The skeptic chat has gone quiet. There was some debate over if those screens are real or not. Some shit doesn’t add up. Why wouldn’t the admins see it’s a fake account? Why would someone go through THAT MUCH trouble to make those screenshots? Getting profile pics and everything? The main issue is that the sender had most likely faked hate they received. Even if those screenshots are real, nobody will believe them now.
Just a lot of talking about nothing tbh. It’s possible we’ll never know the truth about those screenshots.
Its possible that it's people who are trying to make Chloe detractors look bad. I mean people could be sabotaging in sneaky ways, they are crazy after all. Its dumb but they could be making false posts so everyone shares it and then they can cry victim again. They can make it look like so many people are out there falsifying information just to "take down" Chloe. I don't know it's so strange. I can't make sense of this yet
Its possible that it's people who are trying to make Chloe detractors look worse than we are. I mean people could be sabotaging in sneaky ways. They are crazy after all. I don't know it's so strange. This is fishy though.
Who really cares why? It was mildly entertaining. It triggered some of the bigger players and coaxed Chloe out of hiding. It was a success in my view, whether they were false or not. Though it really should be a lesson in only posting verified information and holding off until you've got proof of a valid source. This is why Twitter is such a clusterfuck. Excellent breeding ground for cows though.
If we're going to speculate, I've taken a look at the caps and I'm not sure why someone would fabricate an interaction in which Chloe returned to offer damage control. I also fail to understand how those in the group - which has been verified as existing - would be unable to tell the difference between a fake profile and a real one.
However, the caps themselves look unusual if you scrutinise too hard and a lack of screen recording raises some doubts in my mind. This is the first instance in which Chloe has spoken in outright denial and it was enough to come out of hiding. This may be due to the fact that larger DIDTubers spoke up themselves, but it may also be due to the fact that this is the first thing she can categorically deny. I do find it interesting that she offered no proof to back up her statement, though.
Ultimately, unless we see a screen recording, I'm in the who really gives a fuck either way camp.
Its possible that it's people who are trying to make Chloe detractors look bad. I mean people could be sabotaging in sneaky ways, they are crazy after all. Its dumb but they could be making false posts so everyone shares it and then they can cry victim again. They can make it look like so many people are out there falsifying information just to "take down" Chloe. I don't know it's so strange. I can't make sense of this yet
It could very well be Chloe herself “faking” screenshots to garner more sympathy. She’s been gone for quite some time now after all and people are going to start moving on. If she’s been keeping up on Reddit/Tiktok, she’s bound to see all the questions surfacing about DID malingerers. She’s got to keep a fan base somehow.
Who really cares why? It was mildly entertaining. It triggered some of the bigger players and coaxed Chloe out of hiding. It was a success in my view, whether they were false or not. Though it really should be a lesson in only posting verified information and holding off until you've got proof of a valid source. This is why Twitter is such a clusterfuck. Excellent breeding ground for cows though.
If we're going to speculate, I've taken a look at the caps and I'm not sure why someone would fabricate an interaction in which Chloe returned to offer damage control. I also fail to understand how those in the group - which has been verified as existing - would be unable to tell the difference between a fake profile and a real one.
However, the caps themselves look unusual if you scrutinise too hard and a lack of screen recording raises some doubts in my mind. This is the first instance in which Chloe has spoken in outright denial and it was enough to come out of hiding. This may be due to the fact that larger DIDTubers spoke up themselves, but it may also be due to the fact that this is the first thing she can categorically deny. I do find it interesting that she offered no proof to back up her statement, though.
Ultimately, unless we see a screen recording, I'm in the who really gives a fuck either way camp.
Chloe coming out and demanding innocence is the only thing that makes me believe it IS legit, the general speculation of her camp was that the screenshots were fake to begin with but having Chloe break her media silence just seems like an overcompensation move especially since she ostensibly created a jpg just to make her denial seem more official without sharing any proof otherwise and immediately changing her FB picture. The whole "the lady doth protest too much" bit.
