Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

Miscellaneous:
Frog Twitter and guys from The Right Stuff (TRS) have been in open war with Scott Greer for the past couple of days on Twitter.

Greer spoke at AFPAC and is a close friend of Nick's. He's got terrible takes. He used to be a writer at the Daily Caller, but was doxed by Katie McHugh as being a writer for Richard Spencer's Radix Journal using the pseudonym "Michael McGregor."
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...n-alt-right-website-using-a-pseudonym/569335/ (https://archive.li/d5NdR)

Both groups are mad at Greer/AmNats for various reasons. Recently, I'd say Frog Twitter is primarily mad because after the AmNats appropriated and killed the Groyper meme, it looks like they now have their eyes set on killing the Apu meme. Though they also overlap into having the below grievances.



The hatred between TRS and AmNats has been building up for a couple months. What really kicked it off was when Greer and other AmNats started pushing the narrative that Harvey Weinstein did nothing wrong, which was documented a few pages ago. Note that James Allsup works for TRS. I've seen people on Twitter say that Allsup has been taking a lot of shots at Fuentes/AmNats lately on the podcast he co-hosts. I don't listen to it so IDK what he's been saying.


More recently, TRS is sick of AmNats using the free racism pass they got from Trump and the GOP to bitch about the Chinese and cover-up Trump's lackluster response to Corona Virus. It's funny because late last year, before Corona Virus, Nick was being called a Chinese shill by Frog Twitter, specifically people like Bronze Age Pervert (BAP), Kantbot, Loki, etc. He used to really like BAP and shill his book titled Bronze Age Mindset.

Evidently his dad either works for or owns a company that has deep Chinese ties. Prior to the pandemic, Nick was mostly friendly to China. His feelings about China are directly correlated to Trump's feelings about China.

His dad's work is something that'd be interesting to explore. I saw tweets that documented it, with his name, the company name, etc. I can't find them now. They were probably deleted.



Then yesterday, Greer shot his mouth off about Serbian Nationalists preferring to align themselves with China rather than America because ya know America bombed the fuck out of them and a Serb Nationalist posted a meme that hurt his feelings. That really ignited things.


View attachment 1232644

View attachment 1232647

Greer also put out a tweet with a picture of Jane Fonda in North Vietnam that said "Reminder: this is not a wise political strategy." People were quick to point out that those words are rich coming from Greer, who is a Harvey Weinstein defender.


It's hilarious that Greer and his fellow AmNats have united people they call WigNats. People that were Twitter fighting with each other just a few weeks ago have now coalesced over dunking on Greer lmao.

View attachment 1232751
https://twitter.com/HyperBoraean/status/1250293610110521344 (https://archive.li/l7sEy)

Today, AmNats are deluding themselves into thinking that black people are gonna vote for Trump because of the stimulus checks.

View attachment 1232785
https://twitter.com/ZoomerClips/status/1250366199130550272 (https://archive.li/cFYB7)

View attachment 1232787
View attachment 1232790

Also, the Daily Groyper's Twitter account (@DailyGroyper) was recently permanently suspended. The much better Twitter account, @DailyGrifter, is still kickin'.
As someone else said, people with strong political views are always in-fighting. It happened with Stalin/Trotsky, Hitler/Strasser Brothers, etc. I strive to be thorough and objective, so I'm gonna give a comprehensive answer.

AmNats would give the simple answer of "optics" but if you look at the situation objectively there's much more to it.

Ironically, most of it started after the Charlottesville "Unite The Right" rally that turned into a disaster, but that's not the sole cause. Nick and many TRS guys attended. From what I gather, they both have the same views about the aftermath and agree it was a bad idea.

Yes, TRS made some poor decisions regarding "optics." For example, they had aligned themselves in the Matt Heimbach/Traditional Workers Party (TWP) guys for a little while because they wanted unity among white nationalists.

They ended up ditching that idea and cut things off with Heimbach. I'm not sure exactly when it happened. I think a little bit before Heimbach's "cuckbox" incident. If you don't know about that, just search online. It's hilarious. Heimbach was never central to TRS, though. I think he had a couple of guest appearances and a podcast that had like two episodes before they disassociated from him.

Mike Enoch of TRS went to a rally with Heimbach post-Charlottesville in Shelbyville, TN. For the most part, it wasn't notable but it was definitely cringe. Nick and many others rightfully took the piss out of them for it. It had groups like TWP, Nationalist Socialist Movement (NSM), etc. There were a small few fights between white nationalists and ANIFA/ANTIFA adjacent people. The police handled everything well so it didn't turn into a disaster like Charlottesville.

All people in fringe politics have transgressive elements, but Heimbach gets off on being transgressive. He liked being portrayed as an evil caricature. He played that role for like 10 years. He felt like a character out of a Hollywood movie, LARPy costumes and all.

His behavior was a red flag. I won't say that all people that act like he did are insincere about their beliefs because there's a lot of terrible people. I will say that people should like him should never be associated with, though, at any capacity. TRS learned that lesson, but they really shouldn't have needed to because it was so obvious, but they were operating on the whole muh unity principle.

People like Heimbach typically end up doing one of two things: they become a federal informant and then promote violent acts that get a bunch of people arrested or they have a "change of heart" and reverse their political views. Just recently, Heimbach had a "change of heart" and joined some "anti-hate" group and put up a video on YouTube where he says he's no longer a white nationalist. He was briefly in the NSM before they kicked him out for being a communist. He details that in the video and says "I guess if the red star fits."

It's also worth mentioning that in March 2019, the leader of the NSM, Jeff Schoep, also had a "change of heart" and like gave the organization to a black man who dismantled it or something lmao. Heimbach joined the same "anti-hate" group that Schoep joined.


