Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Kosher Salt]

By this comment you are saying that pregnancy is something that happens TO a woman, instead of her being a part of the process. That is a theory that goes back to Aristotle, that woman is the material on which a man acts. You have some kind of internalized misogyny that you see carrying a baby as something a man does to a woman.

I don't see pregnancy like that.

You:

Supports spousal rape
Says women are a voluntary participant in the process of carrying a baby

...pick one, slut.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Starting to think Melinda here didn't do well in school and just slept with her teachers for her grades to get into a university. There's no way someone this stupid could get into a university unless of course George Mason is no better than a diploma mill and don't care who they bring in as long as they get paid.

 

[Logical Fallacies]

I did not imply that, no.




You're taking my statement out of context. I never said that I enjoy other people getting raped. We were speaking of the context of spouses.




Many people's libido is lowered by pharma drugs, emotional disorders, bad diets, etc. Depression can lower it too.
But if you are physically, emotionally and mentally healthy, a higher libido is the byproduct of it. Calling women "nymphomaniacs" because they have higher libidos is just a by product of sexism, rooted in the idea that women should be sexually repressed. It's not true that only men want frequent sex. A lot of times women's ideas about their own gender represses their sexuality too. Women have not historically been encouraged to be enthusiastic about sex. They have historically been conditioned to believe that they exist for a man's pleasure only. If women start thinking more about their owns needs and wants when it comes to sex, their thinking changes.

I disagree about daily sex being odd. Almost daily sex is healthy. Sure, take a break if you are sick, sad, on the rag, whatever. But it's a good way to end the day. I never Googled this before, but just did now and well, I guess there are others that do the same...

https://www.prevention.com/sex/a20490439/how-to-prioritize-sex-in-marriage/

Is 'Sex Every Day' the key to a healthy marriage? This Apple Valley couple thinks so.

Caitlin and Michael Doemner recently wrote a book for couples on how to ‘prioritize pleasure.'

www.vvdailypress.com

It's really not unreasonable for people with many children. If you get your house in order and put your children to bed on time, there is plenty of adult time after they go to bed.

Yes, I've heard of condoms but they are expensive when you have nearly daily sex and they also decrease pleasure. I can see using it now and then but really, you are creating a crappy sex life using condoms all the time. That's not good for a marriage. It also takes away from spontaneity. Not trying to be TMI, but the reality is that sex is a gift from Elohim and it should be experienced properly in a marriage. It shouldn't be hindered to accommodate capitalism at the expense of the marriage.

I also read somewhere once that frequent sex is good for women too and lowers their risk of depression.

The point? You just can't avoid having lots of children without birth control, abortions or some dysfunction in a marital relationship.

Woman, you can fuck your husband ten times a day, nobody cares. But stop calling women who don't do that, repressed with internalized misogyny. You don't get to decide what other women should do or what they should like. Fuck off with that.

By this comment you are saying that pregnancy is something that happens TO a woman, instead of her being a part of the process. That is a theory that goes back to Aristotle, that woman is the material on which a man acts. You have some kind of internalized misogyny that you see carrying a baby as something a man does to a woman.

I don't see pregnancy like that.

Pretty sure women with adequate sex education don't think that. It's more often the guy who takes himself out of the process of pregnancy because it's not his body which grows the baby. Women can absolutely not take themselves out of the process of pregnancy.

Stop talking so baldly about other women, I told you that before. You feminism is a fucking sham because it only applies to yourself.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Starting to think Melinda here didn't do well in school and just slept with her teachers for her grades to get into a university. There's no way someone this stupid could get into a university unless of course George Mason is no better than a diploma mill and don't care who they bring in as long as they get paid.

Her professors must've had no standards for a fleshy fucksack then.

On an unrelated note, I'm starting to notice a pattern with what Melinda considers "evidence" or a source. It's 9/10 not scholarly, usually being either tabloid garbage, her butchered interpretations of the Torah, or one of her own studies, none of which really constitute as real evidence in an argument of objectivity.

Plus citing your own studies make you seem like a pseudointellectual loser ngl

 

[Tommy Wiseau Kin]

Starting to think Melinda here didn't do well in school and just slept with her teachers for her grades to get into a university. There's no way someone this stupid could get into a university unless of course George Mason is no better than a diploma mill and don't care who they bring in as long as they get paid.

