- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
For the record, here is what muscular women look like:
View attachment 1264067
Note the large arms but small torso and upper body with small hands. Curves are still visible. Female body-builders are a thing and definitely look more freakishly jacked than that but this is after years of hard training and muscle-building--things that would not be present in an apocalyptic world.
Here's Abby for reference.
View attachment 1264079View attachment 1264080
Flat chest, complete lack of curves, large upper torso, broad shoulders attached to jacked man arms, large male hands, thick legs and wide body.
This thing is a troon. There is no feasible way it is not.
Gina Carano is another good example:
It has, legitimately, always pissed me off when Tumblr (feminists, usually) starts sounding off about female characters' bodies, and they'll insist that women with physical fighting skills (like Tifa Lockhart, for instance) are "supposed" to be big, beefy, damn near masculine-looking muscle machines. Making them look feminine is "sexist" because mu male gaze or some shit.
It is possible for a physically strong woman with developed muscles to still look feminine. Some might look a little more masculine depending on their overall appearance, but just because a woman's got muscles doesn't mean she's going to look like a man.
The shape of the flatness of the chest is in particular is what's getting to me. A woman of Abby's rough size and weight, even flat-chested, would probably have a little more curvature to their breasts than, say, a 5'0, 95 lb woman. I mean, google "female bodybuilders" and tell me how many of them have totally flat chests (spoiler: they don't- some may have small breasts, but you can still tell that they're there). If you showed me these pictures with Abby's head cropped out and I didn't have any context for them, I would say that these were pictures of a reasonably muscular adult man, not a woman.
Either this is a shitty, generally unrealistic character design, or Abby's going to be revealed as trans.
ETA: @Reverend explained it a few posts ago, I missed it before posting this.
Last edited: