Character Reference Sheets: a Visual Guide to Autism - OC, DONUT STEEL!

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
for a moment I thought Ground-Lion made them (Unless they did and I'm missing that they go by snivy-kun now).

Actually, they seem to be pretty close. Surprised ground-lion hasn't said anything about how similar the species are.
Maybe that's where the specific nose shape regulations came from; if the noses were pointy it would just be a chimeron with nipples.
 
Just saying, the fact that "closed species" even exist as a concept should have been a giant red flag to you.

The fact is, "closed species" as a concept never made sense. If you wanted your super special OG species to be closed, you know what need to be done? You fucking don't show it to anyone outside your super special group, Of course, this runs contrary to the narcissistic behaviour of furries in general, who wants to be acknowledged for their "creativity". And so comes to the paradox of the idea:

You cannot copyright ideas.

But that's exactly what a closed species is: an idea. A vague collection of attributes that would make up your fictional species. The moment you publish a concept of this, the floodgates are effectively opened. You have exposed the idea to the world, and anybody can take it and use it to run with their own ideas. There's no putting the genie in the bottle. Imagine James Cameron trying to make his blue aliens a "closed species". He'd be laughed out of any Hollywood board immediately. The same applies to furries. By right, the very idea of having a super special closed species should have been mocked right out of the gate. But no. Instead, ironically, these furries took the most overzealous interpretation of copyright law and tried to enforce it on the community. That any use of this "idea" needs their permission and the implicit notion that they should be paid for some shitty collection of ideas that no one else would give the time of the day. I wouldn't say they succeeded, but they certainly built up a vocal minority who would defend this stupid concept. It's honestly fascinating that the very same "communist-leaning" furries, would also defend the notion of "closed species", an extremely capitalist concept, in the same breath.

So yeah, I don't know what you expected.
Yeah, aggressive control over ideas and concepts will typically backfire spectacularly over time; as people get more and more tired of the restrictive treatment, you'll see an upswing in troll art and activity specifically designed to fuck around with the rules and misconstrue them in as many ways as possible anyway.

Really the only way to prevent this is to have the species be open but with a solid "canon/non-canon" line. And don't let your fucking fans fling shit on your behalf against "non-canon" character creators.
 
Just saying, the fact that "closed species" even exist as a concept should have been a giant red flag to you.

The fact is, "closed species" as a concept never made sense. If you wanted your super special OG species to be closed, you know what need to be done? You fucking don't show it to anyone outside your super special group, Of course, this runs contrary to the narcissistic behaviour of furries in general, who wants to be acknowledged for their "creativity". And so comes to the paradox of the idea:

You cannot copyright ideas.

But that's exactly what a closed species is: an idea. A vague collection of attributes that would make up your fictional species. The moment you publish a concept of this, the floodgates are effectively opened. You have exposed the idea to the world, and anybody can take it and use it to run with their own ideas. There's no putting the genie in the bottle. Imagine James Cameron trying to make his blue aliens a "closed species". He'd be laughed out of any Hollywood board immediately. The same applies to furries. By right, the very idea of having a super special closed species should have been mocked right out of the gate. But no. Instead, ironically, these furries took the most overzealous interpretation of copyright law and tried to enforce it on the community. That any use of this "idea" needs their permission and the implicit notion that they should be paid for some shitty collection of ideas that no one else would give the time of the day. I wouldn't say they succeeded, but they certainly built up a vocal minority who would defend this stupid concept. It's honestly fascinating that the very same "communist-leaning" furries, would also defend the notion of "closed species", an extremely capitalist concept, in the same breath.

So yeah, I don't know what you expected.
The thing with closed species is that most of the time the "copyright" is more or less enforced by a gentlemen's agreement among furries. Furries always will respect the rights of each other more than the companies they lift designs and species from, and this can be seen by the meltdowns when companies DMCA rule 34 artists who got a little too popular. As @Pukebucket said there are going to be trolls with furry fandom knowledge (or burnt out self-hating furries looking to cause chaos) who will abuse the fuck out of this to piss off furries. After the political shitstorms of 2016-18, the rise in trolls commissioning troll art of someone elses fursona to fuck with them, and newfags constantly roleplaying as someone elses fursona/using them as their icons, plenty of furry artists have in their ToS that you can't get art of someone else's character unless they approve of it. Imagine crazy rules extending to closed species as well because of trolls fucking with the creators of said species.