It's probably just the latter.

George Mason University currently has an 81% acceptance rate, which means they take just about anybody who applies. The majority of those who get rejected either applied after the deadline or were missing requirements (for example, the school requires 2 years of a foreign language but the student went to a rural high school in South Carolina that only required 1 unit for graduation or the student didn't submit their SAT score).

At most, programs like nursing or engineering may have had some standards but her useless Parks, Recreation, and Leisure Studies degree? Not so much.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Her professors must've had no standards for a fleshy fucksack then.

Some men are just that desperate it seems (look at Marshall). Also, it is Virginia.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

TBH getting a degree isn't very impressive in and of itself. It just means you attended classes regularly and did the work. I mean, Chris-chan got a degree. What you do with the degree is much more important, and Melinda's done absolutely nothing with hers. She might as well have saved her tuition.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

That's a completely made up story. There is no way an infant would be allowed in a lab. It's a major liability and cross contamination issue. Also, it would be dangerous for the baby to be around lab equipment. I'm not buying it.

Also, I know you are lying because ecological breastfeeding is about nursing on demand. There is absolutely no way you can nurse on demand while in the middle of wearing a suit geared for a lab.
Your story is full of shit, not buying it.

And yes, if you have sex on an almost daily basis with your husband (which is a healthy frequency), there is NO WAY you are not getting pregnant without popping pills or other forms of birth control like sponges, or whatever evil shit they make out there. You think out of 365 days a healthy sexually active married couple (having sex at least 5 times a week/1 to 2 times a day/that's several hundred times a year) is going to use the pull out method every time? I don't know what kind of men you have been with but Marshall ain't that kind of guy, thank goodness. I'm not going to have a crappy sex life by using the pull out method with Marshall. The sex would suck if he kept pulling out in the moment. Especially when you are really fucking hard. Pa-lease, get a life. AND IF THAT'S TMI FOR YOU, OH WELL, its contextually relevant.




We have a healthy sex life, and that helps keep our marriage together. Truth be told, men need frequent sex. Truth be told, so do women.



Dude, I'm living off of 4 to 5 hours sleep a day for about 3 weeks now and living off of energy drinks and chocolate trying to keep my children well fed, as usual. My REM cycles are fucked up. If I make a typo oh well. I feel like a zombie some days and I can barely even read sleep deprived like this.




My children are on average 2.5 years apart, due to ecological breastfeeding. The last 2 weaned faster than the older ones, for whatever reason and are closer. It's dangerous for a woman to birth any closer than 2 year intervals too often.



Well, you didn't even give me time to answer before answering for me.

"To answer someone before hearing him out is both stupid and embarrassing." (Prov. 18:3)




Well, I've had a crazy life. Of course I'm a little wierd! But "normal" is way over rated.
Anyways, that's why Marshall loves me. I'm not boring LOL




Unless you have a rape fetish haha





Yes, I think that verbal abuse is just as bad as hitting someone physically repeatedly, if not worse actually. A physical bruise can heal. A verbal wound injures the soul, sometimes very deeply. I think it is harder to heal the soul than to heal the body, IMHO. Also, verbal abuse leads to emotional disorders and mental issues (if you don't cut the person off or are trapped in the situation, like with a boss or parent or whatever) which can take years to correct.

It makes me happy to see you've conceded my points.

1. You have been unable to prove Kant approves of rape (and his words themselves disprove your argument). This one is particularly hilarious because you have been putting words in his mouth when you obviously never even read his fucking book. This is textbook Dunning-Kreuger in action. You don't really know anything about Kantian philosophy or Theoretical Ethics on general.

2. You have been totally and completely incapable of providing me evidence of Hebrew being the original language of man beyond a quote from Genesis that doesn't specify a language. Moreover, the oldest Torah ever discovered is written in Biblical Hebrew and annotated in fucking Aramaic, which itself came after Akkadian!

You're a joke, and a fake intellectual. I find it amusing that once you're confronted with actual facts from someone who is obviously far more educated than you are (not to break my wrist jerking myself off), you drop the argument immediately. You have no idea what I'm talking about, I'm probably talking so far above your head that I might as well be in heaven.

