US The FISA Report

OIG_Spreader.png

The FISA Report
Archive
Much like with the FBI's report on the handling of the Clinton Email investigation, I don't care what the mainstream outlets will have to say about the FISA Report. This report is over 400 pages long and not a word of it leaked to the press ahead of time, and on top of that they're all window-licking idiots so I couldn't give half of a rat's ass what they have to say about it. I'm sure that at some point one of them will manage to push out a good article about it, but I want this thread to be a repository and a page-by-page examination of the report and its contents independent from journalistic vomit.

If you need a primer on what exactly FISA surveillance even means, there's an excellent primer for it over here, and the same author also wrote a long article concerning the oddities in Carter Page's FISA warrant over here. In the event that you're just curious about how we got to this point or want an overall history of the entire debacle, there's a summary for all of that over here.

The gist of it is that FISA Title I and Title III surveillance require there be probable cause to believe the proposed target is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power. They're explicitly designed for foreign spies. These warrants are not supposed to be used against U.S. citizens without a goddamned good reason, and yet that's exactly what happened, and it happened multiple times. It also conveniently just happened to be people in Trump's campaign that were campaign managers who got hit with these FISA warrants, meaning that because of the Three-Hop Rule, the Obama administration was essentially given free reign to spy on literally everyone in Trump's campaign, including Trump himself.

If you were wondering why Horowitz' investigation had to dip so far back to the point where it completely predated all of the Russiagate crap then congratulations, you're asking yourself a smart question. It all had to be rewound to the very beginning because at the very start of this, the entire Trump-Russia collusion narrative was predicated on a hoax, and then everything that came after that hoax just piled onto the lies. Every breathless second the media screamed about Russian collusion, every politician screaming about impeaching "Trump, the Russian Asset", all of it was built on top of this one, original lie, and without it the entire house of cards just falls to pieces.

The reason that Horowitz dug all the way back into the FISA warrants is because one man proved beyond any shadow of any doubt that these warrants could not have been obtained legally. Mueller's Special Counsel proved beyond a doubt that the entire Trump-Russia collusion story was nothing more than a wild conspiracy theory. There has never been evidence put forward to prove that a word of it was real, and because of that, there clearly was not probable cause to allow for FISA warrants to be obtained against Trump campaign members. Despite what so many people were expecting Mueller to do, the only thing that Mueller's S.C. succeeded at doing was stripping away the cover story for the spying on the Trump campaign.

Whether or not that was intentional is anyone's guess and you're likely never going to be able to prove the Mueller "White hat/Black hat" theory one way or the other anyways, so it's a bit of a moot point. The fact remains that at the very end of his investigation, it was proven that there was no definitive evidence or probable cause to assume that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia. Now you know why it was Rod Rosenstein's job to give these frantic, desperate bloodhounds the wider and ever-widening scope they kept asking of him. At the end of this, when Mueller himself was going to be forced to admit he couldn't find any evidence, it was game over for the Collusion Narrative.

Thank you, Robert Mueller.

The only real questions left are as to how the Steele Dossier (Remember that one? It's been awhile.) wound up being shoved ass-first into these FISA warrants even though the Steele Dossier was a remarkably flawed piece of opposition research, and how the FISA warrants were renewed four times in the absence of any legitimate evidence. I'm expecting to hear quite a bit about Rudolph Contreras and the FISC court somewhere in this report, because there were a lot of questions surrounding that whole mess that are in desperate need of an answer.

Either way, I don't want to write a preamble longer than the fucking report itself, so let's see how idiotic our government was with the FISA warrants.
 
The report also discusses, for reasons of thoroughness, CHSs who weren't part of CFH but were connected to the Trump campaign in some way. One CHS told CFH about Page, but it was low-value info that was common knowledge all over the Internet, and didn't factor into the investigation. Another one was involved in the Trump campaign, but wasn't by the time the FBI learned about it. The CFH team looked at his file but didn't use it in the investigation. Another was scheduled to attend a national security forum with Trump. While he was mentioned in an email from the director of CFH, the director couldn't remember it when questioned after the fact, or say whether he actually attended the forum.

Two more CHSs are mentioned, but the page is heavily redacted so that it is impossible to learn anything concrete about them.

