“The coronavirus may be “reactivating” in people who have been cured of the illness, according to Korea’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention https://t.co/KMpwFow0sj”
twitter.com
archived 9 Apr 2020 06:15:03 UTC
archive.md
The coronavirus may be “reactivating” in people who have been cured of the illness, according to Korea’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
www.bloomberg.com
archived 9 Apr 2020 06:13:25 UTC
archive.md
Will we ever find out what's causing the reinfections? I just wanna know if this fiasco is just Spanish Flu MK-II or Nier (not the one with the robot coomer bait,
the one where a father/brother inadvertently destroys the world.)
The information that they've decided to skip is this :
- The patients are being evaluated for what medications they're on that could have suppressed the result of the first test.
- The more likely option that the tests were faulty.
Korea won't readily admit the last one, because it puts in question every test then. People are already getting sick of the CDC and their want for complete control.
Their whole model relies on near-complete social compliance.
They already have all the phone data from people to know where they're going. People are sick of getting the messages 24/7 about it. Most ignore it. They're already questioning how much information the government has.
Their ICU numbers are way down, so it demonstrates that in fact, the disease may infect a lot of people but it doesn't have a high kill count. People are already seeing this and getting sick of being told what to do.
A lot of young people are questioning why this outbreak has been dealt with in such a dramatic way compared to
SARS and MERS - more deadly diseases. It was handled without mass panic and without severe liberty restrictions (tho Korea has been less severe than the west). They're questioning (and resisting) things like electronic wristbands for people in self-isolation.
https://archive.vn/X5Ln6
One head of infectious disease in SK, (I forget which one but if I find it, I'll add it) said it's likely that as the cases drop off, it's not going to be due to social distancing so much as it is due to the virus has spread enough that well, herd immunity. People aren't really "social distancing" in Korea. Hagwons (cram schools) are still open at like 89% capacity.
Everywhere else is open. They're not on lockdown.
Korea's testing is good, it's strong, but it's not as strong or as high as delusional westerners think. People who need to be tested are being tested. When they bring in antibody tests, it will be more interesting than these swab tests. I tend to fully agree with that notion, personally.
They also believe that it was in the population way before Wuhan told anyone and that it spreads as an asymptomatic
infection more often than it produces symptoms.
Which leads to this :
The UK says antibody tests weren't "accurate enough".
archived 9 Apr 2020 07:52:27 UTC
archive.vn
The US finally getting antibody testing in San Miguel, Colorado.
archived 9 Apr 2020 07:53:20 UTC
archive.vn
Today? For some "reason" officials decided that the lab cannot handle their needs, so no more tests. The lab says hold up, yes we can, we're getting it done. Very odd. Sort of gives the vibe that anti-body tests might tell a story that they don't want the public to know. Either side of the fence.
What's disturbing is how Brave New World this is :
St Louis Fed Bank's Bullard wants -
Bullard, appearing on CBS News' Face the Nation, said the United States could use available technology to test "every single person" for the coronavirus every day and then provide them with a badge to indicate they've been tested and can return to the workforce.
archived 9 Apr 2020 09:04:08 UTC
archive.vn
Hitler wanted to protect his people from the Jews, so he pinned a badge to their chest and gassed them.
archived 4 Apr 2020 21:04:04 UTC
archive.vn
But at some stage, nearly all governments will have to strike a balance between ensuring public safety and getting their countries running again. They may also find themselves weighing what is best for society against individual rights, using biological criteria in ways that almost certainly would be rejected absent the current emergency.
From an ethical perspective, she argued, the question of using antibodies as a basis for free movement reconciles a utilitarian vision of what is best for society with respect for individual humanity by protecting “the most fragile, not marginalizing them.”
“It’s not discriminating,” she said. “It’s protecting.”
Basically telling you outright what they want. You don't need rights. At all. You cannot have the right to get sick. You stay in your pod until we've worked out a vaccine for you. What's creepy is that Alex Jones was right about this kind of stuff.