Basically what I'm saying is: Get educated, honey.

 

[Captain Communism]

I'M A PROSTITUTE!

We get it Deviantart Fetishist, now stop yelling or I'll get your mom to ground you in heaven.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

It makes me happy to see you've conceded my points.

1. You have been unable to prove Kant approves of rape (and his words themselves disprove your argument). This one is particularly hilarious because you have been putting words in his mouth when you obviously never even read his fucking book. This is textbook Dunning-Kreuger in action. You don't really know anything about Kantian philosophy or Theoretical Ethics on general.

2. You have been totally and completely incapable of providing me evidence of Hebrew being the original language of man beyond a quote from Genesis that doesn't specify a language. Moreover, the oldest Torah ever discovered is written in Biblical Hebrew and annotated in fucking Aramaic, which itself came after Akkadian!

You're a joke, and a fake intellectual. I find it amusing that once you're confronted with actual facts from someone who is obviously far more educated than you are (not to break my wrist jerking myself off), you drop the argument immediately. You have no idea what I'm talking about, I'm probably talking so far above your head that I might as well be in heaven.

Basically what I'm saying is: Get educated, honey.

Would've been better if you signed off with a classic Melinda saying tbh: like the good ol "GET SOME EDUCATION, DUDE."

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Would've been better if you signed off with a classic Melinda saying tbh: like the good ol "GET SOME EDUCATION, DUDE."

I was originally going to say that but I physically cringed at the idea of posting something that fucking boomertastic.

It's pretty fucking obvious that the people in her daily life don't check her on her bullshit. I happen to have legitimate interest and education in the fields she runs her mouth about so I'll fucking do it. That's the problem with people talking about obscure shit: people around them rarely know enough to tell them they're full of shit.

So while she can say shit like "THE TORAH INVENTED THE CONCEPT OF EVIL" and "HEBREW IS THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE OF MAN" to people in her day to day, and then bully them when they point out that neither of those sound quite right but can't put their finger on why, I can point to specific points in her arguments and deconstruct them as a whole.

I just cannot explain to you how fucking wrong she is. Obviously you've probably read my previous posts but like, she's so wrong it hurts
I've taken the stuff that she's posted here and I've posted it to a message group for people in my master's program and now she's a meme there. The academic community she lauds thinks she's a fucking dipshit. She is literally a laughing stock for the professors and graduate students she sucks off so hard.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

I was originally going to say that but I physically cringed at the idea of posting something that fucking boomertastic.

It's pretty fucking obvious that the people in her daily life don't check her on her bullshit. I happen to have legitimate interest and education in the fields she runs her mouth about so I'll fucking do it. That's the problem with people talking about obscure shit: people around them rarely know enough to tell them they're full of shit.

So while she can say shit like "THE TORAH INVENTED THE CONCEPT OF EVIL" and "HEBREW IS THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE OF MAN" to people in her day to day, and then bully them when they point out that neither of those sound quite right but can't put their finger on why, I can point to specific points in her arguments and deconstruct them as a whole.

I just cannot explain to you how fucking wrong she is. Obviously you've probably read my previous posts but like, she's so wrong it hurts
I've taken the stuff that she's posted here and I've posted it to a message group for people in my master's program and now she's a meme there. The academic community she lauds thinks she's a fucking dipshit. She is literally a laughing stock for the professors and graduate students she sucks off so hard.

With how much she seems to preach and obsess religion so much, why didn't she take theology instead? Unlike parks & rec, it's a degree that you can kinda use outside of the real world, and given her interest in talking and debating about religion, albeit more specifically her sect of Judaism, wouldn't some sort of real education on theology and the workings of religion be better for her?

I know we all know this already, but her degree was a fucking waste and a drain of financial assistance, because with parks and rec, you're not really learning flexible skills outside how to write professional documents and have good revision skills, neither of which Melinda clearly has retained, and maybe some basic science and math.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

With how much she seems to preach and obsess religion so much, why didn't she take theology instead? Unlike parks & rec, it's a degree that you can kinda use outside of the real world, and given her interest in talking and debating about religion, albeit more specifically her sect of Judaism, wouldn't some sort of real education on theology and the workings of religion be better for her?