A sixth CHS was a Trump supporter. He was not affiliated with CFH, and his participation in politics was strictly avocational.
another.png

There's no evidence anything this CHS did affected CFH in any way. Indeed nobody involved with CFH even knew about him, however they think they should've.
 
Pg 458.png Pg 459.png Pg 460.png Pg 461.png Pg 462.png Pg 463.png

Honestly, pages 402-418 of the PDF are absolutely worth reading because they go into even more detail concerning each, specific failure they found in each FISA warrant and the renewal for each one, but I figured that people wouldn't want to read multiple pages bathed in more yellow highlights, and it wasn't particularly covering anything we haven't already learned, so I moved to Pg. 458 of the appendix, where they document each specific problem in the FISA applications, and what sort of inconsistency is present.

What I find the most alarming is that more often than not there's just no supporting documentation. I knew that more than a few of these factual errors would be predicated on a lie in some facet, but the sweeping majority of these assertions made for the FISA warrants were based on absolutely nothing, and because the FISC has to rely on the FBI to tell them the truth, apparently the Crossfire Hurricane team was just making shit up, throwing it at the FISC, and getting the warrant or renewal that they needed.

I need to make one more pass over this entire thing, but I'm gonna' start working on the conclusion for this now, and what to expect going forwards. If you're a deeply impatient person, here's the TL;DR:

 
Decided to check the Wikipedia page.

Trump and his allies repeatedly promoted conspiracy theories asserting that the Crossfire Hurricane investigation was opened on false pretenses for political purposes.[2] A subsequent inquiry by Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz, released in redacted form in December 2019, did not find political bias in the FBI investigation, and determined that the investigation was properly predicated on a legal and factual basis. Attorney General Bill Barr and his designated investigator John Durham publicly stated their belief the evidence justified opening only a preliminary rather than a full investigation and indicated they would continue to investigate.


Its all so tiresome. I wish Carl Jung was alive right now. He would probably have some good insights on what it means for people to outsource their memory to controlled media and gatekept online resources.
 
Decided to check the Wikipedia page.

Trump and his allies repeatedly promoted conspiracy theories asserting that the Crossfire Hurricane investigation was opened on false pretenses for political purposes.[2] A subsequent inquiry by Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz, released in redacted form in December 2019, did not find political bias in the FBI investigation, and determined that the investigation was properly predicated on a legal and factual basis. Attorney General Bill Barr and his designated investigator John Durham publicly stated their belief the evidence justified opening only a preliminary rather than a full investigation and indicated they would continue to investigate.


Its all so tiresome. I wish Carl Jung was alive right now. He would probably have some good insights on what it means for people to outsource their memory to controlled media and gatekept online resources.

Man they're just outright lying over and over. That page glows just as much as the FISA report itself.
 
Decided to check the Wikipedia page.

Trump and his allies repeatedly promoted conspiracy theories asserting that the Crossfire Hurricane investigation was opened on false pretenses for political purposes.[2] A subsequent inquiry by Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz, released in redacted form in December 2019, did not find political bias in the FBI investigation, and determined that the investigation was properly predicated on a legal and factual basis. Attorney General Bill Barr and his designated investigator John Durham publicly stated their belief the evidence justified opening only a preliminary rather than a full investigation and indicated they would continue to investigate.


Its all so tiresome. I wish Carl Jung was alive right now. He would probably have some good insights on what it means for people to outsource their memory to controlled media and gatekept online resources.
I remember in college I was ready to do my first research paper. But before I did, my professor told the class her requirements for the paper. The very first thing she said was “Don’t cite Wikipedia because anyone can put anything they want in those articles.”
 
I remember in college I was ready to do my first research paper. But before I did, my professor told the class her requirements for the paper. The very first thing she said was “Don’t cite Wikipedia because anyone can put anything they want in those articles.”

Which of course sets all the kiddos to "REEEEEEE!"ing because Wikipedia articles are edited, maintained, and moderated by people with their opinions, so of course it's a reliable, perfectly academic-worthy resource to copy-paste their entire papers from gain mucho knowledge to fight the academic patriarchy with!
 