But in all seriousness, we've grown a few pages as a result of nothing in particular. Yes, it was amusing, but every Twitter chimp out isn't newsworthy.
Chloe coming out and demanding innocence is the only thing that makes me believe it IS legit, the general speculation of her camp was that the screenshots were fake to begin with but having Chloe break her media silence just seems like an overcompensation move especially since she ostensibly created a jpg just to make her denial seem more official without sharing any proof otherwise and immediately changing her FB picture. The whole "the lady doth protest too much" bit.
Eh, I suppose so. I think it was more likely the influence of M&M and, I believe, Entropy speaking out that encouraged her to make a public comment. It doesn't strike me as particularly odd that she made an image - she did the same for her last 'suicide' announcement. Her Tweet counter has not yet gone up, so Instagram was her primary platform to make this statement. She really had no choice but to make an image though I notice she took the time to artfully highlight certain words. I can see how it looks like overcompensation yet several allegations have been made in the last few weeks - she hasn't made a single statement on those.
Nothing on the Jamie photographs. Nothing on the Mud Sky knowledge. Nothing on the Asians. But this drew her out. If she is lying - and there is a chance that she may be - then she really has buried her own career. Surely, the 'source' could prove she was in the chat? Surely another member of the group could too? If no one comes forward, and if the 'source' fails to provide 'receipts' as it were, then we have no choice but to disregard this one.
That she changed her profile picture is interesting. We'll see what comes of it.
Eh, I suppose so. I think it was more likely the influence of M&M and, I believe, Entropy speaking out that encouraged her to make a public comment. It doesn't strike me as particularly odd that she made an image - she did the same for her last 'suicide' announcement. Her Tweet counter has not yet gone up, so Instagram was her primary platform to make this statement. She really had no choice but to make an image though I notice she took the time to artfully highlight certain words. I can see how it looks like overcompensation yet several allegations have been made in the last few weeks - she hasn't made a single statement on those.
Nothing on the Jamie photographs. Nothing on the Mud Sky knowledge. Nothing on the Asians. But this drew her out. If she is lying - and there is a chance that she may be - then she really has buried her own career. Surely, the 'source' could prove she was in the chat? Surely another member of the group could too? If no one comes forward, and if the 'source' fails to provide 'receipts' as it were, then we have no choice but to disregard this one.
That she changed her profile picture is interesting. We'll see what comes of it.
Well I mean, with the other allegations they aren't something that the community would get in an uproar about. There is a good deal of plausible deniability of the racism thing that she has already addressed even though the niggs and chinks aren't fully supportive of the concept. The Jamie stuff doesn't bother her because she's never put a name on who abused her and how, she's been smart about that. People are still willing to go to bat for her on the Nan issue. This one got a rise out of people enough for some vague references from other influencers because again far be it for anyone to denounce someone publicly unless they are completely nuclear waste levels of untouchable, and it strikes at the heart of Chloe's drama manufacturing with Trisha which besides the Padilla video put her on the map.
Well I mean, with the other allegations they aren't something that the community would get in an uproar about. There is a good deal of plausible deniability of the racism thing that she has already addressed even though the niggs and chinks aren't fully supportive of the concept. The Jamie stuff doesn't bother her because she's never put a name on who abused her and how, she's been smart about that. People are still willing to go to bat for her on the Nan issue. This one got a rise out of people enough for some vague references from other influencers because again far be it for anyone to denounce someone publicly unless they are completely nuclear waste levels of untouchable, and it strikes at the heart of Chloe's drama manufacturing with Trisha which besides the Padilla video put her on the map.
