Lucy Teale / Suzy Lu / SuzyLuGME & Justin Slater / Steejo - Thin skinned weeb thot, her business major boyfriend who LARPs as a copyright lawyer, serial false flaggers, trying to sue TV Tokyo over Naruto reaction videos, Youtube's favorite forehead

[soy_king]

Quick poll ( for yes, for no), but would you support SuzyLu's pirating if she wasn't a massive cunt?

 

[soy_king]

Quick poll ( for yes, for no), but would you support SuzyLu's pirating if she wasn't a massive cunt?

EDIT: Wow, I'm surprised by the amount of strict believers in copyright laws.

 

[thismanlies]

Quick poll ( for yes, for no), but would you support SuzyLu's pirating if she wasn't a massive cunt?

Fuck no because I can pirate it myself.

 

[inexplicable ethos]

EDIT: Wow, I'm surprised by the amount of strict believers in copyright laws.

It's not the piracy that people care about (I assume), it's her uploading the videos to YouTube and monetizing them/getting Patreon bux for it. Plus the fact that someone at YouTube is blatantly playing favorites and helping her get away with it bothers a lot of people, especially considering how furiously draconian YouTube tends to be on copyrighted content. People have had their entire channels deleted for far, far less. I couldn't care less if someone pirates shit, but making money off doing so is scummy.

 

[Anchors-Away]

It's not the piracy that people care about (I assume), it's her uploading the videos to YouTube and monetizing them/getting Patreon bux for it. Plus the fact that someone at YouTube is blatantly playing favorites and helping her get away with it bothers a lot of people, especially considering how furiously draconian YouTube tends to be on copyrighted content. People have had their entire channels deleted for far, far less. I couldn't care less if someone pirates shit, but making money off doing so is scummy.

Very much this. Piracy is commonplace online. If it be editing software, music, media etc. But all of these are used for personal use. Second you blur the lines and use it for profit, that is when you can kindly fuck off.

 

[soy_king]

Fuck no because I can pirate it myself.

I meant the principal of her doing it, not you actually simping for her.

It's not the piracy that people care about (I assume), it's her uploading the videos to YouTube and monetizing them/getting Patreon bux for it. Plus the fact that someone at YouTube is blatantly playing favorites and helping her get away with it bothers a lot of people, especially considering how furiously draconian YouTube tends to be on copyrighted content. People have had their entire channels deleted for far, far less. I couldn't care less if someone pirates shit, but making money off doing so is scummy.

Very much this. Piracy is commonplace online. If it be editing software, music, media etc. But all of these are used for personal use. Second you blur the lines and use it for profit, that is when you can kindly fuck off.

So, by that logic, would you have issues with Napster or Limewire? By the way, I'm not trying to call anyone out. I'm just curious because I would assume that not as many people would have issues with the acts committed and instead just have a problem with her.

 

[inexplicable ethos]

I meant the principal of her doing it, not you actually simping for her.




So, by that logic, would you have issues with Napster or Limewire? By the way, I'm not trying to call anyone out. I'm just curious because I would assume that not as many people would have issues with the acts committed and instead just have a problem with her.

Limewire wasn't making money off of reuploading content, though. They were making money off of their software installation by bundling adware/spyware with it, and selling a premium version of the software. I don't know much about Napster but I assume they did something similar. It's small, but the difference is crucial; technically, Limewire didn't need piracy to make money. They were just making money off of their original software creation, which just so happened to be used most frequently for illegal p2p downloading. For Lucy, the stolen video is the content. I really doubt most viewers care about her banal commentary, at best they enjoy glancing at her face every once in a while so they can pretend they're watching animu with a true 3D whammen.

 

[soy_king]

Limewire wasn't making money off of reuploading content, though. They were making money off of their software installation by bundling adware/spyware with it, and selling a premium version of the software. I don't know much about Napster but I assume they did something similar. It's small, but the difference is crucial; technically, Limewire didn't need piracy to make money. They were just making money off of their original software creation, which just so happened to be used most frequently for illegal p2p downloading. For Lucy, the stolen video is the content. I really doubt most viewers care about her banal commentary, at best they enjoy glancing at her face every once in a while so they can pretend they're watching animu with a true 3D whammen.

I don't know, I'd argue selling your users' info and bombarding them with ads while engaging in textbook secondary copyright infringement is way worse than engaging in direct copyright infringement and profiting off tips.

Quick sidenote, what you mentioned was Limewire's argument in court (that their software had other uses that just happened to be primarily used for infringement). It lost, not on the grounds that it had this illegal use, but because the evidence overwhelming evidence that's what it was used for and Limewire advertised it as such.

 

[inexplicable ethos]

I don't know, I'd argue selling your users' info and bombarding them with ads while engaging in textbook secondary copyright infringement is way worse than engaging in direct copyright infringement and profiting off tips.

Quick sidenote, what you mentioned was Limewire's argument in court (that their software had other uses that just happened to be primarily used for infringement). It lost, not on the grounds that it had this illegal use, but because the evidence overwhelming evidence that's what it was used for and Limewire advertised it as such.

That's a completely different matter than the one at hand in this thread, and I am not a judge nor is this a courtroom. You're being rather autistic here.

 

[soy_king]

That's a completely different matter than the one at hand in this thread, and I am not a judge nor is this a courtroom. You're being rather autistic here.

