Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

The Decimator said:
I’ve got some more hot takes from KickVic:

View attachment 1007334View attachment 1007333
Click to expand...
can someone please fucking tell me why the only word that comes out of all these people mouths including shanes is that vic is a creep?

its legitimately the only word i ever see as these people describe vic as being a creep,

the oldest so called victim in this shit happened 30 years ago and in 30 years not a single picture, recording of him doing anything close to being a creep.
the only thing that comes close is people taking vics coffee line out of context.

these niggas are litreally living off the words of the defendants as if they cant lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, OldAmishRenegade, Seraphic_Vishnal and 4 others
SpiralStars said:
This had me thinking that media and others see Anti-SLAPP as a tool that will allow them to defame people without consequence. I think there's a 3rd place I've heard Anti-SLAPP recently. It's all about shoring up cancel culture.

I'm not a big fan of the guy in the Oliver story, but I don't trust anything Oliver says about him. Time and time again the John Oliver type Pretend News Anchor have been caught making shit up and they say but we're a comedy show and not required to be accurate like a real news outlet. This is true. But it's also true 95% of their audience believe they are just lampooning actual true news. It's also true they know that which in my opinion makes them scummy.
Click to expand...

Speaking of John Oliver.

Screenshot (547).png

Screenshot (548).png

twitter.com

Mark Methenitis on Twitter

“Hey @iamjohnoliver @LastWeekTonight, if you want to look into the absurd nexus where a SLAPP suit is used to silence victims in a #MeToo context, you should check out this lawsuit... https://t.co/3jEEQ9YMyo”
twitter.com twitter.com
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
Reactions: Seraphic_Vishnal, theworstkindofeurofag, The Decimator and 7 others
Junk Dog said:
Speaking of John Oliver.

View attachment 1007342
View attachment 1007344
Click to expand...
I'm sure John Oliver would love to talk about chinese cartoon voice actors having a legal battle over whether it's ok to call someone a pedophile/predator and take away his business over allegations. /sneed
Edit:
Kill all whales said:

With people like them you can't reason with them or try understand their views.theyre sheep that believes anything the defendants say,anything the defendants say they take their word as fact.

In the end their is no convincing people like them they believe that they're so right that they can't comprehend the fact that might be wrong.
Click to expand...
How the fuck did you even do that?
1573595625919.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Seraphic_Vishnal, Mr. 0, P5Fever and 1 other person
Much Ado About Nothing said:
Here you will see Kessler Collins, P.C.; Monica Rial ; and Ronald Toye listed as 'clients'.
I am not sure who P.C. is? Since Kessler and Collins are Casey's firm. And Andrea is in Carrington and Coleman?
P.C.= PINKER COX most likely. Which is Volney and team Funi!!
Click to expand...
Look closely at the punctuation.
It's:
- Kessler Collins, P.C.
- Monica Rial
- Ronald Toye

I don't know what P.C. stands for, but it goes with Kessler Collins, the full name of the company is "Kessler Collins, P.C."
You can see it on the bottom right of their website too: https://www.kesslercollins.com/ (in the copyright)
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Seraphic_Vishnal, Yuusha-sama, Army Burger and 1 other person
Mister Y said:
Look closely at the punctuation.
It's:
- Kessler Collins, P.C.
- Monica Rial
- Ronald Toye

I don't know what P.C. stands for, but it goes with Kessler Collins, the full name of the company is "Kessler Collins, P.C."
You can see it on the bottom right of their website too: https://www.kesslercollins.com/ (in the copyright)
Click to expand...

@secondclass Pointed out in the lawthread that it stood for Professional Corporation. Which is correct. I checked out the webpage and editing my post to reflect it!
Thank you guys for noticing! don't want people accused for someone else's mess!
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Baked_Potato and Yuusha-sama
PrinceofAllCucks said:
I'm sure John Oliver would love to talk about chinese cartoon voice actors having a legal battle over whether it's ok to call someone a pedophile/predator and take away his business over allegations. /sneed
Edit:

How the fuck did you even do that?
View attachment 1007348
Click to expand...
Shit I've fucked up I was typing when I press entered it just came out like that.know if you excuse me I knew to go and fix it. it's probably a glitch.
 
Junk Dog said:
View attachment 1007350
View attachment 1007352

The defendants won by having their request to depose Slatosch denied? And Chupp is siding with them? Lol, am I missing something here?

twitter.com

Shane Holmberg on Twitter

“The defendants won again. Judge Chupp sides with the defendants on the latest proposed motions. https://t.co/4VIfM53d5A”
twitter.com twitter.com
Archive
Click to expand...
Am i fucking dyslexic or fucking braindead or something? The PDF clearly says that the defendants were denied.
 
Mister Y said:
Said "win" is Chupp saying: You want to ask again if you can depose Slatosch in the next hearing, ok you'll will get to ask again, now stop bothering me.
Now, I would laught my ass off if Chupp just said Lemoine: Well, you asked again, and guess what, the answer is still no.
Click to expand...

Or imagine if he used the date against him
I'm sorry Lemwah, you said the Nov 21st, this is now January and appeals, sorry!
 
Junk Dog said:
View attachment 1007350
View attachment 1007352

The defendants won by having their request to depose Slatosch denied? And Chupp is siding with them? Lol, am I missing something here?

twitter.com

Shane Holmberg on Twitter

“The defendants won again. Judge Chupp sides with the defendants on the latest proposed motions. https://t.co/4VIfM53d5A”
twitter.com twitter.com
Archive
Click to expand...
I feel dumb very dumb right now,shane stupidity never fucking ends I'm getting tiredof Shane's bullshit.

Hey @Shane_Yes_That_One are you fucking autistc, it clearly says the request to depose Slatosch has been denied do I need to spell it for you so you can understand or is it too much for you to understand?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, Seraphic_Vishnal, Rondo Richter Belmont and 1 other person
Much Ado About Nothing said:
Or imagine if he used the date against him
I'm sorry Lemwah, you said the Nov 21st, this is now January and appeals, sorry!
Click to expand...
The real question is would that be the easiest route for chupp to take?

Kill all whales said:
I feel dumb very dumb right now,shane stupidity never fucking ends I'm getting of Shane's bullshit. Hey @Shane_Yes_That_One are you fucking autistc, it clearly says the request to depose Slatosch has been denied.
Click to expand...

He was thread banned here because he cant behave himself. I would take this question to his board if you want him to maybe answer.
 
Much Ado About Nothing said:
Or imagine if he used the date against him
I'm sorry Lemwah, you said the Nov 21st, this is now January and appeals, sorry!
Click to expand...
There is a hearing Nov 21st.
Lemoine wanted to be able to ask to depose Slatosch again during that hearing.
Ty was opposed to writting in the order that the defendants would be allowed to "reurge" the question during the hearing.
Lemoine sent a letter to Chupp complaining about Ty not allowing him to put that in the order.
Chupp apparently allowed Lemoine to do as he wanted.
Now Lemoine will get to ask again to depose Slatosch.

My guess is that Chupp just wanted to shup him up, and will let him sperg during the hearing before denying it again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, EmuWarsVeteran, Seraphic_Vishnal and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back