But like I said, Heimbach was never a big part of TRS, but it did start to show a dividing line in viewpoints between WigNats/AmNats. (Each side labeled the other like Pro-Abortion/Anti-Choice.)

It's also worth mentioning that TRS was aligned with Richard Spencer for a while and Spencer and Fuentes have beef for various reasons I'm not gonna bother to outline. TRS and Spencer don't really associate with each other any more. I don't know why, for sure. He ran National Policy Institute into the ground after he was put in charge of it. It was once a relatively well-funded 501(c)(3). It was founded by a millionaire and really the only viable organization in politics that pushed their point of view. He also fucked his best friend's girlfriend.

TRS runs a tight lipped ship for the most part, they don't like in-fighting to be public. Which is why them all dunking on Scott Greer is hilarious because they finally said "fuck it."

Nick thought that if he wore a suit, didn't associate with undesirables (and went out of his way to condemn said undesirables), used the right words to describe his ideology (not White Nationalist, not Alt-Right, etc) that he could bamboozle people, the press, and organizations like the ADL, SPLC, etc. that he wouldn't be branded WN/Alt-Right/Nazi, etc.

TRS thought that the the groups were going to call them a Nazi anyway, who cares?

The TRS strategy was nonsensical. If someone calls you a faggot, you don't just start sucking cock. They've since backed off on it. They've changed the names of podcasts, distances themselves from people like Chris Cantwell, etc. They've toned down some of the edginess and go out of there way to no say things that can be construed as violence. They're aggressively anti-fedposting and have kicked people off the network for not complying. The Daily Shoah became TDS. Fash The Nation became FTN.

Hate House became Love Street but the guy who hosted it was such a drunk, autistic, shockjock, fedposter that he exploded on drunken, late night YouTube stream about how he hated the direction TRS was going that they kicked him off the network and he left the internet. He was also mad that TRS made him remove Azzmador as a co-host, who is affiliated with the Daily Stormer and does their podcast.

Nick's "optics" strategy on the other hand was complete bullshit and this thread is littered with proof of that. Any time he's called out in the media for comments he's made on things like the holocaust, he plays the irony bro card. He thought that would be able to save him from media scrutiny and he was wrong. Pretending to be a devout Catholic isn't going to shroud you from scrutiny when you talk about Trump's Chosen influence and power. It's that simple.

Nick isn't as clever as he thinks he is.

I can't remember when, but Nick adopted the policy of not talking to the press far after TRS did. Nick thought he could be "optical" and give interviews to people that hated him and his ideas and be given a fair shake. He'd get mad at when journalists he hung out with would publish articles calling him a white nationalist, Alt-Right, Nazi, etc. Most recently, that would be the video interview he gave to MTV where they misled him about what the mini doc they were doing would be about. He said that it was recorded a year or two ago, but he should have known they were going to do that. After all, he claims to be much smarter than everyone else. Yet, he did a DLive stream of his reaction to it where he was incredulous that they didn't treat him fairly.

Nick spoke at AmRen 2018, which is American Renaissance's conference. American Renaissance is a white nationalist organization. He can play semantics all he wants. He'll say something like "I'm not a white nationalist, I'm not advocating for an entirely white country, I just think America should retain a super majority of the founding stock." and thinks that's going to get him off the hook. It doesn't.

Additional areas of conflict:
  • Religion. Many of the TRS guys are atheists that are sympathetic to Christians. TRS has a Christian podcast called the Godcast. The co-founders try to stay out of religious flame wars. When it comes to something like Islam, their views are more nuanced than Nick's. If they talk about Islam, it's through a racial lens, not a religious doctrinal lens. Until recently, Nick would shit on anyone that's not Catholic, including Protestants. His attitude changed during the Groyper Wars probably because claiming to be an AmNat while shitting on the sect of Christianity responsible for America existing is untenable.
  • Women. AmNats call WigNats feminists because they don't hate women. AmNats literately defend Harvey Weinstein as having done nothing wrong, despite court records. They defend a Trump's Chosen movie mogul that explicitly targeted white women and hired ex-Mossad agents to suppress allegations.
  • Trump/GOP. Listen to TDS and you're gonna hear mostly criticism of Trump/GOP. Listen to Chapo Trap House and you're gonna hear mostly criticism of Liberals/DNC. Listen to America First and you're gonna hear mostly Nick sucking Trump's dick.
  • Economics. Like Nick, TRS came from a libertarian background. From what I've read, they started off as a libertarian Facebook group and they gradually became white nationalists. They've basically adopted what Nick would consider "socialist" economic policies: Medicare4All, strong social welfare programs, etc.
  • Daily Stormer. Andrew Anglin and TRS have beef. Anglin is a fan of Fuentes' and Fuentes' is a fan of Anglin. He won't explicitly say it, but he gives dog whistles. He'll say something like "I read XYZ in an article by Andrew Klavan in... What's that website's name? TheDailyWeather.name?" Klavan is a writer/podcaster for Ben Shapiro's Daily Wire.
Evidently DLive is raising the cut out of donations they take to give to Lino Network miners. They've disabled Lemon donations for tonight to do maintenance. Nick is gonna miss out on those sweet, sweet TrumpBux donations he was anticipating tonight. He's mad DLive didn't notify him. Lmao.
I can give more areas of conflict:
  • Trump/GOP, addendum. This goes further than defending/criticizing the Republicans. AmNats straight up believe that they can change the GOP, turn it at their own will, and if they shit on Charlie Kirk a lot, then Trump will notice and support them. WigNats tried this before, got rekt, saw what happened after Richard Spencer's movement crashed and burned, and accepted that they're not gonna get what they want until the system collapses.
  • Foreign Policy. AmNats complain incessantly about WigNats defending Iran or Russia and Nick says he doesn't want to continue the slavish Foreign Policy in regime change. But says a bunch of really sketchy shit behind the scenes, like doing neocon rhetoric during the shitshow with Iran (which he corrected on stream the next day because of the backlash). He supported Trump launching missiles into Syria as "4D Chess" against Xi Jinping and North Korea (I had these two timestamped but YouTube wiped the videos on his channel). He also wanted us to invade Venezuela last year, but corrected that days later too when the situation changed (also timestamped, but again, YouTube wiped the channel).
  • China. An extension to above, TRS hates China, but they don't go down the route where AmNats are just butthurt to a ridiculous extent about them that is basically on the line of starting a war with them. It goes so far that AmNats like Scott Greer also mock and chide Serbians (see above) for being friendly to China after Scott's own country bombed and partitioned them.
  • Big Tent Movement. WigNats don't really give a shit about building a "Big tent movement" while AmNats are desperately trying to get as many moderate Conservatives into the movement and do their best in the "optics". Thing about it is that Nick and his buddies hate the WigNats (ironically their best way of garnering support since nobody but the Alt-Right would support Nick) and do their damnedest to purge, block, and mock them from their movement. This is the biggest sticking point of this whole clash because Nick is trying to shun all those WigNats for optics in crafting a movement appealing to normal Conservatives, yet chills with a bankrupt homosexual that doxxes people (Milo), an unapologetic Zionist loser that is laughed by everyone on twitter (Wohl), literal Lolcows (Baked), and a dude that shoves dildos up his mouth.
So yeah, the reason why the MuttNats and WigNats are going at it is because of recent amount of absolute exceptionalism the AmNats made with in their latest positions above.
In conclusion
baby fights.gif

