- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2014
Yeah but when you're banging 20 guys those inches add up.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
I meant mistaking 10x a day with a minute man as a "great sex life" over 3-4x a week with a guy of any size who takes his time and does a thorough job.
@TamarYaelBatYah proudly describes herself as a "breeder", so I doubt she needs or expects more than a pump and dump experience. All she really wants out if it is the sperm deposit. She measures offspring as an accomplishment.
There are some people who would be interested in seeing birth control or family planning be incentivised for those receiving government assistance. Just a little factoid.
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2014
remember he describes himself as too smart yet says he flunked 9th grade because he was too rebellious.
He didn't learn anything at school. Even at a young age he arrogantly assumed he knew everything and ignored what everyone else was learning
She also saw masturbation as evil
Wonder if she ever got off in her entire life. Possibly. But possibly not. Maybe she sees getting off as evil too. I think she mentioned or at least comes off as someone who shames pregnancy pains.
Yet she's totally a feminist and fighting misogyny you guys
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
It's only feminist if you're doing it HER way, according to her very specific religious beliefs.
What any reasonable human would call serial monogamy and be done with it, she has to find a way to shoehorn it into her religion as " covenant" relationship or " concubinage." Just call it what it is, there's no shame in it, unless you shame others for same, which she does, because they don't do it the exact same way SHE does.
The song and dance about how we all use tax dollars so how dare any of us judge how she uses them is complete bullshit.
She conveniently omits that she has committed fraud 5x to get said tax dollars, and will soon be committing fraud a 6th time to aquire more.
It's no different than people faking sick to steal disability money.
So sorry not sorry Melinda, I do believe my use of tax dollars is more legitimate than yours.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Fun fact: Marshall Castersen is a "minute man" for both pronunciations of "minute" and both meanings of the size pronunciation.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
What is making me happy right now is that they both finally said they won't be back, and are obviously trying. However they will crack at some point, because they just can't help themselves. It's like manna from heaven.
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2014
She's still lurking. She can't keep from logging in and seeing what we're saying. She failed at leaving the site the same way she's failed in every other aspect of her life. Spectacularly and utterly.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
Ok, so now we have a second person trying to make a half educated attempt to address my Appeals. Time to come onto the scene again
. Because this legal issue is the only issue somewhat left on the table. It's yet the final issue to tackle to demonstrate to the entire world just how uneducated the average loyal Kiwi Farmer is ...and bask in the glorious feeling knowing how much smarter I am than you. Mr. Rodger Dodger @RodgerDodger : YES, you do need to demonstrate your accusations if you're going to follow the comments properly where I stated there was legal corruption and the courts did not even follow their own rules and laws. You obviously have failed to follow the thread properly. You jumped in at some point without reading before you speak.
Repeatedly Mr. Looney Mooney has insisted several allegations about my pleadings and lawsuits. Not once have any of these allegations been backed with facts.
When I came to Kiwi Farms to show the entire world just how uneducated the loyal user base on Kiwi Farms is, not a single one of you could loyal KFarmers could back up your accusations and allegations about my lawsuits (or any issue for that matter) with facts. No matter how many times I repeated myself, you all talked in circles.
(No need to address any more of your accusations about my intelligence, my vagina, my beauty, my past, my theology, my philosophies, my lifestyle, my husband's sexual performance, etc because you will just talk in circles until the coming of the Son of Man.)
Then came the brave soul Talk Talk Talk who failed miserably to rebuttal my claim of legal corruption.
Sir Rodger Dodger, if you are going to persist in telling me there is no legal corruption, then BACK UP YOUR SHIT WITH FACTS. You can't answer my claim of legal corruption and case law in my Appeals, now can you?
Also, learn how to read a thread properly before commenting. My comment was in reference to Talk Talk Talk failing to demonstrate there was not legal corruption.
Now...do you want to stop blowing hot empty air out of your mouth and try a better educated attempt at defending the argument that the courts adequately upheld their own rules and laws?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Annnnd there we go. What she lacks in brains, she makes up for in predictability.
- Joined
- May 22, 2016
like clockwork, she returns after saying she was gone for good
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2014
- Joined
- May 26, 2019
Lol that exit lasted. Answer me something: Is it your inescapable narcissism that cannot possibly allow any corner of the internet to mock you, are you genuinely stupid enough to think you're being constructive here, or are you just a masterb8r?Ok, so now we have a second person trying to make a half educated attempt to address my Appeals. Time to come onto the scene again
Mr. Rodger Dodger @RodgerDodger : YES, you do need to demonstrate your accusations if you're going to follow the comments properly where I stated there was legal corruption and the courts did not even follow their own rules and laws. You obviously have failed to follow the thread properly. You jumped in at some point without reading before you speak.
Repeatedly Mr. Looney Mooney has insisted several allegations about my pleadings and lawsuits. Not once have any of these allegations been backed with facts.
When I came to Kiwi Farms to show the entire world just how uneducated the loyal user base on Kiwi Farms is, not a single one of you could loyal KFarmers could back up your accusations and allegations about my lawsuits (or any issue for that matter) with facts. No matter how many times I repeated myself, you all talked in circles.
(No need to address any more of your accusations about my intelligence, my vagina, my beauty, my past, my theology, my philosophies, my lifestyle, my husband's sexual performance, etc because you will just talk in circles until the coming of the Son of Man.)
Then came the brave soul Talk Talk Talk who failed miserably to rebuttal my claim of legal corruption.
Sir Rodger Dodger, if you are going to persist in telling me there is no legal corruption, then BACK UP YOUR SHIT WITH FACTS. You can't answer my claim of legal corruption and case law in my Appeals, now can you?
Also, learn how to read a thread properly before commenting. My comment was in reference to Talk Talk Talk failing to demonstrate there was not legal corruption.
Now...do you want to stop blowing hot empty air out of your mouth and try a better educated attempt at defending the argument that the courts adequately upheld their own rules and laws?
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
She almost lasted a whole day. But at least she showed a shred of restraint and only used two stupid emojis.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
I already stated previously that I would return if someone would bring up the legal issue. Read before you speak!
Also, as aside note, you lack the educational and spiritual credentials to label anyone a Narcissist. You're use of the phrase "allow anyone to mock" is another disguise for demanding I be a pacifist. Take your pacifism and shove it up your UNEDUCATED ass
- Joined
- May 26, 2019
So you're genuinely stupid enough to believe you're being constructive. Perfect.I already stated previously that I would return if someone would bring up the legal issue. Read before you speak!
Also, as aside note, you lack the educational and spiritual credentials to label anyone a Narcissist. You're use of the phrase "allow anyone to mock" is another disguise for demanding I be a pacifist. Take your pacifism and shove it up your UNEDUCATED ass
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
Anybody besides me see the failure here?
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
Define "constructive"
- Joined
- May 26, 2019
"Constructive" in your context would be depriving us of content, not doubling down every other day and continuing to spew the very shit we're mocking you for making your issues with this site so much worse for you.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
What do you have against pacifism? Are you too much of an ape to use brains instead of fists?
Actually, what am I saying, you have no brains
Actually, what am I saying, you have no brains