I wouldn't be so sure. I wouldn't forget that this is a community filled with snowflakes, troons, furries, dykes, white guilters, kinnies, all born from the ashes of Tumblr. They have a breaking point, anywhere between producing child porn and calling someone a nigger. Some have already turned on Chloe as a result of the ongoing race row. Sure, we're a long way from Chloe's nigger moment, and we shouldn't wish for it just yet - we don't want to m!lk this one too early - but the tide is slowly turning on the girl. Certain hashtags on mainstream social media platforms prove that support is wavering. She still has her diehards, and they'll stay up we hit nuclear, but enough noise has been made about her 'racism' and inconsistencies that she has undoubtedly noticed that people are questioning her.
I maintain that it is significant that she opted to speak out on this occasion - though we can only speculate as to why it is significant.
I wouldn't be so sure. I wouldn't forget that this is a community filled with snowflakes, troons, furries, dykes, white guilters, kinnies, all born from the ashes of Tumblr. They have a breaking point, anywhere between producing child porn and calling someone a nigga. Some have already turned on Chloe as a result of the ongoing race row. Sure, we're a long way from Chloe's nigga moment, and we shouldn't wish for it just yet - we don't want to m!lk this one too early - but the tide is slowly turning on the girl. Certain hashtags on mainstream social media platforms prove that support is wavering. She still has her diehards, and they'll stay up we hit nuclear, but enough noise has been made about her 'racism' and inconsistencies that she has undoubtedly noticed that people are questioning her.
I maintain that it is significant that she opted to speak out on this occasion - though we can only speculate as to why it is significant.
Well yeah the SJW crowd that allows this cancer to grow is famous for cannibalism and she's definitely got ankle biters coming after her for racial issues but her transgressions as Nadia aren't very recent and her other race changing alters are more or less kept in the closet never to be spoken about again. There's plenty in the DID SJW crowd that are giving her a hard pass because it's not a choice blah blah. If I were her I'd feel comfortable with how that narrative is playing out as more of a fringe issue.
Most of the contention right now is surrounding her DID being valid, and she's comfortable with that narrative too because even when trying to vaguely distance from Chloe, other influencers aren't willing to get cannibalized for outright claiming Chloe to be a fake and certainly don't want to say the whys and hows should that narrative turn on them. Chloe is safe here for at least where her base is concerned. There's definitely people working to discredit her though and converts are coming up every so often.
The idea of advocating death threats and harassment campaigns is funny enough also old ground but it's so buried underneath the weight of the Nan/pedo fiasco people forget about it. She's definitely silently advocated harassment and death threats, either in her Youtube comments sections where she hearted posts by people that were planning harassment and death threats to Trisha (I don't know if KF has screenshots of but Grandads Lounge certainly did), and the screenshot of her unwilling to specifically tell people to stop harassing and sending death threats to Trisha with the excuse that she receives these comments as well. That someone would go to all the trouble to falsify commentary that implicates she once again has a morally grey concept of where she stands on harassment and death threats by using similar logic devices is pretty oddly specific. Not to say impossible or unlikely, just very oddly specific.
Upon further examination, there are some inconsistencies with her typing style in the caps. There are a handful of errors I've not noticed her making previously; too in place of to, were in place of we're, every one instead of everyone. An out of place capitalisation '...leave If...' and a lack of punctuation.
It could be an indication that these caps are fabricated. It could also be that she was involved in the group conversation but the content of her message has been amended - easily done.
Well yeah the SJW crowd that allows this cancer to grow is famous for cannibalism and she's definitely got ankle biters coming after her for racial issues but her transgressions as Nadia aren't very recent and her other race changing alters are more or less kept in the closet never to be spoken about again. There's plenty in the DID SJW crowd that are giving her a hard pass because it's not a choice blah blah. If I were her I'd feel comfortable with how that narrative is playing out as more of a fringe issue.
Most of the contention right now is surrounding her DID being valid, and she's comfortable with that narrative too because even when trying to vaguely distance from Chloe, other influencers aren't willing to get cannibalized for outright claiming Chloe to be a fake and certainly don't want to say the whys and hows should that narrative turn on them. Chloe is safe here for at least where her base is concerned. There's definitely people working to discredit her though and converts are coming up every so often.