The "dissident right" is as bad as SJW's about petty infighting, drama, and cancellations, which is one major reason they're completely fucked. You'd think a group that was primarily a reaction to the shittiness of team ingsoc would want to make a point to avoid that, but no dice.
 
I'm not sure exactly when it happened. I think a little bit before Heimbach's "cuckbox" incident. If you don't know about that, just search online.
IIRC back then TRS used to more or less back the "pro-optics" side in collaboration with TDS (reeked of a gayop involving MPC too).
They went after Heimbach, the cuckbox incident happend and they felt really vindicated. Afterwards they started shooting against Spencer but before they could cancel/purge him properly Nehlen handed the Ricky Vaughn dox to Christopher Cantwell who promptly published it.
This caused RV to disappear and nearly mention of the company he worked for (SmartCheckr) to be professionally purged from the internet.

In the aftermath TRS became much more negative on Trump, more explicitly National Socialist/White Nationalist and broke with Angling/TDS and MPC for good.
Edit: I suspect the turn came because Mike Enoch et al understood at that point they'd on the chopping block soon after.
 
Last edited:
In conclusion
View attachment 1234200
The "dissident right" is as bad as SJW's about petty infighting, drama, and cancellations, which is one major reason they're completely fucked. You'd think a group that was primarily a reaction to the shittiness of team ingsoc would want to make a point to avoid that, but no dice.
I don't want to sound like Charlie Kirk and say out loud "The Alt Right are the real SJWs!" but they're no different than them. I know Alt Right is a bit of an outdated term, the 'correct term' these days is Dissident Right but Alt Right is still a valid blanket term to describe that group.

In the age of the internet, people with passionate political views will almost always turn on each other and cannibalize one another for minor differences in doctrine rather than actually form united front and actually try to create something. You can see it with both sides, between 'Woke' and 'Based' people.

It's kinda strange to see and I wonder if the internet culture itself is what caused this or its merely based on the character of those people involved.

I mean back in the 1960s and 1970s when you had hippies, communists, and the KKK+neo nazis, and in general, real radicals, did they infight as much compared to today?
 
Last edited:
I don't want to sound like Charlie Kirk and say out loud "The Alt Right are the real SJWs!" but they're no different than them. I know Alt Right is a bit of an outdated term, the 'correct term' these days is Dissident Right but Alt Right is still a valid blanket term to describe that group.

In the age of the internet, people with passionate political views will almost always turn on each other and cannibalize one another for minor differences in doctrine rather than actually form united front and actually try to create something. You can see it with both sides, between 'Woke' and 'Based' people.

It's kinda strange to see and I wonder if the internet culture itself is what caused this or its merely based on the character of those people involved.

I mean back in the 1960s and 1970s when you had hippies, communists, and the KKK+neo nazis, and in general, real radicals, did they infight as much compared to today?
Well George Lincoln Rockwell famously got killed by one of his own former deputies.
 
Ironically, people used to theorize Thiel was funding TRS in 2017-18, because they used to not be so explicitly homophobic and tolerate occasional fags like Greg Johnson, Ghoul and Dante in the movement (they've since become much more negative about that shit).

If Thiel is as woke as people say, he's the "No niggas in my gay bathhouse" Grindr Greg Johnson kind of FagNat. A racist libertarian basically. He's a freaky transhumanist atheist who'd want vat-grown aryan boy slaves in the ethnostate instead of some dead one of Trump's Chosen People on a stick's (((homophobia))). Up until recently, you'd think him and a supposed arch-homophobe like Nick would want nothing to do with each other.

But now Nick is hanging out with catbois and Milo, and saying ackshually we've gotta be nuanced and accept BASED homos in the big tent..really activates the almonds.
Yeah, it's pretty funny. I don't buy it because there's no proof. I think they were just turning a blind eye to their friends. Interestingly enough, Greg Johnson is now an AmNat and posts on The Daily Stormer's forum, where many people call him Grindr Greg lol.

