For those of you who insist on telling me that my theories have no "backing" no "evidence" or whatever other bullshit you keep trying to spew, I will explain why you are wrong for once and for all.
All of your criticisms of me are based on the assumption that whatever is found in "official" sources is good, and whatever is found in "unofficial" sources is bad. You seem to have an especially great fetish for "peer-reviewed journals". All of this is nonsensical. Academia is simply a qualification circle-jerk over who can be the most QUALIFIED and who can have the most SCIENMAGISTICAL PAPERZ. You have to remember that academic institutions are first and foremost MONEY-MAKING ORGANIZATIONS and POLITICAL organizations. Academia is governed not by science, but by money and politics.
This is why they charge innocent students 50000 dollars per year for a piece of scienmajistikal paper. Does having this paper make them any smarter than the person who can not afford to pay 50,000 dollars per year to learn about feminism, diversity studies and queer studies? These are REQUIRED CLASSES now. And politics has infected the education of our young children as well, so they are well-prepared to learn about the mode "advanced" queer studies in college. No longer are they learning to multiply and divide. Instead, they are learning to ponder the philosophical implications of the strawberry-picking escapades and school play ticket sales of Tyrone, Chung-Lei, Kumardeep, Eagle Talon, Shlomo, Ahmed, Rosita, and M'banwenge'. Meanwhile, these institutions are siphoning millions of dollars off of the school to get these required books, just as psychopathic inbred bankers siphon millions and billions of dollars off of us to get required bank loans so we can go to colleges and learn about strawberry picking and intersectionality.
And yet, even knowing all of this, you STILL insist that I am somehow "less qualified" than these strawberry-pickers, and that my opinions are somehow less valid. You'd have to be far more insane than I am if you think what they say even merits consideration. I don't know how you can assume they are any less biased than I am.