Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[LoverofPi]

Yes totally! It's why I wasn't charged the maximum amount in expenses!
@LoverofPi didn't the Nazi's use Phrenology to help discredit certain races are part of their whole scientific racism shtick they had? I know Neo Nazi's today use it. Hell, I think Mikemikev uses it. I wonder how he feels about a supposed Trump's Chosen woman using it.

Yes, they did. Melinda believes it is "the study of the brain, not the skull " though. You know, in complete opposition to its actual definition.

In any case, I suspect that Melinda, upon realizing that her talk of repression is not having the effect on us she wishes it was is going to change tactics and terminology again soon. Once we call out her tells she starts abandoning them.

Jesus H. Christ are you a fucking moron! My sides hurt from laughing so much at your replies. You’re like a petulant child who basically replies “Oh yeah? YOU’RE A POOPY HEAD!!” when someone says something you don’t want to hear (which is basically anything logical or intelligent).

I have to believe that you‘re just trolling us at this point. Nobody could be this fucking stupid.

We've got her mad, she's rating everyone autistic, so expect another poopyhead rant shortly.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Jesus H. Christ are you a fucking moron! My sides hurt from laughing so much at your replies. You’re like a petulant child who basically replies “Oh yeah? YOU’RE A POOPY HEAD!!” when someone says something you don’t want to hear (which is basically anything logical or intelligent).

I have to believe that you‘re just trolling us at this point. Nobody could be this fucking stupid.

Because Kiwi Farms represents everyone....right? Have you always been stupid or did you go to a special school to get that dumb?

1)
(Self-)confidence also means you can acknowledge your weaknesses and mistakes, because you are sure of your strengths and sure that this will not damage your feelings of self-worth. You have shown by your posts that you can do neither. You think you don't have any weaknesses, think are above everyone in this forum and failed to admit mistakes or any flaws you might have. You have been arrogant, haughty and condescending instead of open and engaging. The moment you found out about this forum, you overreacted and freaked out and you haven't stopped yet.
2)
I'm assuming you're using the common idiom and are not referring to Robert Frost's poem, because then you'd have the meaning wrong. People think the meaning of the idiom is the same as the poem, which is not true. Anyways, here's the thing, just because it is less chosen, doesn't mean it's the better/smarter path to take.

take the path less chosen

Definition of take the path less chosen in the Idioms Dictionary by The Free Dictionary

idioms.thefreedictionary.com

You don't have confidence, you have an inflated ego which is meant to hide your insecurities and low feelings of self-worth. And just because your lifestyle is less mainstream, doesn't mean it's better or that you're better for choosing it.
I know you won't agree with this assessment but that is fine. I don't expect you or Marshal to make sense, anyways.

And you think you can speak for how others feel because....?
In case you weren't aware, both telling someone what they feel and creating fairytale stories about them like that .....are signs of a lack of education.

I don't owe anyone the statement that I have weaknesses or have made mistakes. What is it in YOU that needs to hear that from me, or anyone else for that matter? Just because YOU think that YOU have weaknesses, have flaws or have made mistakes doesn't mean that anyone else has to model their self image after YOU. That's like Christians who run around saying "everyone is a sinner". No, it's because THEY are the sinner. Don't project yourself onto others and then demand they own your self image of yourself.

Yes, me not having multiple partners for the sole purpose of sex is sexual repression
Honestly I just think you don't know what repression is and never learned what it is, hopping on any erect cock in your presence

Also, congrats on getting more neg-ratings than your stalker lmao, imagine being hated more than an insane Je,w who fucks cats and stalked a redneck, kinda seems like it'd be an accurate representation of the respect you get IRL if you ever went outside

So a bunch of uneducated misogynistic patriarchal pagan men and uneducated pagan women with internalized misogyny negatively rated a woman who didn't conform to patriarchy more than a man who is a misogynistic. Am I supposed to be surprised?

My children have different mothers and they left us. Made it easy to gain custody of them when the woman abandons their children. Still had to go through them court system to gain custody of them and all of the bullshit that entails, but since I have no criminal record, have never been arrested for anything, have no vices, a stable job, I had an easy time of it. Seems even the government thinks I'm a good parent as men usually aren't given custody of their children. Not everyone can be a shitty parent like you Melinda.

