Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Lemon Fuhrer actually did it!

1. Affidavit of Service of a Subpeona for Percy Tyrone Beard
2. Affidavit of Service of a Subpeona for Beard Harris Bullock & Hughes
3. Notice of Submission Hearing on Defendants Monica Rial and Ronald Toye’s Motion to Compel Deposition and Documents of Chris Slatosch.
4. Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and as Premature.
He did this the minute Nick is streaming. That madman
 
Lemon Fuhrer actually did it!

1. Affidavit of Service of a Subpeona for Percy Tyrone Beard
2. Affidavit of Service of a Subpeona for Beard Harris Bullock & Hughes
3. Notice of Submission Hearing on Defendants Monica Rial and Ronald Toye’s Motion to Compel Deposition and Documents of Chris Slatosch.
4. Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and as Premature.

The malignant bastard served notices of intent to subpoena Ty and BHBH. Not the actual subpoenas.

Shit or get off your shit throne, Lemon Fuhrer.
 
Lemon Fuhrer actually did it!

1. Affidavit of Service of a Notice of Intent of a Subpeona for Percy Tyrone Beard
2. Affidavit of Service of a Notice of Intent of a Subpeona for Beard Harris Bullock & Hughes
3. Notice of Submission Hearing on Defendants Monica Rial and Ronald Toye’s Motion to Compel Deposition and Documents of Chris Slatosch.
4. Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and as Premature.

Each of these were already in the pipeline on 10/23. We knew this was coming. This is not new, and Lemoine is a moron.
 
Anyone who could look at that atrocious font in that hideous document and call it good legal writing is a biased piece of shit. That format is objectively a war crime. No style manual will tell you to use small caps outside of law reviews which for some insane reason continue to use them albeit in very limited circumstances. They should never be used in a legal document, and if they must be used, they should only be used for brief headings, not for solid paragraphs of text.

They should absolutely never be used in legal writing outside of the extremely few uses the Bluebook recommends.

Dumbford is out of his fucking mind on this.
Maybe this strategy is dumb like a fox: You already know the judge is skimming as he reads, so why not use a font that encourages that? (Especially when you explicitly don't WANT the judge to read too closely.)
 
The malignant bastard served notices of intent to subpoena Ty and BHBH. Not the actual subpoenas.

Shit or get off your shit throne, Lemon Fuhrer.

What's the game here? Maximize his way out?

"I didn't actually subpoena them, therefore you can sanction me for subpoenaing them in a blatantly and obvious stupid move. By the way, my court costs went up like a billion dollars because of this, hee hee *WHEEZE* hee."
 
What's the game here? Maximize his way out?

"I didn't actually subpoena them, therefore you can sanction me for subpoenaing them in a blatantly and obvious stupid move. By the way, my court costs went up like a billion dollars because of this, hee hee *WHEEZE* hee."
Under absolutely no reading of the law is this covered by the TCPA, actually. Reasonable Fees does NOT include the costs incurred due to a personal crusade. In fact, nothing that Lemoine is doing here can be linked to the TCPA.
 
Under absolutely no reading of the law is this covered by the TCPA, actually. Reasonable Fees does NOT include the costs incurred due to a personal crusade. In fact, nothing that Lemoine is doing here can be linked to the TCPA.
I suspect it's less about TCPA now than it is about flinging up a cloud of ink and escaping in the confusion. He wants to crash the possibility of appeal beneath a flurry of useless paperwork.
 
I suspect it's less about TCPA now than it is about flinging up a cloud of ink and escaping in the confusion. He wants to crash the possibility of appeal beneath a flurry of useless paperwork.
There might be some secondary reach goals at play, like increasing his chance of sanctions, or trying to get evidence removed or at least thrown into doubt if in case the appeals court takes the case.

But I’m certain that the primary purpose to these filings is to disrupt the plaintiff’s counsel during the critical period where they’re working on the appeal itself. Resources have to be spent to respond to all of this fuckery, and those are resources that would be better served refining an appeal.
 
I hope someone flags Nick down and shows him this. I'm a broke bitch otherwise I would...if he hasn't seen this.

@TiltdownDove ? 🤔



Minor power level, I've been trying different Adderall dosages(prescription) the last month, and I been drinking OJ and going to bed about the time Nick streams to avoid sleepless nights while I'm still adjusting, so I won't be able to answer tags until the next day for about next week
 
Last edited:
There might be some secondary reach goals at play, like increasing his chance of sanctions, or trying to get evidence removed or at least thrown into doubt if in case the appeals court takes the case.

