Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Consider Lizärds]

"I type 95 WPM and am 34 years old. It takes me less than 10 minutes to reply to 8 comments at a time. Sometimes it takes me only 5 minutes. Not as time invested as you seem to think. Not that I owe you an explanation, I don't. You worry about what you do with your time, I'll worry what I do with mine. "

Never claimed you owed me an explanation, though you gave one anyway, as far as it went, @TamarYaelBatYah . I'm curious,,not worried. Why would I be worried?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

"I type 95 WPM and am 34 years old. It takes me less than 10 minutes to reply to 8 comments at a time. Sometimes it takes me only 5 minutes. Not as time invested as you seem to think. Not that I owe you an explanation, I don't. You worry about what you do with your time, I'll worry what I do with mine. "

Never claimed you owed me an explanation, though you gave one anyway, as far as it went, @TamarYaelBatYah . I'm curious,,not worried. Why would I be worried?

Two things, I call bullshit that she types 95 words per minute, more likely she types 95 characters per minute, there's a difference. Average typing speed for a non computer literate person is 40WPM. Second, she's confusing curious with concern.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Funny, because out of the two of us, I'm the only one able to construct an educated argument. Most of your comments are just nonsense

Yes, the redneck hick who's only capable of perpetuating the intellectual equivalent of baby's first argument until she's too insecure to admit she's failed to present her arguments or has been shown to present factually incorrect information all while being too retarded to make a single post to present her thoughts is the one making an educated argument.

Youd be better off saying neither of us do, mate

Now, let's see if you can answer your own bullshit and see how insane you sound.

If you are following The Torah, why can't they drive the enemy out of The Land?

 

[SargonF00t]

Are you a follower of Hume or Mill?

The purpose of life is not finding happiness. In the words of the great philosopher Spinoza, the ultimate good is not finding happiness, it is an intellectual love of Elohim. If you search for pleasure and happiness, your search will never end. If you are moral, happiness naturally stems from it.

Of course, Kant said the same.

Have you ever read Locke?

 

[Fwiffo]

@TamarYaelBatYah , one thing you absolutely need to do is ask yourself: why am I here? I don’t mean in the metaphysical sense, or even to you yourself participating in this thread. I mean: why do I have an entry on Kiwifarms?

It’s easy at this point to think of some garbage excuse about how we are all demons or wicked or secretly jealous of your fabulous prosperity. I want you to take an honest look at the OTHER subjects of this website. To list a few:

Russell Greer: Impotent, spiteful paralegal failure who tried to sue female celebrities when they didn’t respond to his sexual

Lucas Werner: Fat homeless pedophile obsessed with how his sperm telomeres will singlehandedly save the human race if he has sex with an 18-24 year old (really just a thinly veiled scheme to get laid)

Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv: Insane tranny with a humiliation fetish who’s bent on forcing women to wax his genitals, suing beauticians, and getting revenge on immigrants

Nick Bate: an older lolcow, revealed himself as a scat fetishist pedophile who has since been arrested and is serving a decades-long sentence for sexual contact with a minor

MylarBalloonFan: crazy European autist obsessed with preteen cartoons and merchandise, with an irrational hatred for latex balloons

The ever-famous Chris Chandler: namesake of the website for years, legendary autist known for shoving crayola materials in his butt, fearing the man in the pickle suit, and getting constantly catfished throughout his love-quest to find a boyfriend-free girl.

This is the tiniest, tiniest sampling of the dross that earn threads on this site. There’s homeless scamming trannies, neo-Nazi failed shooters, insane vindictive failed wannabe-lawyers, fetishists of literally every flavour, and abject failures in life. Now, do you notice who DOESN’T get a thread here? Normal, average people. Why? Because they aren’t funny.

You are here because you are such a failure, so impotent, so angry, and so colossally incapable of change that you are hilarious to us. We don’t rage against your religious morals; we don’t seek to destroy you. In fact, that’s counter to our ultimate goal: to have you caper for our amusement. Nobody here wants you to change in any way because then the laughs stop.

What is the biggest most irrefutable proof that you and your idiot husband are an enormous hilarious loser? YOU ARE HERE.

And you are in very, very similar company.

 

[Logical Fallacies]

He has never beat any women either. He yoked up an ex of his in a headlock. She testified she received a red mark on her cheek and an injury for one hour (the red mark until it faded). That's not "beating". Also, she provoked it by years of psychological abuse against Marshall. You can only mentally abuse someone so long before they physically lash out.
Either way, he did nothing worthy of condemnation. There is no capital punishment in The Torah for physically striking another person when in a fight, even your spouse. There is a curse for attacking someone. But it's not "attacking" if there were events that led up to being struck. As it is written, "a fool's mouth calls out for a beating".

