You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CareercowRobert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic
So when Bob finally drops his Lord of the Rings video which one of us is gonna suffer through it?
Because if this drivel is any indication than Really That Good Lord of the Rings will be one of the worst things ever.
He's probably going to bitch about White Nationalism and then pull from his ass that Tolkien fought against the germans which meant he also was anti-west and "pro-diversity" just like modern day cosmopolitans and probably cite the bullshit Tolkien's son said about the movies not being in "the true vision" despite the estate greenlighting bullshit like the Dwarves having a medieval WMD.
Tolkien was pro-british and modeled the hobbits after them, he would have fucking hated modern british politics and not only would have probably voted for Brexit but would have wanted the entire fucking EU burned down as a condition.
Tolkien was pro-british and modeled the hobbits after them, he would have fucking hated modern british politics and not only would have probably voted for Brexit but would have wanted the entire fucking EU burned down as a condition.
Weirdly, a lot of your older Brits are uncomfortable (to put it mildly) with being a member of a European quasi-nation state where Germany effectively calls all the shots.
I’ve never understood why Americans on both sides are so obsessed with the EU.
Like either it’s the most fantastic idea ever or it’s blatantly offensive that somebody even thought of it. I don’t see why I should really give a fuck, personally, they can form or not form whatever unions they want.
I’ve never understood why Americans on both sides are so obsessed with the EU.
Like either it’s the most fantastic idea ever or it’s blatantly offensive that somebody even thought of it. I don’t see why I should really give a fuck, personally, they can form or not form whatever unions they want.
Imagine being so thristy that you back up this idiocy:
This is rich coming from the guy who went full defense force for the disney star wars. But besides that, I can't recall other big "prophecy hero" in the recent american block buster shit.
The Marvel capeshit crap is always the same, even if the hero gains it's power or are born with it, they always need to get the obligatory end of act 2 beating so the they rise on the climax. The exception being Captain Marvel (har). And.. i dunno, i haven't watched a lot of block buster hero stuff lately, after end game I'm done with capeshit, so I dunno about spiderman or any of that crap.
Either way, I don't give a shit about what fucken Naomi Wu has to say, she is an actress and a dum-dum anb her basic bitch complains shows it. The funny stuff is that since she tweeted something aking to "I like moviebob's videos", Robert has been retweeting even her farts, it's pretty sad to see someone carrying such a torch on social media like this.
But, I guess, for Robert it's just another day on his pathetic little life...
Man, Bob wanting a movie to appeal to actual authoritarians who run actual death camps where they harvest and sell human body parts from the millions of wrongfully imprisoned civilians who are only in there because of their race and religious belief. The Chinese and North Koreans are probably the closest thing to actual nazis than anything that exists today.
Hero's Journey is one of the great conflicts and there's only a handful of them throughout any form of literature or media. It's a story structure not a genre.
This is rich coming from the guy who went full defense force for the disney star wars. But besides that, I can't recall other big "prophecy hero" in the recent american block buster shit.
The Marvel capeshit crap is always the same, even if the hero gains it's power or are born with it, they always need to get the obligatory end of act 2 beating so the they rise on the climax. The exception being Captain Marvel (har). And.. i dunno, i haven't watched a lot of block buster hero stuff lately, after end game I'm done with capeshit, so I dunno about spiderman or any of that crap.
Either way, I don't give a shit about what fucken Naomi Wu has to say, she is an actress and a dum-dum anb her basic bitch complains shows it. The funny stuff is that since she tweeted something aking to "I like moviebob's videos", Robert has been retweeting even her farts, it's pretty sad to see someone carrying such a torch on social media like this.
But, I guess, for Robert it's just another day on his pathetic little life...
This is rich coming from the guy who went full defense force for the disney star wars. But besides that, I can't recall other big "prophecy hero" in the recent american block buster shit.
