2019-12-23 - Lindsay B. Lieberman on behalf of "K.W."

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m not sure if this is in anyway related. But some GirldDoPorn news was linked on Drudgereport today
Brothers charged with obstructing GirlsDoPorn investigation
Investigators suspect duo removed computers from home of Michael Pratt before he fled the country
By KRISTINA DAVIS
DEC. 23, 2019

5 AM
NORTH COUNTY —

When GirlsDoPorn boss Michael Pratt fled the country — avoiding a civil trial that went on without him and federal sex-trafficking charges that followed — he left behind his cat, as well as a house north of Escondido apparently humming with computer equipment, authorities said.
But investigators suggest the computer equipment, which could contain evidence in the prosecution against him, has disappeared.
Brothers Fredrick and Efrain Jimenez have been charged with one count each of obstructing sex-trafficking enforcement, after sheriff’s deputies found them moving items out of the home Pratt had been living in before abandoning it, according to a complaint unsealed in San Diego federal court last week.
The brothers appeared before a magistrate judge on Tuesday, and pleas of not guilty were entered for them.
They are the latest to be charged in connection with the case that has gained international attention.
Pratt, 36, and Matthew “Ben” Wolfe, 37, described as owners of the websites GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys, are accused of coercing young women from around the country into filming pornographic videos.
According to the FBI, the women answered Craigslist ads seeking models but were then informed they would be paid up to $5,000 a day to shoot erotic videos in posh San Diego hotels. The women said they were assured that the videos would not be posted online but would be sent to overseas collectors for private viewing.
The complaint alleges women were plied with alcohol and sometimes marijuana, then pushed into signing documents that gave the company full rights to distribution of the videos. Several women reported that another co-defendant, porn performer and producer Ruben “Jonathan” Andre Garcia, assaulted them before or after the filming.

The videos were then posted online, and avid viewers made a hobby out of identifying the women and engaging in a campaign of humiliation and harassment, including posting to the women’s social media and notifying coworkers and family members.
Pratt is also charged with production of child pornography and sex trafficking of a minor for the filming of a 16-year-old girl, according to the complaint.
Also charged are Valorie Moser, an administrative assistant; Amberlyn Dee Nored, who was paid to convince prospective talent that the videos would remain private; and videographer Theodore “Teddy” Gyi.
The federal charges hit in mid-October, in the middle of the civil trial against Pratt, Wolfe and Garcia, who are being sued by 22 women identified only as “Jane Does.” Arrests were made. But by then, Pratt, a citizen of New Zealand, had already skipped town.
On the afternoon of Oct. 13 — three days after the federal complaint was unsealed and the first round of arrests were made — sheriff’s deputies were called to a bucolic street in the Hidden Meadows community. A neighbor had reported seeing two unknown individuals emptying the contents of a home on Cerveza Baja Drive into a U-Haul trailer, according to an affidavit filed by the U.S. Marshals Service.
It was the home that Pratt had been living in before his disappearance, investigators say.
Deputies found the Jimenez brothers there. They told the deputies that a friend named “Mark” had borrowed their property and that he had given the brothers a key to the house and asked them to remove their personal property, the affidavit states.
Mark is a nickname that Pratt used, according to investigators.
The brothers told deputies that they had mostly removed furniture, televisions and a camping tent. They denied removing any computers or other electronics, although the deputies noticed in the trailer multiple boxes and small portable air conditioners — “often used to keep electronic equipment cool to ensure these expensive pieces of equipment do not overheat and malfunction,” the affidavit adds.
The brothers refused to answer further questions. The deputies took pictures of the interior of the trailer, without searching further, and left.
The brothers weren’t the only ones who’d been in the house.
Before Pratt left the country, he hired a pet-sitting service to care for his cat daily, according to investigators.
Law enforcement officers interviewed two of those pet-sitters in November. The sitters said that when they began caring for the cat in July, the home had multiple computers and various computer equipment, all of which appeared to have been running, the affidavit states. But soon after Oct. 13, they said they noticed that all the equipment had been removed, with only some wires remaining, the affidavit says.
The investigation later revealed that Fredrick Jimenez, 29, was an employee of GirlsDoPorn from July 2018 to February 2019, according to the affidavit.
Investigators have already seized several computers, hard drives, disks, DVDs and tapes from the GirlsDoPorn office at the Spreckles Building on Broadway in downtown San Diego.
While the criminal cases are proceeding in federal court, the civil case in San Diego Superior Court remains pending. The bench trial wrapped on Nov. 25, although Judge Kevin Enright has yet to issue a verdict.

