Because it's rape. Forcing oneself on someone in a sexual way and hurting them is traumatizing and immoral. You're so smart but you don't understand that? The right to sexual and bodily autonomy and one's own mental boundaries do not stop with marriage, you uneducated idiot. You don't become property when you marry someone. Feminists fought hard for the right to sexual and bodily autonomy and against spousal rape. And just because you enjoy something, doesn't mean other women enjoy it, too. Not everybody is a freak like you.
Your feminist views are pretty archaic and play nicely into patriarchy. One could say they're not feminist views at all but merely the twisted ideas of a cult member. You really shouldn't run your mouth so much.
Thankfully, the law does not care about your feelings and believes. I'm embarrassed that we share the same gender. How are you even human? You are bad and you should feel bad.
If a woman rapes her husband or vice versa, a man rapes his wife, why do you correlate that with "trauma", "hurt", "bodily autonomy", and a violation of "mental boundaries"? Just talking forcing one's self. Not battering someone before the act.
Reason the question needs to be asked is because: if you are already having sex with your spouse anyway, what's the difference in your spouse having your body when
you want it, versus when
they unilaterally want your body? How can you be hurt, traumatized and feel violated if you simply recognize that your spouse
wants your body at a moment you particularly just don't
want to give it? If it is a matter of
want, then it is a power struggle of the wills.
These terms ("trauma", "hurt", "bodily autonomy" and "mental boundaries") imply that the spouse is in a power struggle of control with the spouse. The perception of harm is really coming from
within that person being raped by their spouse, and so they
perceive the event as traumatic, hurtful and violation. Mostly because, in the realm of sex, you really do
not have bodily autonomy in marriage. Your body exists to serve the sexual needs of your spouse
too, not just your own. So I have to disagree with you on many angles.
My
gender equality views are towards empowering women to be feminine, not become like a man. Telling women that sterilizing their uterus by birth control and abortion is not empowering them as women, it's conditioning them to be like men. If a woman is disadvantaged in society financially or otherwise by going through womanly things like pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum healing, there is no real gender equality.
Perhaps I should recap Ruth's beliefs:
-If a woman succeeds in life, it's only because she fucked her way up and had a bunch of abortions and took birth control pills.
-A woman cannot be a virgin, she is either lying, ugly or mentally ill for not seeking a husband
-When you are married spousal rape is a-ok. And yet a woman is still mentally ill for not seeking out a husband who would do this to her
-Barren women are of lower status
-A woman who sleeps around is bad. Unless they had marriages and divorces"" covenants""
-Don't know what her stance is on working mothers. Or of married couples who take birth control /get the snip after one or two kids, or just don't have kids. I'm not going to expect an improvement there...
-despite glorifying motherhood it is best done so by living in crime riddled section 8 housing not giving them an education because school is evil or give them vaccines or medical help because medicine is evil. But guns are a-ok.
... It goes on
The first one is a gross mis-statement of what I have said.
1. I never said that prostituting one's self got you "ahead"
---What I
did say was that women use birth control and abortion in order to financially get ahead in their careers. It's just a fact that once women have children, and especially when they choose to home train/raise or homeschool the children, they
are at a financial disadvantage
2. Yes, I won't deny that I did say that woman using masturbation as a lifestyle instead of seeking a covenant partner/spouse is not mentally healthy. A low sex drive in a woman and sexual repression is not a sign of good mental, physical or emotional health. Women should live satisfying sexual lives, not be encouraged to sexually repress.
3. What is inherently wrong about a man or woman raping their spouse?
4. In Hebraic thought, yes, barren women
are lower in status. It is called a "disgrace", a state of being no Hebrew woman wanted to be in, traditionally. Modern culture is the opposite and encourages women to have minimal children, a barren womb and to glorify a bikini body untouched by pregnancy.
5. I understand a lot of women are abused or mistreated by their husbands by being shamed and forced to be like men to go out and be head providers of their homes. It would be more ideal that women could run small businesses while raising children at home. Women will always be tied to unpaid labor (pregnancy, ecological breastfeeding, domestic work, etc) and so the playing field is not even for women and it never will be. Women will always have to do things to raise families that they never get financially compensated for, so their male covenant partners and fathers need to financially back them. Women should be given the resources to be at home with their babies and children. That is completely feminine. Men should be given the resources and opportunities by society to help support their families. But Capitalism makes haves and have nots, it does not equally distribute resources and opportunities, so here we have a broken system.
5b. Vasectomies and tube tying are violation of The Torah's command to be fruitful and multiply. And to not cut the genitals.
6. I never said public housing was the ideal. I said there is no shame in public housing if it assists you in your moral obligation to homeschool your children (due to your religious beliefs)
7. What's wrong with guns?
. Only an evil woman would deny her infant child her breasts for tard cum (Lam. 4:3).