The idea of advocating death threats and harassment campaigns is funny enough also old ground but it's so buried underneath the weight of the Nan/pedo fiasco people forget about it. She's definitely silently advocated harassment and death threats, either in her Youtube comments sections where she hearted posts by people that were planning harassment and death threats to Trisha (I don't know if KF has screenshots of but Grandads Lounge certainly did), and the screenshot of her unwilling to specifically tell people to stop harassing and sending death threats to Trisha with the excuse that she receives these comments as well. That someone would go to all the trouble to falsify commentary that implicates she once again has a morally grey concept of where she stands on harassment and death threats by using similar logic devices is pretty oddly specific. Not to say impossible or unlikely, just very oddly specific.
Ultimately, I don't think we disagree. I've just been keeping an eye on mainstream social media and noticed a recent surge in accounts questioning Chloe. Although her racism is 'historic' it is being raised as a current issue.
Ultimately, I don't think we disagree. I've just been keeping an eye on mainstream social media and noticed a recent surge in accounts questioning Chloe. Although her racism is 'historic' it is being raised as a current issue.
Yeah no disagreement from this side, I'd actually hate for these screenshots to be authentic because it's an automatic death sentence to the lolcow and we've already lost half the thread to instakills already.
Just had my first proper peek at Twitter. The tide is indeed turning, i didnt expect to see so many of them seeing the light..
Edit: Sorry for all my editing but just had a thought about the screenshots, if someone was trying to fake the whole thing why would they go to the lengths of changing the colour of the chat to a honeycomb yellow? i assume it was done because its called the Beehive? If they were going to fake the whole thing do you not think they would go with basic chat? If it was someone who wasnt in the private group chat how would they know it is honeycomb yellow? kinda more weight behind it being true, imo
In the process of analysing some typing samples to test my own hypothesis and I came across this in the archive. Unlikely to be the same 'Marie' but she was a member of one of the DID support groups with Chloe. Don't take this as definitive proof - take this as a lead to further pursue for those currently investigating these groups. Best of luck.
The grave she's digging herself into here is absolutely insane. STOP SAYING STUPID SHIT THAT MAKES YOU LOOK WORSE but also do absolutely that because it shows how nasty you are and will hopefully open the eyes of those that blindly follow you.
In the process of analysing some typing samples to test my own hypothesis and I came across this in the archive. Unlikely to be the same 'Marie' but she was a member of one of the DID support groups with Chloe. Don't take this as definitive proof - take this as a lead to further pursue for those currently investigating these groups. Best of luck.
I seen someone say on Twitter it couldn't be her because she always uses a period. Not true, evident in this very screenshot. Elsewhere too but this should be enough to prove she doesn't to whoever that was. Imo, her first comment in the chat screenshot was VERY her in style, i'm not sure why people think otherwise. I think they're just blindly following her at this point.. Maybe its the fact that they will be invalidated if she is proven to be a faker, so they have a more personal reason to defend her to the death, even if she is lying through her teeth.
Her “protecting” her “littles” is the cringiest shit she probably does thus far. They aren’t actual children. They’re her. Their names are fake. Their identities are fake. (Hell, their existence at all is fake). “We don’t show our littles to keep them safe”. She acts like she’s putting someone’s baby on screen and listing where the baby lives, its name, and ways to access its goddamn bedroom.
This is one of the many ways she overcompensates with extreme, over-the-top “compassion” so people will look at her and say, “Awwww! She cares so much for her littles! She’s like a mom without actually being a mom!” Her sperg fans are utter morons.
In one of her unboxing videos, where she opens presents sent to her by said dumbfuck fans, she is “positively triggered” by a unicorn stuffed animal. She changes into a little, and there’s a jumpcut. The camera has been adjusted lower so you can’t see her face. Did her little really know how to adjust the tripod? Also, how did all the alters she switched through know to adjust her lapel mic appropriately once she put her scarf on?