So all of these Girls are claiming they were in many ways misled... regarding them agreeing to do porn? Really? Because as near as I can tell the chick let at the heart of the C&Dwas a legal adult, and an ultra rich heiress who had every possible resource in the world with which to vet and come to an informed conclusion about those she chose to do business with. I mean these women willingly chose to have sex on camera, for money, with full knowledge that they were doing porn. Am I missing something here! Or is the bulk of the case against these sleazebag pornographers basically “women are stupid!”?
 
A few random comments on the CAGoldbergLaw.com web site, since I know that someone from the firm will have to read this thread, and this comment. Naturally they will bill Miss Kelly Wang, or Daddy Wang, for the time spent reading. Imagine having to pay someone to read this stuff.

It's the sort of web page one might find by typing "Bottom feeding New York law firm" into the search box of the AltaVista toolbar installed in Internet Explorer 4. It has the right colors. It has a stat counter. It has the scrolling banner. It just needs for the "We Can Help!" button to blink frenetically. In different colors even, possibly pink and green, because that's totally not a nauseating combination. Possibly add that damned dancing baby gif. Who designs a landing page that requires so much scrolling?

The text is written by some soccer mom trying to sound clever and edgy in front of her children's team-mates. It's cringe all the way down.

The photo: Can one feel confident that the legal team, oops, the "crew", can take their legal case seriously when half the staff is wearing Kelly Bundy dresses -- surprisingly some have the figures for it-- and strappy Do-Me's on their feet?

Law Firm Founder Carrie Goldman ought to update those eyeglass frames of hers. They're even more dated than the firm's web page. She does seem feisty enough on her twitter and facebook and instagram. That's a good sign to potential clients at least. How hard would it be to wind her up and drop her on Orange Man™? "Go for the nuts, Carrie!" Stormy Daniels hired the wrong lawyer.
 
Am I missing something here! Or is the bulk of the case against these sleazebag pornographers basically “women are stupid!”?

Can't really say without looking at the contracts they were given and if the contracts had a portion about what would happen to the recordings. So there may be some sort of legal base for breach of contract somehow. Outside of that, yes, it's adult women being stupid. Even if they were pressured to sign without reading it or whatever, they have the right to say "no." I honestly wouldn't be surprised if this is just the next step of #MeToo'ing people, where consent gets retroactively rescinded to protect idiot fucking women.
 
Can't really say without looking at the contracts they were given and if the contracts had a portion about what would happen to the recordings. So there may be some sort of legal base for breach of contract somehow. Outside of that, yes, it's adult women being stupid. Even if they were pressured to sign without reading it or whatever, they have the right to say "no." I honestly wouldn't be surprised if this is just the next step of #MeToo'ing people, where consent gets retroactively rescinded to protect idiot fucking women.
Metooing porn will be the final straw that breaks men into action.
 
The text is written by some soccer mom trying to sound clever and edgy in front of her children's team-mates. It's cringe all the way down.

Holy fuck this was an understatement. This is on the "About us":
Jewlawyers.png


It is....honestly hard to believe an adult was paid to write this for a professional company. Seems more like what you would see on some tech tranny's blog about their next app will finally take down those awful trolls. Like Brianna Wu maybe.
 
She will die a cat mom too. Men in her social class can afford to be choosy. And they definitely wont choose some slut with pictures of her taking jizz to the face all over the internet. Just imagine having to explain that at a cocktail charity, or over cigars in the board room. Her only option would be the marry down the social ladder. But she wont.
She's also got to be a fucking nutcase. Doing really shitty, degrading porn as an act of rebellion? I've known some crazy, trashy people in my life, but can't think of anybody who would have done that--not unless they honestly believed they had nothing to lose. That's somebody who hates their parents, but hates themselves even more.

