Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

How narcissistic do you have to be to believe that the court system gives a FUCK about you, let alone enough of one to waste their time and potentially open themselves up to legal trouble just to “manipulate the outcome not in your favor”? What’s in it for them? Do you have any numbers to back it up?

Or are you just being a fucking moron again?

Something like this makes it clear that's she's both paranoid and also narcissistic to some extent, as she believes herself to not only be the center of attention, but some kinda of hero that's been wrongfully harassed and that she's some kind of targeted individual. It's nut.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

Something like this makes it clear that's she's both paranoid and also narcissistic to some extent, as she believes herself to not only be the center of attention, but some kinda of hero that's been wrongfully harassed and that she's some kind of targeted individual. It's nut.

‘Absolutely. She doesn’t realize that at the end of the day, she’s a fucking nobody, and that people are engaging her here strictly for laughs. She’s too much of a moron to realize that she’s being manipulated for the LOL’s. Even the most idiotic cows have figured that out and have moved on, but not our prized cow! Yep, she’s so much “smarter” than us!

 

[redcent]

How narcissistic do you have to be to believe that the court system gives a FUCK about you, let alone enough of one to waste their time and potentially open themselves up to legal trouble just to “manipulate the outcome not in your favor”? What’s in it for them? Do you have any numbers to back it up?

Or are you just being a fucking moron again?

Lemme try to put my ruth hat on: the courts are corrupt against her due to null paying them handsomely using his links with the masons who are secretly in control of the world. That, and she and she alone knows what feminism is (being allowed to not work because breast feeding and permitting spousal rape) and the courts are against all women because they are patriarchal for not supporting women Ruth being a useless sack of shit and not supporting spousal rape. Because masons. Which is also why she has a thread here: mAsOns!

Lol like anyone but random fucks looking for entertainment give a shit about a crazy woman ranting on the street corner acting like a loon. The preachers on the street look more well adjusted than this bint.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

That's all based on the assumption that those cultures did not take that name ("El") from the line of Adam and Chavah. Since Genesis was written first, before anything else, those cultures actually took the name from the line of Adam and Chavah.

So not only have you failed at math, science, anatomy, but you also failed at History. Is there anything you haven't failed at? Those cultures came before Hebrews made up their own religion. Again, how are you this fucking stupid? My second youngest understands this shit better than you.

My degree program is aimed at preparing someone for Recreation Management, including outdoor skills teaching. Lots of people who graduate with the degree run state parks, national parks, resorts, or work for the Department of Interior. The skills I was taught at the University, including outdoor skills teaching, research, English, Math, History, and Science have made the degree very useful for being a homeschooling parent.

Yet you have shown us that your children are worse off than special needs kids.

 

[Logical Fallacies]

Are you a follower of Hume or Mill?

The purpose of life is not finding happiness. In the words of the great philosopher Spinoza, the ultimate good is not finding happiness, it is an intellectual love of Elohim. If you search for pleasure and happiness, your search will never end. If you are moral, happiness naturally stems from it.

Of course, Kant said the same.

It has been some time since I was in school, so my knowledge on German philosophy might be lacking but that's not what I remember from Kant. So correct me if I'm wrong about this.

First of all, why would this woman even read Kant when she's a religious fanatic following rules handed down from God instead of thinking for herself? Kant hated people like that and called them immature. This dude belonged to the enlightenment. Nothing is enlightened about this woman.

Kant did not say that a moral life will lead to happiness. He said a moral life will better humankind. He just believed that by placing the emphasis on happiness, the nature of morality would be misunderstood. Happiness according to Kant, is simply getting what you want when you need/want it.

His idea of morality was that we are moral beings because we have awareness that we are free, rational, thinking and feeling creatures and therefore should treat each other with respect. Out of this respect a sense of duty will push us to abide to moral law and moral obligations (treat others with goodwill) and this is what will make us human, and inevitably leading to progress of society/humankind.

Anyways, that's roughly what I remember. I wasn't a very big fan of philosophy when I was a teen though. And my English may be lacking, too, but here you go.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

It has been some time since I was in school, so my knowledge on German philosophy might be lacking but that's not what I remember from Kant. So correct me if I'm wrong about this.