Damn, even worse than I thought. You abused the women so much they had to chose between their sanity and their children. Judging by your mouth, I feel sorry for the women.

never said it wasn't

Monogamous relationships isn't anything wrong. Rushing into one or getting into one because of some obligation "just to be married" or being in a relationship where you don't love each other is where the problem lies

not always no. But rushing into things is a sure fire way to miss at least some signs you could have noticed and gotten out.

You can't notice every red flag. Mistakes do happen. But rushing into things makes it all worse.

What, I'm a ptsd victim now?

You know you've been lecturing kiwi farmers on how they can't diagnose you as a narcissist because they're not qualified shrinks. What about your qualifications? How come you get to "diagnose" others but you cant be called a narcissist?

Like, fuck, I know I'm crazy in a lot of ways, but having a happy time isn't part of that.

Because I said symptomatic of PTSD, I never said you actually had PTSD (no diagnosis)

I did not speak with you about the clerk's legal notes, Melinda. Are you confusing me with someone else?



It is also shame and guilt, I said that.



This logic does not follow. Masturbation is not a denial of urges, it is acting on those urges in a safe and healthy way. Yes, sex is amazing, but masturbation is a healthy alternative when your partner is not available. It is not repression by any stretch of the imagination.
Now, one could feel shame about masturbation, and THAT would be repression. Is that what you're thinking of? If it is, that's a you problem.



While this is a bizarre metaphor in general, to follow it along, eating bread and water is preferable to never eating, and should not be mistaken for anorexia or bulemia, which is honestly what your description of masturbation reminds me of.



Again, no. While "living off masturbation" is not something I think anyone should do, pursuing marriage for frequent sex isn't something I think someone should do either. And that's just getting into people with standard sex drives, never mind people with lessened to none for whatever reason.



While this is far from a proper debate, if it were, and the strength of the argument judged according to a group of observers, I have every faith that the panel would side with my arguments over yours. I can define the words I use, for starters.

Really? You have lurked this thread non-stop and I have to start at square one again. Seriously?



So what you are saying is you were fucking around outside of marriage but when you do it it's okay because of reasons.
Quelle surprise.



Making sure you're emotionally and sexually compatible with someone before marriage is sexual repression now? Having sex outside of marriage is sexual repression? Are you seriously arguing that right now?



There's also nothing wrong with having sex outside of marriage, or not having sex. Divorces and sex can both be very messy and taxing, so a lot of people don't want to do one, the other, or either if they can help it.



Considering your general familiarity with the other subjects on which you have deigned to comment on in the recent past (EG: Phrenology) I strongly doubt that. Also wow the projection.



I would hypothesize that more people of those billions of people would disagree with your particular views about sex and intimacy than would disagree with the views posted by the other farmers in the thread.




So why do you take so much issue when other women decide to do it?



This is just a word salad. PTSD and chronic masturbation have basically no causal link with each other.



So why have you been making a big deal about the individual you thought Redcent was sleeping with multiple partners?



This is a tautology and a distraction. You are arrogant.



Melinda thinks she can judge people because she's "chosen" near as I can figure. She thinks no one can judge her in return because they haven't had her specific circumstances.

It's pretty standard Narc shielding, really.

Funny, because there are several comments I've made on here saying the exact opposite about other's judging me. Why are you such an illiterate liar?

Masturbation as a lifestyle IS symptomatic of PTSD, due to a fear of relationships or past trauma. Masturbation as a lifestyle is not a sign of healthy mental activity. A healthy adjusted individual seeks out a life partner.

 

[murgatroid]

@TamarYaelBatYah Do you know how to cook? Can you prove you know how to cook a proper meal and that your children are not feral and surviving on small game and gogurt?

 

[LoverofPi]

Because Kiwi Farms represents everyone....right? Have you always been stupid or did you go to a special school to get that dumb?

You know, when you actually respond to what people say and not what you wanted them to have said you get called out for strawmen arguments less. Keep that in mind in the future.

And you think you can speak for how others feel because....?
In case you weren't aware, both telling someone what they feel and creating fairytale stories about them like that .....are signs of a lack of education.

Okay, if that's the case, what does that say about how you keep making up nonsense about people here?
In any case it's not a sign of lack of education because there is such a thing as being able to understand a person's emotions through context clues such as their writing. You signal your emotions like a beacon, Melinda.