In fact within art communities these days (including the furry fandom) I've seen drama fights online where the core of the issue is that someone stole someone else's style. In other cases a furry can accuse someone else of being an alt account because the artist did a good job at copying someone's style (this has happened in the PK thread). I've seen plenty of artists specifically tell people that they won't copy other artist's styles and while that might be because said artist does not want to leave their comfort zone or brand behind, it might also be because they don't want to open that can of worms and get involved in that drama.

You did bring up a good point. Let's just say someone out there makes a species that becomes popular art wise but it's this closed species and all. Then someone else either lifts elements from it for a new open species or designs their own character that incorporates elements from this species including ones that the creator acted like he had a monopoly on. How would the creator react towards this?

This already does happen to copyrighted characters in particular. There are games made by former Sonic ROM hack/fan game creators that feature characters that look similar in ways to minor Sonic characters. There's the whole fakemon trend where original characters will be designed using elements from Pokemon/Digimon/similar toyetic anime characters or in the style of the characters from those franchises. If you stripped away the fakemon branding many of these characters would have nothing to do with the franchise they were designed to be incorporated into. You could pass them off as another anime influenced character design.

I'm honestly surprised some artists haven't tried fucking with furries by making sure to break every single gentlemen's agreement among furries, but that's because more online artists see furries as a cash opportunity than as a trolling target.
 
In fact within art communities these days (including the furry fandom) I've seen drama fights online where the core of the issue is that someone stole someone else's style.
I agree with your post, I just wanted to point this out in particular since it's not at all a new problem. I was around during the sparkledog boom, and even before then during the animu renaissance and early days of "original species" creation; people have always been shitting their drawers about people stealing their "style", even when their style was just "slightly thicker lineart" or "heart-shaped paw pads". In some cases (such as obvious tracery) this was a fair accusation to make, but a lot of the time it was just kids who couldn't draw a dog accidentally falling into the same design traps in a coincidental fashion and then fighting over which one did it first.

If anything I've seen less and less bickering in recent years over this, even with obvious design lifting (such as with the Orki and Chimerons for instance) being mostly ignored by creators and while fans are still pitching fits over it the general consensus is way less vitriolic than I remember; back in the day the creator of Orkis would've been given their own dedicated ED article for making something so similar to another popular species, not just a brief mention on a design shitpost thread that can be summed up as "six titty fake-Chimeron lol".

However, the closed species drama has seemingly replaced it in that regard; now instead of people complaining as much about design qualms for the sake of "originality" they're doing it for monetary gain and fame. You don't see as many people deliberately ripping design concepts (unless they are sick of the closed species nonsense and are trying to worm around it) because there's money involved. I've seen a lot of newbie artists wanting to create stuff and being terrified that some big-name creator that they haven't heard of is going to swing out of nowhere and threaten them with a lawsuit over what basically amounts to selling drawings of Care Bears.
 
I agree with your post, I just wanted to point this out in particular since it's not at all a new problem. I was around during the sparkledog boom, and even before then during the animu renaissance and early days of "original species" creation; people have always been shitting their drawers about people stealing their "style", even when their style was just "slightly thicker lineart" or "heart-shaped paw pads". In some cases (such as obvious tracery) this was a fair accusation to make, but a lot of the time it was just kids who couldn't draw a dog accidentally falling into the same design traps in a coincidental fashion and then fighting over which one did it first.

If anything I've seen less and less bickering in recent years over this, even with obvious design lifting (such as with the Orki and Chimerons for instance) being mostly ignored by creators and while fans are still pitching fits over it the general consensus is way less vitriolic than I remember; back in the day the creator of Orkis would've been given their own dedicated ED article for making something so similar to another popular species, not just a brief mention on a design shitpost thread that can be summed up as "six titty fake-Chimeron lol".

