Snowflake Chloe Wilkinson / DissociaDID and Nanette Zuniga / Nan / TeamPinata

[snowflakesystem]

What's our time predictions on when Chloe finally makes a video about this?

 

[comrade666]

What's our time predictions on when Chloe finally makes a video about this?

At this stage, it would be purely speculation. Chloe has never faced a large scandal of this scale so we have no past behaviour to use as a frame of reference. She had a minor scandal with race warriors after she claimed she was Native American and various Asian ethnicities but that barely registered with her fans and was only acknowledged on her Tumblr which was never particularly popular and is now defunct.

I'd estimate we'll hear from her in a week or two as she faced criticism for 'bouncing back' too early when she suggested she might host a livestream shortly after her 'suicide attempt' post Trisha drama. This time she's aiming for authenticity by taking a longer break and I'd be willing to bet she is currently planning her next move. She has glossed over 'drama' in the past but I think this is too significant to go unacknowledged. Either she'll return with a please respect my privacy I want to get back to regular posting video, or she'll go for the big sigh... this is the third time I've tried to film this video and it's never something I thought I'd have to post... angle where she addresses everything and uses the influencer guidebook to hit every trope.

Personally, I'm hoping for the latter, and I feel she's enough of a narcissist to take that route. She may well see this as her biggest performance yet. I find it interesting that she deleted her video on Instagram addressing the drama as she loves to perform. It was an impulsive video and her acting was poor - the fake crying at the end was particularly unconvincing - so that may be why. I think she'll be carefully plotting out her next video and that won't drop until she's satisfied.

 

[Shriek the Ogre]

Finally finished the whole thread, and first off, my god, that pic of her uncle ~15 pages back made me think twice about her not having any childhood trauma.... I think I got some trauma from that pic

I don't think I've seen anyone suggest this yet (could be wrong)... Do you guys think it's possible she never showed her littles until more recently because she got some confidence after practicing "being small" with Nan? Wasn't the first time we really saw a 'little' in the Disney Vlogs?

Spoiler: Speculation

She could have initially wanted to include littles in her system because every system seems to have them--and not to go into the "DID real or fake" debate, but the science that says it is real also seems to suggest that childlike states/fragments are possible and maybe even common (again if I'm understanding right)--but then, once she found herself in deeper, possibly faced with the idea of being "little" on camera, she needed a reason not to have to ever do it (because she was uncomfortable with it, lacking confidence, etc, could be a number of reasons). But then, she found herself having had some practice with it with Nan, and found herself a bit more comfortable with the idea. And, if the Anthony Padilla story she said is true, about him saying it would be raw or brave or whatever to include it, I'm sure that the narcissist in her would want that side to show.
(I was 100% thinking she'd go with the story of, "I talked to the little and they were so brave and wanted to tell their story to the world uwu so we let Anthony leave it in")

ETA
Correction:

I believe they first appear in the 'switching 9 times?!' unboxing video. I think that was shortly before Nan though I'm not 100% - I'll have to check the date that was posted. There are social media posts referring to the littles in 2017 shortly after her 'diagnosis' and well before she started her YouTube channel. She was also known to roll out the littles with her previous partner, Jamie.

And even though she showed them a bit before, I can still see Nan escalating Chloe's degeneracy, and increasing her willingness or ability to perform as a little. Plus:

seeing the reaction she gets from revealing 'rare' glimpses of the littles, she now knows that it draws big numbers and is torn.

She likes views and money

 

[comrade666]

Finally finished the whole thread, and first off, my god, that pic of her uncle ~15 pages back made me think twice about her not having any childhood trauma.... I think I got some trauma from that pic

I don't think I've seen anyone suggest this yet (could be wrong)... Do you guys think it's possible she never showed her littles until more recently because she got some confidence after practicing "being small" with Nan? Wasn't the first time we really saw a 'little' in the Disney Vlogs?