First of all, why would this woman even read Kant when she's a religious fanatic following rules handed down from God instead of thinking for herself? Kant hated people like that and called them immature. This dude belonged to the enlightenment. Nothing is enlightened about this woman.

Kant did not say that a moral life will lead to happiness. He said a moral life will better humankind. He just believed that by placing the emphasis on happiness, the nature of morality would be misunderstood. Happiness according to Kant, is simply getting what you want when you need/want it.

His idea of morality was that we are moral beings because we have awareness that we are free, rational, thinking and feeling creatures and therefore should treat each other with respect. Out of this respect a sense of duty will push us to abide to moral law and moral obligations (treat others with goodwill) and this is what will make us human, and inevitably leading to progress of society/humankind.

Anyways, that's roughly what I remember. I wasn't a very big fan of philosophy when I was a teen though. And my English may be lacking, too, but here you go.

To be clear, you're talking about Immanuel right?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

@xtamarlover , precisely WTF did you see in this gaping, dripping sheep's quim? Like what made you even want to speak to her, let alone risk your freedom for? Serious question.

You must have come in late to the game or not been paying attention. He is not going to respond to you because he has been warned by the FBI already not to engage directly with me or any member of my family in any way.

modern day feminism is against spousal rape for either gender though


So you wouldn't mind it if I called you completely useless, right? Because half the reason people get jobs is so they can feel useful. Money is a big part of it, sure, we all need to pay the bills. But the other part is so we don't feel like useless drains or burdens on others. That's why when people who are unemployed try volunteer work. Some people who win the lotto or retire still work too.

Somehow you missed this. But that's fine, you can deal with being called good for nothing if you don't want to prove your worth

There is not one kind of feminism by any means. But even still, I never once said I was a feminist, nor did I say I represent or promote feminism. The term I have used consistently is GENDER EQUALITY.

You failed.

Funny, because out of the two of us, I'm the only one able to construct an educated argument. Most of your comments are just nonsense

‘Absolutely. She doesn’t realize that at the end of the day, she’s a fucking nobody, and that people are engaging her here strictly for laughs. She’s too much of a moron to realize that she’s being manipulated for the LOL’s. Even the most idiotic cows have figured that out and have moved on, but not our prized cow! Yep, she’s so much “smarter” than us!

Strictly for laughs? Obviously you haven't read most of other user's comments. You script fairytales in your head. About every 5 pages you show up and blurt out some nonsense comment like this one. You are blind to your own internal sickness that blurts out these fairytales to feed your own inner demons. You do realize that its a waste of thread space and I could care less about these types of comments that you make?

There is no need to move on. Do you really think anyone here laughing at me would even bother me in the slightest? Those types of comments are easily ignored. I don't internalize your laughter. You're a bunch of people hiding behind anonymous profiles in an ocean called the internet. Kiwi Farms and its loyal user base are like one tree in a forest full of trees. Not a big deal what you think of me in the big scheme of things. Not a big deal in my brain because I don't value the opinions of pagans in the slightest degree.

Really, I could care less about your opinions of me, other than to use them as catalyst for moral philosophy debates, which has worked well thus far.

Topics debated in the last 200 pages have been:

1. Whether or not righteous cursing is valid
2. The meaning of "fornication" in The Torah
3. The meaning of "Adultery" in The Torah
4. The meaning of "slut" and "whore" in The Torah
5. Divorce in The Torah
6. Patriarchy
7. Matriarchy
8. Spousal rape
9. The purpose of education
10. Birth control
11. Abortion
12. Vaccines
13. Homeschooling
14. Capitalism and Socialism
15. Hebrew
16. The origin of language
17. Virginity
18. Sexual repression
19. Carbon dating
20. Striking of spouses
21. Trinity and idolatry

All I can think of off the top of my head at the moment...
I'm somewhat sleep deprived, might have missed some there...

