Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS

[Elric of Melnibone]

I plotted his reactions and posts for 2020 into a 24-hour window and... well, he probably sleeps at some point...
View attachment 1101122
edit: for time zones more familiar to the continental US, the left and right edges of the plot correspond to the time 19:00 eastern, 18:00 central, 17:00 mountain, or 16:00 pacific.

The fact that you put this much work into proving that Anominous cant be Nick is the funniest thing I have read all day. I can save you some time and trouble though, He was born June 20th, 1952 in St Louis Missouri and he currently lives in Louisiana, so he would be CST.

 

[Kosher Salt]

I missed how he was open to being appointed because it's usually an elected position in Texas. Did someone die or retire? He got his current judgeship by being appointed by Rick Perry even though that's also usually an elected position, then has been reelected as an inevitability. So he was apparently expecting to get appointed to fill a vacancy?

Yes, Nick said that an opening had just appeared and Chupp was angling for appointment; then he'd be the incumbent judge when elections come around. Nick claims that the re-election rate for judges is something ridiculous like 95%, but that's clearly way off... I'd say it's closer to 99.5%. Is Texas very different in that respect?

 

[AnOminous]

I'm not sure the times line up exactly here.

It looks like Governor Greg Abbott appointed Mike Wallach to the Second District Court of Appeals, from his previous judgeship of the 348th District in Tarrant County, and he took office on September 3, 2019. The TCPA hearing was three days after Wallach took office, on September 6, 2019.

It seems unlikely Chupp would only have learned he hadn't been appointed to a job he wanted three days after someone else had literally started performing it. I suppose it's possible he was still tard raging over it.

 

[Jub-Jub]

It seems unlikely Chupp would only have learned he hadn't been appointed to a job he wanted three days after someone else had literally started performing it. I suppose it's possible he was still tard raging over it.

Who knows exactly what caused Chupp to Chupp things up, but I wouldn't be surprised if Nick mixed up events and forgot about the writ of mandamus. The amount of autism, insanity, and their respective dates is hard to keep track of.

 

[theworstkindofeurofag]

Joe would have sued Hanleia and rolled the dice with jurisdictional fuckery, on account she actually called him a pedophile.

Hanleia lives in Japan, though, right? I assume it'd have been quite complicated to sue her?

I'd have probably gone after Marzgurl. She started the whole hashtag thing. She was the one who openly admitted to wanting to get Vic cancelled from cons. Now I think it's too late, since the statute of limitations for defamation runs out after a year in Texas.

I know, I know, Marzgurl has nothing and Vic could've gotten nothing as compensation from her. This would've been a way to set an example.

 

[TheClappening]

Hanleia lives in Japan, though, right? I assume it'd have been quite complicated to sue her?

I'd have probably gone after Marzgurl. She started the whole hashtag thing. She was the one who openly admitted to wanting to get Vic cancelled from cons. Now I think it's too late, since the statute of limitations for defamation runs out after a year in Texas.

I know, I know, Marzgurl has nothing and Vic could've gotten nothing as compensation from her. This would've been a way to set an example.

Nick told Joe that, and he still said he would go for it, jurisdiction be damned. Granted, he doesn't have all the details of the case, namely Hanleia would've just been another voice screaming into the wind were it not for the amplification of Monica, Jamie, Ron, Funimation, and to an extent, Armzgurl.

It seems unlikely Chupp would only have learned he hadn't been appointed to a job he wanted three days after someone else had literally started performing it. I suppose it's possible he was still tard raging over it.

From what Nick was saying, that's basically it. Chupp must have been stewing in butthurt for three days and then had to deal with retarded chinese cartoon voices.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

I'd have probably gone after Marzgurl. She started the whole hashtag thing. She was the one who openly admitted to wanting to get Vic cancelled from cons. Now I think it's too late, since the statute of limitations for defamation runs out after a year in Texas.

A year from the latest instance of the tort, upon you finding out.

If she didn't shut up immediately in Feb 2019, she's still fair game.

 

[Friend computer]

Nick told Joe that, and he still said he would go for it, jurisdiction be damned. Granted, he doesn't have all the details of the case, namely Hanleia would've just been another voice screaming into the wind were it not for the amplification of Monica, Jamie, Ron, Funimation, and to an extent, Armzgurl.


From what Nick was saying, that's basically it. Chupp must have been stewing in butthurt for three days and then had to deal with retarded chinese cartoon voices.

Thats intelligent to mishandle evidence in a case straight after not getting a job that heavily involves evidence.

 

[AlexJonesGotMePregnant]

I'm not sure the times line up exactly here.