Spoiler: Speculation

She could have initially wanted to include littles in her system because every system seems to have them--and not to go into the "DID real or fake" debate, but the science that says it is real also seems to suggest that childlike states/fragments are possible and maybe even common (again if I'm understanding right)--but then, once she found herself in deeper, possibly faced with the idea of being "little" on camera, she needed a reason not to have to ever do it (because she was uncomfortable with it, lacking confidence, etc, could be a number of reasons). But then, she found herself having had some practice with it with Nan, and found herself a bit more comfortable with the idea. And, if the Anthony Padilla story she said is true, about him saying it would be raw or brave or whatever to include it, I'm sure that the narcissist in her would want that side to show.
(I was 100% thinking she'd go with the story of, "I talked to the little and they were so brave and wanted to tell their story to the world uwu so we let Anthony leave it in")

Her Uncle is quite the specimen - apologies for scarring you with that.

As for the littles, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe they first appear in the 'switching 9 times?!' unboxing video. I think that was shortly before Nan though I'm not 100% - I'll have to check the date that was posted. There are social media posts referring to the littles in 2017 shortly after her 'diagnosis' and well before she started her YouTube channel. She was also known to roll out the littles with her previous partner, Jamie.

Incidentally, Jamie referred to himself as 'Daddy' frequently in the chat logs I've been given from a verified source. He was involved with the littles as we know he bought them a poster though I can't confirm that he referred to himself as 'Daddy' in that context. Nan did refer to herself as 'Daddy' in relation to the littles.

Honestly? I think Chloe has a thing for DDLG and she would rather not roll that out on camera. But, seeing the reaction she gets from revealing 'rare' glimpses of the littles, she now knows that it draws big numbers and is torn.

 

[Shriek the Ogre]

Incidentally, Jamie referred to himself as 'Daddy' frequently in the chat logs I've been given from a verified source. He was involved with the littles as we know he bought them a poster though I can't confirm that he referred to himself as 'Daddy' in that context. Nan did refer to herself as 'Daddy' in relation to the littles.

Honestly? I think Chloe has a thing for DDLG and she would rather not roll that out on camera. But, seeing the reaction she gets from revealing 'rare' glimpses of the littles, she now knows that it draws big numbers and is torn.

So (to speculate again), if Chloe is very easily influenced and has convinced herself she has DID, could she have mistaken her DDLG kink for child alters? That's a really fucked up way to dress up your attraction to a father/daughter relationship dynamic... Speculating on the more manipulative side of things, she seems to fit into the previously identified theme of creeps infiltrating these supposed 'mental illness safe spaces' to live out pedo/DDLG fantasies

 

[comrade666]

So (to speculate again), if Chloe is very easily influenced and has convinced herself she has DID, could she have mistaken her DDLG kink for child alters? That's a really fucked up way to dress up your attraction to a father/daughter relationship dynamic... Speculating on the more manipulative side of things, she seems to fit into the previously identified theme of creeps infiltrating these supposed 'mental illness safe spaces' to live out pedo/DDLG fantasies

I don't subscribe to the belief that Chloe is delusional. I believe she is completely aware of her own actions and the deception of her audience is a conscious choice. Some here believe she is delusional and truly believes that she has DID, so you aren't alone in that camp, but I personally don't buy it. Her behaviour is far too calculated for that in my opinion.

I personally believe that her motivation for joining the mental health community was primarily monetary. I believe she was further motivated by attention and seeking a platform on which to perform to satiate her narcissism - purely speculative and based upon her inconsistent story and my observations of her behaviour. I truly don't see any evidence to suggest she was initially motivated by kink - she kept her sexual interests on her personal social media. That is where she posted about being a sugar baby and a dominatrix. That never leaked over into her influencer content, at least not until Nan was in the picture. Then she alluded to being involved in D/s dynamics on Tik Tok and admitted that she was in a kink scenario with 'Riven'.

I believe the influence of Nan permitted Chloe to be more open about her sexuality on her influencer profiles but I don't believe that was the motivation for her joining the community.

