Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[lamp]

81% because they are taking students from the DC metropolitan area. They have the nations most educated high schoolers that feed into GMU. The schools in DC metropolitan area are rigorous and full of parents that pay for private tutors and extra curriculars

Then explain why you only need the bare minimum to get in. They’re really desperate. They also aren’t even on the list of top best colleges as of 2020.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Then explain why you only need the bare minimum to get in. They’re really desperate. They also aren’t even on the list of top best colleges as of 2020.

Because high test scores doesn't mean better culture. GMU purposely rejects lots of straight A students with high SAT scores because they frequently say they are looking for well rounded people. You are more likely to be accepted showing involvement in extra curriculars, community OR something interesting you got going on.

They might not make it into magazines but really a lot of that stuff is whoever pays to get in. Whoever is in the club. GMU has a minority for a President, that might have something to do with it too. A lot of these Fortune 500 companies who control University lists are run by Anglo racists

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

View attachment 1271901
Are you sure about that

Even for a diploma mill that's pretty bad. I've seen worse schools out there, but for a school someone tries to claim is one of the best? Not even close.

Because high test scores doesn't mean better culture. GMU purposely rejects lots of straight A students with high SAT scores because they frequently say they are looking for well rounded people. You are more likely to be accepted showing involvement in extra curriculars, community OR something interesting you got going on.

They might not make it into magazines but really a lot of that stuff is whoever pays to get in. Whoever is in the club. GMU has a minority for a President, that might have something to do with it too. A lot of these Fortune 500 companies who control University lists are run by Anglo racists

I've been hired by black people and Asians with my current diploma, my future bosses are Indian and Middle Eastern. You don't know what you're talking about when it comes work because well you don't work.

 

[Cedric_Eff]

Because high test scores doesn't mean better culture. GMU purposely rejects lots of straight A students with high SAT scores because they frequently say they are looking for well rounded people. You are more likely to be accepted showing involvement in extra curriculars, community OR something interesting you got going on.

They might not make it into magazines but really a lot of that stuff is whoever pays to get in. Whoever is in the club. GMU has a minority for a President, that might have something to do with it too. A lot of these Fortune 500 companies who control University lists are run by Anglo racists

Why are you still on here? Why deepen the black hole that is your thread?

 

[SS Reichsmarshall]

Not at this hour of night. And the baby is sleeping







Your math was wrong

George Mason University is an excellent school and has a great reputation all over the USA, and especially the DC metropolitan area. GMU graduates get hired quickly

Look, not trying to put down academics, but GMU isn't exactly the Harvard of Appalachia. It has an 81% acceptance rate. Boo fucking hoo.

Also, you studied Leisure Studies which is a Mickey Mouse Degree. A monkey or gorilla like Koko could get a Bachelor's in "Leisure Studies" whatever the fuck that means. It's not like you studied Nuclear Engineering or Astrophysics.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Look, not trying to put down academics, but GMU isn't exactly the Harvard of Appalachia. It has an 81% acceptance rate. Boo fucking hoo.

Also, you studied Leisure Studies which is a Mickey Mouse Degree. A monkey or gorilla like Koko could get a Bachelor's in "Leisure Studies" whatever the fuck that means. It's not like you studied Nuclear Engineering or Astrophysics.

High acceptance rate just means a college/ university has open standards of who they let in. Hence diploma mills have high acceptance rates. Non-diploma mill schools with high acceptance rates align with what the average applicant is like.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

High acceptance rate just means a college/ university has open standards of who they let in. Hence diploma mills have high acceptance rates. Non-diploma mill schools with high acceptance rates align with what the average applicant is like.

It doesn't help that most diploma mills not only have high acceptance rates, but also have pretty chunky student populations. Mine has a population of around 4000, and George Mason (as of the 2019-2020 educational year) has a population of over 37000. That might not sound big in the retrospect of things, but a student population like that is usually what you see from a cheaper and/or larger campus and public universities.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

It doesn't help that most diploma mills not only have high acceptance rates, but also have pretty chunky student populations. Mine has a population of around 4000, and George Mason (as of the 2019-2020 educational year) has a population of over 37000. That might not sound big in the retrospect of things, but a student population like that is usually what you see from a cheaper and/or larger campus and public universities.

