fanpage like the others they got busted on. It was acquired some other way. It is still there on the article even after countless revisions. If you have proof of a person stepping forward and openly saying they are the person in the picture it would be the first bit of proof of that in this entire thread.

@mindlessobserver made a mistake in the OP insinuating Casey J Harwood is "J" from the ANN article. She isn't. "J" is the TCPA girl. Since the revision in February ANN has those photos quite clearly stating that they are "J".

I've searched pretty exhaustively for J, and while I have some suspicions as to who she is, it's like she walked into that convention, took a picture with Vic, then immediately left and saved the image for years just to use against him later. I can't seem to spot her anywhere in the background of any videos or images of NYCCC '14. Not making any of her other photos public is reasonable, but not showing up anywhere in panels or random convention videos is just bizarre.

View attachment 985099


Is there truth to this? I don't remember seeing anything like this. Even if it was true, Vic calls people who couldn't make it to the con all the time. Would like to see the proof that he wanted these "little girls" to come to his hotel room...

There's no proof of this, but if I can recall correctly, Vic was wont to give phone numbers to people for the fanclub. He would also sometimes have his fanclub en masse show up in his room. The specific claims of him giving his phone number or asking an individual underage girl to his room are nonsense that have never even been attached to a real person, much less proven. All they have is his number written on a notebook, apparently, which means nothing when staffmembers like Jennifer Lynn had vendettas against him and potential access to his number.

This is basically just a rehashing of the Roy Moore story, where he supposedly wrote his number in some girl's yearbook. But that's not surprising, as I am pretty sure Michelle's school story is pretty much a rip from Roy Moore's accusation, too.

View attachment 985339
Well shit isn't this like Inception. They take screenshots of us and now I'm taking screenshots of them taking screenshots of us.
View attachment 985349
View attachment 985350
View attachment 985354

What crawled up lawtwit's fannies, died, and made them start seething so hard at KF recently?
 
What crawled up lawtwit's fannies, died, and made them start seething so hard at KF recently?

The fact that after all of this shit happening we still don't fold. That we still take apart everything we find to get to the actual real truth of the matter. THAT'S what pisses them off so much. They want us to just go "Oh great minds of Lawtwitter please enlighten us fools for we have sinned!" but we don't. Instead several people here constantly show what fools lawtwitter are (Biggest Credit for that to @AnOminous ). They can't deal with this
 
The fact that after all of this shit happening we still don't fold. That we still take apart everything we find to get to the actual real truth of the matter. THAT'S what pisses them off so much. They want us to just go "Oh great minds of Lawtwitter please enlighten us fools for we have sinned!" but we don't. Instead several people here constantly show what fools lawtwitter are (Biggest Credit for that to @AnOminous ). They can't deal with this

I don't even use Twitter. I don't see any of this nonsense except what gets posted here and usually even ignore most of that.
 
EDIT: So there is indeed 3 girls. Casey is not the one in the TCPA filling. And I think you think Mary is, but she isn't either.
All 3 of them were in the article, but the one in the filling is the one I recall denying the article and asking KV to stop using her picture.
I don't remember who she is, but she certainly isn't Mary who is very obviously KV and explicitly confirmed the allegations.
Three had their pictures taken out of context and came forward, yes. Casey J Harwood (outright public denial), the curly-haired girl whose name escapes me (outright public denial), and Mary (photo used without permission). "J" is none of them. Nor was she ever presented to be any of them by ANN. In the OP by @mindlessobserver got confused and states that Casey J is "J". But as you can see that is incorrect.

"J" is someone entirely different than the three of them. Nobody has ever come forward claiming to be "J" and countering what was said in the ANN article. This is why KV uses that specific set of pictures and why they were in the TCPA etc.
Just looked over the ANN piece again and got pissed. Lynzee still kept all of these photos of fans with Vic up, she blurred out their faces so that the pictures look even more sinister. She admitted herself to scouring through Vic's fanpage and saving the pictures from there. All of these girls and women most likely support Vic, yet their photos of precious memories got used by Lynzee to hurt Vic.

The worst thing is, though, that she still has the photo of the red haired girl up. The same girl that explicitly and clearly stated several times that she's not okay with her picture being used to defame Vic.

View attachment 985126

Lynzee is pure scum and I hope to God we'll get to see her deposed one day.

