Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

[Simplicity111]

Sheer boredom is rampant when you refuse to improve your personality.

Gotcha. I guess he just isn't entertained talking to all of us right now...

 

[Amud]

What the fuck does scienmajistikal mean, dude.

It's a silly word referring to the magic of science. For example, somebody decided that "humans" invaded Europe 30,000 years ago even though there is only a single fossil in Europe at the time that doesn't look like a Neanderthal, and that fossil has been carbon dated several times with one of the results stating that it's only 700 years old. However, because it was written on "official" paper, people still believe it without question and become hostile to people who are not fooled by the "official-ness" of the paper.

*it's science
*it's MAGICALLY true because it's on OFFICIAL PAPERZ

It is therefore... SCIENMAJISTIKAL

@Amud , how did you come up with the ideas to make up all these skull types out of thin air? I'm curious.

I'm creative. I'm observant. I notice patterns and assign names to them. I've been theorizing about this stuff for a good two years now. I talk to various people and we bounce ideas off of each other, which helps come up with even more theory. For instance, the term "Potatid" was created by a friend of mine.

@Amud did you just ignore the example of you being sexist that I gave you after you demanded us to show you examples?

It's not sexist to point out that some female archaeologists sleep with their male superiors to get ahead in the field. There are women in many fields who do this. That's a fact. Pointing out facts is not sexist, since sexism is an opinion.

No, people. You don't get it. By observing the curvature of the zinkophilic ridge, you can fundjiphitially conclude that raldorines are superior to alphaomegachadsluts. However, this interpretation is predicated raptiotryphally to how it benefits me and soothes my own ego. Geriantalyifitoously, of course. Naturally.

Now you're just being silly. If you guys don't understand any word I use, just ask and I will gladly define it. Some of the words I use might not be on OFFICIAL PAPERZ but they still have meanings that I can explain. You're just making gibberish up, completely off the top of your head.

 

[ON 190]

It is ridiculous when you perform a medical procedure on yourself, rather than have a professional perform the procedure. It's also ridiculous to argue about it for hours on end. It is also ridiculous to post a picture of you performing the procedure and make it your profile pic on a site like this.

I'm also curious... @Amud, it's ridiculous, but why are you attempting to restructure your cranium?

You're just making gibberish up, completely off the top of your head.

Now you're getting the hang of it, sport!

 

[YI 457]

It's a silly word referring to the magic of science. For example, somebody decided that "humans" invaded Europe 30,000 years ago even though there is only a single fossil in Europe at the time that doesn't look like a Neanderthal, and that fossil has been carbon dated several times with one of the results stating that it's only 700 years old. However, because it was written on "official" paper, people still believe it without question and become hostile to people who are not fooled by the "official-ness" of the paper.

*it's science
*it's MAGICALLY true because it's on OFFICIAL PAPERZ

You're an idiot.

I'm creative. I'm observant. I notice patterns and assign names to them.

No.

 

[Arkangel]

I'm creative. I'm observant. I notice patterns and assign names to them.

So, you're autistic?

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

However, because it was written on "official" paper, people still believe it without question and become hostile to people who are not fooled by the "official-ness" of the paper.

In all of your fancy internet research have you ever come across the term "peer review"?

 

[Simplicity111]

In all of your fancy internet research have you ever come across the term "peer review"?

Well, that would require a reduced ego and willingness to work with others, so no.

 

[seagull]

It's not sexist to point out that some female archaeologists sleep with their male superiors to get ahead in the field. There are women in many fields who do this. That's a fact. Pointing out facts is not sexist, since sexism is an opinion.

You've previously admitted that you had no proof of this, so it is not a fact. Even if this was the case, it takes two consenting adults to do what you are suggesting, so solely blaming women for this imagined phenomenon is indeed, sexist.

Edit, here's your exact quote.

I read about the archaelogy sluts from Texas arcane. I'll concede that his sources might not be accurate.

 

[Simplicity111]

Also @Amud , I'm pretty sure that most of these skull types aren't real, and the "observations" you made were simply slight differences in individual people. If you want to dispute this please come up with a GOOD argument.

 

[Ca Ira]

There are many people with nearly pure Neanderthal phenotypes who have nothing to do with science or other such fields, for example: Pete Postlethwaite, Aitor Karanka, Jahn Teigan, and Che Guevara. I'm sure these people are (or were) not geniuses

Regardless of what you think of Che's politics, he was a man with a sharp intellect.