Yeah, mine has up to 40k a year and we have our university broken up into five areas. Next one I'm going to to finish up my Masters has up to 70k students a year and has three full sized campuses.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Yeah, mine has up to 40k a year and we have our university broken up into five areas. Next one I'm going to to finish up my Masters has up to 70k students a year and has three full sized campuses.

Nice, good luck with that man

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Nice, good luck with that man

Worst thing i see about it is that house prices are terrible due to the dollar here dropping like mad thanks to the cuck we have running the place. Two years time I fully expect it to be as bad as it was in the early 2000's. We're already at $0.69.

I'm trying to convince my fiancee to work on a new degree or just improve on the business degree she already has while she's home on maternity leave before heading back to work in a year or two. That way she has more options for work at better companies. She hates sitting around at home doing nothing.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Your math is incorrect.

It was your math, and yes, it is incorrect. 100% of children can't have 150% of caretakers, on average or in reality or in any possible way. You're an idiot.

Your mistake was your dumb multiplier of 1.5. The two factors that would make the percentage of parents different from the percentage of children would be if the number of children per household varied from the average, or if the ratio between single- and dual-parent households was different from the average household.

Unless you can show data of the CPS spending its time investigating stable, 2-parents-and-1.5-children-per-household families in the suburbs as opposed to single-parent households and breeder gutter trash like yourself, there's no reason to suggest that 37.4% of children means anything other than 37.4% of parents (if anything, it goes in the opposite direction).

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

It was your math, and yes, it is incorrect. 100% of children can't have 150% of caretakers, on average or in reality or in any possible way. You're an idiot.

Your mistake was your dumb multiplier of 1.5. The two factors that would make the percentage of parents different from the percentage of children would be if the number of children per household varied from the average, or if the ratio between single- and dual-parent households was different from the average household.

Unless you can show data of the CPS spending its time investigating stable, 2-parents-and-1.5-children-per-household families in the suburbs as opposed to single-parent households and breeder gutter trash like yourself, there's no reason to suggest that 37.4% of children means anything other than 37.4% of parents (if anything, it goes in the opposite direction).

At best that 37.4% would be the high end of families that get screened in to be looked into.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

Copying stuff I said to you first makes you a poser. Get your own material.

Copying things you said first would make me sound like a moron. PASS.

If you’re going to sue anyone (let’s face it, after several unsuccessful suits you haven’t yet learned a lesson) sue GMU. Your “education” left you woefully unprepared for the real world.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Copying things you said first would make me sound like a moron. PASS.

If you’re going to sue anyone (let’s face it, after several unsuccessful suits you haven’t yet learned a lesson) sue GMU. Your “education” left you woefully unprepared for the real world.

I'd start with her parents, teachers in high school, then GMU in that order because they all failed her.

 

[lamp]

Muhwinda seems like the type of person to buy AirPods for an Android phone

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Poor choices, denial and lies....
Proof of said accusations?

You're a hypocrite. You want to point the finger at Marshall for supposedly being abusive yet you're sitting here trying to abuse me verbally. "Trying" because I don't take it to heart. The manner in which you speak is verbally abusive. Try getting that log out of your eye.

And if you want to harp on the accuracy of statements, check yourself first.

I did NOT tell The Stalker that Marshall was abusive or unstable. I said in an email I felt abused. It's up on another thread, you can check yourself for yourself.

Saying you FEEL abused doesn't mean the person is actual abusing you. It's describing your perception. I wouldn't be with Marshall if he was abusive. We worked out our conflict.

People declare that they are "done" all the time in marriages. I've heard it all. People pack up, toss their rings, say ugly words ....then they turn around and decide to not give up on the marriage. Have Marshall and I had our share of fights? Hell yeah. But that doesn't make him "unstable".

I stand by what I said: Marshall is the most in line with Torah/most righteous man I have ever met in my 34 years of life. I picked him because he seeks Torah and fears YHWH.