But I’m certain that the primary purpose to these filings is to disrupt the plaintiff’s counsel during the critical period where they’re working on the appeal itself. Resources have to be spent to respond to all of this fuckery, and those are resources that would be better served refining an appeal.
They're certainly trying to drain that GFM so Vic can't try a round 2. They're pants-shittingly terrified of that.
 
I've been thinking of this from every angle I could to make it make actual sense.

Fees: Doesn't make sense, this is entirely self-inflicted costs and would immediately fail even the loosest definition of "Reasonable Costs"
Sanctions: Also no. ONLY the judge has a say in the sanctions, Lemoine has no standing to try to force that at all.
Evidence Removal: Also no, the appellate decision is De Novo, meaning even if every single word of evidence was struck by Chupp, it would have no effect.
 
I've been thinking of this from every angle I could to make it make actual sense.

Fees: Doesn't make sense, this is entirely self-inflicted costs and would immediately fail even the loosest definition of "Reasonable Costs"
Sanctions: Also no. ONLY the judge has a say in the sanctions, Lemoine has no standing to try to force that at all.
Evidence Removal: Also no, the appellate decision is De Novo, meaning even if every single word of evidence was struck by Chupp, it would have no effect.

Lemoine’s language in his filings and letters seem to suggest that he’s at least under the impression that he’s entitled to discovery in order to show that the lawsuit was in bad faith. It’s likely he’s off base with that, but it could play into his reasoning even if he’s wrong.

On it’s face this is designed to question Slatosch’s credibility or otherwise intimidate him. Even if that doesn’t have bearing in the appeal itself, it’s clear that’s the long-term goal.

Although you gotta wonder why a lawyer supposedly confident in the full dismissal he already fucking won is working so hard to target a key witness.
 
Lemoine’s language in his filings and letters seem to suggest that he’s at least under the impression that he’s entitled to discovery in order to show that the lawsuit was in bad faith. It’s likely he’s off base with that, but it could play into his reasoning even if he’s wrong.

On it’s face this is designed to question Slatosch’s credibility or otherwise intimidate him. Even if that doesn’t have bearing in the appeal itself, it’s clear that’s the long-term goal.

Although you gotta wonder why a lawyer supposedly confident in the full dismissal he already fucking won is working so hard to target a key witness.

I did notice they also made mention of Stahlin & Huber. So it might be the meager beginnings to a bigger sperg unless someone shoots it down early.

1572546008442.png
 
I did notice they also made mention of Stahlin & Huber. So it might be the meager beginnings to a bigger sperg unless someone shoots it down early.

View attachment 992179
So lemoine is going full retard and unleashing the Mother Of All Tismstorms, and the only way to stop him is for Chupp to take notice, realize what's going on, and do the right thing.

Holy shit. All hands on deck, prepare for collision! This is not a simulation! The day has coooooomeeee!!!! REPENT YOU FOOLS!
 
Return of Service and DEPOSITION SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM of Chris Slatosch:

Does Lemwah even know what he wants with this deposition?
In the filing yesterday he claimed he wanted it to be written documents only, and held at the courthouse before Judge Chupp on the 7th
And now we're back to 1st of November, at that Hilton suites place in Odessa, with the box to have Slatosch show up in person ticked.

1572549069426.png

1572549103476.png
Delivered 30th, signed under oath 31st. The request for subpoena still doesn't met the days required to notice a witness.

1572549207999.png
He still wants it to happen tomorrow. at 10:30 pm. I think he's trying to get Slatosch in contempt of court or some weird shit. Chris will still have to be noticed 30 business days in advance for it to be a legit thing.....Maybe he kinda decided to go full out LAWYERING when he thought the chap didn't have a lawyer.
 
Last edited:
Does Lemwah even know what he wants with this deposition?
In the filing yesterday he claimed he wanted it to be written documents only, and held at the courthouse before Judge Chupp on the 7th
And now we're back to 1st of November, at that Hilton suites place in Odessa, with the box to have Slatosch show up in person ticked.

View attachment 992253

View attachment 992255
Delivered 30th, signed under oath 31st. The request for subpoena still doesn't met the days required to notice a witness.

View attachment 992256
He still wants it to happen tomorrow. at 10:30 pm. I think he's trying to get Slatosch in contempt of court or some weird shit.
This is completely improper.
 
Slatosh still doesn't have to show right? Is lemoine trying to scare him?
 
Back