I know we all know this already, but her degree was a fucking waste and a drain of financial assistance, because with parks and rec, you're not really learning flexible skills outside how to write professional documents and have good revision skills, neither of which Melinda clearly has retained, and maybe some basic science and math.

Theology programs have specific purposes. The overwhelming majority of Jewish theological programs teach Rabbinical Judaism, which she vehemently hates and refers to as a heresy, and she isn't nearly stable enough to sit through courses for a degree program that she disagrees with. She'd get booted for shrieking about how what they're teaching is fucking heretical. Not only would she get booted, she'd get embarrassed by actual Jewish scholars that explain to her, point by point, why she is wrong.

Also generally speaking if you want to be taken seriously in a Jewish theological program you have to learn Hebrew fluently, similar to how Catholic priests that attend real deal seminary are expected to learn Latin, and that's difficult. In fact theology degrees in general are pretty difficult to obtain. They require real work beyond sitting in a fucking building until you pass go and collect your degree. This is why she claims she writes all of these very serious and well informed articles and never provides them and they never show up anywhere. Writing serious shit is hard as fuck. I'm maybe halfway through my thesis and it's sitting at 90 pages, and after I get it done I have to defend it to a panel of people that are more well informed than me on my own subject. It's fucking HARD. Being an actual academic in a field like theology or history or ethics or etymology is difficult as fuck because everyone has the same passion and drive that you do and they read similar materials, often the same materials, and they love to debate shit. So unless you can make your arguments as close to bulletproof as possible you're going to get ripped apart. This is why she won't pursue any real degrees in the fields she's so passionate about, because she's afraid of looking like a fucking idiot. She hides behind the veneer of "well that's just the corrupt system of academia/the patriarchy/rabbinical judaism trying to keep me out" but really she is terrified that her entire belief structure will get fucking gigarekt if she has to stand in front of a panel of 50, 60, and 70-somethings that have done nothing but study her exact field for the last several decades and defend her assertions.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You:

Supports spousal rape
Says women are a voluntary participant in the process of carrying a baby

...pick one, slut.

That's not a contradiction, dummy. Look at the key word there: SPOUSAL (IE SPOUSE). IF a woman chooses to marry a man, his sperm is part of her CHOICE.

Who the hell marries a man and then looks at his sperm like a foreign invader? The fuck?

It makes me happy to see you've conceded my points.

1. You have been unable to prove Kant approves of rape (and his words themselves disprove your argument). This one is particularly hilarious because you have been putting words in his mouth when you obviously never even read his fucking book. This is textbook Dunning-Kreuger in action. You don't really know anything about Kantian philosophy or Theoretical Ethics on general.

2. You have been totally and completely incapable of providing me evidence of Hebrew being the original language of man beyond a quote from Genesis that doesn't specify a language. Moreover, the oldest Torah ever discovered is written in Biblical Hebrew and annotated in fucking Aramaic, which itself came after Akkadian!

You're a joke, and a fake intellectual. I find it amusing that once you're confronted with actual facts from someone who is obviously far more educated than you are (not to break my wrist jerking myself off), you drop the argument immediately. You have no idea what I'm talking about, I'm probably talking so far above your head that I might as well be in heaven.

Basically what I'm saying is: Get educated, honey.

Quit trying to mimic my speech, it makes you look like a poser and a loser

1. Inaccurate. That's just a bunch of mumbo jumbo words thrown around. A bunch of hot air with no point.

2. Inaccurate. Genesis records the first of human history. It all stared with Hebrew.

You haven't presented a single fact. Just scholastic OPINION. Go learn the difference between fact and opinion, you are way off.

Theology programs have specific purposes. The overwhelming majority of Trump's Chosen theological programs teach Rabbinical Judaism, which she vehemently hates and refers to as a heresy, and she isn't nearly stable enough to sit through courses for a degree program that she disagrees with. She'd get booted for shrieking about how what they're teaching is fucking heretical. Not only would she get booted, she'd get embarrassed by actual Trump's Chosen scholars that explain to her, point by point, why she is wrong.