In another unboxing video, one of her littles comes out yet again, and Chloe (who is accompanied by Sally I believe in “co-con”) apparently tries to get the little to go back inside, and “Kyle” pops up to help. “Kyle” repeats the phrase “I’ve got her, I’ve got her” while Chloe does her stupid-faced “dissociation” routine.
Are we to seriously believe that Chloe and Sally were chasing after a little in her mind, and Kyle ran onto the scene and assumingly picked the little up, told everyone else in her mind that it was all okay because “he got her, he got her”? Are all of her alters just chilling in there like an episode of Herman’s Head?? How much of an autist do you need to be to believe this?? It goes against every single facet of what is currently believed about DID by some professionals. Despite many more professionals believing it likely doesn’t exist at all.
Her alters aren’t supposed to all just be chilling out in there. And if a little comes out to play at a bad time, one of them can take the little’s hand and be like “Don’t worry, continue with the video, I’ll keep her entertained”???
This is the most bullshit thing I’ve ever witnessed and the retards who believe it or have their hearts warmed by it are the same type of people who will openly post photos of their new credit cards to their social media, totally uncensored. Dumb fucks.
I seen someone say on Twitter it couldn't be her because she always uses a period. Not true, evident in this very screenshot. Elsewhere too but this should be enough to prove she doesn't to whoever that was. Imo, her first comment in the chat screenshot was VERY her in style, i'm not sure why people think otherwise. I think they're just blindly following her at this point.. Maybe its the fact that they will be invalidated if she is proven to be a faker, so they have a more personal reason to defend her to the death, even if she is lying through her teeth.
I'm not convinced, personally. I'm perhaps giving her far too much credit, but I truly don't believe she'd be stupid enough to outright deny something when it could be so easily proved that she was lying. I think it's slightly more likely that Twitter got trolled, or that those caps have been amended in some way.
I'd be happy to take it all back if someone could provide the evidence I'm wrong - I'd like her to be this stupid.
Linguistics is an area I have some knowledge in, and whilst I won't PL, I'll take a moment to analyse this with you all whilst I've got time to kill. This obviously won't be an in depths analysis as I don't have the character limit, time, or resources. Consider this a brief and very speculative glance.
We'll establish some 'rules' Chloe uses in her public writing as 'DissociaDID'. Start by analysing the very first word of her statements.
It's
Someone
Trigger
Swipe
Have
A
From this, we can determine that she often capitalizes the first letter of every statement. This is a fairly common writing rule and we would only expect to see this relaxed in informal environments. Even in an informal environment, many people use an autocorrect feature which automatically capitalizes the beginning of a sentence. Regardless as to the reason, we can confirm that Chloe capitalizes the first word of every sentence when writing publicly as DissociaDID. We could go on to examine every sentence and get a clearer grasp on her habits - I've done this in my own time and you're welcome to do the same. For now, we'll keep it simple.
Next, I would look for notable punctuation.
She often uses the ampersand in place of the word and - even in her 'formal' role as 'DissociaDID'.
She does appropriately use apostrophes as demonstrated with we've, can't, you're etc.
She often uses exclamation points. Where does she tend to place them? Anywhere in the text. She does not use line breaks following an exclamation point. Additionally, she often uses exclamation points at the end of the very last sentence as a sign off.
Her use of commas is sporadic though mostly appropriate when utilised. She uses commas to list, and occasionally as a sentence break. It would not be considered a hard rule for her to use commas - there are occasions when she should use a comma and does not. Some sentences run on, though when making a 'formal' statement as 'DissociaDID' this is less likely.
She often uses periods at the end of sentences - she uses them appropriately. Occasionally, she will leave a sentence hanging - for example, when signing off with her name; Nin
Occasionally, she will sign out with an emoji.
Next, I would look at how she writes numbers. 2 year, 39 times, 20 years, 6lbs... she uses her number characters rather than typing the word. We can confidently claim this as a rule.