It looks like Governor Greg Abbott appointed Mike Wallach to the Second District Court of Appeals, from his previous judgeship of the 348th District in Tarrant County, and he took office on September 3, 2019. The TCPA hearing was three days after Wallach took office, on September 6, 2019.

It seems unlikely Chupp would only have learned he hadn't been appointed to a job he wanted three days after someone else had literally started performing it. I suppose it's possible he was still tard raging over it.

Nick did say that no one told Chupp that he didn't get the job; considering how dumb and lazy he is, he may not have been watching for any announcements and instead just sat around waiting for the congrats from the appeals court directly like a sucker.

It was #HisTurn.

 

[Steve Smyff]

Hanleia lives in Japan, though, right? I assume it'd have been quite complicated to sue her?

If someone wanted to make them pay their just deserts, getting someone in trouble with the law in Japan is interesting ... once those gears start turning, the Japanese "justice" system has north of 90% conviction rate - I've heard claims as high as 98%. What it takes to get the gears grinding on a person, who knows?

I first learned this in a documentary I saw in the 90s and it was repeated again in the recent kerfuffle with Ghosn.

With that conviction rate I always thought they must be pretty damn selective about who to prosecute (it must be a pretty high bar for evidence and strength of case), but reading about the Ghosn case really makes me wonder.

 

[Iron Hamster]

Joe's thoughts on Vic (after a crash course from Rackets):

Vic definitely suffered damage.
Joe would have sued Hanleia and rolled the dice with jurisdictional fuckery, on account she actually called him a pedophile.
"They're claiming Vic's suit was a SLAPP suit? Wow..."
"It's hard for me to believe none of his claims were meritorious."
"I don't know much about anti-SLAPP or the details, but I think he has a good chance in appeals."
He's not a fan of cancel culture.

BuT nO LAwYeRS bUT nicK and tY THiNk vIC Has A CAse!

Also, I think Nick's enthusiasm about the case is rubbing off on him. Could be interesting if he wants to noodle the Vic case too and brings a fresh perspective. He wasn't a bad guest, though Nick dominated the air time. Mostly because Nick loves to talk and Joe was in a new environment and was probably just quiet because of that.

Also something I didn't know: Apparently Chupp's bad day wasn't anything related to a writ of mandamus, it was because Chupp didn't get appointed to the appeals court, and they apparently ghosted him when they denied him.

Don't forget hanleia was talking about rials actual pedo boyfriend and the turds applied it to Vic.

 

[P5Fever]

If someone wanted to make them pay their just deserts, getting someone in trouble with the law in Japan is interesting ... once those gears start turning, the Japanese "justice" system has north of 90% conviction rate - I've heard claims as high as 98%. What it takes to get the gears grinding on a person, who knows?

I first learned this in a documentary I saw in the 90s and it was repeated again in the recent kerfuffle with Ghosn.

With that conviction rate I always thought they must be pretty damn selective about who to prosecute (it must be a pretty high bar for evidence and strength of case), but reading about the Ghosn case really makes me wonder.

The reason the conviction rate is so high is because Japan had a huge problem with corruption in their courts for decades. Why do you think Ace Attorney is such a ridiculous franchise? It’s a parody of the corruption in the Japanese courts. It takes the corruption of real life and cranks it up to eleven.

 

[diskboomer]

Don't forget hanleia was talking about rials actual pedo boyfriend and the turds applied it to Vic.

Ty even had that in the record; and it showed toward actual malice from Funimation, and Rial. As they knew it couldn't have been about Vic, as it was a former Funi employee, and Ex of Rial's.
Yet they still went with it, and "investigated", and fired Vic after the tweet, and story saying it was about him.

 

[Steve Smyff]

I'm not following you here - how do 90% of the Sasaki-Suzuki-Rando-Criminal-Chans (SSRCC)** that the cops bring in get on the wrong side of somebody

1. with political connecitons
2. with money
3. with a grudge against SSRCC
4. who finds out somehow that the SSRCC is in the system
5. motivated to exercise their corrupt connections

to get that 90% conviction rate?

The numbers aren't adding up for me - I might believe like 5 to 10% of criminals [excess above western systems/rates] have a connected person like that in their past, but 80% excess convictions above western court systems? That is a SERIOUSLY messed up rate of corruption - worse than India even.

** post script: I missed Yamada, Yoshida and Nobunaga in there, sorry YYN.

The reason the conviction rate is so high is because Japan had a huge problem with corruption in their courts for decades. Why do you think Ace Attorney is such a ridiculous franchise? It’s a parody of the corruption in the Japanese courts. It takes the corruption of real life and cranks it up to eleven.

 

[Least Concern]

If someone wanted to make them pay their just deserts, getting someone in trouble with the law in Japan is interesting ... once those gears start turning, the Japanese "justice" system has north of 90% conviction rate - I've heard claims as high as 98%. What it takes to get the gears grinding on a person, who knows?

