Horrorcow Lucas Werner - A man of Spokane, Washington who is obsessed with millennial and Gen Z chicks

[Wernology]

Lucas is a narcissist, hypocrite POS in no way appreciative of the help he receives, but believes he's entitled to get everything. As far as airing out "his grievances" about Christianity, he's vocal across his social media and doesn't hold back just what he thinks about religion. He's gone as far as using the bible to try and manipulate Christian girls to ride his stub of a dick. There is a screencap within the last 2 weeks, of Lucas saying Christians are like pets, and he's got the manual (bible) to train them the way he wants. He even said he's planning to use the bible to keep his 18 yr old Korean Mormon girlfriend in line. We know he's dealing with a catfish, so there goes his plans out the window.

Did anyone ever find out if the alleged 18 year old Korean woman was a catfish?

I'm assuming it is but still, it'd be interesting to see him post about it.

 

[AmpleApricots]

I think lucas' brainbox went all fucktarded.

 

[strandedcastaway]

Remember this is the Catholic Church. They have experience in "keeping things under wrap". All they'd have to do is convince the 16 yr old and her parents if need be, they've taken care of the problem and he'll no longer be around to bother her. Wouldn't put it past them to use his mental illness to "white wash" the incident. As for the women's rights groups, he's been around for years spouting his pedo insanity, and not a peep from the so called women's rights groups. He got away with posting child porn to his facebook, soliciting nudes/sexting from an out of state 16 yr old girl. Where were the women's rights groups, hell where were the authorities.

ETA:
There is also the chat log with the 17 yr old British Emilia. He wanted for her to send him video of her masturbating, calling out his name.

You've got the "keeping under wraps" thing backwards. The church kept priests molesting kids quiet to protect their own. They're not doing that to protect Lucas at the expense of one of their own volunteers, who is probably a member of the church.

 

[Telomayonnaise]

lol @ 600 pages of "hes too pussy to ever do anything" to "oh no he did it" because of the assumptions that 1. this happened at all 2. this happened at HOC which was not named in the tards post on FB 3. that lucas somehow wasn't a timid, neutered tard all along 4. that anyone under any circumstance would side with Lucas Werner over one of their own 5. that all christians are kiddie fuckers so the prior assumptions must be true

Corona-chan cabin fever getting to you?

 

[mothman96]

How do you know these people are HOC residents? I would think most people on his FB are non-homeless observers.

Should have worded that better. The "With the kind of "residents" HOC allows through the door, hardly think there would be a "room full of witness". -- is in response to there being a room full of witness seeing Lucas groping a girl. As I've said before HOC is the go to place for addicts, drug dealers, etc. They can be high on their choice of drug, falling down drunk doesn't matter, HOC will accept everyone. It is known in Spokane Lucas Werner is an insane predator and he walked right in. That segment of people are more likely not be paying attention to what's going on around them as long as it doesn't deal with them directly. So Lucas putting his hand on a volunteer likely would go unnoticed. Also there may be an area in the HOC that is not so out in the open.

My ""There are people who instead of reporting the POS, "help" him out etc. etc." is meant for "The kiddie porn stuff should have gotten him arrested, what happened there is facebooks responsibility etc". in the post I replied to. People that post to his facebook, twitter, etc.

You've got the "keeping under wraps" thing backwards. The church kept priests molesting kids quiet to protect their own. They're not doing that to protect Lucas at the expense of one of their own volunteers, who is probably a member of the church.

Protecting the Church's reputation and by hiding/covering up the priests that were molesting children. The Catholic Church speaks of itself as the one instituted by Christ (the Orthodox say different). I mean the reputation of the Church is at stake so it all was kept hidden until it blew up in the Church's face. As you say, covering up was not to protect Lucas but to protect Catholic Charities/HOC. The kids molested by the priests were members of the Church too.

 

[WonderWino]

lol @ 600 pages of "hes too pussy to ever do anything" to "oh no he did it" because of the assumptions that 1. this happened at all 2. this happened at HOC which was not named in the tards post on FB 3. that lucas somehow wasn't a timid, neutered tard all along 4. that anyone under any circumstance would side with Lucas Werner over one of their own 5. that all christians are kiddie fuckers so the prior assumptions must be true

Corona-chan cabin fever getting to you?