So, we've established some very loose writing rules for Chloe when acting as 'DissociaDID' on a public platform between 2019 and 2020. Now, we should examine her style in a less formal yet semi-public setting.
It is important to note that these caps are a few years out of date. These samples are taken from the DID Facebook Support Groups. Her typing style has shifted somewhat over time - this is normal.
Following the same process as last time.
can
I
Ahh
Hello
Trust
Thank
I
Thank
Lots
I'm
One exception, but the likelihood is, Chloe will capitalize her first word.
No use of the ampersand. These samples are a few years out of date - the ampersand joined her typing toolkit later.
Her use of apostrophe varies. On balance, in this environment, she is unlikely to appropriately use an apostrophe, with some exceptions.
Very few exclamation points. Never as a sign off. This may have joined her typing toolkit later or may only be reserved for the 'DissociaDID' persona.
Her use of comma is still sporadic. Most often used as a sentence break or listing tool. Commas occasionally bridge an opening statement thank you, how did... or I understand, I just... or Hello everyone, just had...
Her use of periods is interesting here - she rarely uses a period when replying to comment as in, in conversation, but when making a post or 'statement' she will end her sentence with a period.
She often signs off a message with an emoji - this would be in character for her.
Occasionally, she will use two question marks for emphasis.
Again, her numbers are characters rather than words, this can be set as a fairly firm rule.
Of note, she does not always capitalize I, I'm, I've... in these examples. I would suggest that she was browsing these groups using a desktop - she does not have the autocorrect feature that is automatically enabled when mobile browsing. I base this off PL knowledge, and the fact that she did not use lowercase i, i've, i'm frequently in the UEA logs, where she primarily used mobile browsing. Those logs are dated prior to these examples - this is not a habit she has 'grown out of' as it were. This may also explain instances of im vs i'm.
TL;DR - Writing Rules
1. It is highly likely that Chloe will capitalize the first word of any statement.
2. Chloe is likely to use an ampersand (&) in place of the word and... particularly when making statements as 'DissociaDID' from 2019 onwards.
3. Chloe occasionally uses commas to list verbs or break up sentences - it is, however, not uncommon for her sentences to run on. She is far more likely to use commas when writing as 'DissociaDID' in a formal or semi-formal setting.
4. Chloe frequently uses exclamation points or emojis as a sign off at the end of a message particularly when writing as 'DissociaDID'.
5. Chloe is highly likely to use periods appropriately at the ends of sentences. The exception is when she is in direct conversation with others. The exception to this exception is when Chloe is in a hostile conversation.
6. When using the 'messenger' application, or other mobile applications, Chloe is likely to use apostrophes due to the autocorrect feature. She is very unlikely to abandon apostrophes when speaking as 'DissociaDID'.
7. When speaking as 'DissociadDID', Chloe is likely to use emotive language and declarations of love.
8. It is almost always the case that Chloe uses numerical characters; 2 over two.
9. Chloe is far less likely to use formal language when speaking privately.
10. Chloe is likely to bridge opening statements to the rest of her sentence with a comma; hi guys, just...
11. Chloe is highly unlikely to make spelling errors or use out of place language.
With these loose rules established, we should now take a brief look at the caps. I should note - these are very loose rules. There will always be exceptions and this is merely a study of probability based upon subconscious habit. Subconscious habit can fluctuate. This is purely speculative.
She did capitalize this statement, in keeping with her rules. She uses and over & though this is not a hard rule, she has been known to use and from time to time. I may have expected Hey guys, we're... though the lack of a comma is not necessarily damning alone. She does use periods appropriately, in keeping with the rules. She uses apostrophes appropriately, in keeping with the rules. Her sign off is a little unusual, though xxx may stand in place of an emoji, and may stand in for emotive language or declarations of love. Her spelling and word choice is also fine. There are some discrepancies such as double spacing between safe and as which is a quirk I've never really noted with her before. I also feel she would have broken up this message with commas.