The Marvel capeshit crap is always the same, even if the hero gains it's power or are born with it, they always need to get the obligatory end of act 2 beating so the they rise on the climax. The exception being Captain Marvel (har). And.. i dunno, i haven't watched a lot of block buster hero stuff lately, after end game I'm done with capeshit, so I dunno about spiderman or any of that crap.
Either way, I don't give a shit about what fucken Naomi Wu has to say, she is an actress and a dum-dum anb her basic bitch complains shows it. The funny stuff is that since she tweeted something aking to "I like moviebob's videos", Robert has been retweeting even her farts, it's pretty sad to see someone carrying such a torch on social media like this.
But, I guess, for Robert it's just another day on his pathetic little life...
The worst thing she ever did on twitter was encourage Bob. I was curious about him and her so I looked into their interaction. He's definitely been going after her far more than she to him. Their first interaction was on September 16, 2019. The context of their meet cute and what we know about Bobbyboi made this particularly hilarious to me.
I'm not sure what set Bob off the most, the mention of GobbledeeGook, being weary of the potential of weirdos hiding behind being trans, or acknowledging that Jake looks like a homeless bottom bear? These are the mysteries.
Oh god. After picking at this minute by minute thru Bob's constant vocal diarrhea, I have watched the entire thing and will now present as I've done before, the
TL;DW: "REALLY THAT GOOD: STAR WARS"
-Ten minute intro of saying: " I have nothing new to say about Star Wars. Evrerybody has already analyzed the franchise to hell and back. So lets try to review STAR WARS standalone."
BASICS
-Bob starts talking about how the story is solid and the then-unheard-of-for-science-fiction great attention to special effects and design make the Star Wars story feel more epic and unique, despite borrowing so much from older sci-fi, fantasy adventure, and more familiar wartime stories from the 60s.
-STAR WARS' characters themselves aren't that fleshed out, ignoring supplemental media. Everyone except Han Solo don't have much in the way of a character arc.
-Stuff like the romance or the dark side of the force explanation is not present here. It overall makes the movie much more standalone, though at the same time much more lacking in mystery.
-INFLUENCE: It made SCI-FI from cheap pulpy adventure movies into blockbusters like alien.
AUTEUR THEORY
-20 minutes in Bob starts talking about auteur theory in a weird french setting.
-then compares Star Wars to the Godfather, as they were both auteur driven movies bringing their respective genres into popularity
-He segways this auteur theory talk into how George Lucas is a very weird person, much to Star Wars' benefit, as it makes Star Wars very unique and Subversive for its time.
SUBVERSIONS
-HOT BOB TAKE: Star Wars has always been Subversive.
-Bob cites the beginning of the movie as subversive as it's all action but confusing, you see all this space and robot stuff that doesn't make sense until you get to Luke 15 minutes into the movie itself.
-Bob cites another subversive part of the first movie is when Ben shows luke the lightsaber, as similar to THE LAST JEDI, it is regarded as not that important, other than a tool for exposition.
-Bob claims that this scene was supposed to subvert the iconic king arthur scene of pulling the sword from the stone.
-Once we get introduced to Luke and Ben we head straight into the cantina scene, another very alien and confusing scene, used to immerse the audience into Star Wars' uniques universe.
CHARACTERS
-Bob begins talking about Luke, how he was an unconventionally young protagonist for the time. Compared to Han Solo, which in another movie he would've been the main character.
-Speaking of Han Solo, Bob now starts talking about how Han Solo is the grounded sane man in the wacky world of Star Wars.
-Star Wars has a lot of references that come from samurai, King Arthur, and Flash Gordon that make the world unique but very difficult to follow.
-Han Solo helps the audience acclimate to the world by acting as an audience surrogate. Like how he doesn't believe in the force much like the audience would watching the movie for the first time.
-Bob says that without a Han Solo type character this is where the other movies start to falter, though this time he doesn't get into details.
THEMES
Bob does not believe this movies is apolitical nor the people who say it is. Star Wars has many themes but the main theme of the movie is WAR, and war has always been political since the dawn of history.