I don't owe anyone the statement that I have weaknesses or have made mistakes

. What is it in YOU that needs to hear that from me, or anyone else for that matter? Just because YOU think that YOU have weaknesses, have flaws or have made mistakes doesn't mean that anyone else has to model their self image after YOU. That's like Christians who run around saying "everyone is a sinner". No, it's because THEY are the sinner. Don't project yourself onto others and then demand they own your self image of yourself.

Oh, there's that Narc Rage again. Or should we say "A symptom of narcissism." Refusal to admit flaws is a classic sign of narcissim.

So a bunch of uneducated misogynistic patriarchal pagan men and uneducated pagan women with internalized misogyny negatively rated a woman who didn't conform to patriarchy more than a man who is a misogynistic. Am I supposed to be surprised?

Refusal to acknowledge responsibility, another sign of narcissism,

Damn, even worse than I thought. You abused the women so much they had to chose between their sanity and their children. Judging by your mouth, I feel sorry for the women.

And not just a moment ago you were trying to lecture someone else about inventing details. Tsk tsk. Hypocrisy. Yet another symptom of Narcissism.

Because I said symptomatic of PTSD, I never said you actually had PTSD (no diagnosis)

Having taken this into account, I will now point out all your symptoms which coincide with narcissism and related cluster B disorders. After all, I'm not diagnosing you, I'm pointing out things you do that are symptomatic thereof.

Funny, because there are several comments I've made on here saying the exact opposite about other's judging me. Why are you such an illiterate liar?

So you are saying that in the past you think we are fully qualified and justified in judging you? Because I said you said the opposite.
I'd have to be a liar and illiterate to be an illiterate liar, and as I am both telling the truth and have a far broader vocabulary than you do, I'd say your accusation fails on both counts.

Masturbation as a lifestyle IS symptomatic of PTSD, due to a fear of relationships or past trauma. Masturbation as a lifestyle is not a sign of healthy mental activity. A healthy adjusted individual seeks out a life partner.

You... you do realize that even people in committed relationships with active sex lives masturbate, right? Masturbate thinking about their significant other, even. And some people in healthy loving relationships have no sex at all.
And again, masturbation and PTSD are not strongly linked like that. Chronic masturbation is a legitimate issue, but it really has nothing to do with post traumatic stress.

 

[redcent]

Because Kiwi Farms represents everyone....right? Have you always been stupid or did you go to a special school to get that dumb?

so who do you think you're representing, if you do think you do?

Because I said symptomatic of PTSD, I never said you actually had PTSD (no diagnosis)

then it is fair to say by what you have revealed about yourself so far is symptomatic of narcissism

Masturbation as a lifestyle IS symptomatic of PTSD, due to a fear of relationships or past trauma. Masturbation as a lifestyle is not a sign of healthy mental activity. A healthy adjusted individual seeks out a life partner.

That is creepy though the way you put it. I can only imagine what you have put prior men through. Did they try to wriggle out of a relationship and have you pressure them to going further because you oh so have to "seek out a life partner?"

If anything, I think your "desire to seek out a life partner" is also symptomatic of something. Some insecurity from being alone, maybe? Some childhood event, some crazy indoctrination, who knows with you?

No one has any right to push someone into relationship. I think thats very bad character of you do so.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Damn, even worse than I thought. You abused the women so much they had to chose between their sanity and their children. Judging by your mouth, I feel sorry for the women.

No, they choose drugs and crime. Good try though.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

No, they choose drugs and crime. Good try though.

She's probably upset she's also not a crackhead robber, just a crackhead

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

She's probably upset she's also not a crackhead robber, just a crackhead

She steals from the government so she's just as bad as any thief.

 

[redcent]

She steals from the government so she's just as bad as any thief.

This implies she has some form of skill or balls to forcibly take something from others.

She has no such ability, she's just a bullshit artist.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

You know, I wonder why Melinda continues to talk here while insinuating that she has some form of professional career creating consumer products, like authoring. If anyone decides to do a background check and come across the farms by chance (we do have several spots in the top 10 results), that would be a very bad look to any professional or contractor hiring her or taking in her work, seeing how angry she gets, tne negative connotations of several of her views like how she thinks spousal abuse is totally fine, her record of spurious litigation, etc is stuff a professional would never, in a million fucking years, EVER want to realistically associate with.