I won't comment on my upbringing because your statements are just flat out inaccurate and I don't need to correct them.

Your victim blaming theory that women pick abusive men is horseshit too.
No one is responsible for another person's sin. If someone was abusive to me, that's their sin, not mine. If someone got dumped because they committed a sin that leads to excommunication or death, that's not my responsibility. There's no "mistakes" to admit because I've never been the guilty party in any break up from my past.

and that's exactly what it is: the past. My heart and mind aren't there anymore, hasn't been for years. I have Marshall and my family now and that is where my heart and mind are.

Marshall and I are going on 4 years. This relationship has outlived the length of any of my past covenant partners. The only comparable in length was my first marriage. It was longer on paper but over from the inside before 4 years.
And that's just one of many reasons Marshall isn't the "latest". He's where my search for a righteous man ends.
Marshall and I are going to make it.

https://www.academia.edu/38858991/The_Excellent_Husband_A_Proverbial_Poem_by_Tamar

In the middle of yet another rant about how wonderful Marshall is, Melinda takes the time to once again claim that she has never made a mistake, dodging responsibility once again for any of her actions.

@Assman

I've given you 3 days to come up with a response. You still have yet to prove your accusations

What you don't understand, like your pagan comrade @Karl_der_Grosse is that in The Torah (the ONLY proper definition of right and wrong) is that the victim of sin NEVER absorbs the guilt, blame or sin of the sinner who does wrong to them.


So like I said before you have failed miserably to substantiate any accusation of sin against me

"Can any of you prove me guilty of sin?" (John 8:46)

There's no contradiction. "Melinda Leigh Scott is a moron " is not "Melinda Leigh Scott is a narcissist too obtuse to see that her publicly displayed patterns of poor choices, denial, and lies have resulted in her having a thread here." Different words are used because many different people have valiantly tried for you to realize that you are your own worst enemy.

I can already see the idiotic response from the banshee stating, "autistic internet screeching isn't public! You're wrong! You made it public! Something something pseudo-scientific theological babbling. I'm smarter than all of you, and I'll keep posting until you admit it!"

Repeat ad infinitum.

Poor choices, denial and lies....
Proof of said accusations?

I've given you 3 days to come up with a response. You still have yet to prove your accusations

What you don't understand, like your pagan comrade @Karl_der_Grosse is that in The Torah (the ONLY proper definition of right and wrong) is that the victim of sin NEVER absorbs the guilt, blame or sin of the sinner who does wrong to them.

So like I said before you have failed miserably to substantiate any accusation of sin against me

"Can any of you prove me guilty of sin?" (John 8:46)

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

You couldn't let your thread die could you @TamarYaelBatYah could you? You were fifth down on the second page before you decided to bump your thread. Not only that, you fucked up your post.

 

[Spergichu]

Ah man. I was just starting to believe that the two lone brain cells in Melinda's skull just happened to rub together in the right way to form a coherent thought and decided to let her thread die. Oh well, I'll get the peanuts.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

@Assman

I've given you 3 days to come up with a response. You still have yet to prove your accusations

What you don't understand, like your pagan comrade @Karl_der_Grosse is that in The Torah (the ONLY proper definition of right and wrong) is that the victim of sin NEVER absorbs the guilt, blame or sin of the sinner who does wrong to them.


So like I said before you have failed miserably to substantiate any accusation of sin against me

"Can any of you prove me guilty of sin?" (John 8:46)



I've given you 3 days to come up with a response. You still have yet to prove your accusations

What you don't understand, like your pagan comrade @Karl_der_Grosse is that in The Torah (the ONLY proper definition of right and wrong) is that the victim of sin NEVER absorbs the guilt, blame or sin of the sinner who does wrong to them.

So like I said before you have failed miserably to substantiate any accusation of sin against me

"Can any of you prove me guilty of sin?" (John 8:46)

Why do you respond only when your thread drops to the second page

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Why do you respond only when your thread drops to the second page

Autism and narcissistic tendencies.