MINUTE 52
-Bob cites that war is political thru AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR as it has politicals as well. Thanos' motive is similar to the very real Malthusian Beliefs on population.
-Was has always been a main feature of American history and culture. It has been a staple of American media as well until the Vietnam war where it lost popularity.
-Star Wars works as it is a War movie with under the guise of Science Fiction.
-The Empire and rebels are a Broad strokes mixture of real historical military factions that are vague enough to cause any offense.
Minute 62
-Bob for some reason addresses the Star Wars vs. Star Trek debate. As how many people would dismiss Star Wars as Fantasy, not "true" Sci-fi.
-Bob refutes by downplaying the "force" aspect of Star Wars back in the first movie it is treated like a religion rather than actual magic with rules compared to the sequels and expanded media.
-then he claims the force is no different as a religion than the doctrine vulcans follow.
-MINUTE 67 : STAR WARS IS TIMELESS.
-Bob believes Star Wars did not become a break out hit out of nowhere. Science fiction was already popular at the time with mass media franchises like PLANET OF THE APES and STAR TREK.
-trending things like CONAN THE BARBARIAN, D&D, and HEAVY METAL were part of the demand for Adventure media with fantasy elements.
-The first parts of nerd culture organically rose thru Star Wars' popularity.
-if you had to say anything bad about this movie it would be that the large push of Star Wars merchandise may be a catalyst for the rise of many merchandise driven media in the 80s such as Transformers and TMNT.
-Another negative about the Star Wars movie is that it was TOO unique and subversive, with so much of the expanded media unable to replicate the Subversive beats or George Lucas' unique style of storytelling. Arguably that fault is more from the writers of the expanded media that don't seem get what made Star Wars so great.
Star Wars in the end has stood the test of time as a modern classic not due to the merchandise or its expanded media but from its truly unique design and characters no other movie has been able to match. These factors are what make STAR WARS, REALLY THAT GOOD.
REALLY THAT GOOD: ADAM SANDLER IS NEXT.
If I missed anything let me know tomorrow, cuz this was exhausting.
"Only Han has an arc." Are you kidding me? Luke goes from whining about power converters and saying he can't do anything about the Empire to leading a mission to rescue the princess and personally blowing up the death star. Sure, he has more character development in the next two movies, but he clearly goes through some big changes in this one.
"A New Hope is subversive because it starts with a lot going on but none of it is explained right away." I could say the same fucking thing about Citizen Kane, the go to greatest movie pick for hacks who want you to think they have good taste. This wasn't anything new when Star Wars did it, you consoomer troglodyte. It's also not that hard to grasp "gun fight between powerful bad guy group and outmatched resistance group, but with spaceships and laser guns" especially since the movie actually does explain it in the title crawl.
"Lightsaber is subversive because it's only used for exposition, like in TLJ." Except it's also used to set up the lightsaber fight between Obi Wan and Vader.
"The force is basically just a religion in the first movie." A religion that has objective proof behind it, since we see Vader choke someone with his mind when the guy disses it. Interesting take from fedora Robert.
Bob says the first parts of nerd culture rose from Star Wars, despite mentioning the earlier Star Trek multiple times in the same video. The Lord of the Rings books also came first and were their own phenomenon. And Cinema Roberto is planning to do one of these on LoTR. Heaven help us.
Bob repeatedly mentions how groundbreaking, unique, and subversive Star Wars was, despite also repeatedly referencing all the samurai, western, pulp, etc stuff it took heavy inspiration from.
What a muddled, pretentious, contradictory take. The entire conceit of reviewing A New Hope as a standalone movie is kind of pointless anyway, since it's not a standalone movie and Lucas never intended it to be a standalone movie. I don't see why it's worthwhile to pretend the next two movies don't exist to make a point about this one that they contradict, like his argument about the force.