Nobody is saying it actually happened as far as i've seen. Its a what if situation

Should have worded that better. The "With the kind of "residents" HOC allows through the door, hardly think there would be a "room full of witness". -- is in response to there being a room full of witness seeing Lucas groping a girl. As I've said before HOC is the go to place for addicts, drug dealers, etc. They can be high on their choice of drug, falling down drunk doesn't matter, HOC will accept everyone. It is known in Spokane Lucas Werner is an insane predator and he walked right in. That segment of people are more likely not be paying attention to what's going on around them as long as it doesn't deal with them directly. So Lucas putting his hand on a volunteer likely would go unnoticed. Also there may be an area in the HOC that is not so out in the open.

My ""There are people who instead of reporting the POS, "help" him out etc. etc." is meant for "The kiddie porn stuff should have gotten him arrested, what happened there is facebooks responsibility etc". in the post I replied to.

Whether he is known around spokane as a predator is irrelevant. If he hasn't actually done anything in the shelter there is no reason for them to do anything, until and unless he does. He could have been to prison for murder but as long as he doesn't try to kill anybody while he is there they wouldn't make an issue of it. Now that would change very quickly if he actually tried to kill someone, same as if he tried to sexually assault someone. That said, I find it very unlikely people aren't going to notice somebody trying to sexually assault a teen girl in any manner. That tends to lead said teen girls to lose their shit and cause a scene which is quite likely to be noticed. Aside from that, I think you may be vastly overestimating how well known lucas actually is, even in spokane. The city is the state epicenter for nutjobs just like him. Aside from the starbuck incident, which is likely either largely forgotten or was never that well known publicly to begin with, he hasn't really done that much to draw attention to himself specifically. Not stuff that the average person is going to be aware of at any rate.

That aside, there are plenty of limitations to the examples you gave. They can be high or drunk when they get there without being turned out, provided they don't start shit or anything of that nature, but the shelter can't allow them to, or look the other way on actually allowing someone to get high or drunk while in the building. They'd get nailed legally for facilitating it if anything happened afterwards, there or if they were allowed to leave. So yeah, they allow alot of questionable people in, but there are tighter restrictions than may be immediately apparent, to protect their own asses

 

[mothman96]

Nobody is saying it actually happened as far as i've seen. Its a what if situation



Whether he is known around spokane as a predator is irrelevant. If he hasn't actually done anything in the shelter there is no reason for them to do anything, until and unless he does. He could have been to prison for murder but as long as he doesn't try to kill anybody while he is there they wouldn't make an issue of it. Now that would change very quickly if he actually tried to kill someone, same as if he tried to sexually assault someone. That said, I find it very unlikely people aren't going to notice somebody trying to sexually assault a teen girl in any manner. That tends to lead said teen girls to lose their shit and cause a scene which is quite likely to be noticed. Aside from that, I think you may be vastly overestimating how well known lucas actually is, even in spokane. The city is the state epicenter for nutjobs just like him. Aside from the starbuck incident, which is likely either largely forgotten or was never that well known publicly to begin with, he hasn't really done that much to draw attention to himself specifically. Not stuff that the average person is going to be aware of at any rate.

That aside, there are plenty of limitations to the examples you gave. They can be high or drunk when they get there without being turned out, provided they don't start shit or anything of that nature, but the shelter can't allow them to, or look the other way on actually allowing someone to get high or drunk while in the building. They'd get nailed legally for facilitating it if anything happened afterwards, there or if they were allowed to leave. So yeah, they allow alot of questionable people in, but there are tighter restrictions than may be immediately apparent, to protect their own asses

Well he did actually do something in the HOC to get him banned once already. He did get himself banned from another shelter for getting aggressive with woman hair dresser that another man had to come to her aid.

 

[JuniperFalls]

I used to work with the homeless and various Christian charities, its not hypocritical for a homeless atheist to stay at a Christian shelter because the point of charity is to help those in need, not advertise or promote a religion or service.

Quibble: it's certainly not hypocritical for a giver of charity (the Catholic Church in this instance) to give out this charity regardless of who the recipient is. And it's not hypocritical for an atheist to accept charity from a religious source, or for a religious person to accept charity from a religion they don't believe in. What is hypocritical is for anybody to accept charity from a person or group while simultaneously telling everyone how scummy and loathsome that person or group is.

Regarding the very weird word salad text posts Lucas has been making recently, didn't they start at the same time he started spending his days sheltering at the library for the quarantine? It might be he's not allowed to make his angry-rant videos because that's too noisy. I wonder if the deterioration in his written word skills is somehow related to presumed frustration at being denied a verbal or spoken-word outlet?

