- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
I like to think that if I was a reporter during a global crisis and I had the chance to ask the President of the United States a question, it wouldn't be about the ratings that his press conferences were getting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shutting down entire countries for months on end because of some coofing isnt advisable either. Aside from totally derailing quality of life, The damage from doing so will wind up making 2008 look like childs play if its allowed to go for too long.Sending people back to work/school just because there aren't recorded cases or those cases are low in that area isn't advised. Wtf. There was an asymptomatic woman who attended two wakes in Newfoundland. Now we have 99 cases directly and indirectly tied to her, that they've found. Making the province have the second highest per capita infection rate as the population is so small. It takes only a single person with Corona to do serious damage.
Two days ago in Newfoundland it was 0 hospitalizations. Now it's 7 in hospital, 2 in ICU. Ending restrictions will make it that much worse. Low case numbers in an area mean nothing when it can move that quickly.
You can't compare a disease to terrorist activity, either. Pearl harbour and 9/11 could be cleaned up and not keep immediately infecting people. Corona cannot as there's no vaccine or treatment currently. The risk dosen't go away once the worst is over because the worst is still ongoing.
I agree it's not good on either side. The whole thing is silly and I want to hear actual information.
So a 0.38% death rate, less then 1/3rd of south korea.View attachment 1207821
![]()
Locals in Wuhan believe 42,000 people may have died from coronavirus …
archived 29 Mar 2020 22:52:55 UTCarchive.li
Wuhans population is 11 million.
The coof isn't Ebola, with a 50% kill rate and yet the parts of Africa it affected are still around. Same with Marburg, And look at all the diseases that actually killed/maimed before antibiotics were readily available after WWII. Smallpox still killed/disfigured people. As a mother, you're lucky because during the first half of the 20th century many children died from childhood diseases like scarlet fever and whooping cough. Look at any family bible before 1940 and there will be several entries of the children who didn't make it to the ripe age of ten. Yet America not only survived, it became the world's only superpower.Did I say that death for any individual is a certainty?
No, I did not. Nothing is certain, for individual survival. But statistics are there.
I also mentioned mass graves. Not in the backyard though. For more information, watch some videos posted on this very forum, of hard hit areas, and how this is being handled.
Taking a daily run to a grocery store, right now, and browsing is simply foolishness. And that IS how you get infected.
You're extrapolating from a single point. You need to extrapolate from many points. I believe you about the H1N1 , but other pathogens have different rates. I think Syphilis got gradually less damaging over hundreds of years.The evidence of virus strains weakening over time is right in front of you. H1N1 killed 60K in America alone in 2009/10, in 2019/20 it has killed less then 1/10th of that. Total sickened by the flu this year is confirmed around 13 million, compared to 57 MILLION in 2009. Not to hard to extrapolate from those numbers really.
I think I largely agree with your position, I thought I made that clear. My point was you initially had a go at a poster for unproven assumptions, without acknowledging that that's what all positions are at this stage. It's still really early days, the press reports will change, and the "well known facts " will too.My assumptions about the number of mild cases come from three things:
1.) we know this disease is more infectious then H1N1 was, as well as other flus and colds
2.)We know testing is wildly underreporting numbers, because testing is so limited. Even serious cases in hospitals are a total crap shoot on whether you can get tested. 2 of the local cases for confirmed corona? They came back march 13th, just got tested two days ago. They were sick the whole time, sick on the way back from italy. They only got tested two days ago. How many other cases are like theirs, sick but not bad enough to require hospitalization so they never get tested?
3.) This bit you quote right here:
The state of Ohio believed there were over 100K coronavirus cases in the state by the 16th. Two weeks ago. Now, how many are in hospital? How many have been caught? 403 and 1653, respectively. My "assumption" you so readily hand-wave is partially based on the very source you seem to think knows more then the rest of us and has already stated total case numbers are VASTLY underreported. So thanks for agreeing with me, in some bizzare backhanded way.
And, really? Do you REALLY think the government of the western world, who cant get a simple aid bill passed without sperging about racism and privileged and owning trump every 10 seconds could keep such information under wraps this long? REALLY? The government doesnt have some super secret special test that gives them true numbers, the number of tests being performed are extremely limited, and what info they are working with, like reduced emissions and confirmed cases, we are seeing too. I'm sure theyve heard some more coming out of china, but the realistic and simplest answer is that they are shutting things down because they have NO FUCKING CLUE what is going on.
So,a gain, we know how diseases less infectious then corona spread, including SARS and previous corona-viruses, so we can extrapolate from that how many are truly infected with this disease. The only reason to believe the numbers are not wide spread is to honestly trust testing numbers that much, which given how limited testing is, only the truly exceptional would do.