Like I said, we don't have any proof yet if Thiel is funding people like Fuentes and Greer, but we do have proof that he's funding Curtis Yarvin ("Mencius Moldbug") and was at one point close to Milo. For the uninitiated, Yarvin is a Jewish neo-rectionary (NRx). He basically wants a technocracy. Saying that he and his views are controversial would be an understatement. He supports slavery.

https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2009/07/why-carlyle-matters/ (https://archive.li/lC5Gl)

Yarvin’s activity under the Moldbug penname has drawn outsized attention to a company of its size. In reports on Moldbug, several outlets have suggested that the company is backed by Peter Thiel, the venture capitalist and Trump adviser who himself has occasionally floated anti-democratic views. Wolfe-Pauly says the company is funded by Thiel’s venture capital arm, Founders Fund, but that Thiel is not personally involved. One of the founders of the company, John Burnham, who no longer works with Yarvin and Wolfe-Pauly, lists himself as a recipient of the controversial Thiel Fellowship, the proceeds of which he reportedly used for unrelated projects.
https://www.theverge.com/2017/2/21/14671978/alt-right-mencius-moldbug-urbit-curtis-yarvin-tlon (https://archive.li/FSOwb)

Moldbug disappeared from the public politics sphere after being doxed, and he's been working on Urbit. He's recently came back into the lime light.

https://americanmind.org/essays/rip-globalism-dead-of-coronavirus/ (https://archive.li/0SJ7i)

Thiel has ties to The American Mind/The Claremont Institute. He also spoke at the National Conservatism conference in 2019. National Conservatism


Politics in America, Britain, and other Western nations have taken a sharp turn toward nationalism—a commitment to a world of independent nations. This has been disorienting to many, not least the American conservative movement, which has, since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, grown increasingly attached to a vision of a global “rules-based liberal order” that would bring peace and prosperity to the entire world while attenuating the independence of nations.

The return of nationalism has created a much-discussed “crisis of conservatism” that may be unprecedented since modern Anglo-American conservatism was formulated by Russell Kirk, William Buckley, and their colleagues in the 1950s. At the heart of this crisis is a question: Is the new American and British nationalism a hostile usurper that has arrived on the scene to displace political conservatism? Or is nationalism an essential, if neglected, part of the Anglo-American conservative tradition at its best?
https://nationalconservatism.org/natcon-dc-2019/about/ (https://archive.li/5itTi)

After Trump’s election, Anton, whose pen name was an open secret among certain segments of the conservative intelligentsia, was suddenly in demand. He was, after all, a seasoned speechwriter with meaningful experience on the N.S.C., and a true Trump supporter amid a conservative foreign-policy community that was signing their names to letters condemning the new president. Anton says that Peter Thiel, the Trump-supporting tech billionaire, who had attended several Claremont Institute symposiums, introduced him to the Trump transition team. He eventually hired him as the N.S.C.’s senior communications director.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/02/michael-anton-white-house-machiavelli (https://archive.li/5Zet5)

Additionally:
Yiannopoulos also had a private relationship with the venture capitalist Peter Thiel, though he was more circumspect than some other correspondents. After turning down an appearance on Yiannopoulos’s podcast in May 2016 (Thiel: “Let’s just get coffee and take things from there”), Thiel invited the Breitbart tech editor for dinner at his Hollywood Hills home in June, a dinner Yiannopoulos boasted of the same night to Bannon: “You two should meet. … An obvious candidate for movie financing if we got external. … He has fucked [Gawker Media founder Nick] Denton & Gawker so many ways it brought a tear to my eye.” They made plans to meet during the July Republican National Convention. But much of Yiannopoulos’s knowledge of Thiel seemed to come secondhand from other right-wing activists, as well as Curtis Yarvin, the blogger who advocates the return of feudalism. In an email exchange shortly after the election, Yarvin told Yiannopoulos that he had been “coaching Thiel.”

“Peter needs guidance on politics for sure,” Yiannopoulos responded.

“Less than you might think!” Yarvin wrote back. “I watched the election at his house, I think my hangover lasted into Tuesday. He’s fully enlightened, just plays it very carefully.”
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...breitbart-and-milo-smuggled-white-nationalism (https://archive.li/1007W)

I just stumbled on a piece from February in the New Republic while trying to find Thiel's exact relationship with The Claremont Institute. He's written for The American Mind and I assume he's a donor.

One of the organizers, Israeli political theorist Yoram Hazony, barred the participation of VDARE’s Peter Brimelow and several other white nationalists. Despite such precautions, however, the old dynamics of movement conservatism soon took center stage, when University of Pennsylvania Law School professor Amy Wax announced in a speech on immigration that the country would be better off with “more whites and fewer nonwhites.” Faced with this reminder of the issues animating the Trumpist right outside the conference room, several conservatives proceeded to defend Wax’s comments in an effort that rapidly went from desperate to dishonest.

https://newrepublic.com/article/156368/finding-neverland-conservative-quest-rid-trumpism (https://archive.li/in4cE)

It's worth pointing out that Amy Wax is a Jew and if she wasn't, she would have been kicked out of academia for the things she's said.

Amy Wax, a tenured professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, had made disparaging remarks about the school’s black students and suggested that some of them should not be at the school. After the video of her remarks came to light earlier this month, the school announced that she was barred from teaching first-year students and would only teach her specific areas of expertise – but would also maintain her tenure, salary and seniority...

This is not even the first time Wax has been caught up in controversy over her statements in the past year. At the beginning of the school year, she co-wrote an op-ed for Philly.com claiming that “all cultures are not equal,” criticizing “single-parent, antisocial habits, prevalent among some working-class whites; the anti-‘acting white’ rap culture of inner-city blacks; [and] the anti-assimilation ideas gaining ground among some Hispanic immigrants.”