You see, it's human nature to debate. You can't avoid it.
And non of the morons taking jabs at me has yet to defeat any moral argument I have presented

 

[Army Burger]

And non of the morons taking jabs at me has yet to defeat any moral argument I have presented

"has yet to defeat any moral argument I have presented"

"has yet"

Work on your English skills before you start calling people morons, Melinda.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

FYI this is where these idiots live. drugs, Aids, and actual Hatfield/McCoy country. Like the same county. Betcha she's got McCoy blood. Devil Anse Hatfield should've wiped them out when he had the chance.

Apparently they have a massive Hep C epidemic. Could that be the "childbirth complication"?

https://www.richmond.com/news/virginia/wise-county-gets-approval-to-launch-virginia-s-first-needle/article_d440e848-9c4c-5d15-abf3-a45e76749850.html

I don't have Hep C and that even if I did, Hep C has no correlation with an alternate birth presentation (ie OP).
I was raised (for a portion of my life) by a parent with a substance abuse problem and I have never taken drugs, nor had a substance abuse problem, because I saw first hand the destruction it causes.

I'm not a native of this area, I moved here for the natural resources. The families and people native of this area have been used by corporations and wealthy people since the 18th century, when wealthy land holders started stealing the land then selling it off to poorer settlers coming from Europe. The families of this area tried to first live by selling whiskey and then the Federal Government came and burned their houses down for refusal to pay taxes on the whiskey. Then the region was made rich by free trade of hemp, ginseng, wheat and livestock. Then the coal industry replaced that, but left most of the families here poor. Then the coal industry collapsed and now the people of this area live under economic oppression, many people selling drugs to survive.

I wrote congress and told them to completely legalize hemp so this area could have an economic revival. They wrote back saying they didnt agree. Ironic, since Daniel and Rebecca Boone sold hemp right down the street to feed their 10 children.

 

[redcent]

There is not one kind of feminism by any means.

granted...

But even still, I never once said I was a feminist, nor did I say I represent or promote feminism. The term I have used consistently is GENDER EQUALITY.

which is what feminism stands for. A rose by any other name... But if you really want to insist, here:

Spoiler: Ruth thinking

the courts are corrupt against her due to null paying them handsomely using his links with the masons who are secretly in control of the world. That, and she and she alone knows what feminism "gender equality" is (being allowed to not work because breast feeding and permitting spousal rape) and the courts are against all women because they are patriarchal for not supporting women Ruth being a useless sack of shit and not supporting spousal rape. Because masons. Which is also why she has a thread here: mAsOns!

Does the above demonstrate you delusional thought processes well enough? Have I captured you insane stupidity or is there anything else I've missed?

Oh, like this "debating" you claim to do. You're more like a genuine mentally challenged five year old arguing that the sun rises in the west whole standing on a east facing beach at the crack of dawn. You have convinced nobody of your inane nonsense and never will.

Is this what you do every night, write out screeds of nonsense to convince yourself you're right and everyone else is wrong? If you're so right why can't you convince anyone else except your brain damaged pet gorilla of your arguments. Fuck, even your stalker thinks you're full of nonsense.

You are alone in your beliefs and nobody cares beyond laughing at you, and if it doesn't bother you, why are you here? If you are here to debate, convince someone. If you are not here to convince anyone you are not here to debate: You are only here to masturbate

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

"has yet to defeat any moral argument I have presented"

"has yet"

Work on your English skills before you start calling people morons, Melinda.

That's George Mason University education for you.

I wrote congress and told them to completely legalize hemp so this area could have an economic revival. They wrote back saying they didnt agree. Ironic, since Daniel and Rebecca Boone sold hemp right down the street to feed their 10 children.

Congress wont even write back Brad Watson and he's Jesus. There's no way they would take the time to write back to you.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

L

You must have come in late to the game or not been paying attention. He is not going to respond to you because he has been warned by the FBI already not to engage directly with me or any member of my family in any way.



There is not one kind of feminism by any means. But even still, I never once said I was a feminist, nor did I say I represent or promote feminism. The term I have used consistently is GENDER EQUALITY.



