You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CareercowRobert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic
Theres an irony in Bobs hatred for the white working classes in the midwesr while the core of Labours voters for many years was the white working classes from the North and Wales which is analogus for the midwest for its reliance on heavy industry and coal
The immediate answer for why that core flipped is “cuz racism” from Robert and other clueless idiot lulberals/leftists but that’s not it.
I read a great breakdown of Labour’s loss and a lot of it stems from Labour considering these areas and this voting block as a lock. Then, much like Hillary, completely ignored their issues in order to pander to minority special interest groups that don’t vote and don’t matter.
The immediate answer for why that core flipped is “cuz racism” from Robert and other clueless idiot lulberals/leftists but that’s not it.
I read a great breakdown of Labour’s loss and a lot of it stems from Labour considering these areas and this voting block as a lock. Then, much like Hillary, completely ignored their issues in order to pander to minority special interest groups that don’t vote and don’t matter.
I don’t pay attention to UK politics that often other than brexit, but isn’t it true the Labour Party was pandering to the rich “gimme-free shit” kids and promising them free shit like free college.
I don’t pay attention to UK politics that often other than brexit, but isn’t it true the Labour Party was pandering to the rich “gimme-free shit” kids and promising them free shit like free college.
I don’t pay attention to UK politics that often other than brexit, but isn’t it true the Labour Party was pandering to the rich “gimme-free shit” kids and promising them free shit like free college.
They promised to scrap university tuition fees and write off existing ones. In theory it would benefit the poor, but those on low income already get it paid for them in part or full, so in practice it would be workers paying for rich kids who can already afford it.
They promised to scrap university tuition fees and write off existing ones. In theory it would benefit the poor, but those on low income already get it paid for them in part or full, so in practice it would be workers paying for rich kids who can already afford it.
not any more they don't, low-income grants were abolished in 2010
and a university degree is fuck-all use unless you're upper-middle class, politically OK and willing to work for free (as an intern) potentially for the rest of your working life, since the one thing a university degree teaches you is how to pass a university degree; if you're from a low-income family you're best off getting an actual job, or an apprenticeship in a skilled trade, particularly if you're a bloke
Methinks a cultured conSOOMer mayme might be afoot > an intellectual and philosopher who learned the hard truths of existance from watching disney movies
> is a sophisticated chef who has mastered the use of mountain dew in the kitchen
> a peerless debater who can render the most intelligent and learned opponant speechless by use of the block and mute buttons
Oh god. After picking at this minute by minute thru Bob's constant vocal diarrhea, I have watched the entire thing and will now present as I've done before, the
TL;DW: "REALLY THAT GOOD: STAR WARS"
-Ten minute intro of saying: " I have nothing new to say about Star Wars. Evrerybody has already analyzed the franchise to hell and back. So lets try to review STAR WARS standalone."
BASICS
-Bob starts talking about how the story is solid and the then-unheard-of-for-science-fiction great attention to special effects and design make the Star Wars story feel more epic and unique, despite borrowing so much from older sci-fi, fantasy adventure, and more familiar wartime stories from the 60s.
-STAR WARS' characters themselves aren't that fleshed out, ignoring supplemental media. Everyone except Han Solo don't have much in the way of a character arc.
-Stuff like the romance or the dark side of the force explanation is not present here. It overall makes the movie much more standalone, though at the same time much more lacking in mystery.
-INFLUENCE: It made SCI-FI from cheap pulpy adventure movies into blockbusters like alien.
AUTEUR THEORY
-20 minutes in Bob starts talking about auteur theory in a weird french setting.
-then compares Star Wars to the Godfather, as they were both auteur driven movies bringing their respective genres into popularity
-He segways this auteur theory talk into how George Lucas is a very weird person, much to Star Wars' benefit, as it makes Star Wars very unique and Subversive for its time.
SUBVERSIONS
-HOT BOB TAKE: Star Wars has always been Subversive.
-Bob cites the beginning of the movie as subversive as it's all action but confusing, you see all this space and robot stuff that doesn't make sense until you get to Luke 15 minutes into the movie itself.
-Bob cites another subversive part of the first movie is when Ben shows luke the lightsaber, as similar to THE LAST JEDI, it is regarded as not that important, other than a tool for exposition.
-Bob claims that this scene was supposed to subvert the iconic king arthur scene of pulling the sword from the stone.
-Once we get introduced to Luke and Ben we head straight into the cantina scene, another very alien and confusing scene, used to immerse the audience into Star Wars' uniques universe.
