SJW Art and Extremes

Why does Tumblr have an obsession with vitiligo?

  • Suicide Girl model and America's Next Top Model contestant have it, spread on Tumblr, that's why.

    Votes: 670 16.2%
  • Stop fucking asking this this question.

    Votes: 481 11.6%
  • I swear to God I will start deleting these posts.

    Votes: 146 3.5%
  • Goddammit.

    Votes: 395 9.6%
  • ACTUALLY IT'S PART OF A DEEP FALSE-FLAG OPERATION TO TURN ALL BLACK PEOPLE WHITE.

    Votes: 2,443 59.1%

  • Total voters
    4,134
I don’t think their reasoning is that deep. Anime characters have big eyes, so their chimp brains interpret that as being white.
Ding ding ding ding ding! We have a winner!

Traditional Japanese art has the characters depicted with small eyes and semi-realistic features. Anime and manga were influenced from the start by the works of Disney (just ask Osamu Tezuka), hence the huge eyes and stylized look. So, since it doesn't feature racist slanted eyes, anime/manga is basically "white" for race-obsessed people like SJWs. Once CalArts showed up, SJWs flocked to it because it could be done in low-effort mode like manga (and that's not a slight against manga, when you have to draw 20 pages a week you need to cut corners somewhere) but at the same time it was seen as progressive.

As for real-life Asian people? They're stereotypically over-achievers and there are few things SJWs hate more than over-achievers. They suffer to an insane degree from Tall Poppy syndrome.
 
EWxc70pXkAERIWi.jpg


Leave green boiz alone!
 
I hate the whole “soft” and “Queer UwU” mentality.
Yes, because we can’t have them as those yucky, baby-making monsters, let’s make them, soft, cuddly queer UWUs instead. But seriously, you’re practically fetishizing them at this point. Rate me mad, but even Dobson had his standards when it comes to this stuff.
 
I hate the whole “soft” and “Queer UwU” mentality.
Yes, because we can’t have them as those yucky, baby-making monsters, let’s make them, soft, cuddly queer UWUs instead. But seriously, you’re practically fetishizing them at this point. Rate me mad, but even Dobson had his standards when it comes to this stuff.
Showed that screencap to the wife and boy she got angry at it. Her big question was "why does 'queer' have to mean 'eroticized female'?"

Like, why couldn't it be a buff male orc in a suit kissing his similarly buff husband as he picks up his pack lunch and leaves for work? Y'know, put a "subversive" twist on the classic Normal Rockwell-style "wholesome 50s American family" look.

Nope, gotta be a girl or "sof boi". It's almost as if that's their kink or something.

Clearly, it can't be it, can it? :thinking:
 
Can women convince themselves that they have a lesbian fetish? The exact same softcore porn imagery is used in Twitterina yuri most of the time and nobody jumps on them for the male gaze.

Like some have brought up, SJWs probably think lipstick lesbians are the most accessible of LGBT, aside from transwomen waifus.
 
If you seriously think that Orc's are like Black people, you're the racist here.
"But but but--"

"The Uruk-Hai in Lord of the Rings had dark skin! Clearly they're black!"

uruk.jpg

(Nevermind the fact that the fellow under that makup clearly doesn't have African features.)

"But what about Azog?!"

azog.jpg

"Err... racism? Reverse racism? Tokenism? Tolkienism?"

(Meanwhile, there's Bright, which manages to be apocalyptically stupid in its worldbuilding by having both black people, and black-coded orcs without any explanation for the distinction between them.)
 
Last edited:
Also gotta love how selective sjw artists are w/ what they find offensive and what not. Most fantasy creatures originated from stereotypes. The classic imagery of green witches w/ greasy black hair and hooked noses largely came from anti-jewish imagery. The stereotype of dwarfs working in mines was largely influenced by the fact a lot of people w/ dwarfism were preferred to work in mines because they could fit in smaller spaces (which is, to use their vocab, pretty ableist if you ask me). Yet you see none of them cry about that.

We all know SJW's like to pretend they are an equal rights advocate for all groups, then focus on only a few of those.
 
Also gotta love how selective sjw artists are w/ what they find offensive and what not. Most fantasy creatures originated from stereotypes. The classic imagery of green witches w/ greasy black hair and hooked noses largely came from anti-Trump's Chosen imagery. The stereotype of dwarfs working in mines was largely influenced by the fact a lot of people w/ dwarfism were preferred to work in mines because they could fit in smaller spaces (which is, to use their vocab, pretty ableist if you ask me). Yet you see none of them cry about that.

We all know SJW's like to pretend they are an equal rights advocate for all groups, then focus on only a few of those.
to be fair i do see a lot of them complaining about the witch thing. had no idea about the dwarfs though
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DatBepisTho
"But but but--"

"The Uruk-Hai in Lord of the Rings had dark skin! Clearly they're black!"


(Nevermind the fact that the fellow under that makup clearly doesn't have African features.)

"But what about Azog?!"


"Err... racism? Reverse racism? Tokenism? Tolkienism?"

(Meanwhile, there's Bright, which manages to be apocalyptically stupid in its worldbuilding by having both black people, and black-coded orcs without any explanation for the distinction between them.)

3z95yn.jpg


Are they saying my boy Azog the Defiller ain't beautiful? These ridiculous orc standards of beauty.
 
to be fair i do see a lot of them complaining about the witch thing. had no idea about the dwarfs though
You can bet a lot of folks complaining about the witch thing did so because "uwu wicca". Meanwhile actual Wiccans (many of which lolcows themselves) were going "get lost with that shit!".

View attachment 1263212

Are they saying my boy Azog the Defiller ain't beautiful? These ridiculous orc standards of beauty.
I know, right?! Those unrealistic standards of orc beauty are SO toxic!
 
Last edited:
Back