- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
Swing State (Pennsylvania) and people are getting fed up.
People all over are getting fed up, more and more every day.
The house arrests need to be ended before the people end them themselves.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Swing State (Pennsylvania) and people are getting fed up.
Blue states are going to try..and people are probably going to ignore it..or set shit on fire.Level with me, people. How bad is this second wave going to be. Are we going to be put in another lockdown in a couple of months?
Swing State (Pennsylvania) and people are getting fed up.
Get that sun tan and don't be black. Got it.
Hmmm. How to speak of Geriatric/ElderCare without PL...Elder care in the Uk has been run down and privatised too much with too few controls. People are moaning on about the government not helping but most of these homes are privately owned and privately run. There are a very small minority of homes run by people who genuinely care and provide a decent living environment. The rest are owned by private concerns (including I’m sorry to say an awful lot of doctors) and staffed by the absolute minimum of qualified staff assisted by larger but still insufficient numbers of minimum wage carers who are treated poorly, paid poorly and have no job security.
You can tell when you walk through the door if it’s a good home or a bad one by the smell. They’re mainly hideous places. Fucking shoot me before I get to that point.
It was a disaster waiting to happen. There needs to be a hard look at how we provide elderly care, both at the personal care level and the nursing care level. Both are horribly underfunded.
The elderly aren’t disposable. We could have had enhanced PPE, enhanced hygiene, staff testing, resident testing. We could have zoned off homes to separate infected and not, and we could have prevented an awful lot of those deaths while still keeping everything else open. As it is we’ve locked down, fucked the economy sideways and still let the grim reaper run amok in the nursing homes.
I'm going to second this. At the very least, make sure they have a do not resuscitate note or some other provision against absurd health treatments. Because care homes will give expensive life-extending care to completely mentally and physically impaired elders simply to keep extracting money rather than to preserve their dignity or quality of life like hospice care would.Hmmm. How to speak of Geriatric/ElderCare without PL...
Let's just say, I have a friend who has worked in Elder Care for 20 years, first as a Delegated RN who later went on to Supervisory Duties, working for a Home Care Agency, supervising up to 70 clients and up to 100 caregivers.
If it can at all be avoided, don't put your elders in a care home. Studies have shown the best and most cost effective option is to allow them to stay in their own homes, with support. As their needs become greater, increase the amount of care. Use Home Care Agencies, Palliative Care and Hospice Agencies as the needs progress. All of this support costs way less than the amount of money that warehousing Gramma would cost.
Of course, your mileage may differ.
But guys, I've been assured by Reddit and Facebook that the people getting fed up with quarantine are just a vocal minority of armed far-right nationalists who only want to open up businesses to oppress people of color! Or something.
Wisconsin, USA
Wisconsin is open for business, by state supreme court decree, 4-3.
It remains to be seen whether the Governor and legislature will compromise on any replacement shutdown orders/ reopening plan.
(archive)![]()
Wisconsin Supreme Court strikes down Wisconsin's stay-at-home order that closed businesses to limit spread of coronavirus
The conservative-controlled court sided with Republican lawmakers who sued over the Democratic governor's order.www.jsonline.com
Have the actual decision~A friend said he's never heard of AdultTime. He says it's Pornhub for him. "Don't cost nothing." A wise consumer, I'd say.
Check this bitch out. If anyone on God's green earth needs firing, she is it. Utterly disgusting.
![]()
Report: NYC Health chief to NYPD on masks: ‘I don’t give two rats’ asses about your cops’
Dr. Oxiris Barbot, New York City's health commissioner, rejected NYPD's requests for facemasks in late March as coronavirus cases among the police department mounted, according to a New York Post report. NYPD Chief of Department Terence Monahan asked Barbot for 500,000 surgical masks, but she...americanmilitarynews.com
Added: A very interesting article from Reason. Sometimes they have some very good stuff.
![]()
Wisconsin Supreme Court Says the State’s COVID-19 Lockdown Violated t…
archived 14 May 2020 20:39:52 UTCarchive.vn
Even though the Democrats would reject it for not helping illegals, NEETS, and anyone else not working, I could see President Trump wanting to provide $1k to $2k monthly over the next six months for anyone working during the first quarter of 2020. For employees, this is easily verified through state unemployment tax reports. Gig workers and other self-employed folks would likely have bank records or receipts verifying business activity during the first quarter. I could also see an exception carved out for anyone already collecting unemployment during the first quarter since one has to have worked prior to collecting it.
Sure, the Dems would hate this version of TrumpBux. At the same time, Trump could tout himself helping the working-class remain whole during the indefinitely lock-downs while taking a swipe at the Democrats for: (1) Spreading fear, uncertainty, and doubt with indefinite restrictions in the areas the govern, and (2) Wanting tax dollars to support illegals and those NEETS able to work but unwilling to do so.
Even if the above idea is unlikely in today's hyper-partisan environment, I still won't put it past Trump to consider doing something that provides additional money to people whose earnings have been impacted by the lockdowns and find a way to do it that garners just enough bipartisan support that the Democrats don't necessarily love it, but still pass it narrowly because their party being seen as anti-worker during an election year would be bad optics.
The way I see it, the Dem's dream version of this is providing $1k to $2k monthly to everyone under a certain wage limit living in the US starting in 2020, including (especially) illegals and temporary residents who just happen to be living here for a short time, the Republican's dream version would be to provide $1k to $2k monthly to everyone under a certain wage limit who were working before the lockdowns started (and obviously are legal citizens), including small business owners and self employed people.
Obviously the Republicans will recoil and hiss from the Dem's proposal like it's made of acid, and the Dem's will do the same from the Republican's proposal, because the right would be horrified at the concept of pumping out billions to illegals, and the left would be horrified at the concept of not sending out money to those who were already unemployed before the economic drop. In the end, I think they'll have to find a middle ground along the lines of what we got with the last stimulus check, where you have to have filed a tax return in the past two years and not yourself be a dependent. Basically, both sides have their hands tied by the fact that the population as a whole wants that money and it's election year.
It would be interesting to see if Trump can shift it so that those employed at the start of 2020 get more while those unemployed get less, but I see anything where he tries to cut out or lessen benefits for the unemployed as being vulnerable to a negative spin by the media and DNC regardless of whether it's fully justified that he would.
I third this. At the very least, fill out a DNR if that is your wish. Even better is an Advanced Medical Directive and a Medical Power of Attorney. Don't wait until you are an old fuck to do it.I'm going to second this. At the very least, make sure they have a do not resuscitate note or some other provision against absurd health treatments. Because care homes will give expensive life-extending care to completely mentally and physically impaired elders simply to keep extracting money rather than to preserve their dignity or quality of life like hospice care would.
Have the actual decision~
CEBM said:Taking account of historical experience, trends in the data, increased number of infections in the population at largest, and potential impact of misclassification of deaths gives a presumed estimate for the COVID-19 IFR somewhere between 0.1% and 0.41%.*
A single estimate of IFR across all age groups is therefore unhelpful, particularly given the significant changes in risk of death with age
LMAO (wouldn't a furry suit actually protect you?):
The second wave is the normal flu season. Lol!If you're in a blue state, yes, yes you are.