CHARACTERS
-Bob begins talking about Luke, how he was an unconventionally young protagonist for the time. Compared to Han Solo, which in another movie he would've been the main character.
-Speaking of Han Solo, Bob now starts talking about how Han Solo is the grounded sane man in the wacky world of Star Wars.
-Star Wars has a lot of references that come from samurai, King Arthur, and Flash Gordon that make the world unique but very difficult to follow.
-Han Solo helps the audience acclimate to the world by acting as an audience surrogate. Like how he doesn't believe in the force much like the audience would watching the movie for the first time.
-Bob says that without a Han Solo type character this is where the other movies start to falter, though this time he doesn't get into details.
THEMES
Bob does not believe this movies is apolitical nor the people who say it is. Star Wars has many themes but the main theme of the movie is WAR, and war has always been political since the dawn of history.
MINUTE 52
-Bob cites that war is political thru AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR as it has politicals as well. Thanos' motive is similar to the very real Malthusian Beliefs on population.
-Was has always been a main feature of American history and culture. It has been a staple of American media as well until the Vietnam war where it lost popularity.
-Star Wars works as it is a War movie with under the guise of Science Fiction.
-The Empire and rebels are a Broad strokes mixture of real historical military factions that are vague enough to cause any offense.
Minute 62
-Bob for some reason addresses the Star Wars vs. Star Trek debate. As how many people would dismiss Star Wars as Fantasy, not "true" Sci-fi.
-Bob refutes by downplaying the "force" aspect of Star Wars back in the first movie it is treated like a religion rather than actual magic with rules compared to the sequels and expanded media.
-then he claims the force is no different as a religion than the doctrine vulcans follow.
-MINUTE 67 : STAR WARS IS TIMELESS.
-Bob believes Star Wars did not become a break out hit out of nowhere. Science fiction was already popular at the time with mass media franchises like PLANET OF THE APES and STAR TREK.
-trending things like CONAN THE BARBARIAN, D&D, and HEAVY METAL were part of the demand for Adventure media with fantasy elements.
-The first parts of nerd culture organically rose thru Star Wars' popularity.
-if you had to say anything bad about this movie it would be that the large push of Star Wars merchandise may be a catalyst for the rise of many merchandise driven media in the 80s such as Transformers and TMNT.
-Another negative about the Star Wars movie is that it was TOO unique and subversive, with so much of the expanded media unable to replicate the Subversive beats or George Lucas' unique style of storytelling. Arguably that fault is more from the writers of the expanded media that don't seem get what made Star Wars so great.
Star Wars in the end has stood the test of time as a modern classic not due to the merchandise or its expanded media but from its truly unique design and characters no other movie has been able to match. These factors are what make STAR WARS, REALLY THAT GOOD.
REALLY THAT GOOD: ADAM SANDLER IS NEXT.
If I missed anything let me know tomorrow, cuz this was exhausting.
I don’t pay attention to UK politics that often other than brexit, but isn’t it true the Labour Party was pandering to the rich “gimme-free shit” kids and promising them free shit like free college.
This is the superior future that Robert opines for. The working class poor (whites) should be disregarded and we should only pander to the rich and minorities.
Robert triples down on his undying hatred for those evil white working class mayonnaise, insisting that the left can win by ignoring their needs and actively shaming and insulting them, despite previous election results:
“Even if you take the whole "morally repugnant" aspect out of the calculus that U.S./UK Leftists/Progressives should embrace social conservatism (aka racism, superstition and LGBTQ-hate) and anti-immigration to "win back" the white working-class; the LOGIC is still bad... 1/3”
“...MAYBE it nets you a handful of minor pickups over the next handful of cycles, but long-term the Trumpified/Brexit-embracing slice of the labor pool is having this existential-panic psychotic-break because the curtain is going down no matter what: Automation is coming... 2/3”
“...you can't stop it, and it's going to completely upend the makeup of what's previously been the worker/manager/owner labor paradigm. "Socially right, fiscally left" = chasing a class of voters that will cease to exist (the category, not the people) within the next 50 years. 3/3”
"The robots are going to replace the obsoletes", sounds like a great campaign model, maybe leftists should outright state their hatred for them and plans to get them unemployed in the future. Afterall, look it how well ignoring them went for Labour in the UK.
Maybe, Chunk"it never happened" Uyger should follow this model for his campaign.
I love how Robert showcases nothing but chronic destain for the working class yet whiteknights for AOC and other socialists who pretend to care about working class voters. It shows that Robert is such a smooth-brained consoomer who will eat anything as long as it isn't from an evil mayonnaise ghoul or "believer" (wrong-thinker).