As for the "war is always political" bullshit, these twats always do this. They equate very vague, broad political themes like war to thinly veiled propaganda about a current event or social issue even though all but the most severely autistic of these propaganda apologists know damn well what people mean when they complain about politics in entertainment. So it's very possible Robert truly doesn't understand the difference.
“No, friend. I told a bad joke, once, and people who - if you follow them, it's a bad look for you - screencapped and repost it 7+ years later as a poor attempt at "ownage." Also a bad look: If you've actually bought into this. Do better. https://t.co/Gh4m8opcoj”
Remember, it was just hyperbole and the evil people from the alt-right doxxing site are not only taking them out of context but are the real enemy here.
"The force is basically just a religion in the first movie." A religion that has objective proof behind it, since we see Vader choke someone with his mind when the guy disses it. Interesting take from fedora Robert.
I'm not gonna watch the Star Wars Robert shit, because I'm a limited human, so sorry to be a fag and ask those who have watched, but does the fatass specify what exactly is Star Wars subverting?
We all know what people mean when they say Last jedi "subverted expectation" meme stupidity. The filmakers didn't want to do the Hollywood preprocessed twist, and instead they fucked over any ongoing story in order to... I dunno, I stoped giving a fuck. The point is, they went the other way people thought and wanted for the sake of being contrarians, because last jedi didn't really add up to anything in the end.
But Star wars doesn't have any precedent to be contrary of, and subvert means to bring down authority, and sure, the story is about rebels sticking to the "man", but no one would be insane to think that Star wars ever wanted to carry any political weight or to be anything more than just a light adventure movie.
So, what the fuck is Star Wars subverting? Nothing about this franshise was stablished to be a counter of, and as far as filmmaking and storytelling goes, it follows the rule book to the T, and it is evident that it doesn't aspire to be anything but a nice movie session to bring your kids to.
At least half of this is waffling, and he's blatantly wrong on quite a few things, especially the idea that Han of all people is your audience insert. It's in reality (and very obviously) Luke, as he is the ignorant farmboy teen who knows little of the galaxy around him, and who yearns for more than what he has.
@Minute 39 & 40 Bob points out that there are 3 different audience surrogates.
Luke= who the audience most identifies with.
C3P0= Auidience POV
Han Solo= Auidience Co-Heckler?
Bob claims this as many people then wouldn't be all that interested in the science fiction jargon, thinking it would be a kids movie. Han solo helps relate to these people as the character itself agrees this is all a bit silly, but fun. So you as the audience should be having fun too.
Sorry this wasn't in the previous post. my brain kinda fried out listening to bob for almost 2 hours straight. Id should probably try to rewrite it to be more in-depth but fuck me you might as well read a goddamn transcript. I was just trying to compress it all down to a reasonable reading time.
I’ve never understood why Americans on both sides are so obsessed with the EU.
Like either it’s the most fantastic idea ever or it’s blatantly offensive that somebody even thought of it. I don’t see why I should really give a fuck, personally, they can form or not form whatever unions they want.
The EU is an American invention. We paid the French a lot of money and intervened in the Vietnam War in part to convince DeGaulle to globalize (this is a controversial opinion, but one of my cohort in grad school did a fantastic thesis about the declassified French diplomatic cables proving this was the goal). It was part of establishing the new world order of the post-war era, and it's one of the most odious legacies of America forcing its vision of global capital on countries who were doing perfectly fine before.
All this is to say that the success or failure of the EU is of fundamental importance to the modern myth of the globalized future. It breaking up disproves the philosophy that guided America for 50 years.
@Minute 39 & 40 Bob points out that there are 3 different audience surrogates.
Luke= who the audience most identifies with.
C3P0= Auidience POV
Han Solo= Auidience Co-Heckler?
Bob claims this as many people then wouldn't be all that interested in the science fiction jargon, thinking it would be a kids movie. Han solo helps relate to these people as the character itself agrees this is all a bit silly, but fun. So you as the audience should be having fun too.