Funny, because out of the two of us, I'm the only one able to construct an educated argument. Most of your comments are just nonsense




Strictly for laughs? Obviously you haven't read most of other user's comments. You script fairytales in your head. About every 5 pages you show up and blurt out some nonsense comment like this one. You are blind to your own internal sickness that blurts out these fairytales to feed your own inner demons. You do realize that its a waste of thread space and I could care less about these types of comments that you make?

There is no need to move on. Do you really think anyone here laughing at me would even bother me in the slightest? Those types of comments are easily ignored. I don't internalize your laughter. You're a bunch of people hiding behind anonymous profiles in an ocean called the internet. Kiwi Farms and its loyal user base are like one tree in a forest full of trees. Not a big deal what you think of me in the big scheme of things. Not a big deal in my brain because I don't value the opinions of pagans in the slightest degree.

Really, I could care less about your opinions of me, other than to use them as catalyst for moral philosophy debates, which has worked well thus far.

Topics debated in the last 200 pages have been:

1. Whether or not righteous cursing is valid
2. The meaning of "fornication" in The Torah
3. The meaning of "Adultery" in The Torah
4. The meaning of "slut" and "whore" in The Torah
5. Divorce in The Torah
6. Patriarchy
7. Matriarchy
8. Spousal rape
9. The purpose of education
10. Birth control
11. Abortion
12. Vaccines
13. Homeschooling
14. Capitalism and Socialism
15. Hebrew
16. The origin of language
17. Virginity
18. Sexual repression
19. Carbon dating
20. Striking of spouses
21. Trinity and idolatry

All I can think of off the top of my head at the moment...
I'm somewhat sleep deprived, might have missed some there...

You see, it's human nature to debate. You can't avoid it.
And non of the morons taking jabs at me has yet to defeat any moral argument I have presented

LOL of course he responded to me. At austistic length, I might add.
He's not prohibited by law from discussing you, only from directly engaging with YOU or YOUR family. If your interpretation of that is "he can't say anything about me if asked by a 3rd party" then you really are a top shelf re.tard, among your other glaring flaws, which include being a litigious whore and a multiple loser before the Courts.

Oh, BTW, NONE of your arguments constitute moral arguments. \Snippets from a retarded fairytale in a book do not a moral code make. Your book (and hence your life) are about as valid as if someone lives by Harry Potter or Le Petite Prince.
Your fairytale has zero moral authority, just like you.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

granted...

which is what feminism stands for. A rise by any other name... But if you really want to insist, here:






Lemme try to put my ruth hat on: the courts are corrupt against her due to null paying them handsomely using his links with the masons who are secretly in control of the world. That, and she and she alone knows what feminism "gender equality" is (being allowed to not work because breast feeding and permitting spousal rape) and the courts are against all women because they are patriarchal for not supporting women Ruth being a useless sack of shit and not supporting spousal rape. Because masons. Which is also why she has a thread here: mAsOns!

Does the above demonstrate you delusional thought processes well enough? Have I captured you insane stupidity or is there anything else I've missed?

Oh, like this "debating" you claim to do. You're more like a genuine mentally challenged five year old arguing that the sun rises in the west whole standing on a east facing beach at the crack of dawn. You have convinced nobody of your inane nonsense and never will.

Is this what you do every night, write out screeds of nonsense to convince yourself you're right and everyone else is wrong? If you're so right why can't you convince anyone else except your brain damaged pet gorilla of your arguments. Fuck, even your stalker thinks you're full of nonsense.

You are alone in your beliefs and nobody cares beyond laughing at you, and if it doesn't bother you, why are you here? If you are here to debate, convince someone. If you are not here to convince anyone you are not here to debate: You are only here to masturbate

Wow, there are huge gaps in your twisted logic.

Where did I ever say everyone else was wrong?
Where did I ever say my goal was to convince anyone else I debate with?

Feminism is NOT gender equality. Feminism has elements in common with gender equality but splits at many points. In fact, many feminists only become sexist against men, which does nothing to help women, only makes the situation worse.