View attachment 1051988 View attachment 1051989 View attachment 1051990 View attachment 1051991 View attachment 1051992 View attachment 1051993

Honestly, pages 402-418 of the PDF are absolutely worth reading because they go into even more detail concerning each, specific failure they found in each FISA warrant and the renewal for each one, but I figured that people wouldn't want to read multiple pages bathed in more yellow highlights, and it wasn't particularly covering anything we haven't already learned, so I moved to Pg. 458 of the appendix, where they document each specific problem in the FISA applications, and what sort of inconsistency is present.

What I find the most alarming is that more often than not there's just no supporting documentation. I knew that more than a few of these factual errors would be predicated on a lie in some facet, but the sweeping majority of these assertions made for the FISA warrants were based on absolutely nothing, and because the FISC has to rely on the FBI to tell them the truth, apparently the Crossfire Hurricane team was just making shit up, throwing it at the FISC, and getting the warrant or renewal that they needed.

I need to make one more pass over this entire thing, but I'm gonna' start working on the conclusion for this now, and what to expect going forwards. If you're a deeply impatient person, here's the TL;DR:


No supporting documentations multiple times and they weren't laughed out of the room? This just comes off as gross incompetence on FISC's part for wasting time on the team's bullshit. Maybe they all were in on it or there's a plant in FISC that was allowing this, yet they still had to put up a smokescreen of law and order and couldn't let things slide without something to prove because someone was still breathing down their necks. They should've recognized the pattern and told them to fuck off long before they did this, what, seventeen times or so and then finally got the warrants because they just wanted them out of their hair.

So... was Steele's pee-pee kinkfic originally rejected before McCain stepped in, or was that what made them decide "We're tired of seeing your faces, so whatever, here's your warrant"?
 
No supporting documentations multiple times and they weren't laughed out of the room? This just comes off as gross incompetence on FISC's part for wasting time on the team's bullshit. Maybe they all were in on it or there's a plant in FISC that was allowing this, yet they still had to put up a smokescreen of law and order and couldn't let things slide without something to prove because someone was still breathing down their necks. They should've recognized the pattern and told them to fuck off long before they did this, what, seventeen times or so and then finally got the warrants because they just wanted them out of their hair.

So... was Steele's pee-pee kinkfic originally rejected before McCain stepped in, or was that what made them decide "We're tired of seeing your faces, so whatever, here's your warrant"?
Oh, no, they didn't fail to get a warrant 16 times and then on the 17th found success. It's a bit of a gross oversimplification but the gist of it is that originally when they pursued a warrant against Carter Page, the FISC declined it because there wasn't enough supporting evidence. The FBI came back months later with the "verified" Steele Reporting and were able to get their FISA.

When you see people saying that the FISA's were obtained through legal and legitimate means through the FISC, they're not technically lying, they're just omitting the fact that the FISA's were only obtained because the FBI/CH Team lied or omitted information in seventeen separate instances in a way that allowed them to obtain the warrants, and subsequently continued to lie or omit information whenever they needed to renew them. The original evidence they had against Page was completely insignificant, but when they came back months later with all of this shopped-around and dolled-up Steele reporting, suddenly they just magically had all of the perfect evidence that they needed.

The FISC wouldn't catch the fact that the Steele reporting was horseshit because it's not the FISC's job to fact-check the evidence that they're given, since the evidence has to pass through so many departments before it reaches them that it's generally taken on faith that it doesn't need another pass-over. I'd consider that a serious weakness with the FISC, and definitely something that needs to be corrected, but in this instance the fault wouldn't lay with the FISC since that's absolutely not in their job description anyways. For all intents and purposes the FISC is currently little more than the rubber stamp at the very end of the conveyor belt.

The fault lays squarely with all of the agents who were doctoring information, editing email headers and pushing Hillary Clinton's op-ed garbage through the case in order to obtain a warrant that was considered completely unjustifiable without the presence of the Steele Dossier.
 
OIG_SpreaderEND.png
For the sake of keeping this entire post readable, I'm going to be splitting it apart and tucking it into different spoilers because otherwise this shit isn't going to be readable because there's a lot to say about it, but there's also some supplementary stuff that's worth taking a glance at, and a particularly funny statement from Comey way back in 2017, where he quotes himself like an absolute faggot.