On balance, there are four to five things that stand out as perhaps not quite right to me, but there are four to fives things that are in keeping with the rules. I'd say it really is 50/50 and inconclusive as to whether she wrote this message. This is the message that I would be most likely to agree she wrote.
She capitalized this message, in keeping with her rules. She uses periods appropriately, though she does not end the statement with a period. This could add weight to either side; she may be avoiding a period as she is in direct conversation, but her lack of a period in a conflict situation is out of character. She used sent over send which is an easy mistake I feel she is unlikely to have made. Again, inconclusive, but I'm inclined to say that she wasn't behind this.
She did capitalize this statement. Her apostrophe use fluctuated; that's but not we're. I feel she would have broken this up with a comma somewhere. She does use periods appropriately though she does not end the statement with a period as she is in direct conversation. Personally, I would have expected her to end that with a period as it was a conflict point. She used the wrong words twice- we're over were and every one over everyone. I've noted her using the correct everyone in the past. That is not one of her usual spelling inconsistencies.
Ultimately, I feel it is unlikely that Chloe was behind the body of text in these messages. I feel it is likely these are shopped caps. Obviously, take this with a large grain of salt. It is entirely speculative and based on personal observation. I would say it's 30/70 leaning towards she isn't behind this.
ETA - Yes, this is very autistic, and could have been summarised with a simple I don't buy it.
Her “protecting” her “littles” is the cringiest shit she probably does thus far. They aren’t actual children. They’re her. Their names are fake. Their identities are fake. (Hell, their existence at all is fake). “We don’t show our littles to keep them safe”. She acts like she’s putting someone’s baby on screen and listing where the baby lives, its name, and ways to access its goddamn bedroom.
This is one of the many ways she overcompensates with extreme, over-the-top “compassion” so people will look at her and say, “Awwww! She cares so much for her littles! She’s like a mom without actually being a mom!” Her sperg fans are utter morons.
In one of her unboxing videos, where she opens presents sent to her by said dumbfuck fans, she is “positively triggered” by a unicorn stuffed animal. She changes into a little, and there’s a jumpcut. The camera has been adjusted lower so you can’t see her face. Did her little really know how to adjust the tripod? Also, how did all the alters she switched through know to adjust her lapel mic appropriately once she put her scarf on?
In another unboxing video, one of her littles comes out yet again, and Chloe (who is accompanied by Sally I believe in “co-con”) apparently tries to get the little to go back inside, and “Kyle” pops up to help. “Kyle” repeats the phrase “I’ve got her, I’ve got her” while Chloe does her stupid-faced “dissociation” routine.
Are we to seriously believe that Chloe and Sally were chasing after a little in her mind, and Kyle ran onto the scene and assumingly picked the little up, told everyone else in her mind that it was all okay because “he got her, he got her”? Are all of her alters just chilling in there like an episode of Herman’s Head?? How much of an autist do you need to be to believe this?? It goes against every single facet of what is currently believed about DID by some professionals. Despite many more professionals believing it likely doesn’t exist at all.
Her alters aren’t supposed to all just be chilling out in there. And if a little comes out to play at a bad time, one of them can take the little’s hand and be like “Don’t worry, continue with the video, I’ll keep her entertained”???
This is the most bullshit thing I’ve ever witnessed and the exceptional individuals who believe it or have their hearts warmed by it are the same type of people who will openly post photos of their new credit cards to their social media, totally uncensored. Dumb fucks.
You're late on everything you listed but I agree with it all. That jumpcut with the little was my very first post actually. We think alike cuz there are others. Anyways, It's the small things that add up to one messed up big picture!
This is pretty poor evidence IMO. I don't know about you but my writing style changes on my mood and current situation. I think all of us have written incorrectly punctuated sentences when in a rush or especially during a live chat/instant message session when the conversation is happening in real time as opposed to posting on social media where people tend to re-read/edit their messages before they post. All of your examples of her writing style were from social media posts yet you are comparing them to her live chat writing.