Also, remember Bob was only joking about his love for eugenics:
“No, friend. I told a bad joke, once, and people who - if you follow them, it's a bad look for you - screencapped and repost it 7+ years later as a poor attempt at "ownage." Also a bad look: If you've actually bought into this. Do better. https://t.co/Gh4m8opcoj”
Remember, it was just hyperbole and the evil people from the alt-right doxxing site are not only taking them out of context but are the real enemy here.
Oh god. After picking at this minute by minute thru Bob's constant vocal diarrhea, I have watched the entire thing and will now present as I've done before, the
TL;DW: "REALLY THAT GOOD: STAR WARS"
-Ten minute intro of saying: " I have nothing new to say about Star Wars. Evrerybody has already analyzed the franchise to hell and back. So lets try to review STAR WARS standalone."
BASICS
-Bob starts talking about how the story is solid and the then-unheard-of-for-science-fiction great attention to special effects and design make the Star Wars story feel more epic and unique, despite borrowing so much from older sci-fi, fantasy adventure, and more familiar wartime stories from the 60s.
-STAR WARS' characters themselves aren't that fleshed out, ignoring supplemental media. Everyone except Han Solo don't have much in the way of a character arc.
-Stuff like the romance or the dark side of the force explanation is not present here. It overall makes the movie much more standalone, though at the same time much more lacking in mystery.
-INFLUENCE: It made SCI-FI from cheap pulpy adventure movies into blockbusters like alien.
AUTEUR THEORY
-20 minutes in Bob starts talking about auteur theory in a weird french setting.
-then compares Star Wars to the Godfather, as they were both auteur driven movies bringing their respective genres into popularity
-He segways this auteur theory talk into how George Lucas is a very weird person, much to Star Wars' benefit, as it makes Star Wars very unique and Subversive for its time.
SUBVERSIONS
-HOT BOB TAKE: Star Wars has always been Subversive.
-Bob cites the beginning of the movie as subversive as it's all action but confusing, you see all this space and robot stuff that doesn't make sense until you get to Luke 15 minutes into the movie itself.
-Bob cites another subversive part of the first movie is when Ben shows luke the lightsaber, as similar to THE LAST JEDI, it is regarded as not that important, other than a tool for exposition.
-Bob claims that this scene was supposed to subvert the iconic king arthur scene of pulling the sword from the stone.
-Once we get introduced to Luke and Ben we head straight into the cantina scene, another very alien and confusing scene, used to immerse the audience into Star Wars' uniques universe.
CHARACTERS
-Bob begins talking about Luke, how he was an unconventionally young protagonist for the time. Compared to Han Solo, which in another movie he would've been the main character.
-Speaking of Han Solo, Bob now starts talking about how Han Solo is the grounded sane man in the wacky world of Star Wars.
-Star Wars has a lot of references that come from samurai, King Arthur, and Flash Gordon that make the world unique but very difficult to follow.
-Han Solo helps the audience acclimate to the world by acting as an audience surrogate. Like how he doesn't believe in the force much like the audience would watching the movie for the first time.
-Bob says that without a Han Solo type character this is where the other movies start to falter, though this time he doesn't get into details.
THEMES
Bob does not believe this movies is apolitical nor the people who say it is. Star Wars has many themes but the main theme of the movie is WAR, and war has always been political since the dawn of history.
MINUTE 52
-Bob cites that war is political thru AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR as it has politicals as well. Thanos' motive is similar to the very real Malthusian Beliefs on population.
-Was has always been a main feature of American history and culture. It has been a staple of American media as well until the Vietnam war where it lost popularity.
-Star Wars works as it is a War movie with under the guise of Science Fiction.
-The Empire and rebels are a Broad strokes mixture of real historical military factions that are vague enough to cause any offense.
Minute 62
-Bob for some reason addresses the Star Wars vs. Star Trek debate. As how many people would dismiss Star Wars as Fantasy, not "true" Sci-fi.
-Bob refutes by downplaying the "force" aspect of Star Wars back in the first movie it is treated like a religion rather than actual magic with rules compared to the sequels and expanded media.
-then he claims the force is no different as a religion than the doctrine vulcans follow.
-MINUTE 67 : STAR WARS IS TIMELESS.
-Bob believes Star Wars did not become a break out hit out of nowhere. Science fiction was already popular at the time with mass media franchises like PLANET OF THE APES and STAR TREK.