Also generally speaking if you want to be taken seriously in a Trump's Chosen theological program you have to learn Hebrew fluently, similar to how Catholic priests that attend real deal seminary are expected to learn Latin, and that's difficult. In fact theology degrees in general are pretty difficult to obtain. They require real work beyond sitting in a fucking building until you pass go and collect your degree. This is why she claims she writes all of these very serious and well informed articles and never provides them and they never show up anywhere. Writing serious shit is hard as fuck. I'm maybe halfway through my thesis and it's sitting at 90 pages, and after I get it done I have to defend it to a panel of people that are more well informed than me on my own subject. It's fucking HARD. Being an actual academic in a field like theology or history or ethics or etymology is difficult as fuck because everyone has the same passion and drive that you do and they read similar materials, often the same materials, and they love to debate shit. So unless you can make your arguments as close to bulletproof as possible you're going to get ripped apart. This is why she won't pursue any real degrees in the fields she's so passionate about, because she's afraid of looking like a fucking idiot. She hides behind the veneer of "well that's just the corrupt system of academia/the patriarchy/rabbinical judaism trying to keep me out" but really she is terrified that her entire belief structure will get fucking gigarekt if she has to stand in front of a panel of 50, 60, and 70-somethings that have done nothing but study her exact field for the last several decades and defend her assertions.

I highly doubt someone who talks as you do-- so evident in your writing -- has any academic credentials at all. You writing clearly shows you are nothing more than a sexist who wants to defend your sexist religious viewpoints.

How dare a woman challenge your sexist religion, eh? You're a baboon who thumps his chest when a woman challenges your sexist patriarchal religious beliefs. Instead of actually being able to refute anything with facts, you just wail like a tarzan on a rope. I'm not intimidated in the least bit by your writing tantrums.

Your writing is a fairytale story in your head that you recite in order to protect your male anxiety and male ego over your patriarchal worldview being challenged. You show that you aren't educated in the least bit because you respond to a challenge to your worldview with insane babbling, not a dignified, educated response.

I was originally going to say that but I physically cringed at the idea of posting something that fucking boomertastic.

It's pretty fucking obvious that the people in her daily life don't check her on her bullshit. I happen to have legitimate interest and education in the fields she runs her mouth about so I'll fucking do it. That's the problem with people talking about obscure shit: people around them rarely know enough to tell them they're full of shit.

So while she can say shit like "THE TORAH INVENTED THE CONCEPT OF EVIL" and "HEBREW IS THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE OF MAN" to people in her day to day, and then bully them when they point out that neither of those sound quite right but can't put their finger on why, I can point to specific points in her arguments and deconstruct them as a whole.

I just cannot explain to you how fucking wrong she is. Obviously you've probably read my previous posts but like, she's so wrong it hurts
I've taken the stuff that she's posted here and I've posted it to a message group for people in my master's program and now she's a meme there. The academic community she lauds thinks she's a fucking dipshit. She is literally a laughing stock for the professors and graduate students she sucks off so hard.

A bunch of parrots in a seminary? I obviously never LAUDED any of those people. Go back about 20 pages, idiot. You seminary parrots are a bunch of fools.

 

[redcent]

That's not a contradiction, dummy. Look at the key word there: SPOUSAL (IE SPOUSE). IF a woman chooses to marry a man, his sperm is part of her CHOICE.

Who the hell marries a man and then looks at his sperm like a foreign invader? The fuck?

everyone but you.

Quit beating around the bush, Ruth. You get off to seeing women get raped. Or men get raped, either way, you're a sick fuck.

Anyone else who saw a spousal rape would either be sickened, outraged, or head for the cops then worry about the poor victim. But not you; you only think of yourself. It's all you you you what you feel never what other people have gone through.

Nobody who looks at a person eating a banana thinks "gee, they chose to eat a banana once, I guess it's okay to tie them up and force feed them a banana while sticking a knife in their neck.