That's not really right either. C3P0 hardly counts, since he (and arguably R2 just as much) is only really the audience POV at the beginning of the film, before the droids link up with Luke. After that the movie mostly follows Luke, and while it does go back to the droids occasionally it also goes to Han and Obi-Wan by themselves for certain scenes. So there's really no one audience POV character.
Han relating to the audience because they won't care about the sci-fi jargon... there's not that much sci-fi jargon in the movie, and some of the most prominent examples are from Han. His infamous quote about making the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs, and when he talks about jumping to hyperspace.
I think Robert was just desperate to come up with things to analyze and sound big brained.
“Even if you take the whole "morally repugnant" aspect out of the calculus that U.S./UK Leftists/Progressives should embrace social conservatism (aka racism, superstition and LGBTQ-hate) and anti-immigration to "win back" the white working-class; the LOGIC is still bad... 1/3”
“...MAYBE it nets you a handful of minor pickups over the next handful of cycles, but long-term the Trumpified/Brexit-embracing slice of the labor pool is having this existential-panic psychotic-break because the curtain is going down no matter what: Automation is coming... 2/3”
“...you can't stop it, and it's going to completely upend the makeup of what's previously been the worker/manager/owner labor paradigm. "Socially right, fiscally left" = chasing a class of voters that will cease to exist (the category, not the people) within the next 50 years. 3/3”
Ok PolitiBob, what is going to replace the worker/manager/owner labor paradigm? We are not heading towards a creator/intellectual society that Leftist Twits think we're heading. The only reason a dimwit like Bob can be a "creator" is because of the capitalist economy that affords him to offer nothing of material value to society. When people's disposable income dries up, the first thing they are going to stop funding is dummies on the internet opining about superhero movies. The Left is heading towards a ruler/dependent society where the more dependent people become, the more powerful the rulers get, and that's by design and works because of useful idiots like Bob.
Bob even admits that the "white" working class (I love how it's the left that doesn't include non-whites as working class, but don't dare label them white, or rich, liberals) will cease to exist as a category, not as a people. Ok, so where are the people going to go? To the party that openly distain their values and reduces them to "racism, superstition and LGBTQ+hate"? Please keep failing hard, Leftists.
I love how he has to put a disclaimer to his comments on AOC. It's like he's aware that you absolutely CAN NOT make any criticism to a POC WYMXN on social media. What a fucking pussy and proof how scared he is of being one of the people put up against the wall by the ideology he supports. Also, you could argue whether or not Bernie and Ron Paul are "politicians", as in cross the aisle, back room deals like what Cenk probably meant by that, but ideologs, Communist and Libertarian respectively. But AOC is NOT a politician. She's an activist that got elected because of campaigning efforts by other activists. And LOL at thinking AOC is Smartest-Kid-In-Class political nerd. No, she's the cute, privileged, popular girl that thinks she's smart because everybody tells her that, either to protect her feeling, ride her popularity, or get into her pants. Everybody else rolls their eyes when they hear her talk, thinking, "shut up and suck more dick, whore".
I’ve never understood why Americans on both sides are so obsessed with the EU.
Like either it’s the most fantastic idea ever or it’s blatantly offensive that somebody even thought of it. I don’t see why I should really give a fuck, personally, they can form or not form whatever unions they want.
We are still culturally closest connected to the UK than anybody else. So there is the empathy for them being ruled by unelected bureaucrats. I joked on another message board that when Germany is mad that you don't want to be part of their club, it's a good sign. And "bureau" is French etymologically, and we all know what happens when you put a frog in a pot and let the water slowly boil. Plus, Leftist in America seem to idolize the EU model, so watching them gives me a heads up why it would ultimately be bad for us. Hence MovieBob and his "disenfranchise the flyover states" mindset.
This is rich coming from the guy who went full defense force for the disney star wars. But besides that, I can't recall other big "prophecy hero" in the recent american block buster shit.