However, the closed species drama has seemingly replaced it in that regard; now instead of people complaining as much about design qualms for the sake of "originality" they're doing it for monetary gain and fame. You don't see as many people deliberately ripping design concepts (unless they are sick of the closed species nonsense and are trying to worm around it) because there's money involved. I've seen a lot of newbie artists wanting to create stuff and being terrified that some big-name creator that they haven't heard of is going to swing out of nowhere and threaten them with a lawsuit over what basically amounts to selling drawings of Care Bears.
Back on the stealing someone’s style thing, when I started posting to FA for the first time an artist whose style I managed to emulate (because I loved how they drew at the time and eventually I branched out and found my own style that was a lot different from everyone else’s) actually accused me of tracing about a day after I started posting my art. Idk whether I should be proud or offended because on one hand I got damn close and on the other I think getting super accusatory about someone else having your style is autistic. Idk if she was just used to tracers or something, but it shows how defensive people will get when they see a style very close to their own. They immediately assume people are tracing them. Not gonna blame them for that considering how many talentless hacks there are in this fandom, but goddamn, dude.
 
jellybeam_specie_sheet_by_kairen1_ddug3rc-fullview.png

Speaking of closed species, here is another... gross-looking one. I feel like the furry who made this had some kinda fetish in mind, dear god.
 

Speaking of closed species, here is another... gross-looking one. I feel like the furry who made this had some kinda fetish in mind, dear god.
This looks just like gastrosnaps right down to the fucking bones showing through the skin. Both look like some kind of weird fetish though.
gastrosnap.png
 

Speaking of closed species, here is another... gross-looking one. I feel like the furry who made this had some kinda fetish in mind, dear god.
What the hell is that supposed to be? It's feral form looks like a turkey lizard in latex.
And does it say "mysterious creature from the stavs" or "mysterious creature from the slavs"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: deermeat

Speaking of closed species, here is another... gross-looking one. I feel like the furry who made this had some kinda fetish in mind, dear god.
This looks just like gastrosnaps right down to the fucking bones showing through the skin. Both look like some kind of weird fetish though.
These things look like they came out of those ASMR craft videos of slime bursting out of a balloon or squishy stress balls in a net.

This is traitless [species]
I thought the whole point of a closed species was
A vague collection of attributes that would make up your fictional species.
As far as I understood about original species, there were supposed to be some traits that make up the novelty of that species in the market. Then again, these things aren't made by mega toy companies that actually know how to protect their brands and compete neck and neck with other big names. It's also worth mentioning that some if not most creators of closed species aren't very transparent with the extent of the traits they allow in especially make-your-own/MYO designs while owners don't know any better other than throwing bitch fits on off-brand looking creatures that are not in any way associated with the popular lines of original species.

[edit] wording
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kane Lives
This looks just like gastrosnaps right down to the fucking bones showing through the skin. Both look like some kind of weird fetish though.
The fetishes are vore and slime. Not hard to figure out.

As far as I understood about original species, there were supposed to be some traits that make up the novelty of that species. Then again these things aren't made by mega toy companies that actually know how to protect their brands and compete neck and neck with other big names. Most creators of closed species aren't very transparent with the extent of these traits while owners don't know any better other than throwing bitch fits on off-brand looking creatures that are not in any way associated with the popular lines of original species.
I always kinda suspected that that was where a lot of these people wanted it to go; back in early DA days making toys of popular merch (such as Black Blood Alliance wolves, or Floraverse figurines) were considered a keystone to being a 'successful' content creator. If your shit was cool enough that toy companies were willing to work with you to make toys, you had to be doing something right, right?

I suspect that's a big part of why so many original species look like some variant of brightly-colored, kid-friendly, mostly simplistic design; because the end goal after taking so much money is to trademark that shit and start working on physical merch.

It's taking a number right out of the 80s toy boom playbook; focus testing critter designs for the kids on DA to find out whether there's a market for it, and then moving that to a more corporate venue down the line.
 
Oh my fucking god these AGAIN! Where did these even come from, why am I suddenly seeing them everywhere including my nightmares?

There's something about Modeseven's art that just screams 'wrong', in a primal fear, uncanny valley way. The only other artists I have that reaction to are Overflo207 and Smudge Proof.



(The fact that he has an expression labeled 'poopy' makes me feel like taking a bath in white phosphorous.)

c250a10c1719dd57395da88f2a4d7009-png.645519
 
Last edited:
There's something about Modeseven's art that just screams 'wrong', in a primal fear, uncanny valley way. The only other artists I have that reaction to are Overflo207 and Smudge Proof.



(The fact that he has an expression labeled 'poopy' makes me feel like taking a bath in white phosphorous.)

c250a10c1719dd57395da88f2a4d7009-png.645519
Thanks for this, my will to live has never been weaker then right now.
 
Back