-trending things like CONAN THE BARBARIAN, D&D, and HEAVY METAL were part of the demand for Adventure media with fantasy elements.
-The first parts of nerd culture organically rose thru Star Wars' popularity.
-if you had to say anything bad about this movie it would be that the large push of Star Wars merchandise may be a catalyst for the rise of many merchandise driven media in the 80s such as Transformers and TMNT.
-Another negative about the Star Wars movie is that it was TOO unique and subversive, with so much of the expanded media unable to replicate the Subversive beats or George Lucas' unique style of storytelling. Arguably that fault is more from the writers of the expanded media that don't seem get what made Star Wars so great.
Star Wars in the end has stood the test of time as a modern classic not due to the merchandise or its expanded media but from its truly unique design and characters no other movie has been able to match. These factors are what make STAR WARS, REALLY THAT GOOD.
REALLY THAT GOOD: ADAM SANDLER IS NEXT.
If I missed anything let me know tomorrow, cuz this was exhausting.
At least half of this is waffling, and he's blatantly wrong on quite a few things, especially the idea that Han of all people is your audience insert. It's in reality (and very obviously) Luke, as he is the ignorant farmboy teen who knows little of the galaxy around him, and who yearns for more than what he has.
It's also clearly an attempt for our Incel Consoomer to try and smash puss with the TLJ weirdos given how he's trying to link ANH to that trashfire.
And to comment, I have no goddamn clue on why he supports the left if he's clearly a Rexist Objectivist who despises workers and creators. Oh wait, because he is a loser who relies on handouts from his enabler family.
Oh god. After picking at this minute by minute thru Bob's constant vocal diarrhea, I have watched the entire thing and will now present as I've done before, the
TL;DW: "REALLY THAT GOOD: STAR WARS"
-Ten minute intro of saying: " I have nothing new to say about Star Wars. Evrerybody has already analyzed the franchise to hell and back. So lets try to review STAR WARS standalone."
BASICS
-Bob starts talking about how the story is solid and the then-unheard-of-for-science-fiction great attention to special effects and design make the Star Wars story feel more epic and unique, despite borrowing so much from older sci-fi, fantasy adventure, and more familiar wartime stories from the 60s.
-STAR WARS' characters themselves aren't that fleshed out, ignoring supplemental media. Everyone except Han Solo don't have much in the way of a character arc.
-Stuff like the romance or the dark side of the force explanation is not present here. It overall makes the movie much more standalone, though at the same time much more lacking in mystery.
-INFLUENCE: It made SCI-FI from cheap pulpy adventure movies into blockbusters like alien.
AUTEUR THEORY
-20 minutes in Bob starts talking about auteur theory in a weird french setting.
-then compares Star Wars to the Godfather, as they were both auteur driven movies bringing their respective genres into popularity
-He segways this auteur theory talk into how George Lucas is a very weird person, much to Star Wars' benefit, as it makes Star Wars very unique and Subversive for its time.
SUBVERSIONS
-HOT BOB TAKE: Star Wars has always been Subversive.
-Bob cites the beginning of the movie as subversive as it's all action but confusing, you see all this space and robot stuff that doesn't make sense until you get to Luke 15 minutes into the movie itself.
-Bob cites another subversive part of the first movie is when Ben shows luke the lightsaber, as similar to THE LAST JEDI, it is regarded as not that important, other than a tool for exposition.
-Bob claims that this scene was supposed to subvert the iconic king arthur scene of pulling the sword from the stone.
-Once we get introduced to Luke and Ben we head straight into the cantina scene, another very alien and confusing scene, used to immerse the audience into Star Wars' uniques universe.
CHARACTERS
-Bob begins talking about Luke, how he was an unconventionally young protagonist for the time. Compared to Han Solo, which in another movie he would've been the main character.
-Speaking of Han Solo, Bob now starts talking about how Han Solo is the grounded sane man in the wacky world of Star Wars.
-Star Wars has a lot of references that come from samurai, King Arthur, and Flash Gordon that make the world unique but very difficult to follow.
-Han Solo helps the audience acclimate to the world by acting as an audience surrogate. Like how he doesn't believe in the force much like the audience would watching the movie for the first time.
-Bob says that without a Han Solo type character this is where the other movies start to falter, though this time he doesn't get into details.
THEMES
Bob does not believe this movies is apolitical nor the people who say it is. Star Wars has many themes but the main theme of the movie is WAR, and war has always been political since the dawn of history.
MINUTE 52
-Bob cites that war is political thru AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR as it has politicals as well. Thanos' motive is similar to the very real Malthusian Beliefs on population.