"A fool’s words get him into fights;
yes, his mouth calls out for a beating." (Prov. 18:6)

Victim blaming, sanctioned by her ridiculous religion. The perpetrator is the real victim, right? Nice.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

You assume KF was the only place I was online that particular evening. The Internet is a big place. I went far yonder beyond Kiwi Farms that evening. I have lightening speed internet on a brand new labtop, easy to surf, read, etc. I'm definitely not going to be doing anything work related at 2am. Especially when I'm on maternity leave (postpartum).

I type 95 WPM and am 34 years old. It takes me less than 10 minutes to reply to 8 comments at a time. Sometimes it takes me only 5 minutes. Not as time invested as you seem to think. Not that I owe you an explanation, I don't. You worry about what you do with your time, I'll worry what I do with mine.

Am I thread banned elsewhere? I wouldn't know.

Before I start, *lightning, laptop
It's no wonder you claim to type 95WPM, you can't spell for shit lmao, realistically it's probably closer to 50 seeing as you're pretty technologically inept and/or poor (seriously who the fuck in their right mind uses a chromebook and isn't a dirt poor college student)

Secondly, where the fuck else would you go? You're in your mid 30s, so if you're browsing reddit or Twitter after midnight that'd be questionable and kinda weird. Only place I could realistically see you is Facebook because you're a major fucking Karen, likely stalking others pages out of jealousy because they were smart enough to use their degree in the real world and not marry the second most re.tarded individual alive (second only to you).

On a side note I find it sad that I have more respect for Marshall and can call him more intelligent than you are. Don't get me wrong, he's exceptional, all the way, but he knew when to shut the fuck up and didn't continue to share embarrassing information for over 3 months.

Also, while there may not be punishment in the Torah for spousal abuse, there is in American legistlation.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

New laptop? Good to see the money you scammed from Andrew is going to good use. Fuck spending it improving my family's living situation, Momma needs to surf the internet and yell at strangers at "lightening" speed. White trash gotta have their toys.

That laptop money would have come in real handy as a deposit for a new place to live, since you're getting evicted and you (and especially your children) aren't allowed to cohabitate with Marshall.

 

[Kosher Salt]

I want to see proof of Melinda typing 95 words a minute, but I'm afraid that providing proof of that claim is just going to be another thing she fails at doing. It's a shame that her potato phone probably can't video and even if it could her mutant retard babies probably couldn't figure out which fingers to use to hold it properly.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Wow, there are huge gaps in your twisted logic.

Where did I ever say everyone else was wrong?
Where did I ever say my goal was to convince anyone else I debate with?

Feminism is NOT gender equality. Feminism has elements in common with gender equality but splits at many points. In fact, many feminists only become sexist against men, which does nothing to help women, only makes the situation worse.

I am far from alone in my beliefs. The people who share my beliefs may not be Kiwi Farms users, but they exist.
But for the sake of moral arguments, I have to say also that it wouldn't matter if no one else agreed with me. Truth is truth even if no one acknowledges it or if even only one person is aware of it. Popularity of a view, or lack of it, does not validate or invalidate a moral truth.

You think I care what The Stalker thinks of my views? That's why he is a Stalker. He's on a theological crusade against my beliefs, always has been, and I clearly stated that many times.




This is a thread, not a PhD thesis. I'll take the liberty of typing slang and making errors. No biggy.



Yes, and showing up on this thread would be engaging directly with me. The Stalker is a lot of things, but I don't think he is stupid enough to do that. I have reason to believe he fears jail more than he fears my husband kicking his ass. Though I'd rather see the latter happen than the former baaahahaha



Yes, did say that in a PM.

I can't read Hebrew very well without vowels. What does that say?

My question was above. If the Orthodox are following The Torah, why can't they drive the enemy out of The Land?

Do me a favor and address the argument that through protohistorical records we can date cuneiform tablets to before Hebrew ones.

Also you inherently misunderstand Kant. Kantian philosophy revolves around the Categorical Imperative, which is totally divorced from religion. He says we should judge each act on its own without any kind of reliance on context. Simply put, to determine if an act is moral we must judge the act and ONLY the act. This is completely and totally divorced from your ideal that we must judge every act according to the Torah. The two are completely incompatible.

