- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
if you want me to but don't see the point. i said i would never say so on the internet if i did.
Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge
- Thread starter Saney
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2013
So you neither confirm nor deny that you raped a slut.
Just like the military will neither confirm nor deny that nuclear weapons are on board certain vehicles.
In other words, yes.
Just like the military will neither confirm nor deny that nuclear weapons are on board certain vehicles.
In other words, yes.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
If you say so, pal. I am not saying I did or didn't and explained why.
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
Refresh my memory, then-- what exact goal do you have that's being stymied by your being "incel"?
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
But what if it's with a girl I don't want to sleep with? Like she's paying for me to go out to eat. Free food cannot be worse then cancer Holden! That's just silly. I know you're talking in metaphors, but girls can be your friends too!
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
in any case, one should try to understand what raping a slut meant at a time when people were sane. it was a punishment and a very important one. i'd say that it was much more important than modern sanitation. you can have a society without modern sanitation but you cannot have a society where you don't punish sluts. so, the natural question here would be - what to do with sluts if they became so degenerate that they picked the kind of awful men who rape them for enough years that sluts actually started to like it? i can only think of turning them into some permanent slave caste.
finding a wife to have a family with. which you can't do in the west where women are public urinals anybody can empty themselves into
that's not what I was talking about. I go on meals with my female friends too.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
Pure bullshit. For that to be true you would have to
- know "females"
- have friends
- go outside
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
hipstrs - try sounding like you're above 4th grade
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
I'm sympathetic to your goal. Surely you'd agree that there are many married couples with kids in the West, though.
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
I sound like a 4th grader? That must be such a turn on for you.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
I'd agree that there are many, yes. But I am afraid we'd disagree on the nature of most "marriages" in the West that came into being during the last 20 years or so.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2013
I speak Fuckbot so I'll take a stab at it.
The "wives" are cucking their "husbands" with multiple rape ape trucker gods on a daily basis while the "husband" provides for degenerate children that aren' his.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
You mean most newer ones? Most are just a cover for women to cheat, steal money and have "husbands" who pay for kids who aren't theirs.
As for illegitimacy rates, the best data we have are simply the large numbers of DNA tests performed by laboratories for various reasons i.e. man wants to know, woman wants to know, court ordered, immigration-related. These generally come out at least 25% tests show the man not the father, annually. This is the best empirical data we have. See: America Association of Blood Banks reporting on this
Now there is conjecture both ways in that it could be higher, or could be lower. Some say sample bias because it may be mostly those looking to find out whether the child is theirs or not so it must be lower, but they fail to account for the fact that there may be an equal, possibly even larger unknown variable in duped men who don't seek testing but think they are the father anyway, yet aren't. So making assumptions there is bad. We have new DNA analysis data that shows a massive historical reproductive disparity in favor of women. Something to the tune of 17:1 women to men who lived 8000 years ago have living ancestors today and while obviously infidelity will not account for all of that, it's still 5:1 in more recent history. Then there is this idea that higher socioeconomic status lowers the risk which may be true but then those at the lowered only make up a tiny portion of the population--maybe 5% at most. Bottom line is, we don't know and what conjectureless empirical data we do have is the closest bet.
Also, one must take into account the non-deceptive forms where the woman already had a kid to an omega scumbag and then wants a provider. In terms of evolutionary psychology, they're equivalent in terms of motivation.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
What is the source of all these numbers? Got a link?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
It's not as if I didn't post one source already or it the 17:1 thing didn't create a mildly big fuss lately...
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2014
I'm pretty sure I'm a sane individual because I didn't ask my parents for sex. Oh right, and I also have the means to support myself without having to resort to being a bottom feeding welfare scum.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2014
neither did I. And you're a woman so making insane comparisons with me is just... insane.
also ,welfare, lol? and why would you even need welfare? you're a woman, a simple biological robot who just wants to procreate. state gave you legal protections and advantages so you can have a job. and you're blaming me as a man for not wanting to fund you being bred by insane men whose only thought process is "break bones- ejaculate- break bones- ejaculate"? Why would I?
it's amazing you still think i am bad for not wanting to fund some feral children of men who splatter your brain all over the floor
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
Oh, now we're playing that game again? Fine, you didn't ask your parents for sex, you asked your mother.
Is there anything you won't try to weasel your way out of?
- Status