Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

"Most people's taxes go to....public schools etc, not to raise their litter"

how fucking ignorant can you possibly keep exposing yourself to be? 🤣

what the fuck do you think a public school is doing? 😂
RAISING PEOPLE'S CHILDREN...free childcare while draining the tax system dry at $8,500/child a year
Umm people who don't have children pay into schools, so children grow up to be productive members of society, and not end up as ignorant, abusive, little faggots like you're raising your children to be. I'm not exaggerating when I say that your children would be better off dead than the way you're raising them. Then again you're an anti-vaxxer so them dying is still a possibility.
 
"Welfare" is just capatilistic lingo for "I don't agree with how you use tax dollars even though I used tax dollars too".

That's the 5th time I've repeated that on this thread because the loyal user base on here is UNEDUCATED

Tell the truth, the real reason you and Marshall haven't gotten married officially is that if Marshall marries you your food stamp benefits go down. I do know how much fringe religious cultists love their welfare bennies. The thinking, I guess, is that it's their job to have the children and it's our job to pay for them. Maybe you shouldn't have children if you can't afford to raise them.
 
If I, or any other Kiwi, started spamming gifs, reaction images, double posting, having duplicate accounts, the same thing would happen. Even well established users can expect a temp ban if they double post one too many times.
This is NOT CENSORSHIP. This is common courtesy and understanding the social etiquette of your surroundings. As @Marshall Castersen is too backwards to understand basic rules of spelling and grammar, I guess basic rules of public behavior confuse him.
Additionally, KF is not a government entity, and not bound by any constitution, or constitutional amendment regarding free speech.

You're a loyal KF user who wants to rant about "courtesy" and "ettiquette". Lady, get that big fucking log out of your eye.

Multiple deletions of my comments is censorship. You're an uneducated moron.

I knew she was going to pull this " I gave birth, therefore I a superior being" bullshit some pregnancy addicts like to haul out, like being a mother makes you special.
Holy shit, you did something human women have done since the beginning of time! You want a gold star for it!
We do it every day.
Cats, rats, and even cockroaches can have babies. You're not special.

nobody said shit about a gold medal you just sound like a jealous woman who has a barren womb or a history of Csections

Birthing strong in resistence to popular culture is praise worthy. No, not every woman has successfully done that since the beginning of time.

Lady, stop talking already, you sound so uneducated
 
Oooh, I see. What a corrupt person you are. You tried to wait until I left, 20 pages AFTER I said no one could address my Appeals, to cowardice your way into a reply. My husband said it was OK for me to come back to the thread to settle this issue. And this issue only. I'm not worried about your fellow KF farms moronic baseless accusations.

Nice try at debunking my pleading but your magic show doesn't work on an educated woman like me. You may be able to fool the uneducated folks on here reading but get ready to have your ass handed to you

For ONE, there is NO legal precedent for discarding a pro-se litigants pleading on the basis of citation and header errors. Nice try though Rekeita.

FOR TWO, the actual legal standard is to construe a Pro-se litigants pleading LIBERALLY. See Vinnedge v Gibbs, 550 F. 2d 926, 928 (4th district)

Also, see Aschcroft and Twombly. "A claim has facial plausibility when the Plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged" (Ashcroft v Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556)

Additionally, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which lower courts are bound to follow, and the Sup. Court must ensure they do, says under Rule 8(e): "pleadings must be construed so as to do justice". In other words, pleadings cannot be tossed out for technical errors when the case law is solid.

So that brings me to my final point: you can harp on technical errors all you want but the FACT remains that my case law supports the legal conclusion that they don't qualify for immunity under CDA 230

That's why you completely ignored the case law. He's only off the hook by corruption.

My opinion of your incompetence isn't really that important. What matters is that the Fourth Circuit held your pleading did not state a cause of action.

I could go on at length about the technical errors in your appeal--the Table of Authorities is a mess, your statement of Issues Presented raises no legal issues for the appellate court to consider, there is no standard of review identified--but that is just the moldy bread on the turd sandwich. The shit in the center is that Nemet pretty specifically holds that the Fourth Circuit law is that Section 230 immunity is strong and will not be overcome by vague allegations. Hell, the plaintiff in Nemet accused the website operator of making up posts and that wasn't enough to overcome Iqbal/Twombly and Section 230 immunity. You couldn't even do that.

Go ahead and tell yourself that the Masons who rule this Flat Earth conspired to let Dear Leader off the hook for making fun of your dumb Mountain Jew ass if it makes you feel better. It doesn't change the fact that you fucking lost and lost hard.
 
Umm people who don't have children pay into schools, so children grow up to be productive members of society, and not end up as ignorant, abusive, little faggots like you're raising your children to be. I'm not exaggerating when I say that your children would be better off dead than the way you're raising them. Then again you're an anti-vaxxer so them dying is still a possibility.

Translation: "my sexist ego feels threatened by your non-patriarchal family structure so I'll try to Scapegoat you with insults and gang harassment"

Got it, understand 😁

My opinion of your incompetence isn't really that important. What matters is that the Fourth Circuit held your pleading did not state a cause of action.

