Monica Rial / Monica Jean Rial / Rialisms & Ron Toye / Ronald Toye III / rontoye3 - 5th Bulma and Ron "Pick Up the Phone or You'll Find Your Dog Dead When You Get Home" Toye

Here is the part you are avoiding, dipshit, you haven't changed from the inhuman monster you were back than, you just sprayed some cheap paint over it to hide it.
that is your opinion but even with that at least there is an attempt. Zero credit for the paint job? Again, I am being decent to you and you lead with insults rudeness. Seems like a waste of energy but that is your choice.

@Ron Toye Alright now I have two questions if you do not mind:

1. Why did you create an account here in January, and then wait until now to start talking?
2. Are you not even worried about the case coming back on appeals? Some of the stuff that you have said is probably going to be used against you.
I am not worried 1 bit about it. That is why I am talking now. Once it is 100% over I will be free to talk about anything and everything.
 
Nice. Checks out.
Okay, fire away everyone.
I am not worried 1 bit about it. That is why I am talking now. Once it is 100% over I will be free to talk about anything and everything.
A piece of advice: To better consolidate your answers, use the quote feature to put everything into a nice post instead of making several separate posts. Each person you quote will get a specific notification that you've quoted them so they can see your answer. Just to make it a bit easier to sift through posts and what not. Just hit "quote" on all the posts you want to answer and then select "insert quotes".
 
View attachment 1294737Notice how they admit there was a kiss. The problem is they can't determine if it was consensual or not, only she can. If they knew it happened why would they encourage him to sue when matters of opinions are not actionable when the event happened admitted by him through his legal team, just a difference of opinion on how she felt? So, 1 story details were added when it was the right time, the other changed their story 3 or more times. Interesting?

Do you have zero reading comprehension? I know you're a potato, but are you actually functionally reta.rded?
 
@Ron Toye Alright now I have two questions if you do not mind:

1. Why did you create an account here in January, and then wait until now to start talking?
2. Are you not even worried about the case coming back on appeals? Some of the stuff that you have said is probably going to be used against you.
@Ron Toye Alright now I have two questions if you do not mind:

1. Why did you create an account here in January, and then wait until now to start talking?
2. Are you not even worried about the case coming back on appeals? Some of the stuff that you have said is probably going to be used against you.
Also, I haven't said anything that is actionable. It might not make people feel good but it isn't actionable. Plus, if anything was, I would take my lumps and keep on talking.
 
I am not worried 1 bit about it. That is why I am talking now. Once it is 100% over I will be free to talk about anything and everything.
Since you ignored this and aren't actually answering peoples questions, you are completely avoiding the actual question, quit playing bernie sanders.

Where are the receipts you and your personal fiancé have promised you would show for the past year? Also your 17 affidavits are all hearsay and not evidence that adds anything to any of your claims. Nothing in any hearing was figured as truthful or not, so Vic has never admitted to any of it. But please. Post those receipts, we’ve been waiting for a whole year.
Fuck off already, do you seriously think your lawyer is ok with this? Are you absolutely fucking insane?
Knowing lemons he probably either doesn't care and thinks they'll be A okay after appeals.
 
Since you have been proven to be legit - Vic denied Monica's allegation, which was sexual assault. He never denied kissing her.


Do you have zero reading comprehension? I know you're a potato, but are you actually functionally reta.rded?
But, do you see how he had every right to deny it was assault, matter of opinion, but he had no shot at winning because her interpretation of his action is different. If it never happened then maybe he could possibly win that one claim but proving damages after there have been years and years of him going to cons and videos showing him admitting people were talking about his actions online make it impossible to diminish his reputation? Nick did him dirty and I hope Vic looks into that.
 
that is your opinion but even with that at least there is an attempt. Zero credit for the paint job? Again, I am being decent to you and you lead with insults rudeness. Seems like a waste of energy but that is your choice.
Cept it isn't an opinion, it's a fact that this all boils down to your need for control. The single defining characteristic that led to all your actions all up till now. It's all about control with you. Monsters, are individuals who think their manipulative and deceitful fuckery as normal, when in reality, you need to be submitted to a psych ward. You are a manipulative control freak, plain and simple.
 
But, do you see how he had every right to deny it was assault, matter of opinion, but he had no shot at winning because her interpretation of his action is different. If it never happened then maybe he could possibly win that one claim but proving damages after there have been years and years of him going to cons and videos showing him admitting people were talking about his actions online make it impossible to diminish his reputation? Nick did him dirty and I hope Vic looks into that.
Him denying makes a fact question for a Jury, you don't get to decide Vics side either, you've barely fucking met the dude or have seen him.
 
I am not worried 1 bit about it. That is why I am talking now. Once it is 100% over I will be free to talk about anything and everything.

Guess somebody was too busy using his Universal Remote on women, and defending predators to know that pride typically comes before the fall for clowns like you.

