- Joined
- Aug 26, 2018
Here's the report that Dietz was so sure would solve the mystery of the SARS lab leaks in Beijing back in 2004. The 'joint-WHO Chinese' team arrived in the lab, which had predictably been sterilized and was told the people infected 'weren't known' to have conducted research using the live virus suggesting another infection source 'within the laboratory or possibly elsewhere'. The team decided that as they could not find any infectious source or procedural error the investigation 'would be complex'. And that seems to be the last update I can find.
Really sets your mind at ease, doesn't it?
https://web.archive.org/web/20200327203038/https://www.who.int/csr/don/2004_05_05/en/
Really sets your mind at ease, doesn't it?
https://web.archive.org/web/20200327203038/https://www.who.int/csr/don/2004_05_05/en/
5 May 2004
Investigation of the source of the current outbreak, first reported on 22 April, continues to focus on the National Institute of Virology in Beijing. The institute is known to have conducted experiments using the live SARS coronavirus during February and March.
Two researchers at the institute developed SARS in late March and mid-April. However, neither is known to have conducted research using the live virus, suggesting some other source of infection within the laboratory or possibly elsewhere.
Members of a joint WHO-Chinese investigative team, wearing full personal protective equipment, entered the institute last Friday and again yesterday. Initial findings indicate that the investigation will be complex, as no single infectious source or single procedural error appears likely to explain infection in the two researchers.