- Joined
- Nov 13, 2019
Is it less stressful to try to ignore a crisis or to try to understand what the risks are and try to mitigate against them for yourself and your family as best you can? Personally I'd prefer the second.
And as bad as things are, the fact is most people here would survive just fine if they got it because they're mostly under 60. E.g.
![]()
Why we still don't know what the death rate is for covid-19
Despite data pouring in from many countries, estimates of how many of those infected with covid-19 die still vary widelyweb.archive.org
For most people here, the chances of dying if infected are probably 1-3%. They might even be lower.
I still find it interesting though, because it's still a serious health care crisis - the mortality rates for people over 70 are non-trivial and the lockdown will cause economic chaos.
Look here
https://web.archive.org/web/2020040...105061/coronavirus-deaths-by-region-in-italy/
View attachment 1217718
Maybe we've been spoiled by modern technology but 10K excess deaths are serious shit to us, even if the percentage mortality would have fallen below the noise floor for most societies over most of human history.
We are not Italy.
Here is a hint ... take a flight from DFW, to Rome. Take several "before" pictures in Dallas, where you grab something to eat, before heading to the airport.
When you get off the plane, take some "after" pictures, where you grab something to eat.
The contrast will be striking. The American picture will be obese, the Italian one, will not.
People in the middle of the life-cycle here are far more vulnerable than their Italian (or Chinese) cohorts. High blood pressure, diabetes and prodromal heart-disease (conditions that a lot of younger people are unaware that they even have) put you at elevated risk of dying of COVID.
In a lot of parts of the world, folks probably would eat more if more food were available to them. But worldwide most people consume a fraction of the calories that North Americans consume, because they don't have access to the variety of food that we do, either because they can't afford it, or it isn't raised or grown fast enough. Or there are logistical issues in transportation, or governments that withhold it from certain populations.
Italians aren't calorie deprived. They eat very well. But it is the "Mediterranean Diet" which many of us couldn't afford here in the States, even if we wanted it. And they eat a wide variety, in smaller portions.
So basically all I am saying is that we shouldn't be lulled into a false sense of security based on statistics coming out of systems with which we have little in common.
I am not opposed to opening things up again. However we need to get a better picture of the vulnerability of our local populations, and plan for it.
Last edited: