Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

0300276C-3D74-4541-84A6-776279764C1E.jpeg
 
Behold the liberals whining, quite hypocritically too, about Project Veritas allegedly spying on them:


Journalists and news organizations crack me up. They consistently fail to self-police their own in regards to ethics and ethical violations, and they adamantly refuse to let let anyone else police them. And they boast of this, under the guise of their claims that "We're completely independent, no one tells us what to do or say! And we certainly shouldn't be held accountable for any mistakes we make, much less the deliberate misreporting, slanted coverage, and opinions masquerading as impartiality."
 
If Hillary would have gotten in for Super Tuesday she'd be the frontrunner right now.

Even a desperate DNC won't back a two-time loser with a second loss so devastating it may as well have counted for two.

I'm sure she wants to, but she doesn't have the money. And if she DID have the money, she'd have just pulled a Bloomberg - billions spent and all you got was this lousy meme delegate from Samoa....

She just threatens to play spoiler to get others to make her stay away so the ambient stink of her doesn't mess up their campaign by offering D-list favors and ego strokes.

Nobody wants her, except the severely deluded.
 
Last edited:
You say that, yet at this very moment the desperate DNC is backing two time loser Joe Biden whose third loss will be far more devastating than Hillary's second.
Saw a theory elsewhere on the web about a possible method to the dems madness.

You know I got to thinking about it… and part of me can see how Biden is the best “loss candidate” for the dems.

Think of it like a game. Trump looks poised to win, the real question is: how big?

Outcome 1) A narrow victory for the dems. This would leave them in a tight spot, especially if GOP picks up the house. Then their winner will be gridlocked without much hope of governing. Could hurt their reputation and set up a failure in 2024. Plus if things shift economically under that president’s watch, it will cement their reputation as depressants on the country. Possibly a modern day demonstration of Pyrrhic victory.

Outcome 2) Trumps wins narrowly. Maybe the best option for the dems as it prove their brand is still salable, while giving them a scapegoat in Trump for anything that goes wrong. If their brand is that good, chance of keeping some power in congress and maintaining gridlock to frustrate the enemy.

Outcome 3) Trump wins big. By far the worst possible option as it proves the brand has turned toxic and increases the chance they lose the house. The party will probably fracture as everyone takes turns blaming everyone else for the loss.

So you’re heading towards the vote in Nov, what’s the play you want to make? If an ideological candidate steps up on the ticket, the brand is going to take extra damage. Thus part of the fear of Sanders – not only might he lose, but he would make the very concept of socialism toxic for a few cycles. After all, if any socialist candidate stepped up, they can be slapped down with a “we lost big last time with one like you, we’re not risking it here!”

This is where Biden could be the smartest play. One, he’s an empty suit enough that a big loss can’t be hung around any one issue – all their pet ideas are still in play electability-wise. And – as Don pointed out – his health issues give them an out. If Trump crushes them in Nov, and Biden all but dies on stage in the lead up, then the Dems can cover for the loss by claiming it wasn’t themselves or their message that lost the election, but their candidate’s failing health that really lost it.

At least that’s my thoughts on it. A week is an eternity in politics and we’ve got a lot of weeks until election day.
 
Saw a theory elsewhere on the web about a possible method to the dems madness.

You know I got to thinking about it… and part of me can see how Biden is the best “loss candidate” for the dems.

Think of it like a game. Trump looks poised to win, the real question is: how big?

Outcome 1) A narrow victory for the dems. This would leave them in a tight spot, especially if GOP picks up the house. Then their winner will be gridlocked without much hope of governing. Could hurt their reputation and set up a failure in 2024. Plus if things shift economically under that president’s watch, it will cement their reputation as depressants on the country. Possibly a modern day demonstration of Pyrrhic victory.

Outcome 2) Trumps wins narrowly. Maybe the best option for the dems as it prove their brand is still salable, while giving them a scapegoat in Trump for anything that goes wrong. If their brand is that good, chance of keeping some power in congress and maintaining gridlock to frustrate the enemy.

Outcome 3) Trump wins big. By far the worst possible option as it proves the brand has turned toxic and increases the chance they lose the house. The party will probably fracture as everyone takes turns blaming everyone else for the loss.

So you’re heading towards the vote in Nov, what’s the play you want to make? If an ideological candidate steps up on the ticket, the brand is going to take extra damage. Thus part of the fear of Sanders – not only might he lose, but he would make the very concept of socialism toxic for a few cycles. After all, if any socialist candidate stepped up, they can be slapped down with a “we lost big last time with one like you, we’re not risking it here!”