I am far from alone in my beliefs. The people who share my beliefs may not be Kiwi Farms users, but they exist.
But for the sake of moral arguments, I have to say also that it wouldn't matter if no one else agreed with me. Truth is truth even if no one acknowledges it or if even only one person is aware of it. Popularity of a view, or lack of it, does not validate or invalidate a moral truth.

You think I care what The Stalker thinks of my views? That's why he is a Stalker. He's on a theological crusade against my beliefs, always has been, and I clearly stated that many times.

That's George Mason University education for you.


Congress wont even write back Brad Watson and he's Jesus. There's no way they would take the time to write back to you.

"has yet to defeat any moral argument I have presented"

"has yet"

Work on your English skills before you start calling people morons, Melinda.

This is a thread, not a PhD thesis. I'll take the liberty of typing slang and making errors. No biggy.

L

LOL of course he responded to me. At austistic length, I might add.
He's not prohibited by law from discussing you, only from directly engaging with YOU or YOUR family. If your interpretation of that is "he can't say anything about me if asked by a 3rd party" then you really are a top shelf re.tard, among your other glaring flaws, which include being a litigious whore and a multiple loser before the Courts.

Oh, BTW, NONE of your arguments constitute moral arguments. \Snippets from a exceptional fairytale in a book do not a moral code make. Your book (and hence your life) are about as valid as if someone lives by Harry Potter or Le Petite Prince.
Your fairytale has zero moral authority, just like you.

Yes, and showing up on this thread would be engaging directly with me. The Stalker is a lot of things, but I don't think he is stupid enough to do that. I have reason to believe he fears jail more than he fears my husband kicking his ass. Though I'd rather see the latter happen than the former baaahahaha

I never messaged you that, איר נאַריש מעשוגע כאָר. What question was it you asked?

Yes, did say that in a PM.

I can't read Hebrew very well without vowels. What does that say?

My question was above. If the Orthodox are following The Torah, why can't they drive the enemy out of The Land?

 

[redcent]

Wow, there are huge gaps in your twisted logic.

Where did I ever say everyone else was wrong?
Where did I ever say my goal was to convince anyone else I debate with?

that's the point, you're not interested in convincing anyone of your side of the story. What's the point? You are just babbling your inane beliefs to yourself and shutting everyone else out. That is not debate. You're just repeating this all to convince yourself

Feminism is NOT gender equality. Feminism has elements in common with gender equality but splits at many points. In fact, many feminists only become sexist against men, which does nothing to help women, only makes the situation worse.

some feminists are sadly like that. But a good chunk of feminists want nothing to do with the third wave stuff and do try to go for gender equality

I am far from alone in my beliefs. The people who share my beliefs may not be Kiwi Farms users, but they exist.

where? Do tell. Because I don't see any evidence of anyone else in your sad cult

But for the sake of moral arguments, I have to say also that it wouldn't matter if no one else agreed with me. Truth is truth even if no one acknowledges it or if even only one person is aware of it. Popularity of a view, or lack of it, does not validate or invalidate a moral truth.

see, that's what a schizo would say. "only I can hear what the purple leprechaun is saying. No one else can hear it. The problem isn't I'm delusional it's just that I and I alone know the truth(TM)"

 

[Consider Lizärds]

At 2 am in the morning, do you think I would do anything else besides farting around on the internet and watching cable? NO. I can't have sex yet and I'm not about to wake Marshall up from his sleep. He worked 6 days straight last week.

So it's 2am, and this is the best place you can be? Arguing with people you dislike as much as they dislike you?

No one is going to change your mind on your views, you're not going to change anyone's views here.

If you had a friend ask what this was in aid of, how would explain your time here? You're here a great deal, more than many regular users.

We were here anyway. Your route started with someone discussing giving you info on a stalker, via failed litigation.

What gives?

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

This is a thread, not a PhD thesis. I'll take the liberty of typing slang and making errors. No biggy.