It sounds like a bollocks theory, and like I said have you got a decent source for it? I must suck at DuckDuckGoing.The war definitely spread the disease, but war movements and weak people do not create a hyperactive killing virus. If that were true war would have wiped out humans long ago. So, why was spanish flu so deadly? Killing your hosts so effectively, especially the young, is a BAD thing for virii.
Well, Mustard gas doesnt kill viruses, so mustard gas+virus=mustard gas+virus. What mustard gas DOES do is cause rampant mutations int he upper respiratory tract. The same place spanish flu attacks so harshly. So mustard gas causes cancerous mutations, bombards cells with mutagens, virus then proceeded to infect said area and get contaminated with heavily mutated DNA, mix with large numbers of people in a cramped area allowing more violent disease to find many hosts to travel home with, and presto, you get spanish flu, a virus so deadly it wiped itself out by accident.
It has not been proven, mostly because you would need to willingly submit humans to those same trails again to prove it, but it is a theory that has been kept alive ever since it was confirmed Spanish flu was H1N1, and not some other long lost strain. There are not many things that make virus hyper-lethal, mutagens are one of them, and the battlefields of WW1 were full of them.
Still not the end of the world. We are not doomed. The extra deaths from spanish flu, swine flu, and smallpox did not doom society, the extra deaths from coofingAIDS will not either.
The single best thing that could happen? So-called "journalists" start getting a double-tap. Their inanity and total lack of situational awareness, fuck 'em. The lot of them.
Sorry, I'll willingly take my MOTIs, but these miserable fucks aren't helping a God-damn thing. They are feeding the hysteria and making it worse.
Said this earlier, we are seeing panic and the media is fueling it. I'm not worried until the "panic" becomes "desperation."
That's when Slappy locks and loads.
The stay at home compliance is over once the warm weather hits.Stay at home guidelines extended to April 30 in the U.S. I don't think people will be able to handle that unless cops start patrolling the streets.
The stay at home compliance is over once the warm weather hits.
The theory has never been proven. The allies were theorizing this in 1918:You're extrapolating from a single point. You need to extrapolate from many points. I believe you about the H1N1 , but other pathogens have different rates. I think Syphilis got gradually less damaging over hundreds of years.
I think I largely agree with your position, I thought I made that clear. My point was you initially had a go at a poster for unproven assumptions, without acknowledging that that's what all positions are at this stage. It's still really early days, the press reports will change, and the "well known facts " will too.
It sounds like a bollocks theory, and like I said have you got a decent source for it? I must suck at DuckDuckGoing.
The virus encountered damaged human DNA in mustard gas wounded lungs, and swapped genetic material with it, and that's why it was so bad? That doesn't sound right. I'll wait for someone medical to comment. But it sounds like last century's version of 5G.
The virus arose in China and spread round the world, it just found a good hunting ground in the trenches. It's China's fault, as always.
Seriously, not even the maddest doom poster here is claiming it's the end of the world. Not even that Train Guy.
It will have lasting affects simply because of
- how interconnected the modern world is, how entwined we are with China.
- How soft and unused to any hardship we are.
- The economic house of cards was due a recession anyway, this is a hell of a catalyst.
It's a big event, not sure you can call it a black swan as it was sort predictable. But it will shake things up. One of my worries is what political changes may come from this.
And those who are panicking are probably more concerned with themselves and their families, not the world. Which is a perfectly understandable position. If I had to choose between the death of a child or the entire population of some foreign country, I doubt I'd make the Mr Spock choice.
Shutting down entire countries for months on end because of some coofing isnt advisable either. Aside from totally derailing quality of life, The damage from doing so will wind up making 2008 look like childs play if its allowed to go for too long.
Human beings are not meant to sit inside all day. As the weather gets nicer, there is going to be increased pressure to lift restrictions, and if the government doesnt do it, sooner or later people will blatantly ignore the orders. Especially as bills come due and paychecks are not filled. Even this $1200 per adult stimulus isnt going to hit in time for april's bills. What happens at the end of april, when funds have totally run dry, people need food, may's bills are coming up, and congress is tying itself in knots trying to get another stimulus bill passed?
Being a NEET is not the status quo for most people, and that friction is going to grow the longer we are shut down, and unless governments can prove most people are still vulnerable, people are not going to listen, and there are nowhere near enough police officers to enforce a nationwide lockdown.
There is one thing. In the past, when a plague broke out, it took time for it to travel around the continent. This time a plague broke out and thousands of lepers brought it to all corners of the earth in a matter of hours.There's nothing remotely uncharted about this.
Maybe it's optimistic but once the weather starts getting really hot I figure a lot of people will stay indoors at some point.
At least I will. Fuck the hot weather.