The Marvel capeshit crap is always the same, even if the hero gains it's power or are born with it, they always need to get the obligatory end of act 2 beating so the they rise on the climax. The exception being Captain Marvel (har). And.. i dunno, i haven't watched a lot of block buster hero stuff lately, after end game I'm done with capeshit, so I dunno about spiderman or any of that crap.
Either way, I don't give a shit about what fucken Naomi Wu has to say, she is an actress and a dum-dum anb her basic bitch complains shows it. The funny stuff is that since she tweeted something aking to "I like moviebob's videos", Robert has been retweeting even her farts, it's pretty sad to see someone carrying such a torch on social media like this.
But, I guess, for Robert it's just another day on his pathetic little life...
If I didn't know that reply was from MovieBob, I would have assumed the response was sarcasm because the original tweet is just completely wrong. "For no reason but birthright"? Shut up. Then I remembered she's Chinese. That's so disgusting that "Movie"Bob is so concerned about the profitability from the Chinese market. This is the guy who complained that the Sonic movie redesigned the character because the fans didn't like it, and they should have stuck with what the "artists" designed. Mister "artist and creator" is worried about a censorious authoritarian government wants in a movie. This is what's wrong with modern leftism, no ideological consistency, just go along with what is supposedly the popular opinion.
So I’ve been playing half life 2 and Wallace Bree’s kind of reminds me of a marginally more competent and far more well spoken Bob Chipman. Same bootlicking cowardice same pseudo intellectual ramblings same misplaced belief in his own superiority and inferiority of everyone else. The also believe that it is their destiny to lead humanity to a superior future. I bet that if the Combine really did exist Bob would almost immediately throw in with them and betray humanity
Oh god. After picking at this minute by minute thru Bob's constant vocal diarrhea, I have watched the entire thing and will now present as I've done before, the
TL;DW: "REALLY THAT GOOD: STAR WARS"
-Ten minute intro of saying: " I have nothing new to say about Star Wars. Evrerybody has already analyzed the franchise to hell and back. So lets try to review STAR WARS standalone."
BASICS
-Bob starts talking about how the story is solid and the then-unheard-of-for-science-fiction great attention to special effects and design make the Star Wars story feel more epic and unique, despite borrowing so much from older sci-fi, fantasy adventure, and more familiar wartime stories from the 60s.
-STAR WARS' characters themselves aren't that fleshed out, ignoring supplemental media. Everyone except Han Solo don't have much in the way of a character arc.
-Stuff like the romance or the dark side of the force explanation is not present here. It overall makes the movie much more standalone, though at the same time much more lacking in mystery.
-INFLUENCE: It made SCI-FI from cheap pulpy adventure movies into blockbusters like alien.
AUTEUR THEORY
-20 minutes in Bob starts talking about auteur theory in a weird french setting.
-then compares Star Wars to the Godfather, as they were both auteur driven movies bringing their respective genres into popularity
-He segways this auteur theory talk into how George Lucas is a very weird person, much to Star Wars' benefit, as it makes Star Wars very unique and Subversive for its time.
SUBVERSIONS
-HOT BOB TAKE: Star Wars has always been Subversive.
-Bob cites the beginning of the movie as subversive as it's all action but confusing, you see all this space and robot stuff that doesn't make sense until you get to Luke 15 minutes into the movie itself.
-Bob cites another subversive part of the first movie is when Ben shows luke the lightsaber, as similar to THE LAST JEDI, it is regarded as not that important, other than a tool for exposition.
-Bob claims that this scene was supposed to subvert the iconic king arthur scene of pulling the sword from the stone.
-Once we get introduced to Luke and Ben we head straight into the cantina scene, another very alien and confusing scene, used to immerse the audience into Star Wars' uniques universe.
CHARACTERS
-Bob begins talking about Luke, how he was an unconventionally young protagonist for the time. Compared to Han Solo, which in another movie he would've been the main character.
-Speaking of Han Solo, Bob now starts talking about how Han Solo is the grounded sane man in the wacky world of Star Wars.
