Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Amud said:
I never claimed to be a genius. You have put words in my mouth several times already. I really wish you would stop it.
Click to expand...


4YhGC1Q.png



>community college
 
  • Winner
  • Autistic
  • Feels
Reactions: KimCoppolaAficionado, cromit, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 21 others
Amud said:
"professional credentials"are just a special treehouse club. They don't study dissenting opinions. Now, fields like mathematics and applied technology are still valid, but any subjective, abstract, or theoretical fields like the humanities and social "sciences" are a bunch of opinions. You're going to college to learn opinions, and they try to tell you it's an objective fact. If anything, I would be MORE hesitant to accept the claims of the academic orthodoxy in fields related to social "Sciences". They are all constructed to confirm their bizarre, irrational "progressive" opinions.
Click to expand...

CrackpotTrophy.jpg

Here is your crackpot trophy. If you quit sticking balloons up your nose, you'll have a better chance of living long enough to be really embarrassed by it.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: cromit, CisCat, AN/ALR56 and 17 others
Amud said:
"professional credentials"are just a special treehouse club. They don't study dissenting opinions. Now, fields like mathematics and applied technology are still valid, but any subjective, abstract, or theoretical fields like the humanities and social "sciences" are a bunch of opinions. You're going to college to learn opinions, and they try to tell you it's an objective fact. If anything, I would be MORE hesitant to accept the claims of the academic orthodoxy in fields related to social "Sciences". They are all constructed to confirm their bizarre, irrational "progressive" opinions.
Click to expand...

Spoken like a man who has no idea how research works in any field whatsoever.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: doubledigitgendergap, cromit, CisCat and 22 others
Amud said:
"professional credentials"are just a special treehouse club. They don't study dissenting opinions. Now, fields like mathematics and applied technology are still valid, but any subjective, abstract, or theoretical fields like the humanities and social "sciences" are a bunch of opinions. You're going to college to learn opinions, and they try to tell you it's an objective fact. If anything, I would be MORE hesitant to accept the claims of the academic orthodoxy in fields related to social "Sciences". They are all constructed to confirm their bizarre, irrational "progressive" opinions.
Click to expand...

Do you not understand how the humanities work? Your entire theses are based around dissenting opinions. For example, since you bring up the erroneous anthropological science, the burden would be on you to prove that your thesis is somehow better than the past five decades of commentary on the racism in anthropology.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Muhyo, Cephalometrist and 10 others
Amud said:
"professional credentials"are just a special treehouse club. They don't study dissenting opinions. Now, fields like mathematics and applied technology are still valid, but any subjective, abstract, or theoretical fields like the humanities and social "sciences" are a bunch of opinions. You're going to college to learn opinions, and they try to tell you it's an objective fact. If anything, I would be MORE hesitant to accept the claims of the academic orthodoxy in fields related to social "Sciences". They are all constructed to confirm their bizarre, irrational "progressive" opinions.
Click to expand...

Do you have any proof for any of this, or is this just a bizarre, irrational opinion that you are telling us is an objective fact? Also, where does medicine count in this? Do you believe that medical degrees are also a special treehouse club?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: doubledigitgendergap, CisCat, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 19 others
Amud said:
I never claimed to be a genius. You have put words in my mouth several times already. I really wish you would stop it.



"professional credentials"are just a special treehouse club. They don't study dissenting opinions. Now, fields like mathematics and applied technology are still valid, but any subjective, abstract, or theoretical fields like the humanities and social "sciences" are a bunch of opinions. You're going to college to learn opinions, and they try to tell you it's an objective fact. If anything, I would be MORE hesitant to accept the claims of the academic orthodoxy in fields related to social "Sciences". They are all constructed to confirm their bizarre, irrational "progressive" opinions.



That's not me.
Click to expand...
It's good to know STEM has your validation. I'll let them know so they can get proper sleep at night, once more. This otherwise all sounds like a projection of insecurity, however. The thing about academics, even in the humanities, is that widely accepted beliefs are often subjected to criticism. For example, we read Aphra Behn's Oroonoko in a Literature class, and my professor strongly denounced the critical interpretation that this was an "anti-slavery" work and strongly insisted that we question the comments of our editors. To say that you are "forced" to believe anything rests upon anecdotal evidence that can readily be refuted, and so I am hesitant to accept your assessment of the state of academia as anything more than sour grapes.

The emphasis in any liberal arts curriculum is thinking for oneself, but certain people (and I am far from innocent of this, myself) are not able to handle thoughts contrary to our own. To go against the grain of commonly accepted ideas requires a strong burden of proof, and to merely sulk in the corner about "special treehouse clubs" indicates that you do not have the intellectual capacity to argue properly against these ideas or that your worldview is antiquated or errant and you simply refuse to re-evaluate it.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: KimCoppolaAficionado, Adamska, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 17 others
Miraak said:
Do you not understand how the humanities work? Your entire theses are based around dissenting opinions. For example, since you bring up the erroneous anthropological science, the burden would be on you to prove that your thesis is somehow better than the past five decades of commentary on the racism in anthropology.
Click to expand...

Conversely anyone who says that there is no controversy or subjectivity in mathematics or the sciences is speaking on the intellectual level of a second grader who has no choice but to believe whatever his or teacher says.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cromit, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Marvin and 9 others
Amud said:
These are all things I would like to address later today, when I get the chance. In the mean time, I will provide you with some reading material.

Note that the forum I'm linking to has a lot of advertisements, so I would suggest installing Adblock if you have not done so already.

1. An explanation of the various forms of "nobilid" features: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...ich-phenotypes-contribute-the-most-to-society

2. An explanation of the damaged psychological state resulting from environmental and genetic deterioration: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?164029-SUBHUMAN-SYNDROME

3. A gallery of various Ignobilid phenotypes, arranged into five categories: www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?161569-New-racial-classification-schema

4. A handy reference chart to accompany (3.)
attachment.php
Click to expand...

Let me stop you right there.

1) There is no such thing as nobilid, seriously ethnicity is not related to how productive you are.
2) No sorry there is a rise in pseudo science an pseudo intellectualism as a whole, part of that is because a lot of people are selective about what fact's they believe and excuse away the ones they find hard to understand or bothersome to there agenda, you are part of that problem, you believe you have a firm grasp on evolutionary biology and sociology and the basic human condition while you clearly don't your understanding of the subjects is as firm as a jelly factory in the middle of a earth quake.
3) Oh hey you found a place that's spewing out the stuff 30's Germany did to excuse eugenics and race hate in the 21st century. Tell me again how your not a Racist again?

There is no link to ethnicity in determining how productive you are, the thing's that determine that how productive you are how much effort your willing to put in, how much education you have or are willing to get and often just being lucky.

You know what I will have to have a word with the mod's there is a lot of pseudo-intellectual loveshy's getting in of late, and it is really lowing the tone.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: cromit, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Vasilisa and 16 others
meatslab said:
It just baffles me how they can't understand that there's a thing called "having a shitty personality".
Click to expand...

All of them always believe that they are perfect in every way and when someone says no to them they try to justify why others should say yes, like Marjie and his rape theory

I miss @mooooo he was more funny only by the fact that he got a wife to brag in a online forum
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MarvinTheParanoidAndroid, Wally Balljacker, José Mourinho and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back