- Joined
- Apr 25, 2020
Trump is such an end to democracy he's allowing free democratic elections near the end of his term as stipulated by the laws put in place before he came into power. What a tyrant.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, if they learned more about the USSR. I bet they don't know that the USSR legalized divorce but after 5 years it was so heavily moderated that no one divorced. You know why? If you think it was because women take advantage of divorce you're ded wrong. It was men who took advantage of loose divorce laws. They married a woman, they fucked her a couple of times for a whole season and then they dumped her and married another, popularizing the term "summer wife". This ultimately led to women being economically destitute, forcing most women in rural areas into prostitution to support themselves. Why? Because when they divorced, the women were taken advantage by other people and since they couldn't defend themselves against others wanting their lands or their businesses, they ended up losing everything because they didn't had a man that stood for them.I don't know where to post this, so I'm throwing it here, with the attached hilarious irony -
Yes, because the armed bodies of the state are supposed to turn a demonstration of heavily armed yet peaceful protesters against a terrible politician who is really umpopular in that state into a bloodbath. Specially when they know they have no chance of winning and that would ultimately lead to many people dead and the public losing faith in their governing bodies and secutiry forces.
Ok so let's solve that by allowing people to bare arms and protest no matter their race.
I read it differently. My interpretation was that they followed the law and didn't chimp out. Probably not the message intended, but it was my initial take on it.Oh, if they learned more about the USSR. I bet they don't know that the USSR legalized divorce but after 5 years it was so heavily moderated that no one divorced. You know why? If you think it was because women take advantage of divorce you're ded wrong. It was men who took advantage of loose divorce laws. They married a woman, they fucked her a couple of times for a whole season and then they dumped her and married another, popularizing the term "summer wife". This ultimately led to women being economically destitute, forcing most women in rural areas into prostitution to support themselves. Why? Because when they divorced, the women were taken advantage by other people and since they couldn't defend themselves against others wanting their lands or their businesses, they ended up losing everything because they didn't had a man that stood for them.
Seeing how fucked this was, the USSR decided to begin regulating divorces so it was nearly impossible to get one. It is really surprising that every so called "advancement" of the USSR (gay marriage, divorce...) was put in practise and ultimately outlawed due to failure.
Yes, because the armed bodies of the state are supposed to turn a demonstration of heavily armed yet peaceful protesters against a terrible politician who is really umpopular in that state into a bloodbath. Specially when they know they have no chance of winning and that would ultimately lead to many people dead and the public losing faith in their governing bodies and secutiry forces.
But sure, it was because Whiteness™ protects from any harm.
I eat wimps like those for breakfast.
Oh, if they learned more about the USSR. I bet they don't know that the USSR legalized divorce but after 5 years it was so heavily moderated that no one divorced. You know why? If you think it was because women take advantage of divorce you're ded wrong. It was men who took advantage of loose divorce laws. They married a woman, they fucked her a couple of times for a whole season and then they dumped her and married another, popularizing the term "summer wife". This ultimately led to women being economically destitute, forcing most women in rural areas into prostitution to support themselves. Why? Because when they divorced, the women were taken advantage by other people and since they couldn't defend themselves against others wanting their lands or their businesses, they ended up losing everything because they didn't had a man that stood for them.
Seeing how fucked this was, the USSR decided to begin regulating divorces so it was nearly impossible to get one. It is really surprising that every so called "advancement" of the USSR (gay marriage, divorce...) was put in practise and ultimately outlawed due to failure.
Yes, because the armed bodies of the state are supposed to turn a demonstration of heavily armed yet peaceful protesters against a terrible politician who is really umpopular in that state into a bloodbath. Specially when they know they have no chance of winning and that would ultimately lead to many people dead and the public losing faith in their governing bodies and secutiry forces.
But sure, it was because Whiteness™ protects from any harm.
I haven't read the books in ages so I'm going by memory on the term. I also don't have the books anymore (gave them away to a niece when she entered middle school) so if anyone feels like digging up the description for the Haradrim, go ahead. Personally, I don't think Tolkien would have made much of a distinction between Turkish and flat-out black in his books but the guy is not around for us to ask directly so I'm not going to argue the point.
If he actually explained his work like what was in the redacted Silmarillion notes people today would be way more angry. He envisioned the LotR mythos as the true history of the Hyperborean Age as delivered to modern man by revelatory dreams and the works of the ancient Elves preserved by Christian monks. His unpublished work reads like a Christ-aligned version of Julius Evola's antiquity replete with the glorification of the European man as the descendant of Numenor. It's absolutely amazing stuff and we're not allowed to have that kind of fun anymore.
rangeban canada from realityTrudeau just banned a bunch of fans after an incident in Canada.
Happened to find this meme on here as a result:
View attachment 1266511
Yes, because the armed bodies of the state are supposed to turn a demonstration of heavily armed yet peaceful protesters against a terrible politician who is really umpopular in that state into a bloodbath. Specially when they know they have no chance of winning and that would ultimately lead to many people dead and the public losing faith in their governing bodies and secutiry forces.
But sure, it was because Whiteness™ protects from any harm.
Of course, that's ignoring the corrupted humans under Sauron's command that Tolkien actually described as having dark skin, the Haradrim (or the people of the south). They're the elephant-riding tribal folks you see in the Battle of the Pelennor Fields in the movies. In the movies they got whitewashed a bit into a light brown but in the novels they're described as having "swarthy" complexions, IIRC. It's actually one of the "problematic" things people see in the Lord of the Rings books.
It's been forever since I read the books or watched the movies, but by these description and from what I've seen I would've assumed they were intended to be Western Asian (like the Persians or Turks), maybe with Indian/South Asian influences as well.IIRC. The men of Near Harad are Arab-like, like North Africans
I think that could work as well. The Haradrim and Easterlings are not described as single culture but diverse collections of nations and culture that usually get bundled together by the Men of the West due to the fact they are perennial enemies of Gondor and their allied statesIt's been forever since I read the books or watched the movies, but by these description and from what I've seen I would've assumed they were intended to be Western Asian (like the Persians or Turks), maybe with Indian/South Asian influences as well.
I'm not well versed in LOTR lore but I don't know why to those people, everything seems to come down to being "coded" and projecting their views and not just enjoying fiction for what it is. It's a book series, it's not going to stop prejudice or end all conflict. No need to harass people that disagree with your "analysis".
If you took mein kampf and changed it from Jews to whiteys sjws would support it.. Come to think of it I think somebody did do thatI wonder what would happen if somehow Hitler came back to life and became the Democratic nominee. Would they still prefer him over Trump?
If you took mein kampf and changed it from Trump's Chosen People to whiteys sjws would support it.. Come to think of it I think somebody did do that
Care to explain for someone who hasn't watched it? I don't understand how this could be so offensive it needed to be cut. My only guess is that it boils down to "Heterosexuality is grody."Watched Indiana Jones & Last Crusade on Netflix tonight.
This clip has been edited out:
View attachment 1266755