I'd say that I was actually surprised by how much of this report we were already aware of, but at the same time it exposed a lot of new information, especially pertaining to the way that these FISAs were able to be obtained, especially the parts pertaining to FBI Atty. Kevin Clinesmith, the man who edited the "not a source" line into the requisite emails that allowed the FBI to go after Page. To see that he was the same attorney from the previous OIG report was an incredibly important piece of the puzzle.

Sorry that this took so long. Originally this post was substantially longer, but about halfway into it I realized that this thread's only 15 pages long, so it really doesn't need some sort of novel-sized, over-arching summary of the entire thing when it's honestly easier to just flip through the damned thread.

Naturally, I'd recommend just sitting down and reading the entire Executive Summary (PDF Pgs. 2-20) included in the PDF since it comprehensively covers all of the contents of the report, but if for some reason reading 19 pages is difficult: The FBI fucked up. The FBI fucked up a lot, and in a way that I believe completely eliminates any possibility that this was done by accident.

At the very beginning of Crossfire Hurricane, the entire investigation was launched because of a brief discussion that one person (Downer) had with Papadapoulos in a bar in England. None of this information was verified in any reasonable way, and all of it came from that one source. From there, the FBI steamrolled after a FISA warrant for Carter Page. This FISA warrant was originally denied by the FISC due to lack of substantive evidence, but then a few months later the FBI comes back and just so happens to have all of the evidence they need in order to obtain their warrant.

The critical part here, as they outlined in this report, is that all of the evidence that the Crossfire team was presenting to the FISC was inherently flawed, tainted, or in some cases filled with outright lies. Because the FISC does not verify information that it's been given--since that's not the FISC's job--the Crossfire team was able to omit or modify key pieces of intel in order for the "evidence" that they were presenting to make it through the FISC and obtain their warrants.

One or two mistakes I could understand, but I'd still find unacceptable for a warrant that is in essence stripping away your Constitutional right to privacy. A FISA should be an extraordinarily rare thing to be used against a United States citizen because at its core it's inherently unconstitutional. It's a warrant that should only be afforded in circumstances where the violation of these rights is outweighed by the potential damage that this citizen could cause by colluding with a foreign entity. IE: Spies.

In this instance, the Crossfire team didn't make one or two mistakes, they made seventeen factual errors or omissions during the course of the FISA warrants and their subsequent renewals, and these mistakes always went one direction: The direction that allowed them to continue surveillance against Carter Page. Find yourself a coin and flip it 17 times. See how many times you get Heads 17 times in a row.

Additionally, we learned that FBI Attorney Kevin Clinesmith, the agent from the previous OIG report who displayed remarkably biased behaviour, made a substantial edit to an email omitting the fact that Carter Page had worked with another government agency, thereby declaring him "not a source." This may seem inconsequential but the general idea is that because of Page's previous work for that agency, some of his activity might look shifty because of the work that he was doing for the U.S. Government. The addition of "not a source" strips that context away, making it look as though his shifty activity is legitimately shifty and not done with an agreement between himself and the U.S. agency.

Think of it like a police agency prosecuting an undercover officer for "selling" drugs, because one of the officers who knew that he was undercover stripped that designation away, allowing the other police agency to pursue him as if he was an actual criminal, and not an undercover agent working for the police. That's essentially what Clinesmith allowed to happen to Page by making that edit. Given Clinesmith's previous, expressed biases in the past in addition to the 17 "errors" included in these applications, I am not willing to give Clinesmith the benefit of the doubt.

I'd been waiting for this report for awhile and probably come just shy of sucking its dick enough to irritate anyone who listens to me ramble on here, but it definitely didn't disappoint. Horowitz' report decimated any of the narratives concerning the legitimacy of the Steele Dossier or the integrity of Comey's FBI during this investigation, and that's exactly what I was hoping it would accomplish. With this report laid out on the desk, there's no wiggle room left to pretend that Trump's campaign wasn't the subject of a flawed and inherently illegal "investigation", and as much as I'm sure that entire swathes of people were upset by this report not coinciding with a massive number of people getting thrown in orange jumpsuits, that's not what the OIG does.

The OIG itself functions as more of an audit than anything else. Their job is to explain how something happened and why it was allowed to happen, and then to offer recommendations to the involved agencies designed to curb any negative behaviour they might have discovered. The prosecutions come later, which brings us to...