If you think about it, it's no fucking wonder she can only publish under a bullshit vanity or subsidy publisher

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You know, when you actually respond to what people say and not what you wanted them to have said you get called out for strawmen arguments less. Keep that in mind in the future.


Okay, if that's the case, what does that say about how you keep making up nonsense about people here?
In any case it's not a sign of lack of education because there is such a thing as being able to understand a person's emotions through context clues such as their writing. You signal your emotions like a beacon, Melinda.


Oh, there's that Narc Rage again. Or should we say "A symptom of narcissism." Refusal to admit flaws is a classic sign of narcissim.


Refusal to acknowledge responsibility, another sign of narcissism,


And not just a moment ago you were trying to lecture someone else about inventing details. Tsk tsk. Hypocrisy. Yet another symptom of Narcissism.


Having taken this into account, I will now point out all your symptoms which coincide with narcissism and related cluster B disorders. After all, I'm not diagnosing you, I'm pointing out things you do that are symptomatic thereof.


So you are saying that in the past you think we are fully qualified and justified in judging you? Because I said you said the opposite.
I'd have to be a liar and illiterate to be an illiterate liar, and as I am both telling the truth and have a far broader vocabulary than you do, I'd say your accusation fails on both counts.



You... you do realize that even people in committed relationships with active sex lives masturbate, right? Masturbate thinking about their significant other, even. And some people in healthy loving relationships have no sex at all.
And again, masturbation and PTSD are not strongly linked like that. Chronic masturbation is a legitimate issue, but it really has nothing to do with post traumatic stress.

CAUGHT YA! Here I go again to POINT OUT YOUR STUPIDITY!
You STILL can't find point A. If I "invent details" AFTER someone did it to me first, that's CALLED EYE FOR EYE. If someone (in your case you and some others) do it first unprovoked, it's lack of education.
Do you see how you can't tell the difference between terms and actions? You aren't smart enough to find POINT A and to differentiate between actions. You talk JUST LIKE THE STALKER. Hell, for all I know, you ARE the Stalker because you have the same disordered thinking. I have an ex-relative who talks like you too. (<<---Marshall, THIS, right here)

The same is true of your analysis that this action or that action is a "symptom of narcissim". You throw together isolated details and think you have a correlation. You isolate details inappropriately and talk in circles just to try to make something look like something it's not. You try to call anything that's a rebuttal "narc rage". That's not the correct definition in the least bit. And newsflash Ms. Uneducated: It's not my responsibility to be responsible for other's behavior. You read some shit off a blog about NPD and you think you can just throw terms around but your lack of intelligence just makes the information completely useless in your brain.

And lady, I have already addressed this claim of psychologists that "Refusal to admit flaws is a classic sign of narcissim". It's not in line with Hebraic thinking/The Torah. You don't need to "admit flaws" to be a moral person. Just because some pagan psychologists come up with some definitions of morality doesn't mean it's right. Go back about 25 pages, I already posted the Scripture verses.

You know, I wonder why Melinda continues to talk here while insinuating that she has some form of professional career creating consumer products, like authoring. If anyone decides to do a background check and come across the farms by chance (we do have several spots in the top 10 results), that would be a very bad look to any professional or contractor hiring her or taking in her work, seeing how angry she gets, tne negative connotations of several of her views like how she thinks spousal abuse is totally fine, her record of spurious litigation, etc is stuff a professional would never, in a million fucking years, EVER want to realistically associate with.

If you think about it, it's no fucking wonder she can only publish under a bullshit vanity or subsidy publisher

To the contrary, my publisher and I already had a talk about this site. They think it's as trashy and unimportant in society as I do. If anything, Kiwi Farms will only help me BOOST sales because when educated people (unlike yourself) see me promoting anti-patriarchal, anti-misogynist talk, they will be more than happy to support me.

I've already gotten dozens of emails from people reaching out to me about how trashy this site is and sympathetic to my cause to sue you. Opening your mouth and standing against the dumb-masses is actually what has made many politicians, sales people, and book authors FAMOUS

Eat Shit

She steals from the government so she's just as bad as any thief.

Funny, because I'm pretty sure some people in Congress and some Jewish socialists got together and created Public Policy to enforce a concept called "the redistribution of wealth". Not everyone is a baboon like you.