 

[Gramh]

From her timeline and current actions it's hard to see Chloe as delusionally believing she has DID. She was always attempting to stand out, and latching on to the newest underground trend of the resurgence of DID/MPD fulfills that, and seeing as how successful Multiplicity was and considering her want to not to seek gainful employment gave a clearer avenue for where to go to get everything she wanted without having to strain herself. Also by saying she's calculating doesn't in any way imply she's extremely competent, just that she's trying to maneuver in the way she thinks will see the most benefit.

 

[Shriek the Ogre]

I believe the influence of Nan permitted Chloe to be more open about her sexuality on her influencer profiles but I don't believe that was the motivation for her joining the community.

I had the same thought about Nan's influence. I mean, how could you not be affected by (and I still can't get over this) a sneeze fetish child porn artist being your partner for two whole years. Set aside the argument of whether she knew at all or to what extent. Nan is a degenerate. It would be fair for people to be wondering about her influence on Chloe even if there weren't all of this evidence of DDLG and s/d popping up after Nan.... It makes me torn between, I hope Nan never touches a computer again (for others' sake as much as her own), and I hope to god she rage posts a bunch of shit against Chloe.

As far as whether she's delusional or just manipulative... Why not both? Go big or go home

 

[A Strange Like You]

Not laying so low anymore I guess

 

[Niggard]

It's possible that "therapy" at the Pottergate centre may actually have induced some form of iatrogenic DID or at least made her deluded about her disorder. I don't know.

 

[SufyanRawlings]

Not laying so low anymore I guess

View attachment 1244872

Yet the SaniTEA Podcast as of right how still has vids of them together, anyone looking to back these vids up incase she purges them just like she has with anything Nan related in them? There is 10 videos total on this channel.

 

[cantcontainmyself]

Not laying so low anymore I guess

View attachment 1244872

This doesn't exactly read as a definitive breakup to me. The way she has written it makes it seem like there is still some kind of relationship happening privately that they are just not going to make public anymore.

 

[tinybip]

on a break she says... archive here

Edit: Worked out how to change size of image

 

[cyberphobe]

Here are two videos Chloe recently deleted - more to follow.

View attachment 1244279
















CHILD & NON-HUMAN DYSPHORIA! Dysphoric Alters! - Dissociative Identity Disorder
View attachment 1244169
















WE BECOME LITTLES | Age Sliding! - Dissociative Identity Disorder

anyone else notice how in the second video, Chloe begins to say how age-sliding and switching is hard to tell the difference, then later in the video when Bobo&Co says it's different because age-sliding happens suddenly while switching comes with voices and dissociating, Chloe agrees and bounces off that point??? Why is there inconsistencies in the so called "educational" channel? Oh wait. Nevermind. It's cause it's not educational. It's someone lying for views.

 

[Twinkie]

When I search this thread for the keyword "pornography" my own post is the first result so I feel I should clarify what I said. I did go back and add this same note to my original post but I'm saying it now as well, for anyone who's reading through the thread and are already past that point:

GL have deleted his videos and said he's done.

He was getting shredded in the comments of his last video by people defending child pornography. Like I'd be done too

Evidently this post is confusing some people. The youtube channel in question is now deleted (as is Nan’s instagram; her page is not available as of this writing) so I can’t link you anything, or show you a screenshot of the comments, but on both platforms Nan’s retarded insane fans were defending her by saying “there is literally nothing wrong with child pornography.”

That is what I’m referring to with this comment. I’m not saying Nan created or distributed child pornography. I was just relaying what her fans were saying verbatim. Stop coming into this thread looking for CP or trying to debate whether or not what she did was CP you fucking weirdos.

 

[Bananasaurus]

What's our time predictions on when Chloe finally makes a video about this?

I don't really think she has to. She's still recovering from a s*u*i*c*i*d*e attempt and has distanced herself from a person who was outed as a nonce and shunned publically. Everyone is sympathetic towards her and all the Nan bashing is the perfect distraction from her KF thread.
All she really has to do is say uwu please respect my privacy in the next video and it will be business as usual.

I'm sure she'll come back stronger than ever with a new alter or two. After all, she named herself Nin after her pedo girlfriend and that's no bueno, she needs to get rid of that persona ASAP. And more suicide equals more trauma equals more alters. Maybe we'll get another ghost or a friendly skeleton that loves bad puns and drinking ketchup?

