🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon, alleged rapist and revenge pornographer. Exiled in Mexico carlesss on a diet of slop. Has triple titties. Wanted to fuck Keffals' moobs.

[instythot]

God he's fat greasy and ugly!

Exactly why he's such a perfect nemesis for Gaytor and Ralph

 

[Arm Pit Cream]

That shitty negativeXP song in 2020? lol that got annoying months ago, why play it now? It's cringe. You don't need to play it to introduce him.

 

[UnKillFill]

This guy seems to be a cow in his own right.

 

[Nephi]

Oh that hapa Negative XP/School Shooter is definitely a lolcow.

 

[Rekkington]

Oh that hapa Negative XP/School Shooter is definitely a lolcow.

I like his stuff but he's really autistic in interviews.

 

[instythot]

I like his stuff but he's really autistic in interviews.

It really seemed like he was playing up "you want a killstream guest? ok, i'll give you the most killstream guest ever!" and none of the hosts were catching on, even with the over the top stuff like "oh, none of this would have happened if my high school girlfriend was nicer to me. I don't believe in sex before marriage guys!"

Were his other interviews with Dick? Because that could be more of the same

 

[Rekkington]

It really seemed like he was playing up "you want a killstream guest? ok, i'll give you the most killstream guest ever!" and none of the hosts were catching on, even with the over the top stuff like "oh, none of this would have happened if my high school girlfriend was nicer to me. I don't believe in sex before marriage guys!"

Were his other interviews with Dick? Because that could be more of the same

I was mainly referencing the Dick one where he just came across as kinda boring, if he is going buckwild on the Killstream he will have redeemed himself in my gay chinky eyes.

 

[instythot]

I was mainly referencing the Dick one where he just came across as kinda boring, if he is going buckwild on the Killstream he will have redeemed himself in my gay chinky eyes.

he was really leaning into the incel alt-right nazi position, but it was also very difficult to take it at face value

 

[aiqe00135]

Were his other interviews with Dick? Because that could be more of the same

Yeah he called in to Masterson's podcast. It wasn't particularly interesting and Shooter is fucking weird, surprise surprise. A few of Dick's listeners didn't get jokes and piled on the dude after the show which didn't help any but that's how it goes.

 

[Lemmingwise]

So to debate Destiny it's not even really about facts, and Enoch was pretty good at constantly demanding that Destiny re-state his actual point instead of being a termite in everyone else's. Forcing him to do that breaks him down very quickly because his whole game is to be a pied piper into a trivial semantic shitpile.

Pretty much why his first talk with metokur was so much fun. Just letting Destiny talk and letting Destiny answer questions, not taking the bait. 20 minutes later and he's sincerely suggesting that the US should bomb mexico.

 

[Freedom Fries]

Pretty much why his first talk with metokur was so much fun. Just letting Destiny talk and letting Destiny answer questions, not taking the bait. 20 minutes later and he's sincerely suggesting that the US should bomb mexico.

The US should bomb parts of mexico and special forces should be conducting drug and gang raids there instead of the ME. Cartels and MS-13 are and always have been a greater threat to Americans than any terrorist group. It isn't an absurd position. We actually used to do this kind of thing in South and Central America.

 

[2021Murder]

he was really leaning into the incel alt-right nazi position, but it was also very difficult to take it at face value

Just based on his albums and discography he seemed like a generic musician but then 7 months ago noticed the huge incel/alt-right fanbase he cultivated and really started leaning into appealing to them. So he's probably playing up to them as well. I mean nothing from his full albums scream incel or n
Alt-right the way his singles from the last 7 months has.

And its not like musicians aren't know for playing personas on interviews. I'd have a hard time believing he is being real on these.

Of course thats all speculation, maybe he just discovered pol last year and that caused the huge swing in his music. But that also makes it a lot harder to believe that hes always been a sperg.