In response, 33 law school colleagues wrote an open letter condemning her statements. Last month, Wax responded in the pages of the Wall Street Journal, saying that her colleagues hadn’t addressed her argument on its merits and that their behavior reflected “a spirit hostile to [unpopular] ideas — indeed, a spirit that might seek to punish the expression of such ideas.”

https://forward.com/news/national/397696/is-this-penn-law-professor-a-truth-teller-or-a-bigot/ (https://archive.li/Vk60a)

It's interesting that she was allowed to speak at the conference, but people like Peter Brimelow were barred from attending.

Finally, we have this video from 3/19/2020 featuring Yarvin. The video is timestamped to the relevant location.


Interviewer: "You're very explicit about have very little interest in white nationalism, for instance.":
Yarvin: "Yeah, I keep meaning to actually go on like Nazi podcasts and argue with them. I may actually do this, I don't wanna be arguing with them, but I think they're just defenseless again me."

Is Yarvin refering to Stormfront Radio? Chris Cantwell's Radical Agenda? A European podcast hosted by some members of Golden Dawn or the Nordic Resistance Movement? Obviously he's talking about TRS and Mike Enoch.

Putting this all together, it makes sense why Thiel would fund the AmNats. If he is, we'll eventually find out. Just like we found out about Thiel's relationship with Yarvin and Milo.

Thiel doesn't even necessarily have to be funding all of them. Maybe just someone like Scott Greer.

It all comes back to why did Nick go on Milo's show? No one has any idea because Nick couldn't explain it. I thought he was trying to get a deal with Gavin McInnes' Censored.TV because he's got the streaming infrastructure and that's a hard problem to solve. It's also very expensive.

I've heard that Milo has pissed off most of his financial backers, and it sounds like him and Thiel had a falling out. Maybe Thiel wanted an intro and Milo was his in. Perhaps Gavin was his in.

Nick has been tight lipped about the the relaunch of his site that he said was gonna happen a month or two ago. Last I heard, he said it was more work than they thought. It's supposed to be a one-stop shop: donations, live streams, video archives, everything.

The site not being done yet is arguably the best indicator of him not being funded by Thiel, but even that isn't rock solid. Nick doesn't know shit about computers. I could easily see his current web guy, Brandon Webster ("Saevant"), overselling his technical skills to get a nice stack of Thiel Bucks.
 
IIRC back then TRS used to more or less back the "pro-optics" side in collaboration with TDS (reeked of a gayop involving MPC too).
They went after Heimbach, the cuckbox incident happend and they felt really vindicated. Afterwards they started shooting against Spencer but before they could cancel/purge him properly Nehlen handed the Ricky Vaughn dox to Christopher Cantwell who promptly published it.
This caused RV to disappear and nearly mention of the company he worked for (SmartCheckr) to be professionally purged from the internet.

In the aftermath TRS became much more negative on Trump, more explicitly National Socialist/White Nationalist and broke with Angling/TDS and MPC for good.
Edit: I suspect the turn came because Mike Enoch et al understood at that point they'd on the chopping block soon after.

TRS aren't one person. The big reason a lot of them got in trouble with people is they started as a blog and troll group that morphed into a podcast platform, and so when things happen and a person they like is accused of something they circle the wagons and shut down. A lot of people who get named were tangential friends with various levels of responsibilities if any at all. It lead to a weird situation where they weren't technically responsible for these weirdos, but they also let these weirdos in too close.

It still happens to this day where one of their people goes off the reservation and they have to figure out how to deal with it without drawing attention to themselves.

They aren't at deiiberate as you think they are. They're just reacting to currents. Fuentes and his ironybro friends had been taking shots at them for two years. The guys over there smelled blood in the water after how badly catboy and Harvey Weinstein damaged the brand of Nick and his friends and have been clearly unleashing two years of anger out on people who used to outright make memes about them (Mike Enoch and ranch came from Nick's friends)
 
IIRC back then TRS used to more or less back the "pro-optics" side in collaboration with TDS (reeked of a gayop involving MPC too).
They went after Heimbach, the cuckbox incident happend and they felt really vindicated. Afterwards they started shooting against Spencer but before they could cancel/purge him properly Nehlen handed the Ricky Vaughn dox to Christopher Cantwell who promptly published it.
This caused RV to disappear and nearly mention of the company he worked for (SmartCheckr) to be professionally purged from the internet.

In the aftermath TRS became much more negative on Trump, more explicitly National Socialist/White Nationalist and broke with Angling/TDS and MPC for good.
Edit: I suspect the turn came because Mike Enoch et al understood at that point they'd on the chopping block soon after.
I'd say that TRS was in favor of optics, but they wouldn't go out of there way to countersignal non-optical people. That said, AmNats will say TRS has bad optics. The optics debate was futile. People just strawmanned the "opposite" side of them.

Fuentes and Anglin branded TRS as WigNats, which I never understood. Initially, the term made sense to describe someone like Heimbach, though there was already a term to describe someone like him: White Nationalist 1.0 (WN 1.0).

It quickly devolved into an insult that AmNats would use against anyone that had any kind of disagreement with Fuentes. During the Groyper Wars, I remember seeing Groypers accusing each other of being WigNats. Lol. Anglin used the same imagery and symbology associated with WigNats, but wasn't classified as such because he said it was irony. I don't recall TRS ever using a Swastika on their site.

Ricky Vaugn played an important role as a liaison between the factions. He was friendly with TRS and Fuentes. Though, there's many WigNats that don't like him.

