Article (archive)
Rick Santelli's evil coronavirus strategy is perfectly emblematic of the "libertarian" politics he represents: superficially "logical," ridiculously "self-interested," and "hard-nosed" - but actually illogical, self-defeating, and superstitious. | Source: CNBC/YouTube
- Rick Santelli proposed infecting the entire global population with the coronavirus in a strange CNBC rant.
- He wants to get the global economy back to normal sooner, but it would likely have a catastrophic impact.
- Santelli’s rant was characteristic of his confused, irrational, and selfish libertarian politics.
Rick Santelli is sick and tired of the coronavirus. In fact, he
hates the coronavirus so much that he’s willing to infect everyone on the planet with it – including you. That way, we can bring the spread of Covid-19 to an early end, and the global economy can return to normal.
I’m not kidding; this is
exactly what Santelli wants (
via Twitter):
Tea Party Godfather Has An Insane Plan To Fight Coronavirus
In
a bizarre rant on CNBC yesterday, he railed against the precautionary measures nations and businesses are taking to protect people
from coronavirus. He says authorities should force everyone to contract Covid-19.
Following some short-term pain, the economy can return to normal in a month or so. Minus the estimated 261.8 million people who would die from the deadly disease, of course.
Being a key figure behind the Tea Party movement, I guess this is what Santelli’s means by “free market” economics: The U.S. government kills off a bunch of old, sick, and/or poor people so that the stock market recovers and corporations continue making billions.
Rick Santelli Tells It Like It Isn’t
Unsurprisingly, Rick Santelli’s moronic diatribe attracted a considerable amount of flack on Twitter. And with good cause, because it was utterly insane.
Santelli’s primary argument is that we’d never quarantine “everybody” because of the common flu. So why should we do it for the coronavirus?
Obviously, the editors at CNBC (they have editors, right?) forgot to remind Santelli that
flu has a death rate of only 0.1%. Meanwhile, the World Health Organization confirmed that
the coronavirus has a probable death rate of 3.4%.
So Santelli’s argument is already beginning to fall apart. Assuming
a global population of 7.7 billion, infecting the entire world with the coronavirus would result in roughly 261.8 million deaths.
Forget the number of Covid-19 deaths. This stock market chart is the only one that matters to Rick Santelli. | Source:
Yahoo Finance
Not great. But the icing on Rick Santelli’s blood-stained cake is that he thinks infecting everyone at the same time would be a
good thing.
Because the mortality rate of this probably isn’t going to be any different if we did it that way.
Um, that’s not quite right, Rick.
Yes, certain experienced and reputable virologists have said that as much of
80% of the world’s population will sooner or later be infected by the coronavirus. So the coronavirus will infect “everyone” (used here very loosely) anyway. So why not give it to everyone now?
Evil Coronavirus Strategy Exposes The Folly Of Rick Santelli’s Libertarian Fantasy World
If everyone on Earth had coronavirus at the same time, the shock to the global economy would be catastrophic.
For one, the strain on the world’s hospital systems would be unthinkably immense. Not only would an estimated 261.8 million people
die from the disease, but hundreds of millions more would need medical attention.
Meanwhile, the world’s economies would come to a virtual standstill. Millions – maybe billions – of people would be unable to work. And yes, the stock market – the very thing Rick Santelli is trying to save! – would likely fall off a cliff as a result. Assuming it isn’t closed altogether.
Still, we should thank Rick Santelli for making such a harebrained proposal. It’s perfectly emblematic of the “libertarian” politics he represents: superficially “logical,” ridiculously “self-interested,” and “hard-nosed” – but actually illogical, self-defeating, and superstitious.
After all, what’s the one way to ensure that “everyone” contracts coronavirus? By calling on central governments to take the lead. But in Rick Santelli’s libertarian fantasy world, shouldn’t governments be as “small” as possible?
Ah yes, I forgot: When it comes to protecting finance and capital, government should be as big as possible.
even if it was a 'mild case'. Even looking at SK numbers they're only at 108 recovered and I assume the 6000 or so confirmed to have it aren't all in active stages of dying. Just the usual isolating at home for quite a few of them but really, what are the criteria for recovery? until you test negative multiple times?