I could go on at length about the technical errors in your appeal--the Table of Authorities is a mess, your statement of Issues Presented raises no legal issues for the appellate court to consider, there is no standard of review identified--but that is just the moldy bread on the turd sandwich. The shit in the center is that Nemet pretty specifically holds that the Fourth Circuit law is that Section 230 immunity is strong and will not be overcome by vague allegations. Hell, the plaintiff in Nemet accused the website operator of making up posts and that wasn't enough to overcome Iqbal/Twombly and Section 230 immunity. You couldn't even do that.

Go ahead and tell yourself that the Masons who rule this Flat Earth conspired to let Dear Leader off the hook for making fun of your dumb Mountain Jew ass if it makes you feel better. It doesn't change the fact that you fucking lost and lost hard.

Translation: "I can't defeat why you said so I'll just talk in circles and try to deny the Free Masons run the show"

Got it, understand 😁
 
Translation: "I can't defeat why you said so I'll just talk in circles and try to deny the Free Masons run the show"

Got it, understand 😁
Translation: I'm a pagan (hey if you can consider people outside of your stupid cult pagans, I can consider people in your stupid cult pagans) slut, who only has two or three prepackaged comebacks. God I've wasted my life.

Got it, understand.

Oh and you're just as good at not posting anymore as you are in every other aspect of your life. Not very.
 
Tell the truth, the real reason you and Marshall haven't gotten married officially is that if Marshall marries you your food stamp benefits go down. I do know how much fringe religious cultists love their welfare bennies. The thinking, I guess, is that it's their job to have the children and it's our job to pay for them. Maybe you shouldn't have children if you can't afford to raise them.

Incorrect on your first ASSUMPTIONS

"Maybe you shouldn't have children if you can't afford to raise them."

UM NO. Maybe your US Government should not exist and people can live like free nomads the way Elohim intended

It's not my responsibility to sterilize my uterus to convenience Capitalism.
 
UM NO. Maybe your US Government should not exist and people can live like free nomads the way Elohim intended
Then leave. Go to some remote shit hole with no law, infrastructure or apparently crop farming and let's see how well you do. I mean getting out from under the government's yoke is something you and your equally retarded, manlet husband wants.

My guess is your entire family will be dead in two weeks...tops
 

Attachments

  • 1579469412383.jpg
    1579469412383.jpg
    177.7 KB · Views: 94
Incorrect on your first ASSUMPTIONS

"Maybe you shouldn't have children if you can't afford to raise them."

UM NO. Maybe your US Government should not exist and people can live like free nomads the way Elohim intended

It's not my responsibility to sterilize my uterus to convenience Capitalism.

If the US government didn't exist, you and your spawn would starve to death. You certainly couldn't rely on Marshall's hard work to keep you fed.
 
If the US government didn't exist, you and your spawn would starve to death. You certainly couldn't rely on Marshall's hard work to keep you fed.
If he would start actually charging for all the cock he sucks then he would be able to feed his family. Then again if he charged people would just go get their dick sucked by someone less gross and pathetic, so who knows.
 
So what's really wrong with a lot of America's legal system? 🤔

I'm gad you have exposed yourself to what you really are. I actually disagree with many of the posters on here. I don't believe you are an Appalachian white woman LARPing as a Jew. I think you are a Jew both spiritually and racially. Every other posting of yours is something about how much you hate Rome, or Jesus, or pagans, or Goyim, or anyone who isn't a Jew.

That is typical Jewish behavior and us "goyim" have known about this Jew behavior since your gypsy-esque, rootless, cosmopolitan people first step foot in our lands. That's why you have been kicked out of 109 countries, and hopefully soon it will be "110 and never again."
 
Here is why you lose on the law.

The Nemet court rejected the argument that Section 230 immunity is overcome by a plaintiff alleging a website operator encouraged allegedly defamatory comments by:

(1) the "structure and design of its website," or (2) its participation in "the preparation of" consumer complaints​

Nemet Chevrolet, Inc. v. Consumeraffairs.com, Inc., 591 F.3d 250, 256-7 (4th Cir. 2009).

Your appellate brief states:

By his actions, Defendant Moon has encouraged unlawful defamatory statements against Plaintiff. These have included false allegations of the Plaintiff being married more than 2 times, being sexually promiscuous, and falsely attributing sexual acts to the Plaintiff which are untrue. In addition, Defendant Moon has encouraged the illegal acts of invasion of her privacy by encouraging the publication of private facts and statements to put the Plaintiff in a false light.​

Appellant's Brief, p. 7 (emphasis added).

You needed to convince the Fourth Circuit to overrule Nemet. You provided no reason for it to do that.

That's the shit in your sandwich.
 
Last edited:
"Most people's taxes go to....public schools etc, not to raise their litter"

how fucking ignorant can you possibly keep exposing yourself to be? 🤣

what the fuck do you think a public school is doing? 😂
RAISING PEOPLE'S CHILDREN...free childcare while draining the tax system dry at $8,500/child a year
It also provides a basic education, which is need to be a citizen in a functioning democracy.
(Honestly what we spend on education isn’t utilized properly, and the US public education system needs massive reforms, but that’s for another argument).
The taxes you pay for school go so that the next generation will (hopefully) be productive members of society and not degrade into illiterate hooligans.
 
Back