 

[instythot]

Just based on his albums and discography he seemed like a generic musician but then 7 months ago noticed the huge incel/alt-right fanbase he cultivated and really started leaning into appealing to them. So he's probably playing up to them as well. I mean nothing from his full albums scream incel or n
Alt-right the way his singles from the last 7 months has.

And its not like musicians aren't know for playing personas on interviews. I'd have a hard time believing he is being real on these.

Of course thats all speculation, maybe he just discovered pol last year and that caused the huge swing in his music. But that also makes it a lot harder to believe that hes always been a sperg.

I expected @theralph and Gator to be dumb enough to take that line at face value, but am disappointed in Bibble for doing the same

 

[2021Murder]

I expected @theralph and Gator to be dumb enough to take that line at face value, but am disappointed in Bibble for doing the same

Its even weirder considering musicians have been known to be as authentic as wrestlers for about a century now. At least Dick seemed to understand during their interview. But this is a classic situation where the booker has a guest on that the hosts dont know or care about

 

[Lemmingwise]

Naked Ape was the only person who knew how to deal with Destiny's bullshit. He talked over him, made constant insults and completely shut down his gish-galloping until Destiny rage quit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHHgqh0rfxQ

Kirsty Winters used similar tactics effectively against Sargon. The key is to just go on the attack and don't assume you're actually debating a rational person.

It's not hard to find, but in ase anyone else wants to go down memory lane

 

[Berrakh]

Destiny almost certainly doesn't read his sources that closely. Naked Ape knew that study better and Destiny was caught with his cock in the door.

 

[MelloYello]

Destiny almost certainly doesn't read his sources that closely. Naked Ape knew that study better and Destiny was caught with his cock in the door.

Precisely.
Exposing Destiny as the bloviating cuck is the way to handle his bullshit.
In this case, by proving that his argument rested entirely on a single paper, which Destiny either didn't read or didn't understand.

He's a self-aggrandizing moron, a fraud, much like Sargon.

 

[Berrakh]

Precisely.
Exposing Destiny as the bloviating cuck is the way to handle his bullshit.
In this case, by proving that his argument rested entirely on a single paper, which Destiny either didn't read or didn't understand.

He's a self-aggrandizing moron, a fraud, much like Sargon.

Let's pump the breaks here. He is definitely smarter than Sargon.

 

[AltisticRight]

Destiny almost certainly doesn't read his sources that closely. Naked Ape knew that study better and Destiny was caught with his cock in the door.

If you've "debated" enough of these citation scatterbombing types, you'll realise that most of them never read beyond the abstract, or simply skip straight to the conclusion.
This is extremely prevalent when it comes to robbing guns from people. People cite that Australian paper that analysed gun-related crimes after the robbery some decades ago due to a mass shooting in Tasmania, it's all in the abstract. Yet their conclusion was "gun control had no statistically significance on lowering gun-related crimes", many use that paper to claim the opposite of their conclusion, then resort to whining and suicide rates when being called out.

It's an extremely pathetic tactic, especially when someone has an in-circle of spergs that have google scholar opened to feed information. This isn't debating to convince fence sitters or to reinforce one's views, it's debating to pwn the opponent, like a kid in primary school.

 

[instythot]

If you've "debated" enough of these citation scatterbombing types, you'll realise that most of them never read beyond the abstract, or simply skip straight to the conclusion.
This is extremely prevalent when it comes to robbing guns from people. People cite that Australian paper that analysed gun-related crimes after the robbery some decades ago due to a mass shooting in Tasmania, it's all in the abstract. Yet their conclusion was "gun control had no statistically significance on lowering gun-related crimes", many use that paper to claim the opposite of their conclusion, then resort to whining and suicide rates when being called out.

It's an extremely pathetic tactic, especially when someone has an in-circle of spergs that have google scholar opened to feed information. This isn't debating to convince fence sitters or to reinforce one's views, it's debating to pwn the opponent, like a kid in primary school.

Yeah, but let's not pretend that anyone tuned into bloodsports for intellectual betterment. We came for the tantrums, and Little Stevie pretty consistently delivers or causes them