- Joined
- Oct 25, 2014
I have a genius IQ, I'm not intimidated by your crayon question. I was a Harry F Byrd scholar, an Honors college student, and I finished putting myself through college as a single mom broke as shit with 3 children while having to sue my University financial aid office pro-se for discrimination (and won). So try that and try running a house, homeschooling and cooking from scratch with 5 children and pregnant while on a budget, while trying to take care of a husband too. Then we can talk about crayons and "intelligence".
Marshall and I are strictly monogamous, we don't allow others into our sex life, so I don't have sex with anyone else, neither does he. We play bondage but no, no ass to mouth because it's not hygienic. Ew.
Striking a woman is not "sexism" when the man is a victim of psychological abuse or was attacked first. To give women sovereign immunity to abuse men with no consequence is called "benevolent sexism" (against women). It's sexism against women because you try to elevate woman to "angel" status. That dehumanizes women. It's not gender equality.
Psychologic abuse of a spouse causes a victim to lash out, even physically. Kiwi Farmers have relentlessly attacked Marshall with no thought of how his ex had treated him. Did you ever consider the fact that she psychologically abused him for years by sneaking around doing drugs, getting DUIs, endangering their family being involved with drug dealers and almost killing the child they had together in a car accident because she was high? That's psychological abuse. American law acquits women of first degree murder when they kill their abusers, where's the empathy for abused men? Not to mention she provoked him further by throwing a lot cigarette at him that evening. So Marshall got her off the hook when she got caught driving a child high but the moment he did something, she called the cops. Hypocrisy to say the least.
In The Torah there is no such thing as "wife beater". In Exodus 21:18 it says that the person who strikes another during a fight must pay/arrange for the other's healing/recovery. It's not a sin that leads to being "cut off" or "put to death". It's a situation that requires the person who strikes to restitute to the other.
Yet your husband has done meth, if you taking drugs is psychological abuse to him, then him taking meth is psychological abuse to you, are you allowed to strike him back then?
In either case as bad as what you did was, he could have "striked back" at you in a more civilised way. Refusing to help you in whatever court order you got for "endangering your child" for example. Or leaving you.
Instead he takes drugs himself... And that doesn't strike you as hypocritical? I don't know if he has his own DUIs but with his bluster of being some tough edgy moron it doesn't leave much to the imagination
Either way it's terrible for your kids being raised in what seems to be violent home