One of the most interesting aspects of this entire report and the Crossfire Hurricane investigation in general, is how utterly absent that one Agent's name always tends to be. We've learned so many fucking things about people like Lisa Page, Kevin Clinesmith, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Peter Strzok, and yet there was another agent involved in all of this. He was so involved in this that he was the second agent at the Flynn interview that Strzok conducted.

Joseph Pientka.

I've mentioned him before, back when I used to be way too excited about the timetable for all of these investigations and I'd assumed they'd be wrapping up much sooner than I originally expected, but Pientka's name first surfaced almost two years ago now, and today he's... Still something of a complete mystery to us. Hell, we've still never even seen his face. Pientka was right there in the middle of all of this though, right there at the plot to frame Flynn and the use of the Steele Dossier to prop up the FISAs and drive Trump/Russia allegations, and yet unlike everyone else involved, there's a complete lockdown around this guy.

There is not one official document where Pientka's name is unredacted. It's redacted in the supplemental discovery in the Flynn case, it's redacted in the Clinton Email Investigation, and it's redacted all throughout this FISA Abuse report. The only time that his name surfaced was during a FOX news report, following which the reporter claims that he got an aggressively angry phone call concerning him publishing the agent's name.

So it appears that even this late into the game, the DOJ and FBI do not want anybody calling attention to this guy. At all. Not a name, not a face, nothing. Skeptical people are likely apt to say something about a cover-up, but if that's what they were trying to do then I don't think that we'd have our hands on this OIG report, and because of all the people that they'd scramble to protect with a cover-up, why the fuck would it be Special Agent Some Guy and not Comey or McCabe?

My personal theory is that this guy is being protected to make sure he escapes accountability because he flipped. They're behaving as if this one, random guy is in a witness protection program, and I believe that's probably not far from the truth. A cover-up just wouldn't make any sense because we already know what Pientka did, we already know he was the second agent present during the Flynn interview, and we know he was taking notes from Ohr after his meetings with Steele and Fusion GPS' Glenn Simpson. It's a bit late to pretend like none of that ever happened when they're also telling us that it happened anyways, and he just wouldn't make any sense as the one person who gets to skate from this for no reason.

I found a lot of the redactions in this report very interesting, especially when they cropped up in places where I was expecting to see Pientka's name. I think that when Durham's investigation rolls up to the gates, Pientka will emerge as a witness, and we'll finally get to see what exactly this guy has to say. I'd offer a timetable for that but as I've proven already: I'm a bit shit at predicting when these things are going to happen. If you want a ballpark anyways, I'm expecting it somewhere around March-July of next year.

The Durham investigations are where we're going to see who is taking the heat for these fuck-ups. If you're waiting for indictments, that's where they're going to start.



6d905864e85c69dcc4df8f1b430f6023.png
 
That's the biggest problem with conspiracies that require the government to be competent.
It's good to get a real conspiracy now and again so we can all remember what they look like:

Obvious corruption in plain sight that everyone just keeps forgetting to do anything about. For fucks sake, the Steele dossier includes a reference to a non-existent consulate in Miami. This is basic shit you can google and they fucked it up in their special report made for this coup.

Real conspiracies look suspicious as fuck and generally don't pass the smell test, mostly they hope we lose interest.
 
U.S. judge blasts FBI over handling of wiretap applications of ex-Trump campaign adviser
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ns-of-ex-trump-campaign-adviser-idUSKBN1YL2FX (http://archive.vn/B4Mtv)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal judge blasted the FBI on Tuesday for repeatedly submitting applications to wiretap former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page that were riddled with errors and omissions, and ordered the government to inform the court on how it plans to reform the process.

The scathing order here from Rosemary Collyer, the presiding judge over the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, marked the first time the court responded to the controversy, which became public last week with the release of a report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

Horowitz’s probe scrutinized the FBI’s actions in the early stages of its investigation into contacts between Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and Russia, known as Operation Crossfire Hurricane. The investigation was later handed off to Special Counsel Robert Muller, who was appointed in May 2017.

Horowitz concluded that while there was no evidence of political bias, the FBI’s original application to wiretap Page and its three subsequent renewal requests contained errors and omissions, including failing to inform the court that Page had served as a source for another U.S. intelligence agency.