I am curious though, do you have any proof regarding those 100 women Vic Mignogna sexually assaulted or perhaps explain why you defended a sexual predator like Neil Kaplan? I mean besides him lying to cover the Fattest of Fatassess in Anime to avoid his own MeToo.
 
Last edited:
Since you ignored this and aren't actually answering peoples questions, you are completely avoiding the actual question, quit playing bernie sanders.

Where are the receipts you and your personal fiancé have promised you would show for the past year? Also your 17 affidavits are all hearsay and not evidence that adds anything to any of your claims. Nothing in any hearing was figured as truthful or not, so Vic has never admitted to any of it. But please. Post those receipts, we’ve been waiting for a whole year.

Knowing lemons he probably either doesn't care and thinks they'll be A okay after appeals.
So, affidavits are hearsay? Then why are you all so sold on me being an abuser? That was 1 affidavit vs 17 that were sworn under the penalty of perjury. There will be more info on that that comes out once appeals are finally laughed out of court. I can point you to things in the record but I can't post anything that isn't in the record yet until this is over. I wish I could but I can't and trust me I hate it!
 
I am not worried 1 bit about it. That is why I am talking now. Once it is 100% over I will be free to talk about anything and everything.
Where did the legal charges agaisnt Vic you claimed were coming in your conversation with the con owner (the name of the con escapes me at atm) go? You or the person ( i assume monica or the twins) decided to not pursue anything? They never materialized and you used that information to Threaten on behalf of your wife fiancee to break her contract and the money you lauded over the con if they didnt break contract with Vic seems very unethical and possibly illegal (well have to wait for appeal and the suit) especially when those charges have never materialized.
 
But, do you see how he had every right to deny it was assault, matter of opinion, but he had no shot at winning because her interpretation of his action is different. If it never happened then maybe he could possibly win that one claim but proving damages after there have been years and years of him going to cons and videos showing him admitting people were talking about his actions online make it impossible to diminish his reputation? Nick did him dirty and I hope Vic looks into that.
Thats a fact question, you're literally saying that this lawsuit should go to discovery and survive any sort of motion to dismiss like this

ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND
 
So, affidavits are hearsay? Then why are you all so sold on me being an abuser? That was 1 affidavit vs 17 that were sworn under the penalty of perjury. There will be more info on that that comes out once appeals are finally laughed out of court. I can point you to things in the record but I can't post anything that isn't in the record yet until this is over. I wish I could but I can't and trust me I hate it!
You can post your receipts if you're oh so sure appeals will be in your favor, if you would've done this before Vic sued, you wouldn't be $300k in the hole.
Theres literally court record of you being one, way more proof then anything Vic has been accused of.
People lie in court, like the sender of legal papers that nobody knows.
 
Also @Ron Toye - why did Monica go back to Vic's room after she claimed he sexually assaulted her? She didn't say she was forced, she just went back with him.

Also, you did accuse Vic of sexual assault, which is the criminal statute for rape in Texas (and a whole bunch of other states). And it wasn't your opinion. Here, have some more receipts (since you "can't recall")

He's guilty.PNG


On top of accusing him of a crime, you claimed that you "personally knew him" which you don't and never have - so that a lie.
I know HIM - Glad cons are cancelling him.PNG


Proof you wanted him cancelled (which you denied in you DMs to Nick)
Better see him canceled.PNG

He did enough to be cancelled.PNG


Claiming you have some kind of personal relationship with him - and "glad to see conventions cancel him"
I know HIM - Glad cons are cancelling him.PNG
 
Him denying makes a fact question for a Jury, you don't get to decide Vics side either, you've barely fucking met the dude or have seen him.
You are getting warmer with that, the fact is there was a kiss, you agree, now it comes down to who is believed, if it got that far, when you take into account 17 people were willing to submit affidavits under the penalty of perjury plus the videos, we win. He had no shot. He was on the right path until Nick convinced him to sue. I am sure he wanted to, but knew better, then Nick played into his ego and tugged his heart talking about the fans, knowing his plan was to weaponize his channel and have content, not calculating the cost Vic would be saddled with when the lawsuit failed. Think about this, The owner of this website had a case go all the way to the supreme court and he won, the defendant, so Nick can't hide behind the fact he didn't know this lawsuit was doomed.
 
You are getting warmer with that, the fact is there was a kiss, you agree, now it comes down to who is believed, if it got that far, when you take into account 17 people were willing to submit affidavits under the penalty of perjury plus the videos, we win. He had no shot. He was on the right path until Nick convinced him to sue. I am sure he wanted to, but knew better, then Nick played into his ego and tugged his heart talking about the fans, knowing his plan was to weaponize his channel and have content, not calculating the cost Vic would be saddled with when the lawsuit failed. Think about this, The owner of this website had a case go all the way to the supreme court and he won, the defendant, so Nick can't hide behind the fact he didn't know this lawsuit was doomed.
Sorry, court doesn't work by mob rule. You like to type a lot to say a lot of nothing.
 
Back