- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Behold the liberals whining, quite hypocritically too, about Project Veritas allegedly spying on them:
Jules talks the FAXX!!
If Hillary would have gotten in for Super Tuesday she'd be the frontrunner right now.Abrams never conceded that race and calls herself Governor on her website (http://archive.vn/rtzIu)
View attachment 1178290
I would unironically prefer Hillary to Stacy Abrams.
If Hillary would have gotten in for Super Tuesday she'd be the frontrunner right now.
You say that, yet at this very moment the desperate DNC is backing two time loser Joe Biden whose third loss will be far more devastating than Hillary's second.Even a desperate DNC won't back a two-time loser with a second loss so devastating it may as well have counted for two.
Saw a theory elsewhere on the web about a possible method to the dems madness.You say that, yet at this very moment the desperate DNC is backing two time loser Joe Biden whose third loss will be far more devastating than Hillary's second.
Saw a theory elsewhere on the web about a possible method to the dems madness.
You know I got to thinking about it… and part of me can see how Biden is the best “loss candidate” for the dems.
Think of it like a game. Trump looks poised to win, the real question is: how big?
Outcome 1) A narrow victory for the dems. This would leave them in a tight spot, especially if GOP picks up the house. Then their winner will be gridlocked without much hope of governing. Could hurt their reputation and set up a failure in 2024. Plus if things shift economically under that president’s watch, it will cement their reputation as depressants on the country. Possibly a modern day demonstration of Pyrrhic victory.
Outcome 2) Trumps wins narrowly. Maybe the best option for the dems as it prove their brand is still salable, while giving them a scapegoat in Trump for anything that goes wrong. If their brand is that good, chance of keeping some power in congress and maintaining gridlock to frustrate the enemy.
Outcome 3) Trump wins big. By far the worst possible option as it proves the brand has turned toxic and increases the chance they lose the house. The party will probably fracture as everyone takes turns blaming everyone else for the loss.
So you’re heading towards the vote in Nov, what’s the play you want to make? If an ideological candidate steps up on the ticket, the brand is going to take extra damage. Thus part of the fear of Sanders – not only might he lose, but he would make the very concept of socialism toxic for a few cycles. After all, if any socialist candidate stepped up, they can be slapped down with a “we lost big last time with one like you, we’re not risking it here!”
This is where Biden could be the smartest play. One, he’s an empty suit enough that a big loss can’t be hung around any one issue – all their pet ideas are still in play electability-wise. And – as Don pointed out – his health issues give them an out. If Trump crushes them in Nov, and Biden all but dies on stage in the lead up, then the Dems can cover for the loss by claiming it wasn’t themselves or their message that lost the election, but their candidate’s failing health that really lost it.
At least that’s my thoughts on it. A week is an eternity in politics and we’ve got a lot of weeks until election day.
They don't want anyone with those views to run so that's good for the DNC. Radicals are just a weapon, that's why the Chapotards got disavowed by NYT.Somewhat sensible thought pattern except for one thing. That is, whether Bernie wins the nomination and loses the election or simply doesn't get the nomination, the "democrat socialist"/"progressive" undercurrent will still be significantly pushed back anyway unless the DNC doesn't mind Bernie running a 3rd time as the DNC nominee and a 2nd time as the DNC candidate at the ripe old age of 82. The only other known "socialist"/"progressive" of a similar caliber would be AOC but she wouldn't be old enough to run till 2028.
![]()
The Path Forward YT on Twitter
“This is Joe Biden at his St. Louis rally earlier today. He spoke for less than 10 minutes, and these are just SOME of the verbal errors he made. This is NOT a stutter. This is serious. @progressvoice @KyleKulinski @OrganizingPower @CANCEL_SAM @shaunking #WhereIsJoe https://t.co/5zsWddwqNi”twitter.com
What the FUCK? This is not a cognitively or mentally okay person.
That Kuru be hittin' hard.Indeed, that became to have some eerie similarities to Hillary's health problems in 2016 like her coughing and the time she collapsed at the 9-11 Memorial site.
I think the rule is 35 at the time of inauguration, which puts AOC in the running for 2024.Somewhat sensible thought pattern except for one thing. That is, whether Bernie wins the nomination and loses the election or simply doesn't get the nomination, the "democrat socialist"/"progressive" undercurrent will still be significantly pushed back anyway unless the DNC doesn't mind Bernie running a 3rd time as the DNC nominee and a 2nd time as the DNC candidate at the ripe old age of 82. The only other known "socialist"/"progressive" of a similar caliber would be AOC but she wouldn't be old enough to run till 2028.
I think the rule is 35 at the time of inauguration, which puts AOC in the running for 2024.
Oh, boy.
Like I said, he was always gaffe prone, but this is getting more and more into dementia.![]()
The Path Forward YT on Twitter
“This is Joe Biden at his St. Louis rally earlier today. He spoke for less than 10 minutes, and these are just SOME of the verbal errors he made. This is NOT a stutter. This is serious. @progressvoice @KyleKulinski @OrganizingPower @CANCEL_SAM @shaunking #WhereIsJoe https://t.co/5zsWddwqNi”twitter.com
What the FUCK? This is not a cognitively or mentally okay person.
If Biden somehow manages to win the presidency, one upside will be that it'll be funny as hell having and watching a president become senile while in office for the first time.![]()
The Path Forward YT on Twitter
“This is Joe Biden at his St. Louis rally earlier today. He spoke for less than 10 minutes, and these are just SOME of the verbal errors he made. This is NOT a stutter. This is serious. @progressvoice @KyleKulinski @OrganizingPower @CANCEL_SAM @shaunking #WhereIsJoe https://t.co/5zsWddwqNi”twitter.com
What the FUCK? This is not a cognitively or mentally okay person.