So let's judge spousal rape by Kantian standards. Since we cannot take into account the context of the rape (marriage) we must judge the rape itself. Is a rape moral? The answer is no, by your own admission. You've explicitly stated earlier that rape itself is wrong unless in the context of marriage, which means you cannot be a Kantian. Kant's comment about living a moral life is about applying this Categorical Imperative to every action in your life. If you were to make sure each action you take is inherently moral, you will be happy. Again, you argue for contextual morality, which is flatly rejected by Kant and his school.

I should mention that on top of being a lingual autist I'm also a member of the Kantian school of philosophy.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

New laptop? Good to see the money you scammed from Andrew is going to good use. Fuck spending it improving my family's living situation, Momma needs to surf the internet and yell at strangers at "lightening" speed. White trash gotta have their toys.

That laptop money would have come in real handy as a deposit for a new place to live, since you're getting evicted and you (and especially your children) aren't allowed to cohabitate with Marshall.

I didn't use any money received from The Stalker to pay for my $160 laptop. I used money from my small business because it was a business expense. C'mon now, I though you stalked my finances via the federal cases, you should know better.

Cohabitate? Marshall and I are legally married you moron. He legally adopted my children too.

Even if we were not legally married I maintain a First Amendment right to live with him without a legal paper through a religious Ketubah. The government can't do shit about that.

Neither does $160 pay for a deposit. Neither do I need to pay for a deposit if I move from here. I had a Torah sister invite me to rent a house on her land. I also have the option of going back to one house with Marshall. I may even go ahead and move over seas finally.

You're an idiot. I would mock you and say "nice try" but damn, you just made the second dumbest comment EVER.

Before I start, *lightning, laptop
It's no wonder you claim to type 95WPM, you can't spell for shit lmao, realistically it's probably closer to 50 seeing as you're pretty technologically inept and/or poor (seriously who the fuck in their right mind uses a chromebook and isn't a dirt poor college student)

Secondly, where the fuck else would you go? You're in your mid 30s, so if you're browsing reddit or Twitter after midnight that'd be questionable and kinda weird. Only place I could realistically see you is Facebook because you're a major fucking Karen, likely stalking others pages out of jealousy because they were smart enough to use their degree in the real world and not marry the second most re.tarded individual alive (second only to you).

On a side note I find it sad that I have more respect for Marshall and can call him more intelligent than you are. Don't get me wrong, he's exceptional, all the way, but he knew when to shut the fuck up and didn't continue to share embarrassing information for over 3 months.

Also, while there may not be punishment in the Torah for spousal abuse, there is in American legistlation.

You swear like I care about spelling on a thread.

As I said before, I don't use social media. IE I don't use reddit, Twitter. Facebook or YouTube. Like I said before, I side with the Ultra Orthodox on this issue: social media is evil. From my POV, its a BaMaH [בָּמָה]

And even if I did use social media, I would not be using it to compare lives, I have never been jealous of anyone in my life. I didn't even know what jealousy was until about age 22 when someone explained it to me. That's how much of a simpleton I am when it comes to evil. I actually had to talk to evil people more often to figure out how they think.

Victim blaming, sanctioned by her ridiculous religion. The perpetrator is the real victim, right? Nice.

Look at yourself and say that again! If you mentally abuse a man that doesn't mean they have to be a doormat and just sit there and take it just because they are a man. If you mentally abuse a man, don't be surprised when he gets up in your face and hits you.

Have you ever read Locke?

Yes, briefly. I would like to read more though. How about you?

Yes, the redneck hick who's only capable of perpetuating the intellectual equivalent of baby's first argument until she's too insecure to admit she's failed to present her arguments or has been shown to present factually incorrect information all while being too exceptional to make a single post to present her thoughts is the one making an educated argument.

Youd be better off saying neither of us do, mate

Now, let's see if you can answer your own bullshit and see how insane you sound.

If you are following The Torah, why can't they drive the enemy out of The Land?

As a woman I am forbidden by The Torah from fighting in the army of Israelites. That is the duty of my husband and sons. We aren't in The Land, so this question doesn't really apply.

Oh to be a fly on the wall when CPS finally shows up to seize her spawn due to the beaner beating the shit out of them/her, and her screaming shite from her gay fairytale book at them as they tase her.

My husband doesn't beat our children, so this isn't an issue.

@TamarYaelBatYah , one thing you absolutely need to do is ask yourself: why am I here? I don’t mean in the metaphysical sense, or even to you yourself participating in this thread. I mean: why do I have an entry on Kiwifarms?

It’s easy at this point to think of some garbage excuse about how we are all demons or wicked or secretly jealous of your fabulous prosperity. I want you to take an honest look at the OTHER subjects of this website. To list a few:

Russell Greer: Impotent, spiteful paralegal failure who tried to sue female celebrities when they didn’t respond to his sexual

Lucas Werner: Fat homeless pedophile obsessed with how his sperm telomeres will singlehandedly save the human race if he has sex with an 18-24 year old (really just a thinly veiled scheme to get laid)

Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv: Insane tranny with a humiliation fetish who’s bent on forcing women to wax his genitals, suing beauticians, and getting revenge on immigrants

Nick Bate: an older lolcow, revealed himself as a scat fetishist pedophile who has since been arrested and is serving a decades-long sentence for sexual contact with a minor

MylarBalloonFan: crazy European autist obsessed with preteen cartoons and merchandise, with an irrational hatred for latex balloons

The ever-famous Chris Chandler: namesake of the website for years, legendary autist known for shoving crayola materials in his butt, fearing the man in the pickle suit, and getting constantly catfished throughout his love-quest to find a boyfriend-free girl.

This is the tiniest, tiniest sampling of the dross that earn threads on this site. There’s homeless scamming trannies, neo-Nazi failed shooters, insane vindictive failed wannabe-lawyers, fetishists of literally every flavour, and abject failures in life. Now, do you notice who DOESN’T get a thread here? Normal, average people. Why? Because they aren’t funny.

You are here because you are such a failure, so impotent, so angry, and so colossally incapable of change that you are hilarious to us. We don’t rage against your religious morals; we don’t seek to destroy you. In fact, that’s counter to our ultimate goal: to have you caper for our amusement. Nobody here wants you to change in any way because then the laughs stop.

What is the biggest most irrefutable proof that you and your idiot husband are an enormous hilarious loser? YOU ARE HERE.

And you are in very, very similar company.

Does this comment have a point? It just sounds like a person who drank alcohol and put some rambling on a page. Your facts are even accurate. The ignorance of this comment, just WOW

Are you serious?
Absolute weaklings.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

I didn't use any money received from The Stalker to pay for my $160 laptop. I used money from my small business because it was a business expense. C'mon now, I though you stalked my finances via the federal cases, you should know better.

Cohabitate? Marshall and I are legally married you moron. He legally adopted my children too.

Even if we were not legally married I maintain a First Amendment right to live with him without a legal paper through a religious Ketubah. The government can't do shit about that.

Neither does $160 pay for a deposit. Neither do I need to pay for a deposit if I move from here. I had a Torah sister invite me to rent a house on her land. I also have the option of going back to one house with Marshall. I may even go ahead and move over seas finally.

You're an idiot. I would mock you and say "nice try" but damn, you just made the second dumbest comment EVER.




You swear like I care about spelling on a thread.

As I said before, I don't use social media. IE I don't use reddit, Twitter. Facebook or YouTube. Like I said before, I side with the Ultra Orthodox on this issue: social media is evil. From my POV, its a BaMaH [בָּמָה]

And even if I did use social media, I would not be using it to compare lives, I have never been jealous of anyone in my life. I didn't even know what jealousy was until about age 22 when someone explained it to me. That's how much of a simpleton I am when it comes to evil. I actually had to talk to evil people more often to figure out how they think.





Look at yourself and say that again! If you mentally abuse a man that doesn't mean they have to be a doormat and just sit there and take it just because they are a man. If you mentally abuse a man, don't be surprised when he gets up in your face and hits you.




Yes, briefly. I would like to read more though. How about you?



As a woman I am forbidden by The Torah from fighting in the army of Israelites. That is the duty of my husband and sons. We aren't in The Land, so this question doesn't really apply.



My husband doesn't beat our children, so this isn't an issue.




Does this comment have a point? It just sounds like a person who drank alcohol and put some rambling on a page. Your facts are even accurate. The ignorance of this comment, just WOW

I knew a cunt who used to blame everyone who crossed her of being a drunk. She was a malignant narcissist and was eventually jailed and lost 6 figure judgement in Civil court. Aim high, psycho.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Do me a favor and address the argument that through protohistorical records we can date cuneiform tablets to before Hebrew ones.

Also you inherently misunderstand Kant. Kantian philosophy revolves around the Categorical Imperative, which is totally divorced from religion. He says we should judge each act on its own without any kind of reliance on context. Simply put, to determine if an act is moral we must judge the act and ONLY the act. This is completely and totally divorced from your ideal that we must judge every act according to the Torah. The two are completely incompatible.