 

[pull over dat ass too fat]

I'm new to this shitshow & can't be arsed to read all 171 pages, but some thoughts:
- Nan's brother claimed he and Nan didn't get along much when they were kids until he got appendicitis, and then they "became super close" which is a bit fucking disturbing
- I'm surprised the DID community is cool with "Nadia," based on the depictions seeeems problemaaaatic
- On a genuinely solemn note, I really hope Nan doesn't get kids and become one of those munchy moms

thank you for anyone who archived video.

 

[Gramh]

I got bored with no new information coming out and started looking through Chloe's Youtube replies and instantly wish I hadn't. The amount of people that commented roughly "I was diagnosed with something else, but after watching your videos I finally managed to convince my therapist I have DID!" makes me feel A-loggy. The amount of likes those replies got made me close Youtube and want to end my bout with sobriety. That personality cult mentality is cranked up to 11 around Chloe.

 

[Carlos the Scientist]

I'd estimate we'll hear from her in a week or two as she faced criticism for 'bouncing back' too early when she suggested she might host a livestream shortly after her 'suicide attempt' post Trisha drama. This time she's aiming for authenticity by taking a longer break and I'd be willing to bet she is currently planning her next move. She has glossed over 'drama' in the past but I think this is too significant to go unacknowledged. Either she'll return with a please respect my privacy I want to get back to regular posting video, or she'll go for the big sigh... this is the third time I've tried to film this video and it's never something I thought I'd have to post... angle where she addresses everything and uses the influencer guidebook to hit every trope.

I'm wondering if she'll upload some '''prefilmed''' videos to keep her fans watching and speculating. When Chloe 'integrated' with Nina, there were two weeks' worth of prefilmed videos (the second one was the 'clothes are not consent' video, for a timescale) before she actually talked about the integration. There was lots of speculation in the comments, and it probably kept her views up for a couple of weeks while she was working out how to act best. Maybe the same will happen here, her buying herself a bit of time (and views, money, etc) before addressing anything.

on a break she says... archive here

View attachment 1244963
Edit: Worked out how to change size of image

She is absolutely lurking on every social media platform. Probably didn't realise that anyone would pick up on small details like this.

 

[comrade666]

Yet the SaniTEA Podcast as of right how still has vids of them together, anyone looking to back these vids up incase she purges them just like she has with anything Nan related in them? There is 10 videos total on this channel.

I believe @Ryanstartedthefire has archived them if I'm remembering rightly. If not, then I can do that.

That is what I’m referring to with this comment. I’m not saying Nan created or distributed child pornography. I was just relaying what her fans were saying verbatim. Stop coming into this thread looking for CP or trying to debate whether or not what she did was CP you fucking weirdos.

They literally spent a good few days insisting that CP was a coping mechanism and Nan was traumatised before their favourite DIDtubers turned the tide and said actually that's not cool!
You really can't write this stuff these people are retarded.

All she really has to do is say uwu please respect my privacy in the next video and it will be business as usual.

This is where I'm torn - this would be the smart move but I think she's too much of a narcissist to take such an easy exit. This is the first opportunity she's got to act like a real YouTuber and address a scandal. I don't think I can see her passing up such a great opportunity to practice her acting and increase her engagement. Her subscriber count is increasing in the midst of all this 'drama' and a good number of the new subscribers are definitely just here to watch it all unfold.

I'm wondering if she'll upload some '''prefilmed''' videos to keep her fans watching and speculating. When Chloe 'integrated' with Nina, there were two weeks' worth of prefilmed videos (the second one was the 'clothes are not consent' video, for a timescale) before she actually talked about the integration. There was lots of speculation in the comments, and it probably kept her views up for a couple of weeks while she was working out how to act best. Maybe the same will happen here, her buying herself a bit of time (and views, money, etc) before addressing anything.

Potentially. The difference is she planned that integration and had the pre-filmed footage prepared. I do think she is in genuine shock as a result of this 'drama' and isn't sure where to go from here.