-Was has always been a main feature of American history and culture. It has been a staple of American media as well until the Vietnam war where it lost popularity.
-Star Wars works as it is a War movie with under the guise of Science Fiction.
-The Empire and rebels are a Broad strokes mixture of real historical military factions that are vague enough to cause any offense.
Minute 62
-Bob for some reason addresses the Star Wars vs. Star Trek debate. As how many people would dismiss Star Wars as Fantasy, not "true" Sci-fi.
-Bob refutes by downplaying the "force" aspect of Star Wars back in the first movie it is treated like a religion rather than actual magic with rules compared to the sequels and expanded media.
-then he claims the force is no different as a religion than the doctrine vulcans follow.
-MINUTE 67 : STAR WARS IS TIMELESS.
-Bob believes Star Wars did not become a break out hit out of nowhere. Science fiction was already popular at the time with mass media franchises like PLANET OF THE APES and STAR TREK.
-trending things like CONAN THE BARBARIAN, D&D, and HEAVY METAL were part of the demand for Adventure media with fantasy elements.
-The first parts of nerd culture organically rose thru Star Wars' popularity.
-if you had to say anything bad about this movie it would be that the large push of Star Wars merchandise may be a catalyst for the rise of many merchandise driven media in the 80s such as Transformers and TMNT.
-Another negative about the Star Wars movie is that it was TOO unique and subversive, with so much of the expanded media unable to replicate the Subversive beats or George Lucas' unique style of storytelling. Arguably that fault is more from the writers of the expanded media that don't seem get what made Star Wars so great.
Star Wars in the end has stood the test of time as a modern classic not due to the merchandise or its expanded media but from its truly unique design and characters no other movie has been able to match. These factors are what make STAR WARS, REALLY THAT GOOD.
REALLY THAT GOOD: ADAM SANDLER IS NEXT.
If I missed anything let me know tomorrow, cuz this was exhausting.
So when Bob finally drops his Lord of the Rings video which one of us is gonna suffer through it?
Because if this drivel is any indication than Really That Good Lord of the Rings will be one of the worst things ever.
So when Bob finally drops his Lord of the Rings video which one of us is gonna suffer through it?
Because if this drivel is any indication than Really That Good Lord of the Rings will be one of the worst things ever.
So when Bob finally drops his Lord of the Rings video which one of us is gonna suffer through it?
Because if this drivel is any indication than Really That Good Lord of the Rings will be one of the worst things ever.
The one thing I'd like to see Bob wrap his pea-brain around regarding LOTR is the fact its biggest heroes are a member of the landed gentry and a gardener, and the worst thing that happens to the genteel, innocent, pastoral countryside is automation and invading immigrants.
The one thing I'd like to see Bob wrap his pea-brain around regarding LOTR is the fact its biggest heroes are a member of the landed gentry and a gardener, and the worst thing that happens to the genteel, innocent, pastoral countryside is automation and invading immigrants.
I fully expect him to say "It's a product of its' time" and pull out the "racist" act for it (because brown people serve Mordor) because that's a common point that shitstirring "artists" who wish they could be Tolkien like to do.
Robert triples down on his undying hatred for those evil white working class mayonnaise, insisting that the left can win by ignoring their needs and actively shaming and insulting them, despite previous election results:
The one thing I'd like to see Bob wrap his pea-brain around regarding LOTR is the fact its biggest heroes are a member of the landed gentry and a gardener, and the worst thing that happens to the genteel, innocent, pastoral countryside is automation and invading immigrants.
But thats in the books though.
And KinoRobert knows that reading is for Republicans and Wasteland Ghouls.
Besides the Hobbits aren't Children of Iluvatar That Matter.
Of course they would reject Saruman's Superior Future.
Although I could see Bob claiming that the Elves leaving for Valinor is a metaphor for White Flight and...
Okay I'm gonna stop now.
Theorizing about Bob hot takes isn't good for my sanity.
But thats in the books though.
And KinoRobert knows that reading is for Republicans and Wasteland Ghouls.
Besides the Hobbits aren't Children of Iluvatar That Matter.
Of course they would reject Saruman's Superior Future.
Although I could see Bob claiming that the Elves leaving for Valinor is a metaphor for White Flight and...
Okay I'm gonna stop now.
Theorizing about Bob hot takes isn't good for my sanity.
Honestly, just steal a bunch of ideas other people came up with, and then filter it through being a smoothbrained violent tard who wants to gas the normals, and you'll probably be close to what he'd say.
twitter.com
twitter.com