Nobody who looks at someone who says they love cola thinks" gee, they like cola they shouldn't protest then if I shoved a cola bottle from the gutter in their arse as they slept"

Nobody who thinks of rape thinks to lovey doveey times with someone they trust, they think of someone who turned around, dropped the mask and broke their trust and was as violent as fuck

Nobody but you ruth because you are sick

Edit:also I don't think you answered me when I asked you ruth: what would you do if marshal changed his mind on the torah? If he denounced it, turned around and called it nonsense. Spat on your beliefs then demanded you fuck him, would you still be up for it, you'd still be married after all. And spousal rape is A OK according to you

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

It's probably just the latter.

George Mason University currently has an 81% acceptance rate, which means they take just about anybody who applies. The majority of those who get rejected either applied after the deadline or were missing requirements (for example, the school requires 2 years of a foreign language but the student went to a rural high school in South Carolina that only required 1 unit for graduation or the student didn't submit their SAT score).

At most, programs like nursing or engineering may have had some standards but her useless Parks, Recreation, and Leisure Studies degree? Not so much.

Another little fairytale. Whats the matter? You're just another person in the world who has to take digs at educated people because you can't achieve what they did?? Pa-lease. Im not intimidated in the least bit by your whining and crying over what you don't have. I've heard this kind of bullshit for years from people who...DON'T...have...a...degree. You all are the same. Funny how it's always the people who DON'T have a college degree who are the first to try to belittle it. OH GEE, the MOTIVE THERE ISN'T OBVIOUS ::sarcastic bitch voice::

You don't even know how to read statistics, do you? George Mason University may have a 81% acceptance rate these days (it was 67% when I attended), but WHERE ARE THOSE STUDENTS COMING FROM?, dummy. From Northern Virginia, one of the most educated regions in the nation. Taking 81% of the most educated high schoolers in the nation is taking the cream of the crop and a smart choice for GMU. GMU is an incredible university full of diversity, rigorous training and down to earth people. You get a lot of education at a great price.

Not to mention, I was admitted into the Honors Program. Much harder to get into and for people with a higher GPA than the average.

Want some cheese with that whining of yours?

TBH getting a degree isn't very impressive in and of itself. It just means you attended classes regularly and did the work. I mean, Chris-chan got a degree. What you do with the degree is much more important, and Melinda's done absolutely nothing with hers. She might as well have saved her tuition.

Proof that I've "done nothing" with it?

And btw....how do you know I wasn't given scholarships to attend?

Woman, you can fuck your husband ten times a day, nobody cares. But stop calling women who don't do that, repressed with internalized misogyny. You don't get to decide what other women should do or what they should like. Fuck off with that.



Pretty sure women with adequate sex education don't think that. It's more often the guy who takes himself out of the process of pregnancy because it's not his body which grows the baby. Women can absolutely not take themselves out of the process of pregnancy.

Stop talking so baldly about other women, I told you that before. You feminism is a fucking sham because it only applies to yourself.

...but you're trying to tell me what to do?

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

How dare a woman challenge your sexist religion, eh? You're a baboon who thumps his chest when a woman challenges your sexist patriarchal religious beliefs. Instead of actually being able to refute anything with facts, you just wail like a tarzan on a rope. I'm not intimidated in the least bit by your writing tantrums.

Congrats on perfectly describing Marshall lmao, fucking re.tard

The rest of this is gibberish, I'm not wasting more than a few brain cells responding, because trying to form some kind of intellectual debate with you is like removing spinal discs so you can bite your own balls and cum in your eyes. It's unproductive, you earn nothing from it, and in the end, you've basically blinded yourself temporarily in idiocy.
It's obvious you don't understand irony, satire, or humor to begin with, or at least you ditch the ideas entirely when it's targeting you because you're an insecure pussy. You'll never understand that this is all your fault, and that you've ruined your reputation as a human being to begin with. Good luck finding another publisher if your books ever end up existing, because with information like this out there about you, you ain't gonna get signed again. It's a shock you got anywhere at all.

Go back about 20 pages, idiot.

So when we tell you to go pack in the thread for evidence, it's illegitimate, but telling us to go back to see your bile is suddenly actual proof.
Aight.

And btw....how do you know I wasn't given scholarships to attend?

If you were given scholarships, you've basically wasted money given to you to further your education. You know, cuz you didn't. You wasted a couple hundred thousand on a degree you've never used, aren't using, and never will use and flaunting it like it's an achievement.