Yes, and showing up on this thread would be engaging directly with me. The Stalker is a lot of things, but I don't think he is stupid enough to do that. I have reason to believe he fears jail more than he fears my husband kicking his ass. Though I'd rather see the latter happen than the former baaahahaha

Your husband is only capable of beating women. And kids, of course. Your kids. Thank G_ndalf Null had the sense to threadban AC from this thread, and allow for Carlson to answer in other threads (where ostensibly YOU are threadbanned) . For what it's worth, he's of infinately more worth on these humble farms than you are, more entertaining and a much better person in comparison. I say this as someone who is not unaware of his rapiness and desire to enslave poor people. Even taking those things into account, he's a better person than you. Let THAT sink in for a sec.

credit where it's due, you were spot-on about Appalachia.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

This is a thread, not a PhD thesis. I'll take the liberty of typing slang and making errors. No biggy.

"Rules for thee, not for me!" I see.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Your husband is only capable of beating women. And kids, of course. Your kids. Thank G_ndalf Null had the sense to threadban AC from this thread, and allow for Carlson to answer in other threads (where ostensibly YOU are threadbanned) . For what it's worth, he's of infinately more worth on these humble farms than you are, more entertaining and a much better person in comparison. I say this as someone who is not unaware of his rapiness and desire to enslave poor people. Even taking those things into account, he's a better person than you. Let THAT sink in for a sec.

credit where it's due, you were spot-on about Appalachia.

So a man with a patriarchal worldview is defending another man.
And I am supposed to be surprised or affected by this?
You're just a robot with a socially programmed disease coming out of your fingers.

So it's 2am, and this is the best place you can be? Arguing with people you dislike as much as they dislike you?

No one is going to change your mind on your views, you're not going to change anyone's views here.

If you had a friend ask what this was in aid of, how would explain your time here? You're here a great deal, more than many regular users.

We were here anyway. Your route started with someone discussing giving you info on a stalker, via failed litigation.

What gives?

You assume KF was the only place I was online that particular evening. The Internet is a big place. I went far yonder beyond Kiwi Farms that evening. I have lightening speed internet on a brand new labtop, easy to surf, read, etc. I'm definitely not going to be doing anything work related at 2am. Especially when I'm on maternity leave (postpartum).

I type 95 WPM and am 34 years old. It takes me less than 10 minutes to reply to 8 comments at a time. Sometimes it takes me only 5 minutes. Not as time invested as you seem to think. Not that I owe you an explanation, I don't. You worry about what you do with your time, I'll worry what I do with mine.

Your husband is only capable of beating women. And kids, of course. Your kids. Thank G_ndalf Null had the sense to threadban AC from this thread, and allow for Carlson to answer in other threads (where ostensibly YOU are threadbanned) . For what it's worth, he's of infinately more worth on these humble farms than you are, more entertaining and a much better person in comparison. I say this as someone who is not unaware of his rapiness and desire to enslave poor people. Even taking those things into account, he's a better person than you. Let THAT sink in for a sec.

credit where it's due, you were spot-on about Appalachia.

Am I thread banned elsewhere? I wouldn't know.

My husband has taken out several men, even those taller than him.

He has never beat any women either. He yoked up an ex of his in a headlock. She testified she received a red mark on her cheek and an injury for one hour (the red mark until it faded). That's not "beating". Also, she provoked it by years of psychological abuse against Marshall. You can only mentally abuse someone so long before they physically lash out.
Either way, he did nothing worthy of condemnation. There is no capital punishment in The Torah for physically striking another person when in a fight, even your spouse. There is a curse for attacking someone. But it's not "attacking" if there were events that led up to being struck. As it is written, "a fool's mouth calls out for a beating".

"A fool’s words get him into fights;
yes, his mouth calls out for a beating." (Prov. 18:6)

"Rules for thee, not for me!" I see.

Where did I ever hold you accountable for grammar on a KF thread?

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Oh to be a fly on the wall when CPS finally shows up to seize her spawn due to the beaner beating the shit out of them/her, and her screaming shite from her gay fairytale book at them as they tase her.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Oh to be a fly on the wall when CPS finally shows up to seize her spawn due to the beaner beating the shit out of them/her, and her screaming shite from her gay fairytale book at them as they tase her.

Luckily they can use stun guns and tasers without a permit there.