Yeah, I think the lawsuit that Enoch was dragged into and got out of really woke him up. When that happened, they made an effort to clean things up and get rid of what they perceived as dead weight.

I mean back in the 1960s and 1970s when you had hippies, communists, and the KKK+neo nazis, and in general, real radicals, did they infight as much compared to today?

Definitely.

There was rampant infighting between the Black Liberation Army, Black Panthers, Weather Underground, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), etc. If you're interested in learning more about that, check out Bryan Burrough's Days of Rage: America's Radical Underground, the FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary Violence.

This is article is a good synopsis of the book.

How receptive? In fall of 1968, there were 41 bombings and arson cases on college campuses. We’re not talking letters under doors or vandalism, here. We’re talking about Molotov cocktails setting shit on fire. Here’s how radical SDS was: Burrough notes that Weatherman’s opponents for leadership in SDS elections were “Progressive Labor,” who were literal Maoists. To distinguish themselves, Weatherman called for white radicals to live like John Brown: ie, to kill the enemies of black liberty.

The election was nuts; Weatherman literally expelled their opponents from the party before the vote, so SDS split. But Weatherman occupied the national office, which meant they could evaluate SDS members as potential recruits.
https://status451.com/2017/01/20/days-of-rage/ (https://archive.li/JRiFq)

In the 1930s/1940s, the KKK didn't like Hitler/NSDAP.
Malcolm X was assassinated by a fellow Nation of Islam (NOI) member named Thomas Hagan. Hagan said he did it to get retribution for Malcolm criticizing another NOI member, Elijah Muhammad, who's now the leader of NOI. Many speculate that Muhammad ordered the hit.

They aren't at deiiberate as you think they are. They're just reacting to currents. Fuentes and his ironybro friends had been taking shots at them for two years. The guys over there smelled blood in the water after how badly catboy and Harvey Weinstein damaged the brand of Nick and his friends and have been clearly unleashing two years of anger out on people who used to outright make memes about them (Mike Enoch and ranch came from Nick's friends)
TRS and the irony bros were exchanging shots two years ago. Enoch and Sven got wasted and did a stream with Shawn and Beardson where they all just hurled insults at each other.

It toned down for a bit and each side did their own thing for the most part. When Fuentes and Allsup were working together they did an election stream with TRS' Jazzhands McFeels.

Last summer, Fuentes was sympathetic when Allsup was banned from YouTube and decided to join TRS as a co-host on FTN. Fuentes started the year by saying he didn't want to talk about WigNats anymore and was moving on.

I agree that they struck when the catboy ordeal came to light, but the strike wasn't anything more than a few comments making fun of him. He was supposed to be Mr. Optics, after all. But it wasn't until AmNats defended Harvey Weinstein that they went all out. They never really talked about any of the Daily Stormer drama, but they started taking shots back at Anglin after he defended Weinstein.

Didn't that meme orginiate on pol? The irony bros (specifically Shawn and Beardson) love to take credit for things they can't prove they started. Their show isn't popular and they like to portray themselves as being more important than they really are.


Well, this is interesting. Another AmNat being friendly with Milo.

EVsI2mdWsAE8dwY.jpg
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't want to post twitter posts, but I guess the AmNats really want to die on this hill like they did with Weinstein
Twitter is good, that's the medium AmNats use the most, and I find a lot of my content in this thread. The worst thing about Nick being banned from YouTube is they have a dope transcript feature, so you don't have to listen to 3 hours of Fuentes' sucking Trump's dick to find how what he's up to. Please just try to archive if you have the time because Nick loves to deletes Tweets and his buddies are always getting banned on Twitter.


I listened to some of his show Wednesday because DLive had suspended buying Lemon donations to do upgrades. Very lulzy. I'm not gonna search for timestamp/clip it because it's too much of a pain in the ass, but I'm fairly certain he said something about how this ordeal means war with China. Pretty sure that was before the whole muh CIA/NSA/whatever spooks started circulating the idea that it's from a Chinese lab. Anyone that watched it, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, because I like to be factual.

First, when the fuck did AmNats ever consider spook intelligence agencies to be credible? What about muh deep state trying to sabotage Trump?

Second, even if it did stem from an accidental lab fuck up, who fuckin' cares? Okay, the Chinese government lied and covered it up. What a shock. That doesn't excuse Trump's terrible response to it. Trump could have shut down Chinese inbound flights to America when they got word of it in late December, especially January. He didn't do so until most of the major airliners had already said they were suspending Chinese to America flights.

Third, he says globalism has to die with the virus, like it's somehow China's fault that GOP politicians voted/passed bullshit "free trade" deals, etc. that resulted in American companies offshoring manufacturing. Nick sucks the dick off that same party and politicians.

More from Nikiboo32, Nick's trap friend that was in his discord server and who his mods claimed was a real girl
How tf he not know what men's vs women's feet look like? Lmao. Unless...
 
Read the imgur gallery. Nick knew Nikiboo32 was a trap. He was mutuals with Niki. His discord even found out after they tried to run cover for Niki and not only tolerated his presence but at least one guy openly lusted after Niki on Fuentes' server.
I did, was just joking around. It's good info that I knew a lil about before, but haven't looked into much. Might need to more.

I'm furious with the wignats. This was pretty cringe ngl. I'm a professional who takes MAGA seriously. This was like a catboy going to a dog fight. I wore a suit. I have good optics. These are cucks-*gets bodied by drag queen*
What's really funny about muh optics, is that if you were forced to either give a Roman salute in front of a white woman (particularly, a mom, sister, etc.) or parrot the AmNat/Groyper talking points on "muh white women bad because X, Y,Z" and their rape women or Harvey Weinstein did nothing wrong "memes," most white women are going to be much more disgusted by the supposedly AmNat Optics First shit.