Most of us, including me, can flex our degrees because we're putting that info to use. What have you done? Name me 3 things with real world use that apply the knowledge of a Parks & Rec degree specifically, not just some of the general knowledge you learn with other branches of a law or just going to uni in general.

Not to mention, I was admitted into the Honors Program. Much harder to get into and for people with a higher GPA than the average.

Don't pull a Chris-Chan on us. Prove it. Saying you were in the honor's program is meaningless.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

everyone but you.

Quit beating around the bush, Ruth. You get off to seeing women get raped. Or men get raped, either way, you're a sick fuck.

Anyone else who saw a spousal rape would either be sickened, outraged, or head for the cops then worry about the poor victim. But not you; you only think of yourself. It's all you you you what you feel never what other people have gone through.

Nobody who looks at a person eating a banana thinks "gee, they chose to eat a banana once, I guess it's okay to tie them up and force feed them a banana while sticking a knife in their neck.

Nobody who looks at someone who says they love cola thinks" gee, they like cola they shouldn't protest then if I shoved a cola bottle from the gutter in their arse as they slept"

Nobody who thinks of rape thinks to love doveey times with someone they trust, they think of someone who turned around, dropped the mask and broke their trust.

Nobody but you ruth because you are sick

I never said I was a sadist who enjoyed seeing anyone injured in their marriage. Completely a misquote of ANYTHING I have said.

What I said was: spousal rape cannot be proven to be a sin

I also clearly said that striking/battering someone during the act of rape is different than the act of rape itself, and can be proven a sin.

You are kirking out, but seriously, instead of getting emotional about it, provide a outline proving your moral theory that spousal rape is a sin.

Congrats on perfectly describing Marshall lmao, fucking re.tard

The rest of this is gibberish, I'm not wasting more than a few brain cells responding, because trying to form some kind of intellectual debate with you is like removing spinal discs so you can bite your own balls and cum in your eyes. It's unproductive, you earn nothing from it, and in the end, you've basically blinded yourself temporarily in idiocy.
It's obvious you don't understand irony, satire, or humor to begin with, or at least you ditch the ideas entirely when it's targeting you because you're an insecure pussy. You'll never understand that this is all your fault, and that you've ruined your reputation as a human being to begin with. Good luck finding another publisher if your books ever end up existing, because with information like this out there about you, you ain't gonna get signed again. It's a shock you got anywhere at all.

Oh, and if you were given scholarships, you've basically wasted money given to you to further your education. You know, cuz you didn't.

" Not to mention, I was admitted into the Honors Program. Much harder to get into and for people with a higher GPA than the average. "

Don't pull a Chris-Chan on us. Prove it. Saying you were in the honor's program is meaningless.

That doesn't describe Marshall at all.

A bunch of fairytales in your head. Why do you even keep responding? you sound like you take drugs of some kind. You are long winded and just throw words around in a disordered manner.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

That doesn't describe Marshall at all.

A bunch of fairytales in your head. Why do you even keep responding? you sound like you take drugs of some kind. You are long winded and just throw words around in a disordered manner.

Do you not see the irony here?

What I said was: spousal rape cannot be proven to be a sin

Does it not come to your mind that sins aren't the end-all for right and wrong, you absolute fucking brain dead cultist?

 

[redcent]

I never said I was a sadist who enjoyed seeing anyone injured in their marriage

no, instead you feel nothing, which is equally as bad.

If you weren't a sadist or a sociopath why are you not horrified or sickened by the idea of spousal rape? Don't you get it, you're missing out on human emotions here

What I said was: spousal rape cannot be proven to be a sin

you said you were a rape fetishist. Do you even know what that means, what that implies, or are you just that fucking stupid.

I also clearly said that striking/battering someone during the act of rape is different than the act of rape itself, and can be proven a sin.

rape is damage you stupid bint. You never had any damage from fucking cause you gush all the time and constantly spend every day fucking like a nymph. Maybe if you were dry for a change you'd understand that shit can hurt.

You are kirking out, but seriously, instead of getting emotional about it, provide a outline proving your moral theory that spousal rape is a sin.

how about proving you can show some common human decency admit you are stupid and spousal rape is horrifying...


... No?


I rest my case