It's been almost 10 years, and it's possible she's been in therapy to look at why exactly she chose to do something so intensely degrading and personally damaging--but it's just as likely she hasn't. Everything she's managed to do since then smacks of Chinese Tiger Mommy and Absentee Finance Daddy smoothing her path by quietly donating money and using their connections to get her into the right school, and the right internships and jobs, so she can appear sane and respectable again. And--as we see, they are still throwing away money on legal fees in a futile effort to eradicate any trace of her brief foray into porn.

But it's still out there, and always will be, and too many of the "right" people know about it. The ones who don't only need to google her to find out. So yeah, I agree; she's going to remain a "cat mom."

In olden times, her dad would’ve paid some jumped up striver from no background to marry her. This can still be accomplished, plenty of finance bros from no particular background would wife her as a favor to such a big boss.

Isn't like she’s fat.
If she was merely fat, a striver might still marry her, figuring he could pressure her into losing weight. Other men might recognize what he was doing, and find it amusing, but he wouldn't take a massive status hit.

But marrying the big boss's crazy daughter who still has nasty facefucking pornos floating around on the internet, and whose dead-eyed jizz-splattered face was a meme for a while? That's when a striver realizes that the big boss might not always be his big boss, and that putting in more hours at work is a much better bet than hitching himself to the daughter whose reputation is damaged beyond all repair. A smart striver knows he's just going to look like a total cuck, and won't go there.

That's assuming men are rational. When they're thinking with their dicks, their normal thoughts go out the window. She's relatively pretty and the world knows she's very kinky, so she could probably seduce some rich guy if she wanted to.
She's not that pretty. She might pass as cute if she had a spark of life in her eyes and had an outgoing personality, but every (non-porn) pic I've seen on her thread is just a whole lot of blah.

And that everyone knows she's kinky AF just means she will, at best, end up as some rich guy's side piece--nobody's going to want her to be the mother of their kids. Her best bet might be a musician for whom it would be a LOLedgy PR move to marry the rich girl who did porn, but she's nowhere near hot enough for that.
 
Has anyone even thought about the fact that this place has a massive bot good enough to detect altered images of thier copyrighted material?

I'm suprised nobody has posted pictures from their website on here yet:

>get sued
>have to go to court
>arrive
>see these guys waiting for you
>what do?

View attachment 1065488


This law office seems pretty big on "fighting trolls" so I wonder if they'll try make another move or maybe contact """victims""" of Kiwi Farms to try and screw with Null.

View attachment 1065493



View attachment 1065505

LINDSAY LIEBERMAN, ESQ.
Senior Associate

Lindsay is a former Kings County prosecutor who specialized in cases of sexual violence and crimes against children. Prior to joining the Special Victims Bureau, Lindsay handled general violent crimes. She has successfully tried rapes, robberies, assaults, and child abuse cases to jury verdict and has argued matters before the Appellate Division, First Department.

Lindsay graduated cum laude from Brooklyn Law School in 2011. She completed her B.A. in Political Science at Rutgers College, graduating with Honors in 2007, and was an active member of Sigma Delta Tau as an undergraduate and alum.
Lindsay is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, and the Southern District of New York. She has been admitted pro hac vice in California, Washington D.C., and Florida.
She is a member of the Sex and Law Committee of New York City Bar Association and a member of the Cyber Sexual Abuse Task Force.
She is also an adjunct professor in the Administration Justice Department at Salve Regina University in Newport, RI.

Notable Cases She’s Led At the Firm:

August 22, 2018 – Lindsay is lead attorney in our client’s extreme stalking and harassment case (United States of America v. David Waldman). The offender stalked our client for four years after she’d ended their four-month relationship. Lindsay’s expert guidance and collaboration with the Department of Justice led to Waldman’s arrest in June 2018. He pled guilty to one count of cyberstalking on August 22, 2018 and will sentenced in November 2018. (Read full press release from the Department of Justice.)

May 9, 2018 – Our firm represents the stalking victim in United States of America v. Ryan S. Lin. The offender terrorized our client for over a year, including issuing bomb threats in her name. Lindsay is lead attorney on the case and provided excellent criminal case advocacy to our client throughout the investigation and his arrest. In May 2018, Lin pled guilty to 25 counts offenses related to his campaign of terror. He will be sentenced in September 2018. (Read full press release from the Department of Justice.)

