US The FISA Report

OIG_Spreader.png

The FISA Report
Archive
Much like with the FBI's report on the handling of the Clinton Email investigation, I don't care what the mainstream outlets will have to say about the FISA Report. This report is over 400 pages long and not a word of it leaked to the press ahead of time, and on top of that they're all window-licking idiots so I couldn't give half of a rat's ass what they have to say about it. I'm sure that at some point one of them will manage to push out a good article about it, but I want this thread to be a repository and a page-by-page examination of the report and its contents independent from journalistic vomit.

If you need a primer on what exactly FISA surveillance even means, there's an excellent primer for it over here, and the same author also wrote a long article concerning the oddities in Carter Page's FISA warrant over here. In the event that you're just curious about how we got to this point or want an overall history of the entire debacle, there's a summary for all of that over here.

The gist of it is that FISA Title I and Title III surveillance require there be probable cause to believe the proposed target is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power. They're explicitly designed for foreign spies. These warrants are not supposed to be used against U.S. citizens without a goddamned good reason, and yet that's exactly what happened, and it happened multiple times. It also conveniently just happened to be people in Trump's campaign that were campaign managers who got hit with these FISA warrants, meaning that because of the Three-Hop Rule, the Obama administration was essentially given free reign to spy on literally everyone in Trump's campaign, including Trump himself.

If you were wondering why Horowitz' investigation had to dip so far back to the point where it completely predated all of the Russiagate crap then congratulations, you're asking yourself a smart question. It all had to be rewound to the very beginning because at the very start of this, the entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative was predicated on a hoax, and then everything that came after that hoax just piled onto the lies. Every breathless second the media screamed about Russian collusion, every politician screaming about impeaching "Trump, the Russian Asset", all of it was built on top of this one, original lie, and without it the entire house of cards just falls to pieces.

The reason that Horowitz dug all the way back into the FISA warrants is because one man proved beyond any shadow of any doubt that these warrants could not have been obtained legally. Mueller's Special Counsel proved beyond a doubt that the entire Trump-Russia collusion story was nothing more than a wild conspiracy theory. There has never been evidence put forward to prove that a word of it was real, and because of that, there clearly was not probable cause to allow for FISA warrants to be obtained against Trump campaign members. Despite what so many people were expecting Mueller to do, the only thing that Mueller's S.C. succeeded at doing was stripping away the cover story for the spying on the Trump campaign.

Whether or not that was intentional is anyone's guess and you're likely never going to be able to prove the Mueller "White hat/Black hat" theory one way or the other anyways, so it's a bit of a moot point. The fact remains that at the very end of his investigation, it was proven that there was no definitive evidence or probable cause to assume that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia. Now you know why it was Rod Rosenstein's job to give these frantic, desperate bloodhounds the wider and ever-widening scope they kept asking of him. At the end of this, when Mueller himself was going to be forced to admit he couldn't find any evidence, it was game over for the Collusion Narrative.

Thank you, Robert Mueller.

The only real questions left are as to how the Steele Dossier (Remember that one? It's been awhile.) wound up being shoved ass-first into these FISA warrants even though the Steele Dossier was a remarkably flawed piece of opposition research, and how the FISA warrants were renewed four times in the absence of any legitimate evidence. I'm expecting to hear quite a bit about Rudolph Contreras and the FISC court somewhere in this report, because there were a lot of questions surrounding that whole mess that are in desperate need of an answer.

Either way, I don't want to write a preamble longer than the fucking report itself, so let's see how idiotic our government was with the FISA warrants.
 
These people are never held accountable for their actions.

If the FISA Court actually gave a fuck about holding these people accountable, they wouldn't have chosen a corrupt Lawfare blogger David Kris to reform it, because he has spent the last several years lying about there ever being a problem at the FISA courts, lying about process, and lying about how they illegally and unconstitutionally targeted American citizens, and also lying to the courts himself. The review process is fucked, and it's the job of scumbags like Kris to keep it broken by manufacturing the thinnest veneers of justifications to keep the surveillance going. Any red flags thrown up by the judges are worthless, they're all talk and no action, and even when shown definitive proof that they are being lied to, they look the other way. They should be dragged, kicking and screaming, like a dog who crapped on the rug to to have their noses shoved into the pile of shit they created. Instead, they are being allowed to shovel it all under the rug, because everybody just wants to cover their asses and knows the FISA system is being wantonly abused for purely political reasons.
 
Untitled-1.jpg


The OIG just completed the audit of the FISA warrants. Every single report they examined (25 of them in total) contained errors, unsupported facts, or were missing files that they were supposed to reference. Every single FISA warrant had one or more fatal flaws that should have prevented it from ever being used.