-Star Wars has a lot of references that come from samurai, King Arthur, and Flash Gordon that make the world unique but very difficult to follow.
-Han Solo helps the audience acclimate to the world by acting as an audience surrogate. Like how he doesn't believe in the force much like the audience would watching the movie for the first time.
-Bob says that without a Han Solo type character this is where the other movies start to falter, though this time he doesn't get into details.
THEMES
Bob does not believe this movies is apolitical nor the people who say it is. Star Wars has many themes but the main theme of the movie is WAR, and war has always been political since the dawn of history.
MINUTE 52
-Bob cites that war is political thru AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR as it has politicals as well. Thanos' motive is similar to the very real Malthusian Beliefs on population.
-Was has always been a main feature of American history and culture. It has been a staple of American media as well until the Vietnam war where it lost popularity.
-Star Wars works as it is a War movie with under the guise of Science Fiction.
-The Empire and rebels are a Broad strokes mixture of real historical military factions that are vague enough to cause any offense.
Minute 62
-Bob for some reason addresses the Star Wars vs. Star Trek debate. As how many people would dismiss Star Wars as Fantasy, not "true" Sci-fi.
-Bob refutes by downplaying the "force" aspect of Star Wars back in the first movie it is treated like a religion rather than actual magic with rules compared to the sequels and expanded media.
-then he claims the force is no different as a religion than the doctrine vulcans follow.
-MINUTE 67 : STAR WARS IS TIMELESS.
-Bob believes Star Wars did not become a break out hit out of nowhere. Science fiction was already popular at the time with mass media franchises like PLANET OF THE APES and STAR TREK.
-trending things like CONAN THE BARBARIAN, D&D, and HEAVY METAL were part of the demand for Adventure media with fantasy elements.
-The first parts of nerd culture organically rose thru Star Wars' popularity.
-if you had to say anything bad about this movie it would be that the large push of Star Wars merchandise may be a catalyst for the rise of many merchandise driven media in the 80s such as Transformers and TMNT.
-Another negative about the Star Wars movie is that it was TOO unique and subversive, with so much of the expanded media unable to replicate the Subversive beats or George Lucas' unique style of storytelling. Arguably that fault is more from the writers of the expanded media that don't seem get what made Star Wars so great.
Star Wars in the end has stood the test of time as a modern classic not due to the merchandise or its expanded media but from its truly unique design and characters no other movie has been able to match. These factors are what make STAR WARS, REALLY THAT GOOD.
REALLY THAT GOOD: ADAM SANDLER IS NEXT.
If I missed anything let me know tomorrow, cuz this was exhausting.
I’d say that I’d want EFAP to cover it but taking the base time of the video converting it into EFAP time (1 second of our time is equivalent to one minute of EFAP) and also factoring in that this is a movieblob video meaning a higher than normal autism concentrations which will most certainly increase the time that it takes to cover the video: it could take days even weeks.
Reminder this is a woman so stupid that she blocked an Amazon plant in her district because she thought the tax incentives would be taken out of the treasury, instead of it just being a refunded portion of the tax revenue the plant would bring in.
This isn't some political spin, she seriously does not understand how tax breaks work.
Oh, and she thought her sink's garbage disposal motor was some kind of monster and she couldn't figure out why it was making noise.
Reminder this is a woman so stupid that she blocked an Amazon plant in her district because she thought the tax incentives would be taken out of the treasury, instead of it just being a refunded portion of the tax revenue the plant would bring in.
This isn't some political spin, she seriously does not understand how tax breaks work.
Oh, and she thought her sink's garbage disposal motor was some kind of monster and she couldn't figure out why it was making noise.
Geez, when I read your garbage disposal comment I thought it must've been some stupidity in a leaked conversation, or something that was from a while in her past or something, but no, she uploaded a video of it herself earlier this year. This woman desperately needs a tard wrangler to regulate her Twitch streaming or whatever the hell she's uploading on to show how down with the kids she is.