August 11, 2017 – Lindsay successfully completed a complex and painstaking negotiation to transfer the copyright of commercial material to our client who had been the target of vicious online harassment for over five years due to the material’s widespread distribution. The transfer was a major step in giving our client control over her reputation.

She's the one who negotiated the purchase of the sluts porn video.
Maybe @Null could hire her to expose Vordrak.

One is that this was totally legal and this Lindsay woman is a complete exceptional individual.
Shes a jewish lady who does art instead of going into the family business. You tell me.
 
I’m not sure if this is in anyway related. But some GirldDoPorn news was linked on Drudgereport today

So all of these Girls are claiming they were in many ways misled... regarding them agreeing to do porn? Really? Because as near as I can tell the chick let at the heart of the C&Dwas a legal adult, and an ultra rich heiress who had every possible resource in the world with which to vet and come to an informed conclusion about those she chose to do business with. I mean these women willingly chose to have sex on camera, for money, with full knowledge that they were doing porn. Am I missing something here! Or is the bulk of the case against these sleazebag pornographers basically “women are stupid!”?

I'm curious where that article gets that people made a hobby of identifying the girls in the videos. Are they talking about that one where the thot was wearing the same clothes on the same day her boyfriend left on a tour in Afghanistan? Other than that, I can't actually recall any other instances. I might be misremembering though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
I hope they lose this case. All that money and lack of good parenting got your daughter's throat readjusted 👍 It was too late for anyone to do anything after she signed her body over. The lawyers and pappy should just take it on the face like the brave(stupid) young girl did.

EDIT: I know nothing has happened yet but knowing how fucking stupid society is, I feel this might go somewhere. Fear no fuckshit, Null.
 
Lmao of fucking course they would.

Ever since the rich girl did the facefuck shoot, daddy's been trying his damnedest to get any trace of it offline.

Why would she want to do it? Her allowance is ten times what they paid for a shoot.

Edir: Also before 8chan cucked itself, there was a Girlsdoporn subboard where people were going and identifying the girls by name and location, either they knew them by family or they were scholarship kids.
 
I’m not sure if this is in anyway related. But some GirldDoPorn news was linked on Drudgereport today


So all of these Girls are claiming they were in many ways misled... regarding them agreeing to do porn? Really? Because as near as I can tell the chick let at the heart of the C&Dwas a legal adult, and an ultra rich heiress who had every possible resource in the world with which to vet and come to an informed conclusion about those she chose to do business with. I mean these women willingly chose to have sex on camera, for money, with full knowledge that they were doing porn. Am I missing something here! Or is the bulk of the case against these sleazebag pornographers basically “women are stupid!”?
The way I remember the story, most of them flew out to do a modeling photoshoot. While they were there, the were "coerced" into going further. Obviously "modeling" and "doing porn" would have to be stated in the contract that they sign. The crux of their case, as I remember, is that they were told that the video would only go to private collectors and wouldn't be on the internet. Well, that can be technically true, but what the private collector does with his private collection is his prerogative.

Now, there are so many links in that chain, I have no idea if they actually have a case. Were the lawyers who wrote up the contract deceptively vague? Who would be the "private collector" the films were sold to, and were they connected to GirlsDoPorn and/or the filming crew? Were the women just stupid and now regret it?

Also, I think maybe two of the girls were still only 17 when in contact with the company, so even though they signed the contract and filmed the porn at 18, it's still manipulating a minor before then. I don't know, I hope I got it right or I'll feel super embarrassed and sue KiwiFarms.

Holy fuck this was an understatement. This is on the "About us":
View attachment 1066723

It is....honestly hard to believe an adult was paid to write this for a professional company. Seems more like what you would see on some tech tranny's blog about their next app will finally take down those awful trolls. Like Brianna Wu maybe.
I love the priorities in how they will get justice for their clients.
Economic justice - Yeah, that's just suing. If someone hurts you illegally, you should seek financial retribution.
Restraining orders - Ok, if someone is harassing and stalking you and you feel threatened, that's a pretty rational protection.
Advocacy in Campus Disciplinary proceeding - Um, why are lawyers getting involved here if actual laws aren't being broken?
Exposing a predator - Now we're in Twitter cancel culture territory. Now you are anti-lawyering, declaring someone should be guilty in public opinion before any crime has been charged.
"Getting the piece-of-shit thrown in jail" - If actual laws are being broken, that should be the top priority! Not being number one on the list just looks like you want people thrown in jail for being a piece of shit.
 
