All he needs to do, is stop calling everyone who annoys him a moron and not interact with "detractors", stop begging and calling what he's doing crowdfunding, and do something that isn't selfish like one charity stream in his entire life and he'd probably shut up 90% of the people who don't like him but he knows then he'd lose his audience.
The "crowfunding" thing bugs me a lot because the original pitch for early Kickstarter stuff was "everyone please help us develop something that you will all get to enjoy. This will be a collaborative effort because we can't afford the initial monetary risk ourselves."
With Phil, it's "give me money." There's no collaboration or anything to "fund." You're not getting anything you weren't getting before, and we know that he's not going to actively improve the quality. Even if we were being
super generous and saying "Phil is taking the money and using it to continue to buy new games for the stream", you don't use the word "crowdfund" for an ongoing service that arguably is never going to be completed.
It's basically "pay me to fund me, but also pay me to remove my own personal risk from the situation, as well." For sure, people use the income they get from their business to put back into their business, but with Phil, it's phrased in such a way that there's no humility of "I got this money, I'm thankful for it and am going to use it to improve the quality of my offerings so that I can continue to do good business."
There's always this layer of guilt in terms of "help me pay my bills" with the implication that his content would go away otherwise. "Crowdfunding" implies that the community has some kind of ownership or investment in the product that we know he isn't putting in himself. Sorry, I know this is repetitive, but it's just Phil trying to sound smart
at best, and at worst setting up an abusive relationship with his audience.