This is where Biden could be the smartest play. One, he’s an empty suit enough that a big loss can’t be hung around any one issue – all their pet ideas are still in play electability-wise. And – as Don pointed out – his health issues give them an out. If Trump crushes them in Nov, and Biden all but dies on stage in the lead up, then the Dems can cover for the loss by claiming it wasn’t themselves or their message that lost the election, but their candidate’s failing health that really lost it.

At least that’s my thoughts on it. A week is an eternity in politics and we’ve got a lot of weeks until election day.

Somewhat sensible thought pattern except for one thing. That is, whether Bernie wins the nomination and loses the election or simply doesn't get the nomination, the "democrat socialist"/"progressive" undercurrent will still be significantly pushed back anyway unless the DNC doesn't mind Bernie running a 3rd time as the DNC nominee and a 2nd time as the DNC candidate at the ripe old age of 82. The only other known "socialist"/"progressive" of a similar caliber would be AOC but she wouldn't be old enough to run till 2028.
 
Somewhat sensible thought pattern except for one thing. That is, whether Bernie wins the nomination and loses the election or simply doesn't get the nomination, the "democrat socialist"/"progressive" undercurrent will still be significantly pushed back anyway unless the DNC doesn't mind Bernie running a 3rd time as the DNC nominee and a 2nd time as the DNC candidate at the ripe old age of 82. The only other known "socialist"/"progressive" of a similar caliber would be AOC but she wouldn't be old enough to run till 2028.
They don't want anyone with those views to run so that's good for the DNC. Radicals are just a weapon, that's why the Chapotards got disavowed by NYT.
 
So Biden is pretty much an Ok, this is the centrist option and people are familiar with him. If he loses, it wouldn't be too much of a loss and we can use him until he stops being useful?

It sounds like it's a we may lose, but not too bad.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Flexo

What the FUCK? This is not a cognitively or mentally okay person.
 

What the FUCK? This is not a cognitively or mentally okay person.

Indeed, that became to have some eerie similarities to Hillary's health problems in 2016 like her coughing and the time she collapsed at the 9-11 Memorial site.
 
"and uh, be great state of....Maryland? O-Biden administration got it done! And the uh, passion, Democrat lifelong! Babaaaa...dagaaa! *thunderous applause by paid audience* And...I ju...just wanted to say, you know, uh, *trails off* and we're got it done! and baaaa....baaa...you know, Barack and I, we had TOUGH negotiations with Chairman Zedong, and let me tell you, we brought, Brock and I, brought Kruschev to the table as well, the president of Zimbabwe, and....*slurs and babbles incoherently for about 14 seconds straight*....and THAT'S why we have no choice but to come TOGETHER and elect Trump! *paid crowd goes into thunderous applause again*
 
Somewhat sensible thought pattern except for one thing. That is, whether Bernie wins the nomination and loses the election or simply doesn't get the nomination, the "democrat socialist"/"progressive" undercurrent will still be significantly pushed back anyway unless the DNC doesn't mind Bernie running a 3rd time as the DNC nominee and a 2nd time as the DNC candidate at the ripe old age of 82. The only other known "socialist"/"progressive" of a similar caliber would be AOC but she wouldn't be old enough to run till 2028.
I think the rule is 35 at the time of inauguration, which puts AOC in the running for 2024.

Oh, boy.
 
I think the rule is 35 at the time of inauguration, which puts AOC in the running for 2024.

Oh, boy.

Well she's 30 right now. I take it she will sometime turn 31 this year which I ignored for whatever reason.

@Shaka Brah You don't need to tell me the DNC doesn't want Radicals they can't control manning the boat considering the same principal applies to the GOP. Politics is the art of manipulating people's emotions and desires after all.
 

What the FUCK? This is not a cognitively or mentally okay person.
Like I said, he was always gaffe prone, but this is getting more and more into dementia.

Reagan only started to decline by the time he was out, losing a bit of focus and forgetting things in '86-'87 or so. Joe is more like early-mid 90's Reagan, where his bad days began to outnumber his good days given how frequent this shit is becoming.
 

What the FUCK? This is not a cognitively or mentally okay person.
If Biden somehow manages to win the presidency, one upside will be that it'll be funny as hell having and watching a president become senile while in office for the first time.
 
Back