I first learned this in a documentary I saw in the 90s and it was repeated again in the recent kerfuffle with Ghosn.

With that conviction rate I always thought they must be pretty damn selective about who to prosecute (it must be a pretty high bar for evidence and strength of case), but reading about the Ghosn case really makes me wonder.

I've heard these kinds of numbers too (and I stumbled upon the Ghosn story the other day - fascinating stuff), but remember that that's criminal court. This is a civil matter. I couldn't find statistics for civil cases after a brief search, but since no prosecutorial discretion is involved, I suspect the results of such cases to be a lot more nuanced. And that's assuming the civil case would occur in Japan in the first place… wouldn't it actually occur in the US in this case?

 

[Steve Smyff]

yeah, my revenge fantasy was about framing her criminally** (and getting that sweet sweet 90% working in "my" favour) & getting her tossed in jail, not civil stuff.

** and if the 90% comes from aggressive cops & prosecutors arguing in front of prosecutor-friendly judges & juries, not from selective prosecutors only prosecuting the strongest (most-obvious, best-evidenced) cases, how hard can it be to frame someone

I've heard these kinds of numbers too (and I stumbled upon the Ghosn story the other day - fascinating stuff), but remember that that's criminal court. This is a civil matter. I couldn't find statistics for civil cases after a brief search, but since no prosecutorial discretion is involved, I suspect the results of such cases to be a lot more nuanced. And that's assuming the civil case would occur in Japan in the first place… wouldn't it actually occur in the US in this case?

 

[AnOminous]

Hanleia lives in Japan, though, right? I assume it'd have been quite complicated to sue her?

Suing her wouldn't be the problem. Actually serving her would be.

From what Nick was saying, that's basically it. Chupp must have been stewing in butthurt for three days and then had to deal with retarded chinese cartoon voices.

Well if so it would be ironic that he followed up his tard rage on not getting a job on the appeals court by proving that he wasn't fit to be on it. There's no room for tard rage on an appeals court.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Suing her wouldn't be the problem. Actually serving her would be.

Yeah, suing her would have been overall difficult.

For one thing, her original tweet didn't mention Vic by name, except in a second tweet, which was just a screenshot of something that someone else said:

🍌🐟 on Twitter: "A friend linked me this Cw underage sexual assault……

archived 20 Jan 2019 22:01:10 UTC

archive.md

Vic's lawsuit would have had to establish that she was talking about him in the first tweet, and/or that her second tweet was actionable defamation on its own. That could probably be done, but it complicates the argument.

Second, she was just a random Twitter handle; her dox wasn't known until a couple of months later (based on when the dox were archived, that'd be March 10... she apparently didn't have a thread until July 2, though). Vic would have had to sue her based on a pseudonymous Twitter handle, and probably would've had to obtain discovery from Twitter to actually track down her real identity... I'm not sure if the farm's efforts in compiling her dox would have even been usable for proving who she was in a legal context. I suspect probably not.

Third, it's unlikely that her tweet would have done any damage on its own. She was a literal nobody, some random ass-mad fujoshit, bitching about someone who ass-mad fujoshits had been bitching about for a decade because he wouldn't sign their gay incest child porn artwork. She could've argued that she wasn't really responsible for the harm to Vic that was primarily caused by other people, who had more relevance and credibility, picking up the accusations of sexual misconduct and blasting them to much larger audiences.

And of course, let's not forget that she probably has no money and nothing worth taking. Suing her would have been a purely symbolic gesture.

Pretty much every aspect of trying to sue her would have been complicated.

edit: it would've also been much harder to show actual malice, just in case Vic ends up being ruled a public figure of some kind.

 

[In Heaven]

I'm not following you here - how do 90% of the Sasaki-Suzuki-Rando-Criminal-Chans (SSRCC) that the cops bring in get on the wrong side of somebody

1. with political connecitons
2. with money
3. with a grudge against SSRCC
4. who finds out somehow that the SSRCC is in the system
5. motivated to exercise their corrupt connections

to get that 90% conviction rate?

The numbers aren't adding up for me - I might believe like 5 to 10% of criminals [excess above western systems/rates] have a connected person like that in their past, but 80% excess convictions above western court systems? That is a SERIOUSLY messed up rate of corruption - worse than India even.

I remember hearing that Japan's court systems run under the assumption "guilty until proven innocent," so maybe that has something to do with it?

 

[Basil II]

Didn't Fruit Moot already talk with McAfee on a stream once, and his take away was basically 'never meet your heroes?" Or was that somebody else?

I had a short convo with Feeder Moot in chat and he thinks McAfee is bullshitting for attention.