 

[mothman96]

lol @ 600 pages of "hes too pussy to ever do anything" to "oh no he did it" because of the assumptions that 1. this happened at all 2. this happened at HOC which was not named in the tards post on FB 3. that lucas somehow wasn't a timid, neutered tard all along 4. that anyone under any circumstance would side with Lucas Werner over one of their own 5. that all christians are kiddie fuckers so the prior assumptions must be true

Corona-chan cabin fever getting to you?

Who said all christian are kiddie fuckers. There are just 2 different views of what Lucas would be capable off doing in a homeless shelter setting and the way a shelter would handle the situation.

 

[Da Dude123]

The other thing that can be going on is that homeless shelters are often controversial places. While many people in theory like the idea of helping out the homeless, when it actually happens and your business or home is near a homeless shelter, people find out the hard truth on how unpleasant homeless people truly can be.

The increase in litter, drug use, petty crime, loitering, and various bad behavior effects your business or your living environment, many people petition for these places to close. Incidents where the police need to be called are public record and can be used as evidence on why a shelter should be shut down.

Therefore, it would make perfect sense for HOC or any other shelter to want to sweep that under the rug. Plus, if that did happen the girl may not want to press charges and would settle for Lucas being banned. Just a theory. Who knows if this actually occurred?

Who said all christian are kiddie fuckers. There are just 2 different views of what Lucas would be capable off doing in a homeless shelter setting and the way a shelter would handle the situation.

 

[LightEmittingDiode]

 

[Club Sandwich]

I wonder if his hot 18 year old Korean GF dumped him because he is now constantly mooing about not having a “bae”

he's doing an awful lot of black twitter slang, and botching it terribly only in the way a try-hard white boy can. more than that, he's replacing entire phrases with it, which is no where near natural language (slang meant to shorten and informalize speech but still be intelligible).

i want to see a rant video where he uses this sort of speech throughout. i guess being a homeless pedo gives him a free SJW appropriation pass, or else we'd be seeing more people in his replies that call him out for it.

also "agrivous"? that's not even a word. at least "slosh" is an actual word (however poor in taste) and he's not even using it as the slang expression correctly.

 

[Wernology]

he's doing an awful lot of black twitter slang, and botching it terribly only in the way a try-hard white boy can. more than that, he's replacing entire phrases with it, which is no where near natural language (slang meant to shorten and informalize speech but still be intelligible).

i want to see a rant video where he uses this sort of speech throughout. i guess being a homeless pedo gives him a free SJW appropriation pass, or else we'd be seeing more people in his replies that call him out for it.

also "agrivous"? that's not even a word. at least "slosh" is an actual word (however poor in taste) and he's not even using it as the slang expression correctly.

Gonna guess he meant egregious but since he doesn't know how to say it he couldn't look up how to spell it so he just guessed.

His only speaks in incorrect slang pairs nicely with this video:

How are you going to argue with, "No. I don't..really...get slang because...you're a moron."?
There's nothing you can say in the face of that that will make any difference at all.

 

[drtoboggan]

Pukas is turning into Pootie Tang.

 

[mothman96]

also "agrivous"? that's not even a word. at least "slosh" is an actual word (however poor in taste) and he's not even using it as the slang expression correctly.

Gonna guess he meant egregious but since he doesn't know how to say it he couldn't look up how to spell it so he just guessed.

He messed up his sentence . He was aiming at --"Greed is a grievous sin".

 

[Rogowski]

If he did get catfished again he won’t bring it up until he can use it for sympathy same the PayPal and weebly bans.

 

[GleamingTheQ-Bert]

He messed up his sentence . He was aiming at --"Greed is a grievous sin".

You may be giving him too much credit there. Remember he's the person who said "my humor isn't too gallouse".....because he read the phrase "gallows humor" and incorrectly assumed it was a freestanding adjective, as well as mispronouncing it. Lucas has never heard of the gallows; like where people were hanged? He's an illiterate idiot.

He's a mong. Utterly.

I absolutely believe he would say "agreivous" and think it's correct.

See also the way he regularly misuses "denote".

 

[Rogowski]

It’s all nonsense. Those first 2 screen caps I’m sharing here were posted in SOFALAW and appear to be a group chat so it looks like someone’s pozloading my negholep again and trying to steer the tard ship.

 

[mothman96]

Christian gen Z girls of Spokane Wa., if you don't want to fuck Lucas Werner, the insane pedo genetic reject that's not even fit to live in a flop house, you're going to end up in hell.

ETA: To all that provide us with the Lucas insanity the we would otherwise not have-- a big thanks. You've been thanked before-but thanks again.

 

[AbraCadaver]

Someone messaged Lucas on Instagram for more misused, cringy slang responses:

Is there a stronger word for cringe?