- Joined
- Jun 18, 2019
That's why Lucas grounded it in the culture of the day, which is especially apparent in ROTS. Like you can read a lot of Vietnam into the OT, you can read a lot of the attitudes of the late 90s into TPM, where you can see worries about the US's role as sole superpower and criticism of its politics (the villain is "Nute Gunray", enough said). AOTC has some criticism of Bush and government unaccountability plus reflects the uncertainty of the post-9/11 era (including fighting on Geonosis, a desert planet, as the "first battle of the Clone Wars", like Afghanistan was the first battleground of the War on Terror). ROTS is totally anti-Bush and criticizes his expansion of government powers and his global wars ("so this is how liberty dies").
At the same time, none of these Star Wars movies bashes you over the head with its politics. As I've said, one thing I'm glad about is Disney's Soy Wars movies is the movies themselves aren't too political and rely on statements by the producers to make them political. Aside from maybe Solo (which no one, including the writers, could decide if the "Droid Lives Matter" droid was a parody or a serious take since the movie's production was a clusterfuck), there's no real blatant insertion of politics into the movies and they don't even have characters with names like Nute Gunray or Lott Dodd in the movies, so no "Tronald Dumpf" or whatever. I don't think the feminism in TLJ is any more blatant than the anti-Bush stuff in ROTS and is only worse because of godawful writing and directing and politically because modern feminism is shit while GW Bush actually was a shit president.
Battleship Potemkin is a pretty damn classic silent film (although that's a different style of acting) and it's literal communist propaganda.
Wasn't Attack of The Clones actually filmed in 2000? Which would make the War on Terror parallels an interesting coincidence, but The Phantom Menace could also be said to anticipate the War on Terror in a way.
Last edited: