War Trump says U.S. will designate Mexican drug cartels as terrorists - Time for Mexico to get liberated

Trump says U.S. to designate Mexican drug cartels as terrorists

U.S. President Donald Trump said he will designate Mexican drug cartels as terro...

www.reuters.com

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said in an interview aired on Tuesday that he will designate Mexican drug cartels as terrorists over their role in drug and human trafficking.

“They will be designated ... I have been working on that for the last 90 days. You know, designation is not that easy, you have to go through a process, and we are well into that process,” Trump said in an interview with conservative media personality Bill O’Reilly that aired on Tuesday.

Once a group is designated as a terrorist organization, under U.S. law it is illegal for people in the United States to knowingly offer support and its members cannot enter the country and may be deported. Financial institutions that become aware they have funds connected to the group must block the money and alert the U.S. Treasury Department.

Mexico’s government did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Mexico’s foreign minister, Marcelo Ebrard, said on Monday he did not expect the United States to make such a move.

Earlier this month, Trump, in a tweet, offered to help Mexico “wage WAR on the drug cartels and wipe them off the face of the earth.”

The proposal came after nine Americans were killed in an ambush in northern Mexico.

Mexican authorities said they may have been victims of mistaken identity amid confrontations among drug gangs in the area.

But the LeBaron extended family, members of a breakaway Mormon community that settled in northern Mexico decades ago, has often been in conflict with drug traffickers in Chihuahua and victims’ relatives said the killers must have known who they were targeting.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Better be careful, Drumpf. Big, bad Amlo won't be letting anything happen to his boys.



But seriously, what could he even do about it if the US just started droning the fuck out their jungles? It's not like any of our allies would do anything other than making a strongly worded statement.

What happened to gulags and based communists like Stalin or Best Korea. Stalin would have cleaned with Mexico real good. Where do all these spineless cucks come from?

 

[AnOminous]

But seriously, what could he even do about it if the US just started droning the fuck out their jungles?

Cry like a bitch while taking another bag full of money from the cartels.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

So, they are bitching about the US bailing them out of their cartel problem?

We should have annexed the entire country when we had control of Mexico City in the Mexican American War.

 

[mindlessobserver]

So, they are bitching about the US bailing them out of their cartel problem?

We should have annexed the entire country when we had control of Mexico City in the Mexican American War.

But then we would have had more States to fight over who would be slave and who would be free. But worse and far more important then the fate of some negroes would be introducing a huge voting block of papist catholics. Before we had turned around half the senators in Washington would have been taking orders from Rome and the antichrist himself. It could not be borne.

(Seriously that is why the US didnt just annex the whole place)

 

[pwnest injun]

Cry like a bitch while taking another bag full of money from the cartels.

Or empty out all their prisons at our borders, oh wait they already do that sometimes.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

But then we would have had more States to fight over who would be slave and who would be free. But worse and far more important then the fate of some negroes would be introducing a huge voting block of papist catholics. Before we had turned around half the senators in Washington would have been taking orders from Rome and the antichrist himself. It could not be borne.

(Seriously that is why the US didnt just annex the whole place)

I Mean, we don't have to make them states instantly, we wait 20 years while we beat the Catholics into submission, as they deserve to be.

 

[AnOminous]

So, they are bitching about the US bailing them out of their cartel problem?

They might be advised to remember we didn't take it too well when the Taliban rebuffed our offer to help them with Osama. It starts to look like they're actually actively harboring enemies who are attacking U.S. citizens.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

They might be advised to remember we didn't take it too well when the Taliban rebuffed our offer to help them with Osama. It starts to look like they're actually actively harboring enemies who are attacking U.S. citizens.

While I am completely against any sort of long term military action in Mexico..I can't help but say..

ARE YOU READY?
I SAID ARE YOU REAAAADDDDYYYY?!
THEN FOR THE THOUSANDS IN ATTENDANCE AND THE MILLIONS WATCHING AROUND THE WOOOORLLLDDD
LETS GET READY TO RUBBLEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

 

[JohnDoe]

It has been a long time since we had a war with Mexico. Might be time again.

 

[Dom Cruise]

So, they are bitching about the US bailing them out of their cartel problem?

We should have annexed the entire country when we had control of Mexico City in the Mexican American War.

Hell, I say we should still just say fuck it and annex it, illegal immigration issue solved!

While I am completely against any sort of long term military action in Mexico..I can't help but say..

ARE YOU READY?
I SAID ARE YOU REAAAADDDDYYYY?!
THEN FOR THE THOUSANDS IN ATTENDANCE AND THE MILLIONS WATCHING AROUND THE WOOOORLLLDDD
LETS GET READY TO RUBBLEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

America needs another war where we unequivocally kick some ass again to get some of our confidence back.

This is part of what’s gone wrong with the US, we wanted to kick some ass after 9/11 but it didn’t go well, Bush was hubristic and overextended ourselves and it all went poorly and really shook up our self confidence, just like Vietnam.

While obviously I want to avoid another Vietnam/Iraq scenario, the difference with México is how many of your average Juans there would really give a shit if they suddenly became part of the US? They might even be happy and even if they didn’t like it, how many would be willing to die over it?

Some of course, but Mexico is lacking a cult like Islam or Communism to really make the populace ready to die, once we take out the cartels, it’d be basically be over with, wouldn’t it? I just don’t see Mexicans acting like Arabs or Commies over it.

 

[The Last Stand]

While obviously I want to avoid another Vietnam/Iraq scenario, the difference with México is how many of your average Juans there would really give a shit if they suddenly became part of the US? They might even be happy and even if they didn’t like it, how many would be willing to die over it?

Reclaim the Mexicans' land for the US. We could have about 20 new states in the process. That way we don't have to worry about immigration.

 

[Unog]

Reclaim the Mexicans' land for the US. We could have about 20 new states in the process. That way we don't have to worry about immigration.

Yeah, twenty whole new states worth of Democrat, socialist voters.

Just what we need.

 

[benithedude]

View attachment 1027382

If only we could erect some defensive barrier to keep them out, perhaps a great wall manned with military personnel. Or, maybe, you know, we could just put up a tall fence without any watchtowers, one that allows drugs to continue to flow freely. That'd be cool be too.

some surveillance cameras with motion or heat sensors will do the trick , and not as costly as a wall

 

[Unog]

some surveillance cameras with motion or heat sensors will do the trick , and not as costly as a wall

The point is to impede ingress, not surveillance.

Unless you're insinuating that there'll be guns attached to those cameras.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

I wonder if they're going to find any "cartel activity" in those brand new harbors China built in Mexico...
Only one way to find out, lol!

This alone makes it totally legit-the Chinese are transporting chemical precursors needed for meth production, not to mention fentanyl, to Mexico for the cartels. It's a hostile action, if not an act of war, against the US.

 

[benithedude]

The point is to impede ingress, not surveillance.

Unless you're insinuating that there'll be guns attached to those cameras.

the point is to locate them and recover them

 

[Unog]

the point is to locate them and recover them

Or you could just have a physical barrier and not need to waste the man-hours searching for someone who's long gone by the time the border patrol folks get there.

Also it'd get pretty fucking expensive having to replace the cameras that would certainly be broken by illegals.

 

[TaimuRadiu]

So, they are bitching about the US bailing them out of their cartel problem?

We should have annexed the entire country when we had control of Mexico City in the Mexican American War.

Blame the future Confederacy for that, they thought cheap Mexican labor would devalue their niggers.

If you take anything away from this post, it's fuck Texas.

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

Mexico is an incurable infectious disease and anyone who thinks we can fix it or help it at all is a fool. Bombing cartels will do nothing but waste resources because new ones will pop up immediately. Actively annexing any part of Mexico is effectly comitting societal suicide via pos-loading our collective neg-holes. I don't know how anyone can look at the cartel and Hispanic gang activity in this nation, the political corruption in areas with high Hispanic density, and things like the Hispanic high-school drop out and teen pregnancy rate and think we're at all winning the cultural battle, or that getting even more involved with these people's collective dysfunction is a good idea. Let Mexico rot in it's own filth and focus on keeping that filth from further creeping into our yard.

 

[pwnest injun]

I wonder if Mexico would shut down the border if we assassinated a cartel leader?