Mercifully, I don't even need to do a deep-dive because excluding the introduction and the attachments, it's only about 10 pages long.
 
You'd need a time machine to go back and find the political will to do anything about this, unfortunately.

I can't imagine a future that will be filled with less shadowy authoritarianism and abuses of state power.
If Trump were smart he would be tweeting this information out every hour on the hour.
 
What the fuck happened between Watergate and now that anyone actually trusts and believes any government organization to the point of blind faith?

Other than Orange Man Bad.

A generation raised on media that always made the rich conservative a villain while the "good" guy was a police officer or FBI agent of some kind.

And Democrats can ramble off from memory a litany of sins the Republicans have done since Watergate. (Clinton impeachment, 2000 election, Blocking Obamacare.

Basically a segment of the population believes the Democrats would save them instead of knifing them in the spine.

Alternatively, Clinton's campaign knew their audience well enough that they knew that any bold enough lie would be eaten up without question.
 
Seems like a good time to make people disappear. After all, how many people are talking about Mohammed bin Salman sharking his way through the Saudi royal family, killing anyone who could challenge his power?
 

Normally I don't put much stock in a random news site that I'm not familiar with, but if that's coming from John Solomon then I'm more than willing to listen because his track record with this stuff is about as close to spotless as you're able to get. I'm more than a little interested in seeing what all of those footnotes have to say.
 

Normally I don't put much stock in a random news site that I'm not familiar with, but if that's coming from John Solomon then I'm more than willing to listen because his track record with this stuff is about as close to spotless as you're able to get. I'm more than a little interested in seeing what all of those footnotes have to say.
While this would be a stupid thing to do, with their track record I wouldn't be surprised if they literally wrote "how can we use this info against 45?" on a page margin.
 

Normally I don't put much stock in a random news site that I'm not familiar with, but if that's coming from John Solomon then I'm more than willing to listen because his track record with this stuff is about as close to spotless as you're able to get. I'm more than a little interested in seeing what all of those footnotes have to say.
Over on talk radio Gorka has him on talking it up.
 
I saw this earlier today, but didn't quite know where to post it, but this thread coming back to the top is convenient. Last night Catherine Herridge from CBS (archive) released a few excerpts from the covertly recorded conversation from Oct. 31, 2016 that the FBI used to frame George Papadoloplous for being a Russian agent. Then later the whole transcript was put out accompanying a story by Chuck Ross at the Daily Caller (archive).

It's one hundred and seventy one pages of mostly innocuous shit and car engine sounds and restaurant noises through which Papadopolous (abbreviated "CT") denies everything to a "Confidential Human Source" in an a casual environment where he thinks he is talking with a friend, unaware that treacherous glow in the dark niggers are listening. The whole thing is on Chuck Ross' scribd account. The FBI was already making up gay faggot names for the case. This was "Crossfire Typhoon," which of course was intended to be spun into "Crossfire Hurricane." And none of this exculpatory evidence mattered to the FBI; once again the government ignored the complete lack of evidence to chase non-existent phantom Russians for their own nefarious purposes. George Papadopolous denies any Trump campaign involvement in supposed "Russian hacking" and even brings up Australian glow in the dark plant Alexander Downer, who was also part of the Stefan Halper-orchestrated frame job in Europe.


EVLGTUgUcAEchMQ
EVLGTUfUcAIxZcT
EVLGTUhUUAArHCx
EVLGTUiVAAEhYdA
 
Last edited:

Normally I don't put much stock in a random news site that I'm not familiar with, but if that's coming from John Solomon then I'm more than willing to listen because his track record with this stuff is about as close to spotless as you're able to get. I'm more than a little interested in seeing what all of those footnotes have to say.


Looks like three of the requested footnotes were partially declassified today.


One of the four is still ENTIRELY classified. Once again all it shows is that the Crossfire Hurricane zealots ignored EVERY early warning that they had that they were wrong, and are still using classifications to hide exculpatory evidence, not "sources and methods," as they have been doing from the beginning.

Every time something gets declassified it just exposes more of their bullshit. We'll see how long these glow in the dark faggots manage to kick the can down the road until the next tiny bit is declassified, since that is the only strategy they have left at this point: hope they kick the can far enough that the world ends before the whole truth gets out.
 
from what I gather Seckulow's been going on about some new unredacted stuff that manages to find ways to make things look even more bullshit
 
While this would be a stupid thing to do, with their track record I wouldn't be surprised if they literally wrote "how can we use this info against 45?" on a page margin.

With the new info that came out recently with the notes, I can't believe I was actually pretty close.

Oh Lordy
 
Back