 

[LoverofPi]

CAUGHT YA! Here I go again to POINT OUT YOUR STUPIDITY!
You STILL can't find point A. If I "invent details" AFTER someone did it to me first, that's CALLED EYE FOR EYE. If someone (in your case you and some others) do it first unprovoked, it's lack of education.
Do you see how you can't tell the difference between terms and actions? You aren't smart enough to find POINT A and to differentiate between actions. You talk JUST LIKE THE STALKER. Hell, for all I know, you ARE the Stalker because you have the same disordered thinking. I have an ex-relative who talks like you too. (<<---Marshall, THIS, right here)

The same is true of your analysis that this action or that action is a "symptom of narcissim". You throw together isolated details and think you have a correlation. You isolate details inappropriately and talk in circles just to try to make something look like something it's not. You try to call anything that's a rebuttal "narc rage". That's not the correct definition in the least bit. And newsflash Ms. Uneducated: It's not my responsibility to be responsible for other's behavior. You read some shit off a blog about NPD and you think you can just throw terms around but your lack of intelligence just makes the information completely useless in your brain.

And lady, I have already addressed this claim of psychologists that "Refusal to admit flaws is a classic sign of narcissim". It's not in line with Hebraic thinking/The Torah. You don't need to "admit flaws" to be a moral person. Just because some pagan psychologists come up with some definitions of morality doesn't mean it's right. Go back about 25 pages, I already posted the Scripture verses.

Oh, I got you good and fucking mad, didn't I? You're raging impotently because I really do have you pegged. And you again seem to think I'm someone other than I am. Perhaps a CPS worker that was worried you were an abusive narcissist?

Anyways you haven't caught me on anything. All you're doing is proving yet again you will jump at any chance to invent excuses as to why it's okay for you to do things you don't want other people to do to you.

Also wow, three posts in a row just while I'm typing this. We really hit you in a sore spot.

Just how badly did your fake publisher gouge you for, huh? 2k? 3k?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

So you are saying that in the past you think we are fully qualified and justified in judging you?

I'm pretty sure for about 200 pages now I have clearly communicated that, as pagans, you are NOT qualified nor justified to judge me according to The Torah. You lack both the experience and knowledge of righteousness to embark on such an endeavor. And I am 100% certain that not a one of you has been commissioned by YHWH to sit over the House of Israel as a Judge.

....And I'm pretty sure for about 200 pages I have clearly communicated that although you have a right to judge me, that's your own self autonomy, your judgments are pagan in nature (not based on Torah) and therefore, completely irrelevant to a Torah follower like myself.

You really missed all that? I've said it only about every other page.

 

[LoverofPi]

I'm pretty sure for about 200 pages now I have clearly communicated that, as pagans, you are NOT qualified nor justified to judge me according to The Torah. You lack both the experience and knowledge of righteousness to embark on such an endeavor. And I am 100% certain that not a one of you has been commissioned by YHWH to sit over the House of Israel as a Judge.

....And I'm pretty sure for about 200 pages I have clearly communicated that although you have a right to judge me, that's your own self autonomy, your judgments are pagan in nature (not based on Torah) and therefore, completely irrelevant to a Torah follower like myself.

You really missed all that? I've said it only about every other page.

So you're saying exactly what I said, you think you are qualified to judge us but we aren't qualified to judge you because of a made up reason that allows you to act with impunity. Glad I cleared that up.

Seriously, are you reading off a "warning signs of narcissism" checklist? You are amazing as hitting all of these symptoms.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

To the contrary, my publisher and I already had a talk about this site. They think it's as trashy and unimportant in society as I do. If anything, Kiwi Farms will only help me BOOST sales because when educated people (unlike yourself) see me promoting anti-patriarchal, anti-misogynist talk, they will be more than happy to support me.

I've already gotten dozens of emails from people reaching out to me about how trashy this site is and sympathetic to my cause to sue you. Opening your mouth and standing against the dumb-masses is actually what has made many politicians, sales people, and book authors FAMOUS

Eat Shit

1. Don't multi post you dumb fucking kike learn to form a coherent stream of though in a message.

2. Must not be very professional if they don't give a fuck about all of the objectionable shit you do and say being recorded on the internet, kinda furthers my point really

3. Almost nobody outside of the farms know you exist in the general public, and most people that would find out would be turned off by the info they find, it'd probably not affect sales at best, trash them at worst.