DMCA_Abuse.gif


If I was a millionaire banker who wanted this video nuked off of the internet, I would just find a way to fudge the girls date of birth by six days. Then this would technically be child pornography and you could get rid of it forever.

45345314545.JPG


✡ ✡ ✡ Goldberg Law✡ ✡ ✡ is the final boss for the kiwifarms. I could not imagine a more perfect adversary.

screencapture-cagoldberglaw-about-lindsay-lieberman-2019-12-25-07_02_43.png

I wonder who that client could be...maybe a certain vice president of Goldman Sachs

Her twitter https://twitter.com/lindsayl908

Why do all these twitter feminist name their movements "#(pound) me too", or "its on us". They sound like porno titles.

tweet 2.JPG


SHE IS A BRIANNA WU FAN (she liked this tweet). That tweet is from her boss (Goldberg Law)

Tweet 1.JPG


She is also into body positivity based on her likes
31313.JPG
 
Last edited:
The way I remember the story, most of them flew out to do a modeling photoshoot. While they were there, the were "coerced" into going further.

Details of said coercion, according to the DOJ:

Some of the women were pressured into signing documents without reviewing them and then threatened with legal action or outing if they failed to perform; some were not permitted to leave the shooting locations until the videos were made

Fying dumb/desperate women out for modeling work or even a more vanilla porn shoot and not paying them/paying to fly them back till they've done way more than they initially agreed to is a pretty common practice in the industry. Money is the leverage pornographers have over performers, and they use it to get the footage they want.

All of this to say that it takes something really special for a rich girl to go through with a Facial Abuse shoot. I'd pay $200 to know the details of what motivated her.
 
A few random comments on the CAGoldbergLaw.com web site, since I know that someone from the firm will have to read this thread, and this comment. Naturally they will bill Miss Kelly Wang, or Daddy Wang, for the time spent reading. Imagine having to pay someone to read this stuff.

The text is written by some soccer mom trying to sound clever and edgy in front of her children's team-mates. It's cringe all the way down.

Wait this is a real website? I thought this was some sort of trolljob that some KF member wrote up as a joke.

This is what they're going with to find clients?

:story:

1577282481772.png
 
Like Brianna Wu maybe.

She is a Wu fan on her twitter.

Capture.JPG


It is another sho'ah


341313.JPG


Warning: A screenshot of harassment that one of Goldberg clients had to deal with!


I wonder if the nudes of Ms. Goldberg are still out there somewhere
 
Get ready for this one.
They are copyright striking this picture:
View attachment 1066105
On this thread

Notice how it's back in August, and is a dead thread with nothing identifying her? Absolutely useless.

There is a post further down in the thread identifying her. Aside from a few 4chan posts and spam, nothing else shows up for "Kelly Balthazar" from the last 6 months. "Kelly Wang" is too generic a name to show anything related to her (apart from this). Even "Jiayi Wang" shows lots of unrelated results within the last 6 months. Their lawyer is clearly getting lazy and just clicking results, quickly finding an email address and sending DMCAs so they can bill for it without putting any thought into it.

Kelly Balthazar - spoiled and nutty daughter of a Goldman Sachs VP worth tens of millions, got into some sort of fight with her father and five days after her 18th birthday did two hardcore porn shoots, (one with FacialAbuse of all things) as a way to embarrass her parents. under the name "Mayli." She later got arrested and kicked out of Georgetown for drug dealing, changed her name to Kelly Wang and is now an 'artist' https://www.instagram.com/jiayiwang_inkart/ & https://www.jiayiwanginkart.com/.

While the whole story about Kelly doing porn is fascinating, I feel bad for her that her lolcow lawyer and father have gone and kicked the hornet's nest when Kelly's clearly moved on with her life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back