Possibly. I'm just interested in people's perspectives, and to watch the YouTube equivalent of the Fall of Berlin.

 

[Kaiser Aura]

Fuck no because I can pirate it myself.

This. I will admit the cuntiness doesn't help though.

 

[TenaflyViper]

It's not the piracy that people care about (I assume), it's her uploading the videos to YouTube and monetizing them/getting Patreon bux for it. Plus the fact that someone at YouTube is blatantly playing favorites and helping her get away with it bothers a lot of people, especially considering how furiously draconian YouTube tends to be on copyrighted content. People have had their entire channels deleted for far, far less. I couldn't care less if someone pirates shit, but making money off doing so is scummy.

This. Some of us follow people with real talent that have to walk on pins and needles to stay monetized. Or, hell--try being a horror-themed channel of any kind. ScareTheater, Reignbot, Nexpo--just because they like to talk about spooky things, they're forced to rely more on sponsors and Patreon. Channels run by adults and aimed at adults cannot swear even ONCE, or those videos get demonitized. Idk if they have a bot, or just some obsessively determined prudes, but a video will deadass have monetization yanked because 20 minutes in, someone says "bitch". I have seen this firsthand.

It ain't right.

 

[Yotsubaaa]

The plot thickens.

Don't forget to archive. She's already DFE'd once, after all!
(tweet archive for the tweet you screencapped: https://archive.li/Th7Py)

But yeah, it looks like something's going on. Something kind of gay?

Steejo on Twitter

“Can't say I've ever heard of the anime company "fKVHKA9aXT1U5c2HapkDiaLtEtg5PLDdUVDEQWPMZdh6a8pHT9H2s4deiutR"”

twitter.com

(https://archive.li/lhJRy)

Maybe their shitty joke will be funnier the second time?

Suzy on Twitter

“@FullThrottleeee @Steejo Twinsies! 🤣 My fav anime company is ghgdgsffgysfgbdshgysgbshgfs.”

twitter.com

(https://archive.li/TROva)

And it seems like Steejo's suggesting that Tipster and his Discord buddies are behind the take downs?

Steejo on Twitter

“Thanks for the backup on this one Tippy boy. Nice to know that you have a discord of people who you know are capable of doing something like this.”

twitter.com

(https://archive.li/XvcHj)

Has this guy ever even used the internet before?

Steejo on Twitter

“@Unit0208 No, I don't think he would. I'm saying that it's sad that he's got people in his discord that he knows would do something like this. You'd think someone so against this type of thing wouldn't associate with people who would do it.”

twitter.com

(https://archive.li/ozCCv)

 

[TenaflyViper]

Wait...so, is it not the companies having those videos taken down after all?? I thought the videos were claimed, not just struck.

 

[Boobie Bomb]

Wait...so, is it not the companies having those videos taken down after all?? I thought the videos were claimed, not just struck.

Might be the same trolls from Niggas Gay Jewish Black hacker group or something. Not sure if that is one of their members who did it. But hmm?

 

[Yotsubaaa]

Wait...so, is it not the companies having those videos taken down after all?? I thought the videos were claimed, not just struck.

I actually have no idea what's going on. Those accounts could just be people fucking around. Or they could be Suzy and Steejo themselves flagging their own videos on sock accounts. Or those screengrabs that Suzy and Steejo posted could be completely fake (photoshopped/fucking around with the HTML page source/fabricated emails/etc. Notice how they both are specifically not showing the email headers?).

It's too early to say for sure either way.

 

[CSeks101]

I actually have no idea what's going on. Those accounts could just be people fucking around. Or they could be Suzy and Steejo themselves flagging their own videos on sock accounts. Or those screengrabs that Suzy and Steejo posted could be completely fake (photoshopped/fucking around with the HTML page source/fabricated emails/etc. Notice how they both are specifically not showing the email headers?).

It's too early to say for sure either way.

This is turning into SoK-level internet warrior behaviour right there.
Also I doubt they want any of these people writing to their e-meil address.

 

[TenaflyViper]

I actually have no idea what's going on. Those accounts could just be people fucking around. Or they could be Suzy and Steejo themselves flagging their own videos on sock accounts. Or those screengrabs that Suzy and Steejo posted could be completely fake (photoshopped/fucking around with the HTML page source/fabricated emails/etc. Notice how they both are specifically not showing the email headers?).

It's too early to say for sure either way.

Ngl, I'm gonna be disappointed if it turns out there actually isn't anyone of authority looking into these two.

 

[CSeks101]

Ngl, I'm gonna be disappointed if it turns out there actually isn't anyone of authority looking into these two.

Which would also disprove the claims that she lied about the takedowns... at least by the logic of the fellow autists here...

This is becoming one of these cases were people overestimate their own intelligence because that other person is dumb....

I said Sons of Kojima, but maybe a little bit of MatPat too, because some people just desperately WANT to believe some of the theories put forward, despite them not being true at all or contradicting...

Before you say anything, I'm not here to defend Suzy Lu, I'm here because I dislike some of her detractors, including self-important prick MarkAfterDark and Quarterton. I'm here to enjoy the second coming of SoK.

 

[Slay3rx]

Have you seen she now has a cameo account and is charging 1k$ and makes it out like the site invited her to join?

What a joke guess she needs money for the law suit.