4. An educated person would absolutely despise you lmao, screeching about your college degree and how Yahweh will totally smite everyone but the good ol likes isn't intellectualism, it's the polar opposite

5. Show the emails and prove it, otherwise your words are nigh near meaningless

6. The ideology of "all publicity is good publicity" is inherently flawed, rarely keeps you relevant long term. Negative attention can only captivate for so long. You'd make an exception if you went into the comedy industry, however

You might wanna save that shit for yourself, Melinda, I doubt the food you've got will last long unless you kill your piglets and make some chitterlings

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Oh, I got you good and fucking mad, didn't I? You're raging impotently because I really do have you pegged. And you again seem to think I'm someone other than I am. Perhaps a CPS worker that was worried you were an abusive narcissist?

Anyways you haven't caught me on anything. All you're doing is proving yet again you will jump at any chance to invent excuses as to why it's okay for you to do things you don't want other people to do to you.

Also wow, three posts in a row just while I'm typing this. We really hit you in a sore spot.

Just how badly did your fake publisher gouge you for, huh? 2k? 3k?

I'm not mad at all. That's your own fairytale perception, something you do a lot of. You do realize that telling others how they feel and making up fairytales like that is symptomatic of the very mental illness you claim not to have (NPD)? Since I don't believe in pagan psychology, I'll just call it what it is: UNEDUCATED. You are HIGHLY UNEDUCATED. I've clearly demonstrated how to find Point A and differentiate terms and you still just don't get it. A saying comes to mind with you: "YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID" (<<---Marshall, hahaha, remember what we were talking about earlier?)

I'm not even going to address your inane comments about the publisher. It's so moronic it doesn't even deserve a response.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

I'm not mad at all. That's your own fairytale perception, something you do a lot of. You do realize that telling others how they feel and making up fairytales like that is symptomatic of the very mental illness you claim not to have (NPD)? Since I don't believe in pagan psychology, I'll just call it what it is: UNEDUCATED. You are HIGHLY UNEDUCATED. I've clearly demonstrated how to find Point A and differentiate terms and you still just don't get it. A saying comes to mind with you: "YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID" (<<---Marshall, hahaha, remember what we were talking about earlier?)

I'm not even going to address your inane comments about the publisher. It's so moronic it doesn't even deserve a response.

Melinda, just accept you're a fucking narcissist, saying you don't believe in a form of fucking science makes you seen deluded and, ironically enough, uneducated.

 

[redcent]

Torah Torah Torah Torah Torah Torah Torah pagans Torah

Pokemon have a better vocabulary than you

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

So you're saying exactly what I said, you think you are qualified to judge us but we aren't qualified to judge you because of a made up reason that allows you to act with impunity. Glad I cleared that up.

Seriously, are you reading off a "warning signs of narcissism" checklist? You are amazing as hitting all of these symptoms.

Am I qualified to judge you under The Torah? YES
"Why you ask?" Because I have 14 years of walking this walk, and more than a decade of research and study of The Torah under my belt

Are you qualified to judge me under The Torah? NO
"Why you ask?" Because you are a pagan

I already asked about 40 pages ago whether you were a Torah follower or not and you answered NO.

Melinda, just accept you're a fucking narcissist, saying you don't believe in a form of fucking science makes you seen deluded and, ironically enough, uneducated.

Proof that I am a narcissist?

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Am I qualified to judge you under The Torah? YES
"Why you ask?" Because I have 14 years of walking this walk, and more than a decade of research and study of The Torah under my belt

Are you qualified to judge me under The Torah? NO
"Why you ask?" Because you are a pagan

I already asked about 40 pages ago whether you were a Torah follower or not and you answered NO.

Saying you're a follower of a religion doesn't inherently make you a proper or respectable follower in the community. Sucking off scriptures you twist into malice isn't being a real follower, it's justifying ignorance and hatred under the cover of religious belief.

Proof that I am a narcissist?

You contain a lot of the traits of a narcissist. You can't accept failure and try to twist it as some kind of victory to make yourself feel better, you're deluded to feel that you are a superior person, your inherent pseudointellectualism, your lack of empathy and understanding of how people work outside of yourself and the small group around like yourself, how easily angered you are by insults from randos on the internet, you project your failures and mistakes onto others often fabricating lies, you have no will to self improve, etc.