So let's judge spousal rape by Kantian standards. Since we cannot take into account the context of the rape (marriage) we must judge the rape itself. Is a rape moral? The answer is no, by your own admission. You've explicitly stated earlier that rape itself is wrong unless in the context of marriage, which means you cannot be a Kantian. Kant's comment about living a moral life is about applying this Categorical Imperative to every action in your life. If you were to make sure each action you take is inherently moral, you will be happy. Again, you argue for contextual morality, which is flatly rejected by Kant and his school.

I should mention that on top of being a lingual autist I'm also a member of the Kantian school of philosophy.

The belief that Sumerian clay tablets were before Hebrew is scholastic OPINION. Not FACT. Genesis is the beginning of human history. No pagan scholar is going to change my mind on that.

I've studied Kant in depth, I don't misunderstand him. Yes, Kant wasn't openly a follower of The Torah, so yes, his moral philosophy is not entirely based on The Torah. However, what I am saying is not out of line with Kantian ethics. Like you said, Kant believed that a moral absolute (categorical imperative) could not be based on inclination (feeling/ momentary impulse) but instead must be based on duty in order to have any moral virtue. That is exactly what The Torah is about: duty and obligation.

In the spousal rape scenario, judging by Kantian ethics: Kant says that if you have a moral absolute, it must be true for all people. If I say that spousal rape is not a sin for either a man or a woman, then yea, I've applied it fairly to all. Again, there is harmony there with Kantian ethics.

I didn't use any money received from The Stalker to pay for my $160 laptop. I used money from my small business because it was a business expense. C'mon now, I though you stalked my finances via the federal cases, you should know better.

Cohabitate? Marshall and I are legally married you moron. He legally adopted my children too.

Even if we were not legally married I maintain a First Amendment right to live with him without a legal paper through a religious Ketubah. The government can't do shit about that.

Neither does $160 pay for a deposit. Neither do I need to pay for a deposit if I move from here. I had a Torah sister invite me to rent a house on her land. I also have the option of going back to one house with Marshall. I may even go ahead and move over seas finally.

You're an idiot. I would mock you and say "nice try" but damn, you just made the second dumbest comment EVER.




You swear like I care about spelling on a thread.

As I said before, I don't use social media. IE I don't use reddit, Twitter. Facebook or YouTube. Like I said before, I side with the Ultra Orthodox on this issue: social media is evil. From my POV, its a BaMaH [בָּמָה]

And even if I did use social media, I would not be using it to compare lives, I have never been jealous of anyone in my life. I didn't even know what jealousy was until about age 22 when someone explained it to me. That's how much of a simpleton I am when it comes to evil. I actually had to talk to evil people more often to figure out how they think.





Look at yourself and say that again! If you mentally abuse a man that doesn't mean they have to be a doormat and just sit there and take it just because they are a man. If you mentally abuse a man, don't be surprised when he gets up in your face and hits you.




Yes, briefly. I would like to read more though. How about you?



As a woman I am forbidden by The Torah from fighting in the army of Israelites. That is the duty of my husband and sons. We aren't in The Land, so this question doesn't really apply.



My husband doesn't beat our children, so this isn't an issue.




Does this comment have a point? It just sounds like a person who drank alcohol and put some rambling on a page. Your facts are even accurate. The ignorance of this comment, just WOW

*your facts are NOT even accurate
(got interrupted, forgot the NOT)

 

[Army Burger]

View attachment 1230613
Are you serious?
Absolute weaklings.

If you can't behave, you've got to pay the consequences. Simple as that, Melinda.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

The belief that Sumerian clay tablets were before Hebrew is scholastic OPINION. Not FACT. Genesis is the beginning of human history. No pagan scholar is going to change my mind on that.

I've studied Kant in depth, I don't misunderstand him. Yes, Kant wasn't openly a follower of The Torah, so yes, his moral philosophy is not entirely based on The Torah. However, what I am saying is not out of line with Kantian ethics. Like you said, Kant believed that a moral absolute (categorical imperative) could not be based on inclination (feeling/ momentary impulse) but instead must be based on duty in order to have any moral virtue. That is exactly what The Torah is about: duty and obligation.

In the spousal rape scenario, judging by Kantian ethics: Kant says that if you have a moral absolute, it must be true for all people. If I say that spousal rape is not a sin for either a man or a woman, then yea, I've applied it fairly to all. Again, there is harmony there with Kantian ethics.