Horowitz found that a former low-level FBI attorney also doctored an email that claimed the opposite - saying that Page in fact was not a source for the other agency, which Reuters has since identified as the CIA.

“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor,” Collyer wrote in her Dec. 17 order.

“The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” she wrote.

The judge gave the government until Jan. 10 to file a submission outlining “what it has done, and plans to do, to ensure that the statement of facts in each FBI application accurately and completely reflects information possessed by the FBI that is material to any issue presented by the application.”

Trump responded on Twitter, saying the “statement by the Court was long and tough. Means my case was a SCAM!”

The FBI, in a statement, said Director Chris Wray feels the conduct of certain FBI employees described in Horowitz’s report is “unacceptable and unrepresentative of the FBI as an institution.”

“The director has ordered more than 40 corrective steps to address the report’s recommendations,” the bureau said, adding that the FBI was committed to working with the court and the Justice Department “to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) process.”

The Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Lindsey Graham, said in a statement he was “very pleased” to see Collyer condemn the handling of the Page warrant application. He added that FISA reform would be a top priority of his panel next year.


---

The FISA Judge Strikes Back

She orders the FBI to shape up after its abuses, but that isn’t nearly enough.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fisa-judge-strikes-back-11576628256 (http://archive.vn/dlDhd)

By The Editorial Board
Dec. 17, 2019 7:17 pm ET

Our media friends want to ignore the FBI’s abuse of power in seeking secret warrants to spy on Carter Page, but the country deserves a thorough accounting and clean up. One step in the right direction arrived Tuesday when a clearly outraged head of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court told the government to shape up and fast.

In a blistering order that she made public, presiding FISC Judge Rosemary Collyer responded to last week’s Inspector General report on the FBI’s dishonest applications. She notes that the FBI appears before her court without a competing pleader, and that the government thus “has a heightened duty of candor to the [FISC] in ex parte proceedings.”

She adds that the IG report found “troubling instances in which FBI personnel provided information” to the court “which was unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession.” FBI officials also hid information from the court that was detrimental to their claim of probable cause that Mr. Page was an “agent of a foreign power.”


Judge Collyer’s order demands that the government, no later than Jan. 10, inform the court “in a sworn written submission” what it has done and plans to do to make sure future FISA warrant applications aren’t tainted. This is useful and is the first public evidence we’ve had that the FISA judges believe they were deceived.

Yet it also underscores how the FISA process dilutes political accountability. The FBI has tried to say its applications were kosher because a court approved them, while the court now fingers the FBI for deception. But so far no individuals have been held accountable, and the abuses would never have been discovered without the digging of former House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes.

Congress created FISA in the late 1970s to protect against previous FBI wiretap abuses. Clearly it hasn’t worked, and more bureaucratic hurdles won’t stop FBI officials who lie or alter email evidence. Injecting judges into secret executive-branch national security decisions was always a mistake, and now we know it abets abuse more than prevents it.

---

Attached is the judge's order.
 

Attachments

I know most of the network cocksuckers are wall-to-wall impeachment shitshow coverage, but IG Michael Horowitz is testifying today before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs. I doubt it will be too different from the last meet before Judiciary.

Edit: It's over now


 
Last edited:
e01ada77911ec99f7728bc97df011acd.jpg c47a296abea59eecf73a2f26e4144fda.png

The FISA court unclassified a document from Jan. 7th (Hey, no leaks!) declaring that least two of the four Carter Page FISA warrants were illegal and that there was "insufficient predication to establish probable cause" that he was a foreign agent. The FISA court order also noted that it is a federal crime for any federal official to “intentionally disclose or use information obtained under color of law by electronic surveillance, knowing or having any reason to know that the information was obtained through electronic surveillance not authorized” by law.

They also add that there's a decision pending on the remaining two, citing “misstatements and omissions.” This sets up a possible scenario where-in all of the FISA applications are rendered illegitimate, completely dismantling anything and everything that the Mueller investigation was founded on. It also means that everyone who signed off on the warrants could be in some serious shit.

These applications were signed by James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Rod Rosenstein, and Dana Boente. For shits and giggles, here's some snippets from Adam Schiff's memo that nobody fucking remembers because it was fake and gay:

EO_2p0VXUAA3Ckv.jpg EO_2p0OX0AEC2pD.jpg
 
Back