Something I forgot to mention when Fuentes and James Allsup were arguing about AmNats supporting Weinstein is kinda funny. In one of Allsup's Telegram posts about it, he used either the word "thunderstruck" or some a variation with a different tense.

Nick is always talking about how much smarter he is than everyone else. He read Allsup's post on stream and was adamant that thunderstruck isn't an actual word. He went on about it for a few minutes. He finally looked it up, saw that it's a word, and was immediately thunderstruck.

What's interesting is that thunderstruck has become a popular meme/dog whistle in these kinda internet circles because Hitler uses it in Mein Kampf. It's probably the most quoted Mein Kampf passages on /pol/, etc.

The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.

Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.

I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying.

Gradually I began to hate them.

Nick has always loved to talk about how young he is. He still does it even though he's gonna be 22 this year. He's not really hip with the memes these days. Welcome to aging, big guy.

Nick definitely has a complex regarding aging. He was probably told by conservative adults when he was a cringe lolbertarian/neocon high school kid that he was the smartest young guy they've ever met.

I've never seen a neocon teenage boy that didn't adopt those beliefs because he needed validation from adults because no kids his age wanted to be friends with him.
 
From my research, Scott Greer hasn't had a job since getting fired from the Daily Caller. I haven't seen any writing from him. He spends all day on Twitter. He recently started a podcast that has unimpressive engagement. I guess it's possible that he's writing under a pseudonym or is a trust fund kid.

Peter Thiel has been throwing a lot of financial support at the NRx crowd. It wouldn't be out of the question that he's doing the same for AmNats, but there's no proof of anything yet.
I'm 99% sure Greer is back to writing for white nat/dissent right whatever they call themselves sites (American Renaissance and Counter Currents) again under the name Robert Hampton.
firefox_2020-04-18_19-54-00.png

Unz Review a site of both 'fringe' left and right political articles reposted one of his articles and this is the only comment on. Looking at the archive for Hampton
https://www.counter-currents.com/author/rhampton/
it's the same exact writing style as Greer
this article in particular convinced me it's him, i remember Greer's tweets during the Soleimani assassination, it's everything he said in just article form.
As for funding Lee Stranahan , formerly of Breitbart now with Sputnik, had a theory that Thiel is connected but it's one of his assicoates Jeff Giesea, the man responsible for the Deploraball, who's been the mainstream backer of what was then the alt right and now groypers. I wished I had the link still it was a longform interview for a different radio show he did, Stranahan explained how Giesea is oddly unknown for being a millionaire on the right. Giesea saw the alt right as a vehicle for memetic warfare but didn't like racist parts of it
In 2015 Giesea got a piece published in a journalist for fucking NATO about how he genuinely sees memes as a cybeweapon that should have been used to fight ISIS.
Stranahan did an interview with Richard Spencer, i believe it's deleted from yt since Spencer's channel got taken down, where Stranahan asks him if Giesea ever gave funding to NPI and Spencer said he donated a few thousand to them during 2015 2016. he's been open about heavily promoting the alt lite Posobiec, Cernovich Ali Alexander etc.
even from all the anti 'hate' left wing stalking sites the only prominent expose on him was this article by Buzzfeed during Deploraball which is fairly interesting honestly.
 
I'm 99% sure Greer is back to writing for white nat/dissent right whatever they call themselves sites (American Renaissance and Counter Currents) again under the name Robert Hampton.
View attachment 1239949
Unz Review a site of both 'fringe' left and right political articles reposted one of his articles and this is the only comment on. Looking at the archive for Hampton
https://www.counter-currents.com/author/rhampton/
it's the same exact writing style as Greer
this article in particular convinced me it's him, i remember Greer's tweets during the Soleimani assassination, it's everything he said in just article form.
As for funding Lee Stranahan , formerly of Breitbart now with Sputnik, had a theory that Thiel is connected but it's one of his assicoates Jeff Giesea, the man responsible for the Deploraball, who's been the mainstream backer of what was then the alt right and now groypers. I wished I had the link still it was a longform interview for a different radio show he did, Stranahan explained how Giesea is oddly unknown for being a millionaire on the right. Giesea saw the alt right as a vehicle for memetic warfare but didn't like racist parts of it
In 2015 Giesea got a piece published in a journalist for fucking NATO about how he genuinely sees memes as a cybeweapon that should have been used to fight ISIS.
Stranahan did an interview with Richard Spencer, i believe it's deleted from yt since Spencer's channel got taken down, where Stranahan asks him if Giesea ever gave funding to NPI and Spencer said he donated a few thousand to them during 2015 2016. he's been open about heavily promoting the alt lite Posobiec, Cernovich Ali Alexander etc.
even from all the anti 'hate' left wing stalking sites the only prominent expose on him was this article by Buzzfeed during Deploraball which is fairly interesting honestly.

scottgreer.png



scotty.png


scotty.png
 
Nick has always loved to talk about how young he is. He still does it even though he's gonna be 22 this year. He's not really hip with the memes these days. Welcome to aging, big guy.

Nick definitely has a complex regarding aging. He was probably told by conservative adults when he was a cringe lolbertarian/neocon high school kid that he was the smartest young guy they've ever met.

I've never seen a neocon teenage boy that didn't adopt those beliefs because he needed validation from adults because no kids his age wanted to be friends with him.

AF has a very "Hello fellow kids" quality to it, despite Nick being a fellow kid. Reminds me of "Pokemon go to the polls!" sometimes. I've seen guys twice his age do memes more organically.