It's not sexist to point out that some female archaeologists sleep with their male superiors to get ahead in the field. There are women in many fields who do this. That's a fact. Pointing out facts is not sexist, since sexism is an opinion.

But the way you present your statements about female archaeologists sleeping with their superiors implies much more than that it occurs sometimes. You implied that it was such a systemic problem that the field of archaeology itself had been compromised, which is a far more extravagant claim.

To look at it another way, if I run down the street screaming, "NIGGERS ARE RAPISTS! NIGGERS ARE RAPISTS!" what I'm saying is, in a sense, factual-- it is true that some black people do commit rape-- but the way I'm presenting that fact strongly implies a prejudice on my part.

You admitted to me earlier in the thread that your belief that the field of archaeology has been fundamentally compromised by rampant promiscuity is something you picked up on some Internet forum, and not from any kind of firsthand experience.

No, people. You don't get it. By observing the curvature of the zinkophilic ridge, you can fundjiphitially conclude that raldorines are superior to alphaomegachadsluts. However, this interpretation is predicated raptiotryphally to how it benefits me and soothes my own ego. Geriantalyifitoously, of course. Naturally.

It's not an exact sciencemajistik.

 

[Dalcon]

Snorting condoms is ridiculous. Using finger cots for neurocranial restructuring is exactly what many chiropractors do, and it has a large backing of patients and doctors who swear by the technique. It is therefore not ridiculous. See the difference?

"Appeal to scientific authority is uncool. Except when I do it. Then it's totally cool."

I'm still not convinced you're not a troll, but I know in my bones you're a dickhead.

 

[Reverend_Lovejoy]

"Appeal to scientific authority is uncool. Except when I do it. Then it's totally cool."

I'm still not convinced you're not a troll, but I know in my bones you're a dickhead.

He's probably a troll, or at least he'll probably admit to being a troll at some point. If he's not a troll then he's a misinformed, possibly misanthropic, idiot.

 

[Stratomsk]

I hate sluts for a multitude of reasons.

*They accelerate the genetic degeneration of our species by only allowing low IQ psychopathic specimens with Ignobilid features (for example, upper facial flatness) to procreate
*They have created a climate in which many of the most capable of men have greatly reduced motivation to contribute to society
*They have destroyed the stability of the family unit, meaning that most children now grow up in a suboptimal environment. This is unfair to the children.

"Slut is a term applied to an individual who is considered to have loose sexual morals or who is sexually promiscuous. It is generally pejorative, and is most often used as an insult, sexual slur or offensive term of disparagement (slut shaming) against girls or women."

That is the Wikipedia definition supported by several citations. It is a word that exclusively relates to women and girls. You in those three lines make sweeping generalizations about them without proving what you say with actual evidence. CITATION NEEDED.

How can sluts "accelerate the genetic degeneration of our species by only allowing low IQ psychopathic specimens with Ignobilid features (for example, upper facial flatness) to procreate"?
You are assuming that sluts only go after low IQ "Ignobilid specimens" as well as the idea that Ignobilid facial features and low IQ are interconnected without giving evidence. CITATION NEEDED.

How have sluts "created a climate in which many of the most capable of men have greatly reduced motivation to contribute to society."?
How can they of been capable of doing this? CITATION NEEDED.

How have sluts "destroyed the stability of the family unit, meaning that most children now grow up in a suboptimal environment"?
Again, how have they destroyed the stability of the family unit? How is any of this just the woman's fault, as @CatParty said? CITATION NEEDED.

You make sweeping generalizations and authoritative statements without providing evidence to any of these things. Until you do, that's all those statements will ever be.

 

[Amud]

 

[Ca Ira]

e's probably a troll, or at least he'll probably admit to being a troll at some point.

I hope not. His shtick isn't that creative, if he is.

 

[Simplicity111]

Oh god that's just plain disturbing.

 

[Ca Ira]

Who or what is the guy with the wand meant to represent?

 

[Reverend_Lovejoy]

I hope not. His shtick isn't that creative, if he is.

It's working though, otherwise we wouldn't be here.

 

[Peace and Harmony]

Stupid shit

Please explain how any new discovery whatsoever comes into mainstream acceptance if academia is one gigantic worldwide circlejerk, and how we even know of discredited ideas if this is so.

Let me guess: they're there to throw us off the scent.

 

[Wally Balljacker]

Spoiler: BJ Blazkowicz confirmed for slayerid.

I cannot believe how cringe your are being right now. It's rather inhuman.