It isn't scholastic opinion, it's demonstrable. The Assyrian calendar lasted until they were conquered by Macedonia, and we know the Greek calendar well, so we can decipher the Assyrian calendar, which means we can also decipher the Sumerian calendar and the documents dated using it, which predate the comparable Hebrew texts, including the Torah. What you're saying simply doesn't align with reality.

Also you are again totally misrepresenting Kant. You are making a contextual judgement, not an absolute. Rape is either right or wrong. Spousal is a modifier in this context. Rape is the act. We are judging the act. Adding a modifier to an act doesn't make a new act. You've admitted rape is wrong, therefore by Kantian ethics spousal rape must also be wrong since it is the same thing.

Please provide evidence that the Torah is the earliest written document.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Lol, you don't use social media, Melinda? What the fuck do you think this site is, if not social media?

 

[Logical Fallacies]

Look at yourself and say that again! If you mentally abuse a man that doesn't mean they have to be a doormat and just sit there and take it just because they are a man. If you mentally abuse a man, don't be surprised when he gets up in your face and hits you.

As long as she did not physically attack him, there was no need for him to defend himself physically. Attacking someone without being attacked beforehand is abuse and not defense. It makes you the attacker. You transition from victim to perpetrator, no matter if you have been mentally abused by said person (press X to doubt) before or not, no matter if you have been provoked or not. Since women generally pose less of a threat to men (unless maybe they have a gun) than men pose to women, he could have walked away and taken himself out of the situation but I guess he wasn't smart enough for that. Smart is not his thing.

I can't believe how many basic things have to be explained to these people. Thank God the law doesn't accept the delusional ideas of lunatics but only it's own concepts and theories.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

You swear like I care about spelling on a thread.

As I said before, I don't use social media. IE I don't use reddit, Twitter. Facebook or YouTube. Like I said before, I side with the Ultra Orthodox on this issue: social media is evil. From my POV, its a BaMaH [בָּמָה]

And even if I did use social media, I would not be using it to compare lives, I have never been jealous of anyone in my life. I didn't even know what jealousy was until about age 22 when someone explained it to me. That's how much of a simpleton I am when it comes to evil. I actually had to talk to evil people more often to figure out how they think.

Then why are you still here lmao this is technically social media

 

[Kamov Ka-52]

I didn't use any money received from The Stalker to pay for my $160 laptop. I used money from my small business because it was a business expense. C'mon now, I though you stalked my finances via the federal cases, you should know better.

Cohabitate? Marshall and I are legally married you moron. He legally adopted my children too.

Even if we were not legally married I maintain a First Amendment right to live with him without a legal paper through a religious Ketubah. The government can't do shit about that.

Neither does $160 pay for a deposit. Neither do I need to pay for a deposit if I move from here. I had a Torah sister invite me to rent a house on her land. I also have the option of going back to one house with Marshall. I may even go ahead and move over seas finally.

You're an idiot. I would mock you and say "nice try" but damn, you just made the second dumbest comment EVER.




You swear like I care about spelling on a thread.

As I said before, I don't use social media. IE I don't use reddit, Twitter. Facebook or YouTube. Like I said before, I side with the Ultra Orthodox on this issue: social media is evil. From my POV, its a BaMaH [בָּמָה]

And even if I did use social media, I would not be using it to compare lives, I have never been jealous of anyone in my life. I didn't even know what jealousy was until about age 22 when someone explained it to me. That's how much of a simpleton I am when it comes to evil. I actually had to talk to evil people more often to figure out how they think.





Look at yourself and say that again! If you mentally abuse a man that doesn't mean they have to be a doormat and just sit there and take it just because they are a man. If you mentally abuse a man, don't be surprised when he gets up in your face and hits you.




Yes, briefly. I would like to read more though. How about you?



As a woman I am forbidden by The Torah from fighting in the army of Israelites. That is the duty of my husband and sons. We aren't in The Land, so this question doesn't really apply.



My husband doesn't beat our children, so this isn't an issue.




Does this comment have a point? It just sounds like a person who drank alcohol and put some rambling on a page. Your facts are even accurate. The ignorance of this comment, just WOW

View attachment 1230613
Are you serious?
Absolute weaklings.

Lol if you're gonna whine you could at least have the balls to @ me.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Your facts are even accurate.

So they are accurate? This is why you should probably give a shit about your spelling lmao, a tard slip-up like this don't look good