Who should you copy when it comes to fighting the culture war: Hanoi Jane and the cultural Marxist hegemony that went from counterculture to the mainstream in a generation, or Scott Greer, a shunned nobody who can't even hold a writing job under his real name? Greer is a loser, fucking Benny Johnson has more influence than he could ever dream of.
 
I'm 99% sure Greer is back to writing for white nat/dissent right whatever they call themselves sites (American Renaissance and Counter Currents) again under the name Robert Hampton.
View attachment 1239949
Unz Review a site of both 'fringe' left and right political articles reposted one of his articles and this is the only comment on. Looking at the archive for Hampton
https://www.counter-currents.com/author/rhampton/
it's the same exact writing style as Greer
this article in particular convinced me it's him, i remember Greer's tweets during the Soleimani assassination, it's everything he said in just article form.
As for funding Lee Stranahan , formerly of Breitbart now with Sputnik, had a theory that Thiel is connected but it's one of his assicoates Jeff Giesea, the man responsible for the Deploraball, who's been the mainstream backer of what was then the alt right and now groypers. I wished I had the link still it was a longform interview for a different radio show he did, Stranahan explained how Giesea is oddly unknown for being a millionaire on the right. Giesea saw the alt right as a vehicle for memetic warfare but didn't like racist parts of it
In 2015 Giesea got a piece published in a journalist for fucking NATO about how he genuinely sees memes as a cybeweapon that should have been used to fight ISIS.
Stranahan did an interview with Richard Spencer, i believe it's deleted from yt since Spencer's channel got taken down, where Stranahan asks him if Giesea ever gave funding to NPI and Spencer said he donated a few thousand to them during 2015 2016. he's been open about heavily promoting the alt lite Posobiec, Cernovich Ali Alexander etc.
even from all the anti 'hate' left wing stalking sites the only prominent expose on him was this article by Buzzfeed during Deploraball which is fairly interesting honestly.
This is an excellent post. I'm also fairly confident that Robert Hampton is Scott Greer. Hampton has so many articles that match up with what Greer's pet issues on Twitter are.

I forgot about Jeff Giesea. That theory sounds plausible. Giesea is a homosexual, like Thiel, Milo, and Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents.

All of Hampton's Counter-Currents articles are now archived on the Wayback Machine. If they're ever scrubbed from Johnson's site, these links will easily lead you to all the archives.

 
Ironically, people used to theorize Thiel was funding TRS in 2017-18, because they used to not be so explicitly homophobic and tolerate occasional fags like Greg Johnson, Ghoul and Dante in the movement (they've since become much more negative about that shit).

If Thiel is as woke as people say, he's the "No niggas in my gay bathhouse" Grindr Greg Johnson kind of FagNat. A racist libertarian basically. He's a freaky transhumanist atheist who'd want vat-grown aryan boy slaves in the ethnostate instead of some dead one of Trump's Chosen People on a stick's (((homophobia))). Up until recently, you'd think him and a supposed arch-homophobe like Nick would want nothing to do with each other.

But now Nick is hanging out with catbois and Milo, and saying ackshually we've gotta be nuanced and accept BASED homos in the big tent..really activates the almonds.

Honestly, I think it's because Nick Fuentes is so deep in the closet that he's found Narnia.

I know you dislike the trope of "traditionalist moral conservative turns out to be a closet queer" but with Nick Fuentes, it is all but officially confirmed as true at this point and any attempt he makes at denying it only lends more credence to it.

At the heart of it all, Nick Fuentes is an edgelord and a contrarian who likes to think of himself as being an iconoclast and a rebel, when really he's just a pathetic asshole who just enjoys pissing people off.

If he were born in 1988 instead of 1998, he would probably be a far-left SJW Antifa BreadTube troon, or at least a fedora-clad atheist skeptic.

I said this way earlier in the thread, but I think Nick is gayer than Liberace and the Folsom Street Fair combined but since being gay isn't really seen as taboo anymore and his parents are probably suburbanite yuppie liberals who would be fine with having a gay son, he rebels by going full edgelord and adapting some weird affectation of Traditional Catholicism that only seems to exist in Paradox Interactive games with some basic bitch /pol/ memes sprinkled on top of it.

His whole radical right-winger mindset is basically the same "Fuck You, Mom and Dad!" mentality that fuels most of the SJW's and fedora skeptics.

Nick Fuentes is to conservative Christianity what Bob Chipman is to liberal atheism
 
I'm lurking through the recent FTN podcast to see the local WigNat dunk on Greer for shits and giggles. James Allsup is just straight up mocking and shitting on Nick, which is a first because TRS has never explicitly gone after him in my time listening.

Looks like the autistic WigNat-AmNat drive-by shootings are escalating into a turf war.
 
I'm lurking through the recent FTN podcast to see the local WigNat dunk on Greer for shits and giggles. James Allsup is just straight up mocking and shitting on Nick, which is a first because TRS has never explicitly gone after him in my time listening.

Looks like the autistic WigNat-AmNat drive-by shootings are escalating into a turf war.
They fought in 2018 but TRS wasn't giving heavy hitting blows like they are now. They def must have decided after AmNats defended Weinstein that they're not on the same side. Just under an hour in, McFeels says "You know what's going to die with this virus, Nick? Your brand of shitty conservatism. Everyone is gonna remember that you doubled down on Donald." Lmao.

Nick will pretend he doesn't, but you know he's listening to FTN; especially now that Allsup is a co-host. His Type A personality wouldn't allow otherwise.

Edit: They really are going balls to the wall. I almost skipped through the VPN ad read, but didn't. I had to rewind it to make sure I heard Allsup correctly. There's like 5 or 6 references to AmNats in it. It's fucking hilarious.
 
Last edited:
Back