Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Dumb Bitch Smoothie said:
Nope. I think he was just making the comment to Chupp when Chupp was talking about Lemoine charging five times as much as Johnson despite Johnson being the only lawyer who got out clean on the first go.
Click to expand...
Oh. Damn and here I was hoping Johnson accidentally admitted to something damaging(not against himself obviously).
 
  • Feels
Reactions: P5Fever
theworstkindofeurofag said:
Could it be that Chupp has a problem with Vic moving his house into a trust fund? Some lawsperg said that Chupp called that "fraudulent", but that was a lawtwitter sperg, so not trustworthy.

Could Vic doing that be interpreted as fraudulent by Chupp? And if so, for what reasons? What kind of consequences could this have?
Click to expand...

Protecting your assets seem to be a BHBC specialty so I doubt anything illegal would come of it and it would be a waste of time to pursue that.
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL, Exterminatus and 9 others
My rendition of what happened with Sharon after she was exposed to the insane levels of Chad Vic emits
1574448246410.png
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Winner
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Kosher Salt, ConSluttant, Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL and 23 others
I'm reaching here, and I mean reaching.

Volney is the one person NO ONE has commented on. From what I can see, at least. We saw a minimal commentary from Johnson but imo his billing was clear and mostly fair. No real reason to ask much of him other than to pin Lemoine to the wall.

I wonder if Volney's testimony versus Lemoine's, especially with Funimation being heavily involved in the beginning under Casey, flipped a switch on in Chupp's mind.

I am probably absolutely wrong but I've wondered why we heard nothing public about Funi and Volney.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: I Love Beef, Hotfartz :), P5Fever and 2 others
The only thing likely to happen with this
more motions to depose people from Lemonhead fuhrerhead
quickthrowaway said:
You guys are cute. It's just Chump procrastinating. He was the kid in University who would ask for an extension on the day of deadline.
Click to expand...
Dumb Bitch Smoothie said:
Furthermore, the faster he makes a decision the faster he can push it out of his mind and just enjoy the upcoming holiday.
Click to expand...
don't know about this - why take his time on this part when he royally fscked the previous one.

if any part of the appeal succeeds then surely any ruling he makes here is vacated.

Any time he spends on this is a complete waste.
His priorities appear (from the outside looking in) so out of whack - the motion(s) to spend time on were the previous ones, NOT this one.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Hotfartz :), OldAmishRenegade and theworstkindofeurofag
Prefacing this shit as I'm not a lawyer, but the trust issue with Vic (and I'm not at a spot with tabs for a computer).

By signing his house to his mother and she making a trust with Beard, Vic may have sought to retain control of the house. That's fine. I didn't see if he did it as revocable or irrevocable. If revocable then Monica/Ron/Jamie/Funimation can step in and revert it back, sell the house for cash. Also there was no mention (or I'm too much of a boomer to see it) if Vic funded said trust.

Chupp raising the eyebrow is because it was done after the reversal and before the fees argument. It can be seen as Vic trying to hide his shit so he can claim being broke. Regardless of how quickly he can liquidate assets, he still has them. And if he can claim no assets he may be judgement proof.

So in other words: Is this an irrevocable trust? Was it funded? And why 'after' the TCPA did it happen? Made it seem as if he was trying to hide. IMO would have been better to deed it to Mom for said trust back in May / June.

Might a lawyer check my logic here?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Hotfartz :), theworstkindofeurofag, Rondo Richter Belmont and 1 other person
GenericReviewerDraco said:

Kira (@YouFoundKira) | Twitter

The latest Tweets from Kira (@YouFoundKira). Con Staff. Skater who loves to go fast
twitter.com twitter.com


View attachment 1020186
View attachment 1020188
We are gonna have to wait till Monday-Wednesday of next week.
Click to expand...

This is the equivalent of a sporting event last-minute interrupting the broadcast schedule of your favorite anime while it's on a cliffhanger, pushing it back a week.

Watch "early" turn out to be "Wednesday".
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: P5Fever, theworstkindofeurofag, Allanon and 2 others
Kari Kamiya said:
This is the equivalent of a sporting event last-minute interrupting the broadcast schedule of your favorite anime while it's on a cliffhanger, pushing it back a week.

Watch "early" turn out to be "Wednesday".
Click to expand...

For those who thought Sharon Grigsby was teeing up the judge to knock Vic down in an update this morning, now her article stands as is throughout the weekend.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Exterminatus, OldAmishRenegade, P5Fever and 7 others
GenericReviewerDraco said:

Kira (@YouFoundKira) | Twitter

The latest Tweets from Kira (@YouFoundKira). Con Staff. Skater who loves to go fast
twitter.com twitter.com


View attachment 1020186
View attachment 1020188
We are gonna have to wait till Monday-Wednesday of next week.
Click to expand...
I hope he doesn't reverse one of his rulings. As Nick has said, the worst outcome is TI on Ron as that would delay appeal until after trial. There was something in Lemon's submissions on charges that caught Nick's attention that looked like it could force a reconsideration on TI. Perhaps it was bait. Getting a single TI charge reversed is the best outcome for Lemon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldAmishRenegade and P5Fever
MadPanda said:
Guy blueballs worse than Nick.



You know the other thing that makes me press X to doubt is that Sharon did not bring that up in her paper. I am betting that would have been slipped in if true.
Click to expand...

Her eyes might have glazed over during anything about money and math because it made her girl brain freeze up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: P5Fever
diskboomer said:
Of course a tard cum guzzler thinks perjury, and liability is just how it's done. Yet if something similar happened to Vic, and Ty......


View attachment 1014547

archive.md

Twitter

archived 18 Nov 2019 21:19:18 UTC
archive.md archive.md

View attachment 1014550
View attachment 1014551
View attachment 1014549
View attachment 1014548
Click to expand...
Replying to bump this. Notable that the claim of "Vicarious Liability" was dismissed because:
"The court (found) that Defendants have shown by preponderance of the evidence that the Defendants Marchi, Rial and Toye were Independent Contractors at all times while associated with Defendant Funimation. The Court additionally (found) that (Vic) has failed to establish, by clear and specific evidence, a prima facie case for each element of his vicarious liability claim against Defendant Funimation."
This may call that decision into question. (that said, if everything else is dismissed, I don't see how the Vicarious Liability is at all relevant anyway, but just noteworthy)

One "Hail Mary", remote possibility (highly unlikely IMO, but "possible") is a reconsideration of what is going on here. The POINT of TCPA is to prevent a person or entity from bullying defendants into silence by forcing them through prolonged legal fights they can't afford. The few excerpts and tactics that have been rumored or confirmed in this hearing seems like it should dispute that's what was going on. If anything, JSL's tactics seem clearly designed to maliciously ruin Vic financially at the end of this. I wonder if the attempt to go after Slatosch might've overplayed their hand.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: I Love Beef, Hotfartz :), OldAmishRenegade and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back