Also, nice fact about the risembool rangers being underage. Bet she pulled that right out of her encrusted ass.
To be fair that is the archived Jan 30 version of the article, not the Feb 4 version. I had to dig to get it. When you google the article it directs to a version which does not contain pictures lifted from Vic's fansite and it makes very clear that the TCPA girl is "J". Here's a listing of all the edits made by ANN. You can see in the timeline where they got caught and purged the fansite photos and Lynzee made her half-assed retraction notice.

Is everybody clear on this now? Brunette in zip up hoodie that has a series of three pictures with Vic in the ANN article is "J". "J" is KV. Nobody has ever come forward with evidence to the contrary. Ok, good.
 
I don't even use Twitter. I don't see any of this nonsense except what gets posted here and usually even ignore most of that.
not sure if you misunderstand me but i didn't mean you directly oppose anything they say. I meant to say that you (and a number of other users, you just happened to be the one i see doing it most often) have allowed a lot of us less knowledgeable Kiwis learn about the law in this case. Which in turn leads to lawtwitter just looking stupid because their application tends to be "Fuck you i said so so it's true."
 
Three had their pictures taken out of context and came forward, yes. Casey J Harwood (outright public denial), the curly-haired girl whose name escapes me (outright public denial), and Mary (photo used without permission). "J" is none of them. Nor was she ever presented to be any of them by ANN. In the OP by @mindlessobserver got confused and states that Casey J is "J". But as you can see that is incorrect.

"J" is someone entirely different than the three of them. Nobody has ever come forward claiming to be "J" and countering what was said in the ANN article. This is why KV uses that specific set of pictures and why they were in the TCPA etc.

To be fair that is the archived Jan 30 version of the article, not the Feb 4 version. I had to dig to get it. When you google the article it directs to a version which does not contain pictures lifted from Vic's fansite and it makes very clear that the TCPA girl is "J". Here's a listing of all the edits made by ANN. You can see in the timeline where they got caught and purged the fansite photos and Lynzee made her half-assed retraction notice.

Is everybody clear on this now? Brunette in zip up hoodie that has a series of three pictures with Vic in the ANN article is "J". "J" is KV. Nobody has ever come forward with evidence to the contrary. Ok, good.

The fact that we can assume J is kickvic and has given permission for ANN and Rial to use her photograph like this can actually help in narrowing down who the person is. Their listed age is likely irrelevant, but they were clearly teenaged and likely 15-16 at most in 2014. They are white, and have had long brown hair before, which is likely their natural color. They either live in the area of NYC, or their family is well-to-do enough for them to go to NYC for a con that's also super expensive to get into. Given her lack of appearance in most places, I think she didn't participate much, which means she's probably a local.

J may be a part of her name, or it might not. But I suspect she's at least semi-prominent in kickvic even still, since she volunteered her photo for ANN (and is one of only maybe two who did) at the very beginning, and then also clearly agreed to have her photo front and center of Lemoine's TCPA response. She isn't likely an affiant, as they'd have used that story.
 
not sure if you misunderstand me but i didn't mean you directly oppose anything they say. I meant to say that you (and a number of other users, you just happened to be the one i see doing it most often) have allowed a lot of us less knowledgeable Kiwis learn about the law in this case. Which in turn leads to lawtwitter just looking stupid because their application tends to be "Fuck you i said so so it's true."
Well lawtwitters word pretty much doesn't matter, people care more about competence now more than ever given how Lawtwitter have behaved like complete fuckwards that don't have the maturity and professionalism that their job requires. in the past a lawyer like Nick would be laughed at as being a unremarkable lawyer but now the bar has gotten so low or his talents are that good (pick one or another) that he can be considered a very good lawyer.

Not only that both given that people are learning abit more about the law from lawyers like Nick and Ty talking on the livestream and getting interested in reading up on it. Pretty much gives person with a bit of common sense the ammo to debunk an actual lawyers bullshit and outright humiliate them.
 
not sure if you misunderstand me but i didn't mean you directly oppose anything they say. I meant to say that you (and a number of other users, you just happened to be the one i see doing it most often) have allowed a lot of us less knowledgeable Kiwis learn about the law in this case. Which in turn leads to lawtwitter just looking stupid because their application tends to be "Fuck you i said so so it's true."

I'm just saying anything I respond to is probably out of context and may be dumber than the usual output of whoever I'm responding to, other than particularly noxious and meretricious oafs like Greg Doucette, who genuinely is a repulsive person. The others may be better.
 
Back